fdc41e11f was reverted in e46c1def5 because it broke the C++11 build.
We shouldn't be using enable_if_t in C++11, instead we must use
enable_if<...>::type.
This reverts commit fdc41e11f9. It causes the
libcxx/modules/stds_include.sh.cpp test to fail with:
libcxx/include/ostream:1039:45: error: no template named 'enable_if_t'; did you mean 'enable_if'?
template <class _Stream, class _Tp, class = enable_if_t<
Still investigating what's causing this and reverting in the meantime to get
the bots green again.
Libc++ had an issue where nonsensical code like
decltype(std::stringstream{} << std::vector<int>{});
would compile, as long as you kept the expression inside decltype in
an unevaluated operand. This turned out to be that we didn't implement
LWG1203, which clarifies what we should do in that case.
rdar://58769296
This commit adds std::construct_at, and marks various members of
std::allocator_traits and std::allocator as constexpr. It also adds
tests and turns the existing tests into hybrid constexpr/runtime tests.
Thanks to Richard Smith for initial work on this, and to Michael Park
for D69803, D69132 and D69134, which are superseded by this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68364
This patch makes `std::rotate` a constexpr. In doing so, this patch also
updates the internal `__move` and `__move_backward` funtions to be
constexpr.
This patch was previously reverted in ed653184ac because it was missing
some UNSUPPORTED markup for older compilers. This commit adds it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65721
cppreference lists the support for this paper as partial.
I found 4 functions which the paper marks as `constexpr`,
but did not use the appropriate macro.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84275
This patch makes `std::rotate` a constexpr. In doing so, this patch also
updates the internal `__move` and `__move_backward` funtions to be
constexpr.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65721
This implements the part of P0619R4 related to the default allocator.
This is incredibly important, since otherwise there is an ABI break
between C++17 and C++20 w.r.t. the default allocator's size_type on
platforms where std::size_t is not the same as std::make_unsigned<std::ptrdiff_t>.
Summary: Update status page and test synopsis. Add synopsis in <cmath>.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80456
Summary:
This LWG issue states that the result of `year_month_day_last::day()` is implementation defined if `ok()` is `false`.
However, from user perspective, calling `day()` in this situation will lead to a (possibly difficult to find) crash.
Hence, I have added an assertion to warn user at least when assertions are enabled.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70346
This implements the relaxed requirements on the std::array constructors of span,
where the type only needs to be convertible to the element type of the span.
Note that the previous tests were not sufficient, as the const array<T, n> constructor
was only tested for compile time and the array<T, N> only during runtime.
Restructure the tests so that we can test conversions as well as both constructors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75706
Summary:
This LWG issue states that the result of `year_month_day_last::day()` is implementation defined if `ok()` is `false`.
However, from user perspective, calling `day()` in this situation will lead to a (possibly difficult to find) crash.
Hence, I have added an assertion to warn user at least when assertions are enabled.
I am however not aware of the libc++ stand on the desired behaviour.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF, #libc
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70346
Summary: The return type modification has already been implemented in rL364840 and rL365290.
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF, #libc!
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70275
Summary:
This patch implements https://wg21.link/P0325.
Please mind that at it is my first contribution to libc++, so I may have forgotten to abide to some conventions.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists, ldionne, lichray
Reviewed By: ldionne, lichray
Subscribers: lichray, dexonsmith, zoecarver, christof, ldionne, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69882
Summary:
LWG 3158 marks the allocator_arg_t constructor of std::tuple as
conditionnally explicit based on whether the default constructors
of the tuple's members are explicitly default constructible.
This was previously committed as r372778 and reverted in r372832 due to
the commit breaking LLVM's build in C++14 mode. This issue has now been
addressed.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65232
llvm-svn: 373092
This also reverts:
- r372778: [libc++] Implement LWG 3158
- r372782: [libc++] Try fixing tests that fail on GCC 5 and older
- r372787: Purge mentions of GCC 4 from the test suite
Reason: the change breaks compilation of LLVM with libc++, for details see
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/libcxx-dev/2019-September/000599.html
llvm-svn: 372832
Summary:
LWG 3158 marks the allocator_arg_t constructor of std::tuple as
conditionnally explicit based on whether the default constructors
of the tuple's members are explicitly default constructible.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65232
llvm-svn: 372778
Louis Dionne