This teaches the outliner to save LR to a register rather than the stack when
possible. This allows us to avoid bumping the stack in outlined functions in
some cases. By doing this, in a later patch, we can teach the outliner to do
something like this:
f1:
...
bl OUTLINED_FUNCTION
...
f2:
...
move LR's contents to a register
bl OUTLINED_FUNCTION
move the register's contents back
instead of falling back to saving LR in both cases.
llvm-svn: 338278
This change fixes build errors when building a runtime with adaptive lock stats
enabled. Most of the errors were due to the recent changes in the runtime, but
it seems that we have not tried to build this debug runtime on Windows for a
long time.
Patch by Hansang Bae
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49823
llvm-svn: 338277
1) Remove unnecessary data from list node structure
2) Remove timerPair in favor of pushing/popping explicitTimers.
This way, nested timers will work properly.
3) Fix #pragma omp critical timers
4) Add histogram capability
5) Add KMP_STATS_FILE formatting capability
6) Have time partitioned into serial & parallel by introducing
partitionedTimers::exchange(). This also counts the number of serial regions
in the executable.
7) Fix up the timers around OMP loops so that scheduling overhead and work are
both counted correctly.
8) Fix up the iterations statistics so they count the number of iterations the
thread receives at each loop scheduling event
9) Change timers so there is only one RDTSC read per event change
10) Fix up the outdated comments for the timers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49699
llvm-svn: 338276
Previously, I thought this was a Windows failure. Then I realized it failed on
every bot that used the verifier. This makes it use the verifier always, and
adds that pass to the pipeline checks so that it's consistent across all bots.
llvm-svn: 338272
Summary:
This adds an LLD flag to mark executable LOAD segments execute-only for AArch64 targets.
In AArch64 the expectation is that code is execute-only compatible, so this just adds a linker option to enforce this.
Patch by: ivanlozano (Ivan Lozano)
Reviewers: srhines, echristo, peter.smith, eugenis, javed.absar, espindola, ruiu
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: dokyungs, emaste, arichardson, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49456
llvm-svn: 338271
Summary:
Attempt to extract a shrl from a udiv or a shl from a mul if this allows a rotate to be formed. This targets cases where the input to a rotate pattern was a mul or udiv by a constant and InstCombine merged one of the shifts with the op.
Patch by: sameconrad (Sam Conrad)
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, lebedev.ri, javed.absar
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: efriedma, kparzysz, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47681
llvm-svn: 338270
This reapplies commit r338206 reverted by r338214 since the bug that
r338206 uncovered has been fixed in r338268.
Add support for inline assembly with matching input operand that do not
naturally go in the register class it is constrained to (eg. double in a
32-bit GPR). Note that regular input is already handled by existing
code.
llvm-svn: 338269
It seems like the pass pipeline on Windows is slightly different than on Linux
and macOS. As a result, the arm64-opt-remarks-lazy-bfi test has been failing.
This switches a CHECK-NEXT to a CHECK-DAG to try and get this running properly
again.
It'd be nice to switch it back to a CHECK-NEXT if possible, but the CHECK-NEXT
lines following the line we care about (the optimization remark emitter)
do a pretty good job of enforcing the ordering we want.
Hopefully this works, since I don't have a Windows machine. ;)
Example failure: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win/builds/11295
llvm-svn: 338267
After cleaning up program state maps in `checkDeadSymbols()`,
a transition should be added to generate the new state.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47417
llvm-svn: 338263
This patch enables instructions that are destructive on their
destination- and first source operand, to be prefixed with a
MOVPRFX instruction.
This patch also adds a variety of tests:
- positive tests for all instructions and forms that accept a
movprfx for either or both predicated and unpredicated forms.
- negative tests for all instructions and forms that do not accept
an unpredicated or predicated movprfx.
- negative tests for the diagnostics that get emitted when a MOVPRFX
instruction is used incorrectly.
This is patch [2/2] in a series to add MOVPRFX instructions:
- Patch [1/2]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49592
- Patch [2/2]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49593
Reviewers: rengolin, SjoerdMeijer, samparker, fhahn, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49593
llvm-svn: 338261
According to the standard, pointers referring to the elements of a
`basic_string` may be invalidated if they are used as an argument to
any standard library function taking a reference to non-const
`basic_string` as an argument. This patch makes InnerPointerChecker warn
for these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49656
llvm-svn: 338259
This patch adds predicated and unpredicated MOVPRFX instructions, which
can be prepended to SVE instructions that are destructive on their first
source operand, to make them a constructive operation, e.g.
add z1.s, p0/m, z1.s, z2.s <=> z1 = z1 + z2
can be made constructive:
movprfx z0, z1
add z0.s, p0/m, z0.s, z2.s <=> z0 = z1 + z2
The predicated MOVPRFX instruction can additionally be used to zero
inactive elements, e.g.
movprfx z0.s, p0/z, z1.s
add z0.s, p0/m, z0.s, z2.s
Not all instructions can be prefixed with the MOVPRFX instruction
which is why this patch also adds a mechanism to validate prefixed
instructions. The exact rules when a MOVPRFX applies is detailed in
the SVE supplement of the Architectural Reference Manual.
This is patch [1/2] in a series to add MOVPRFX instructions:
- Patch [1/2]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49592
- Patch [2/2]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49593
Reviewers: rengolin, SjoerdMeijer, samparker, fhahn, javed.absar
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49592
llvm-svn: 338258
Started crashing in r337453. See the added test case for the crash repro.
The fix reverts part of r337453 that causes the crash and does
not actually break anything when reverted.
llvm-svn: 338255
This makes it easier for someone to copy-paste this line, change the path, and run the command.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49201
llvm-svn: 338254
The combination of r338240 and r338242 causes the opt pass pipeline tests to
fail because of how r338242 makes BasicAA be invalidated more often. Adjust the
tests to reflect this.
llvm-svn: 338250
By using PhiValuesAnalysis we can get all the values reachable from a phi, so
we can be more precise instead of giving up when a phi has phi operands. We
can't make BaseicAA directly use PhiValuesAnalysis though, as the user of
BasicAA may modify the function in ways that PhiValuesAnalysis can't cope with.
For this optional usage to work correctly BasicAAWrapperPass now needs to be not
marked as CFG-only (i.e. it is now invalidated even when CFG is preserved) due
to how the legacy pass manager handles dependent passes being invalidated,
namely the depending pass still has a pointer to the now-dead dependent pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44564
llvm-svn: 338242
The machine verifier asserts with:
Assertion failed: (isMBB() && "Wrong MachineOperand accessor"), function getMBB, file ../include/llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h, line 542.
It calls analyzeBranch which tries to call getMBB if the opcode is
JMP_1, but in this case we do:
JMP_1 @OUTLINED_FUNCTION
I believe we have to use TAILJMPd64 instead of JMP_1 since JMP_1 is used
with brtarget8.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49299
llvm-svn: 338237
Summary:
These instructions interact with hardware blocks outside the shader core,
and they can have "scalar" side effects even when EXEC = 0. We don't
want these scalar side effects to occur when all lanes want to skip
these instructions, so always add the execz skip branch instruction
for basic blocks that contain them.
Also ensure that we skip scalar stores / atomics, though we don't
code-gen those yet.
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48431
Change-Id: Ieaeb58352e2789ffd64745603c14970c60819d44
llvm-svn: 338235
The analyzer may consider a container region as dead while it still has live
iterators. We must defer deletion of the data belonging to such containers
until all its iterators are dead as well to be able to compare the iterator
to the begin and the end of the container which is stored in the container
data.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48427
llvm-svn: 338234
Code in `CC_ARM_AAPCS_Custom_Aggregate()` is responsible for handling
homogeneous aggregates for `CC_ARM_AAPCS_VFP`. When an aggregate ends up
fully on stack, the function tries to pack all resulting items of the
aggregate as tightly as possible according to AAPCS.
Once the first item was laid out, the alignment used for consecutive
items was the size of one item. This logic went wrong for 128-bit
vectors because their alignment is normally only 64 bits, and so could
result in inserting unexpected padding between the first and second
element.
The patch fixes the problem by updating the alignment with the item size
only if this results in reducing it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49720
llvm-svn: 338233
Summary:
This patch makes clang-format indent the subsequent lines created by breaking a
long javadoc annotated line.
Reviewers: mprobst
Reviewed By: mprobst
Subscribers: acoomans, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49797
llvm-svn: 338232
Summary:
This change moves FDR mode to use `internal_mmap(...)` from
sanitizer_common instead of the internal allocator interface. We're
doing this to sidestep the alignment issues we encounter with the
`InternalAlloc(...)` functions returning pointers that have some magic
bytes at the beginning.
XRay copies bytes into the buffer memory, and does not require the magic
bytes tracking the other sanitizers use when allocating/deallocating
buffers.
Reviewers: kpw, eizan
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49972
llvm-svn: 338228
There are a couple of issues you run into when you start getting into
more complex names, especially with regards to function local statics.
When you've got something like:
int x() {
static int n = 0;
return n;
}
Then this needs to demangle to something like
int `int __cdecl x()'::`1'::n
The nested mangled symbols (e.g. `int __cdecl x()` in the above
example) also share state with regards to back-referencing, so
we need to be able to re-use the demangler in the middle of
demangling a symbol while sharing back-ref state.
To make matters more complicated, there are a lot of ambiguities
when demangling a symbol's qualified name, because a function local
scope pattern (usually something like `?1??name?`) looks suspiciously
like many other possible things that can occur, such as `?1` meaning
the second back-ref and disambiguating these cases is rather
interesting. The `?1?` in a local scope pattern is actually a special
case of the more general pattern of `? + <encoded number> + ?`, where
"encoded number" can itself have embedded `@` symbols, which is a
common delimeter in mangled names. So we have to take care during the
disambiguation, which is the reason for the overly complicated
`isLocalScopePattern` function in this patch.
I've added some pretty obnoxious tests to exercise all of this, which
exposed several other problems related to back-referencing, so those
are fixed here as well. Finally, I've uncommented some tests that were
previously marked as `FIXME`, since now these work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49965
llvm-svn: 338226
Jessica Paquette