> Before this patch, S_[L|G][THREAD32|DATA32] records were emitted with a simple name, not the fully qualified name (namespace + class scope).
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79447
This causes asserts in Chromium builds:
CodeViewDebug.cpp:2997: void llvm::CodeViewDebug::emitDebugInfoForUDTs(const std::vector<std::pair<std::string, const DIType *>> &):
Assertion `OriginalSize == UDTs.size()' failed.
I will follow up on the Phabricator issue.
for variables in nested scopes (including inlined functions) if there is a
single location which covers the entire scope and the scope is contained in a
single block.
Based on work by @jmorse.
Reviewed By: vsk, aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79571
Summary:
Add memcpy and memset to the list of function with optimized codegen.
hasOptimizedCodeGen() was returning false for them.
This was not an issue when working with c++ as clang typically emits an
intrinsic rather than a libfunc call, but when working with IR,
this would cause some issues with sanitizers which would not correctly
mark the function as nobuiltin in `maybeMarkSanitizerLibraryCallNoBuiltin()`.
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78991
Summary:
This patch fixed the error of counting the remaining FPRs. Complex floating-point
values should be passed by two FPRs for the hard-float ABI. If no two FPRs are
available, it should be passed via a 64-bit GPR (fp+fp). `ArgFPRsLeft` is only
decreased one while the type is complex floating-point. It causes two floating-point
values in the complex are passed separately by two GPRs.
Reviewers: asb, luismarques, lenary
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, evandro, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79770
unittest/Tablegen generates an executable that depends on MLIRIR and
LLVMMLIRTableGen. Avoid specifying linkage dependence on LLVM
libraries here because then everyone has to depend on those libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80093
Generally:
1) don't use target_link_libraries() and add_mlir_library() on the same target, use LINK_LIBS PUBLIC instead.
2) don't use LINK_LIBS to specify LLVM libraries. Use LINK_COMPONENTS instead
3) no need to link against LLVMSupport. We pull it in by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80076
Now that load/store alignment is required, we no longer need most
of them. Also switch the getLoadStoreAlignment() helper to return
Align instead of MaybeAlign.
We can't leave undef vector element constants as-is,
it is a miscompile, so we need to sanitize them.
We have two vectors (C and ~C):
* We can't replace undef with 0 in both of them
* We can't replace undef with 0 in only one of them
* We could replace undef with -1 in both of them
* We could replace undef with -1 in only one(!) of them
* We could replace undef with -1 in one and 0 in another one of them.
Therefore, it seems best to go with the last option, since otherwise
we'd loose knowledge that C and ~C have no common bits set,
which seems more important than preserving partial undef knowledge.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45955
This is a no-op/NFC at the moment & generally makes the code /somewhat/
cleaner/less reliant on assumptions about what will produce a debug_addr
section.
It's still a bit "spooky action at a distance" - the add ranges code
pre-emptively inserts addresses into the address pool it knows will
eventually be used by the range emission code (or low/high pc).
The 'ideal' would be either to actually compute the addresses needed for
range (& loc) emission earlier - which would mean decanonicalizing the
range/loc representation earlier to account for whether it was going to
use addrx encodings or not (which would be unfortunate, but could be
refactored to be relatively unobtrusive).
Alternatively, emitting the range/loc sections earlier would cause them
to request the needed addresses sooner - but then you endup having to
split finalizeModuleInfo because some things need to be handled there
before the ranges/locs are emitted, I think...
LVI and its consumers currently have quite a bit of complexity
related to dominator tree management. However, it doesn't look
like it is actually needed...
The only use of the dominator tree is inside isValidAssumeForContext().
However, due to the way LVI queries work, it is not needed:
If we query a value for some block, we will first get the edge values
from all predecessor blocks, which also includes an intersection with
assumptions that apply to the terminator of the predecessor. As such,
we will already have processed all assumptions from predecessor blocks
(this is actually stronger than what isValidAssumeForContext() does
with a DT, because this is capable of combining non-dominating
assumptions). The only additional assumptions we need to take into
account are those in the block being queried. And we don't need a
dominator tree for that.
This patch only removes the use of DT, I will drop the machinery
around it in a followup.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76797
Summary: Adds a matcher called `hasOperands` for `BinaryOperator`'s when you need to match both sides but the order isn't important, usually on commutative operators.
Reviewers: klimek, aaron.ballman, gribozavr2, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80054
This build vector lowering pattern came up in D79886.
I've tried to limit the improvement to cases where it looks
clearly better to load, but we could remove the 'TODO'
predicates already if we are willing to overlook some
corner cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80013
This is required to get avr-gdb correctly showing values at the right
addresses. This problem was discovered by using debug symbols in an
external program to lookup values in an AVR simulator.
This was originally in D79116.
Converting from a narrow-enough FP source value to integer and
back to FP guarantees that the conversion to FP is exact because
of UB/poison-on-overflow.
This was suggested in PR36617:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36617#c19
When the callee requires a dynamic stack realignment,
it is not possible to correcty access the incoming
stack arguments using the stack pointer. We reserve a
base pointer in such cases to access the function arguments
inside the callee. The base pointer will hold the incoming
stack pointer value before any kind of delta added to it.
Reviewed By: arsenm, scott.linder
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78811
Spurious assertion failures are symptoms of a race condition for the handling
of detached tasks:
Assertion failure at kmp_tasking.cpp(3744): taskdata->td_flags.complete == 1.
Assertion failure at kmp_tasking.cpp(710): taskdata->td_flags.executing == 0.
in the case of detach=true, all accesses to taskdata in __kmp_task_finish need
to happen before (~line 873):
taskdata->td_flags.proxy = TASK_PROXY;
This assignment signals to __kmp_fulfill_event, that the task will need to be
freed there. So, conceptionally the ownership of taskdata is moved.
Reviewed By: AndreyChurbanov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79702
When compiling with -Werror=overloaded-virtual, gcc emits this:
====
llvm/include/llvm/Pass.h:102:16: error: ‘virtual bool llvm::Pass::doInitialization(llvm::Module&)’ was hidden [-Werror=overloaded-virtual]
virtual bool doInitialization(Module &) { return false; }
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/Inliner.cpp:20:0:
llvm/include/llvm/Transforms/IPO/Inliner.h:38:8: error: by ‘virtual bool llvm::LegacyInlinerBase::doInitialization(llvm::CallGraph&)’ [-Werror=overloaded-virtual]
bool doInitialization(CallGraph &CG) override;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
====
This is an old issue which has just started biting our downstream after
a slight rearrangement of includes around Inliner.
Fixing it similar to how doFinalization was done years ago.
Summary:
On XMEGA, I/O address space is same as data address space - there is no 0x20 offset,
because CPU General Purpose Registers are not mapped in data address space.
From https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVR_microcontrollers
> In the XMEGA variant, the working register file is not mapped into the data address space; as such, it is not possible to treat any of the XMEGA's working registers as though they were SRAM. Instead, the I/O registers are mapped into the data address space starting at the very beginning of the address space.
Reviewers: dylanmckay
Reviewed By: dylanmckay
Subscribers: hiraditya, Jim, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77207
Patch by Vlastimil Labsky.
Since setting COMPILER_RT_USE_BUILTINS_LIBRARY would remove -z,defs
flag, missing builtins library would continue to build unnoticed.
Explicitly emit an error in such case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79470
Dmitry Preobrazhensky