added vpclmulqdq feature recognition
added intrinsics support for vpclmulqdq instructions
_mm256_clmulepi64_epi128
_mm512_clmulepi64_epi128
matching a similar work on the backend (D40101)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41573
llvm-svn: 321480
added vaes feature recognition
added intrinsics support for vaes instructions, matching a similar work on the backend (D40078)
_mm256_aesenc_epi128
_mm512_aesenc_epi128
_mm256_aesenclast_epi128
_mm512_aesenclast_epi128
_mm256_aesdec_epi128
_mm512_aesdec_epi128
_mm256_aesdeclast_epi128
_mm512_aesdeclast_epi128
llvm-svn: 321474
Craig noticed that CodeGen wasn't properly ignoring the
values sent to the target attribute. This patch ignores
them.
This patch also sets the 'default' for this checking to
'supported', since only X86 has implemented the support
for checking valid CPU names and Feature Names.
One test was changed to i686, since it uses a lakemont,
which would otherwise be prohibited in x86_64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39357
llvm-svn: 316783
AVX512_VPOPCNTDQ is a new feature set that was published by Intel.
The patch represents the Clang side of the addition of six intrinsics for two new machine instructions (vpopcntd and vpopcntq).
It also includes the addition of the new feature set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33170
llvm-svn: 303857
Rationale :
// sse3
__m128d test_mm_addsub_pd(__m128d A, __m128d B) {
return _mm_addsub_pd(A, B);
}
// mmx
void shift(__m64 a, __m64 b, int c) {
_mm_slli_pi16(a, c);
_mm_slli_pi32(a, c);
_mm_slli_si64(a, c);
_mm_srli_pi16(a, c);
_mm_srli_pi32(a, c);
_mm_srli_si64(a, c);
_mm_srai_pi16(a, c);
_mm_srai_pi32(a, c);
}
clang -msse3 -mno-mmx file.c -c
For this code we should be able to explicitly turn off MMX
without affecting the compilation of the SSE3 function and then
diagnose and error on compiling the MMX function.
This is a preparatory patch to the actual diagnosis code which is
coming in a future patch. This sets us up to have the correct information
where we need it and verifies that it's being emitted for the backend
to handle.
llvm-svn: 249733
that we can build up an accurate set of features rather than relying on
TargetInfo initialization via handleTargetFeatures to munge the list
of features.
llvm-svn: 249732
Coby Tayree