This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40072.
GNU addr2line's --functions switch is off by default, has a short alias
of -f, and does not take an argument. This patch changes llvm-symbolizer
to allow the second and third point (changing the default behaviour may
have negative impacts on users). If the option is missing a value, it
now treats it as "linkage".
This change does cause one previously valid command-line to behave
differently. Before --functions <value> was accepted, but now only
--functions=<value> is allowed (as well as --functions). The old
behaviour will result in the value being treated as a positional
argument.
The previous testing for --functions=short has been pulled out into a
new test that also tests the other accepted values and option formats.
Reviewed by: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57049
llvm-svn: 351968
The old diagnostic form of the trace produced by -v and -vv looks
like:
```
check1:1:8: remark: CHECK: expected string found in input
CHECK: abc
^
<stdin>:1:3: note: found here
; abc def
^~~
```
When dumping annotated input is requested (via -dump-input), I find
that this old trace is not useful and is sometimes harmful:
1. The old trace is mostly redundant because the same basic
information also appears in the input dump's annotations.
2. The old trace buries any error diagnostic between it and the input
dump, but I find it useful to see any error diagnostic up front.
3. FILECHECK_OPTS=-dump-input=fail requests annotated input dumps only
for failed FileCheck calls. However, I have to also add -v or -vv
to get a full set of annotations, and that can produce massive
output from all FileCheck calls in all tests. That's a real
problem when I run this in the IDE I use, which grinds to a halt as
it tries to capture all that output.
When -dump-input=fail|always, this patch suppresses the old trace from
-v or -vv. Error diagnostics still print as usual. If you want the
old trace, perhaps to see variable expansions, you can set
-dump-input=none (the default).
Reviewed By: probinson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55825
llvm-svn: 351881
Summary:
A couple of changes in the Scudo documentation:
- tag the shell code blocks as `console`;
- document error messages that are displayed in some termination conditions,
the reason they triggered, and potential causes.
Reviewers: eugenis, enh
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56857
llvm-svn: 351838
This broke the RISCV build, and even with that fixed, one of the RISCV
tests behaves surprisingly differently with asserts than without,
leaving there no clear test pattern to use. Generally it seems bad for
hte IR to differ substantially due to asserts (as in, an alloca is used
with asserts that isn't needed without!) and nothing I did simply would
fix it so I'm reverting back to green.
This also required reverting the RISCV build fix in r351782.
llvm-svn: 351796
Specifically, clarify the following:
1. Volatile load and store may access addresses that are not memory.
2. Volatile load and store do not modify arbitrary memory.
3. Volatile load and store do not trap.
Prompted by recent volatile discussion on llvmdev.
Currently, there's sort of a split in the source code about whether
volatile operations are allowed to trap; this resolves that dispute in
favor of not allowing them to trap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53184
llvm-svn: 351772
Summary:
Capture the current agreed-upon toolchain update policy based on the following
discussions:
- LLVM dev meeting 2018 BoF "Migrating to C++14, and beyond!"
llvm.org/devmtg/2018-10/talk-abstracts.html#bof3
- A Short Policy Proposal Regarding Host Compilers
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123238.html
- Using C++14 code in LLVM (2018)
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123182.html
- Using C++14 code in LLVM (2017)
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118673.html
- Using C++14 code in LLVM (2016)
lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/105483.html
- Document and Enforce new Host Compiler Policy
llvm.org/D47073
- Require GCC 5.1 and LLVM 3.5 at a minimum
llvm.org/D46723
Subscribers: jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56819
llvm-svn: 351765
all missed!
Thanks to Alex Bradbury for pointing this out, and the fact that I never
added the intended `legacy` anchor to the developer policy. Add that
anchor too. With hope, this will cause the links to all resolve
successfully.
llvm-svn: 351731
As noted in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36651, the specialization for
isPodLike<std::pair<...>> did not match the expectation of
std::is_trivially_copyable which makes the memcpy optimization invalid.
This patch renames the llvm::isPodLike trait into llvm::is_trivially_copyable.
Unfortunately std::is_trivially_copyable is not portable across compiler / STL
versions. So a portable version is provided too.
Note that the following specialization were invalid:
std::pair<T0, T1>
llvm::Optional<T>
Tests have been added to assert that former specialization are respected by the
standard usage of llvm::is_trivially_copyable, and that when a decent version
of std::is_trivially_copyable is available, llvm::is_trivially_copyable is
compared to std::is_trivially_copyable.
As of this patch, llvm::Optional is no longer considered trivially copyable,
even if T is. This is to be fixed in a later patch, as it has impact on a
long-running bug (see r347004)
Note that GCC warns about this UB, but this got silented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D50296.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54472
llvm-svn: 351701
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This installs the new developer policy and moves all of the license
files across all LLVM projects in the monorepo to the new license
structure. The remaining projects will be moved independently.
Note that I've left odd formatting and other idiosyncracies of the
legacy license structure text alone to make the diff easier to read.
Critically, note that we do not in any case *remove* the old license
notice or terms, as that remains necessary until we finish the
relicensing process.
I've updated a few license files that refer to the LLVM license to
instead simply refer generically to whatever license the LLVM project is
under, basically trying to minimize confusion.
This is really the culmination of so many people. Chris led the
community discussions, drafted the policy update and organized the
multi-year string of meeting between lawyers across the community to
figure out the strategy. Numerous lawyers at companies in the community
spent their time figuring out initial answers, and then the Foundation's
lawyer Heather Meeker has done *so* much to help refine and get us ready
here. I could keep going on, but I just want to make sure everyone
realizes what a huge community effort this has been from the begining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56897
llvm-svn: 351631
An abstract call site is a wrapper that allows to treat direct,
indirect, and callback calls the same. If an abstract call site
represents a direct or indirect call site it behaves like a stripped
down version of a normal call site object. The abstract call site can
also represent a callback call, thus the fact that the initially
called function (=broker) may invoke a third one (=callback callee).
In this case, the abstract call side hides the middle man, hence the
broker function. The result is a representation of the callback call,
inside the broker, but in the context of the original instruction that
invoked the broker.
Again, there are up to three functions involved when we talk about
callback call sites. The caller (1), which invokes the broker
function. The broker function (2), that may or may not invoke the
callback callee. And finally the callback callee (3), which is the
target of the callback call.
The abstract call site will handle the mapping from parameters to
arguments depending on the semantic of the broker function. However,
it is important to note that the mapping is often partial. Thus, some
arguments of the call/invoke instruction are mapped to parameters of
the callee while others are not. At the same time, arguments of the
callback callee might be unknown, thus "null" if queried.
This patch introduces also !callback metadata which describe how a
callback broker maps from parameters to arguments. This metadata is
directly created by clang for known broker functions, provided through
source code attributes by the user, or later deduced by analyses.
For motivation and additional information please see the corresponding
talk (slides/video)
https://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-10/talk-abstracts.html#talk20
as well as the LCPC paper
http://compilers.cs.uni-saarland.de/people/doerfert/par_opt_lcpc18.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54498
llvm-svn: 351627
This change adds demangling support to the ELF side of llvm-readobj,
under the switch --demangle/-C.
The following places are demangled: symbol table dumps (static and
dynamic), relocation dumps (static and dynamic), addrsig dumps, call
graph profile dumps, and group section signature symbols.
Although GNU readelf doesn't support demangling, it is still a useful
feature to have, and brings it on a par with llvm-objdump's
capabilities.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40054.
Reviewed by: grimar, rupprecht
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56791
llvm-svn: 351450
Summary: This change factors out compiler checking / warning, and documents LLVM_FORCE_USE_OLD_TOOLCHAIN. It doesn't introduce any functional changes nor policy changes, these will come late.
Subscribers: mgorny, jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56799
llvm-svn: 351387
Summary:
When running llvm-objdump with the -macho option objdump will by default
disassemble only the __TEXT,__text section (or __TEXT_EXEC,__text when
disassembling MH_KEXT_BUNDLE files). The -disassemble-all option is
treated no diferently than -disassemble.
This change upates llvm-objdump's MachO parsing code to disassemble all
__text sections found in a file when -disassemble-all is specified. This
is useful for disassembling files with more than one __text section, or
when disassembling files whose __text section is not present in __TEXT.
I added a lit test case that verifies "llvm-objdump -m -d" and
"llvm-objdump -m -D" produce the expected results on a reference binary.
I also updated the CommandGuide documentation for llvm-objdump.rst and
verified it renders correctly as man and html.
rdar://42899338
Reviewers: ab, pete, lhames
Reviewed By: lhames
Subscribers: rupprecht, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56649
llvm-svn: 351238
Summary:
Explicitly note that multithreading support is not included in the stable
ABI.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56681
llvm-svn: 351213
compiler identification lines in test-cases.
(Doing so only because it's then easier to search for references which
are actually important and need fixing.)
llvm-svn: 351200
official Git repository.
Remove the directions for using git-svn, and demote the prominence of
the svn instructions.
Also, fix a few other issues while I'm in there:
* Mention LLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS more.
* Getting started doesn't need to mention test-suite, but should
mention clang and the other projects.
* Remove mentions of "configure", since that's long gone.
I've also adjusted a few other mentions of svn to point to github, but
have not done so comprehensively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56654
llvm-svn: 351130
Part of the effort to refactoring frame pointer code generation. We used
to use two function attributes "no-frame-pointer-elim" and
"no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" to represent three kinds of frame
pointer usage: (all) frames use frame pointer, (non-leaf) frames use
frame pointer, (none) frame use frame pointer. This CL makes the idea
explicit by using only one enum function attribute "frame-pointer"
Option "-frame-pointer=" replaces "-disable-fp-elim" for tools such as
llc.
"no-frame-pointer-elim" and "no-frame-pointer-elim-non-leaf" are still
supported for easy migration to "frame-pointer".
tests are mostly updated with
// replace command line args ‘-disable-fp-elim=false’ with ‘-frame-pointer=none’
grep -iIrnl '\-disable-fp-elim=false' * | xargs sed -i '' -e "s/-disable-fp-elim=false/-frame-pointer=none/g"
// replace command line args ‘-disable-fp-elim’ with ‘-frame-pointer=all’
grep -iIrnl '\-disable-fp-elim' * | xargs sed -i '' -e "s/-disable-fp-elim/-frame-pointer=all/g"
Patch by Yuanfang Chen (tabloid.adroit)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56351
llvm-svn: 351049
This shortcut mechanism for creating types was added 10 years ago, but
has seen almost no uptake since then, neither internally nor in
external projects.
The very small number of characters saved by using it does not seem
worth the mental overhead of an additional type-creation API, so,
delete it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56573
llvm-svn: 351020
This patch improves llvm-profdata show command:
(1) add -value-cutoff=<N> option: Show only those functions whose max count
values are greater or equal to N.
(2) add -list-below-cutoff option: Only output names of functions whose max
count value are below the cutoff.
(3) formats value-profile counts and prints out percentage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56342
llvm-svn: 350673
In LTO or Thin-lto mode (though linker plugin), the module
names are of temp file names which are different for
different compilations. Using SourceFileName avoids the issue.
This should not change any functionality for current PGO as
all the current callers of getPGOFuncName() is before LTO.
llvm-svn: 350579
Make sure all print statements are compatible with Python 2 and Python3 using
the `from __future__ import print_function` statement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56249
llvm-svn: 350307
James Henderson