186.crafty, fhourstones and 132.ijpeg.
Bugpoint makes really nasty miscompilations embarassingly easy to find. It
narrowed it down to the instcombiner and this testcase (from fhourstones):
bool %l7153_l4706_htstat_loopentry_2E_4_no_exit_2E_4(int* %i, [32 x int]* %works, int* %tmp.98.out) {
newFuncRoot:
%tmp.96 = load int* %i ; <int> [#uses=1]
%tmp.97 = getelementptr [32 x int]* %works, long 0, int %tmp.96 ; <int*> [#uses=1]
%tmp.98 = load int* %tmp.97 ; <int> [#uses=2]
%tmp.99 = load int* %i ; <int> [#uses=1]
%tmp.100 = and int %tmp.99, 7 ; <int> [#uses=1]
%tmp.101 = seteq int %tmp.100, 7 ; <bool> [#uses=2]
%tmp.102 = cast bool %tmp.101 to int ; <int> [#uses=0]
br bool %tmp.101, label %codeRepl4.exitStub, label %codeRepl3.exitStub
codeRepl4.exitStub: ; preds = %newFuncRoot
store int %tmp.98, int* %tmp.98.out
ret bool true
codeRepl3.exitStub: ; preds = %newFuncRoot
store int %tmp.98, int* %tmp.98.out
ret bool false
}
... which only has one combination performed on it:
$ llvm-as < t.ll | opt -instcombine -debug | llvm-dis
IC: Old = %tmp.101 = seteq int %tmp.100, 7 ; <bool> [#uses=1]
New = setne int %tmp.100, 0 ; <bool>:<badref> [#uses=0]
IC: MOD = br bool %tmp.101, label %codeRepl3.exitStub, label %codeRepl4.exitStub
IC: MOD = %tmp.97 = getelementptr [32 x int]* %works, uint 0, int %tmp.96 ; <int*> [#uses=1]
It doesn't get much better than this. :)
llvm-svn: 14109
collapse this:
bool %le(int %A, int %B) {
%c1 = setgt int %A, %B
%tmp = select bool %c1, int 1, int 0
%c2 = setlt int %A, %B
%result = select bool %c2, int -1, int %tmp
%c3 = setle int %result, 0
ret bool %c3
}
into:
bool %le(int %A, int %B) {
%c3 = setle int %A, %B ; <bool> [#uses=1]
ret bool %c3
}
which is handy, because the Java FE makes these sequences all over the place.
This is tested as: test/Regression/Transforms/InstCombine/JavaCompare.ll
llvm-svn: 14086
This code hadn't been updated after the "structs with more than 256 elements"
related changes to the GEP instruction. Also it was not handling the
ConstantAggregateZero class.
Now it does!
llvm-svn: 13834
into (X & (C2 << C1)) != (C3 << C1), where the shift may be either left or
right and the compare may be any one.
This triggers 1546 times in 176.gcc alone, as it is a common pattern that
occurs for bitfield accesses.
llvm-svn: 13740
in the size calculation.
This is not something you want to see:
Loop Unroll: F[main] Loop %no_exit Loop Size = 2 Trip Count = 2147483648 - UNROLLING!
The problem was that 2*2147483648 == 0.
Now we get:
Loop Unroll: F[main] Loop %no_exit Loop Size = 2 Trip Count = 2147483648 - TOO LARGE: 4294967296>100
Thanks to some anonymous person playing with the demo page that repeatedly
caused zion to go into swapping land. That's one way to ensure you'll get
a quick bugfix. :)
Testcase here: Transforms/LoopUnroll/2004-05-13-DontUnrollTooMuch.ll
llvm-svn: 13564
%tmp.0 = getelementptr [50 x sbyte]* %ar, uint 0, int 5 ; <sbyte*> [#uses=2]
%tmp.7 = getelementptr sbyte* %tmp.0, int 8 ; <sbyte*> [#uses=1]
together. This patch actually allows us to simplify and generalize the code.
llvm-svn: 13415
is only used by a cast, and the casted type is the same size as the original
allocation, it would eliminate the cast by folding it into the allocation.
Unfortunately, it was placing the new allocation instruction right before
the cast, which could pull (for example) alloca instructions into the body
of a function. This turns statically allocatable allocas into expensive
dynamically allocated allocas, which is bad bad bad.
This fixes the problem by placing the new allocation instruction at the same
place the old one was, duh. :)
llvm-svn: 13289
loop. This eliminates the extra add from the previous case, but it's
not clear that this will be a performance win overall. Tommorows test
results will tell. :)
llvm-svn: 13103
Chris Lattner