exception specifications on member functions until after the closing
'}' for the containing class. This allows, for example, a member
function to throw an instance of its own class. Fixes PR12564 and a
fairly embarassing oversight in our C++98/03 support.
llvm-svn: 154844
instead of having a special-purpose function.
- ActOnCXXDirectInitializer, which was mostly duplication of
AddInitializerToDecl (leading e.g. to PR10620, which Eli fixed a few days
ago), is dropped completely.
- MultiInitializer, which was an ugly hack I added, is dropped again.
- We now have the infrastructure in place to distinguish between
int x = {1};
int x({1});
int x{1};
-- VarDecl now has getInitStyle(), which indicates which of the above was used.
-- CXXConstructExpr now has a flag to indicate that it represents list-
initialization, although this is not yet used.
- InstantiateInitializer was renamed to SubstInitializer and simplified.
- ActOnParenOrParenListExpr has been replaced by ActOnParenListExpr, which
always produces a ParenListExpr. Placed that so far failed to convert that
back to a ParenExpr containing comma operators have been fixed. I'm pretty
sure I could have made a crashing test case before this.
The end result is a (I hope) considerably cleaner design of initializers.
More importantly, the fact that I can now distinguish between the various
initialization kinds means that I can get the tricky generalized initializer
test cases Johannes Schaub supplied to work. (This is not yet done.)
This commit passed self-host, with the resulting compiler passing the tests. I
hope it doesn't break more complicated code. It's a pretty big change, but one
that I feel is necessary.
llvm-svn: 150318
template without a corresponding parameter pack, don't immediately
substitute the alias template. This is under discussion in the C++
committee, and may become ill-formed, but for now we match GCC.
llvm-svn: 149697
template. Such pack expansions can easily fail at template
instantiation time, if the expanded parameter packs are of the wrong
length. Fixes <rdar://problem/10040867>, PR9021, and the example that
came up today at Going Native.
llvm-svn: 149685
part of template argument deduction is ill-formed, we mark it as
invalid and treat it as a deduction failure. If we happen to find that
specialization again, treat it as a deduction failure rather than
silently building a call to the declaration.
Fixes PR11117, a marvelous bug where deduction failed after creating
an invalid specialization, causing overload resolution to pick a
different candidate. Then we performed a similar overload resolution
later, and happily picked the invalid specialization to
call... resulting in a silent link failure.
llvm-svn: 141809
This makes the code duplication of implicit special member handling even worse,
but the cleanup will have to come later. For now, this works.
Follow-up with tests for explicit defaulting and enabling the __has_feature
flag to come.
llvm-svn: 138821
parameters on the floor in certain cases:
class X {
template <typename T> friend typename A<T>::Foo;
};
This was parsed as a *non* template friend declaration some how, and
received an ExtWarn. Fixing the parser to actually provide the template
parameters to the freestanding declaration parse triggers the code which
specifically looks for such constructs and hard errors on them.
Along the way, this prevents us from trying to instantiate constructs
like the above inside of a outer template. This is important as loosing
the template parameters means we don't have a well formed declaration
and template instantiation will be unable to rebuild the AST. That fixes
a crash in the GCC test suite.
llvm-svn: 130772
of an expansion, and we have a paramameter that is not a parameter
pack, don't suppress substitution of parameter packs within this
context.
llvm-svn: 126819
parameter type to see what's behind it, so that we don't end up
printing silly things like "float const *" when "const float *" would
make more sense. Also, replace the pile of "isa" tests with a simple
switch enumerating all of the cases, making a few more obvious cases
use prefix qualifiers.
llvm-svn: 125729
together. In particular:
- Handle the use of captured parameter pack names within blocks
(BlockDeclRefExpr understands parameter packs now)
- Handle the declaration and expansion of parameter packs within a block's
parameter list, e.g., ^(Args ...args) { ... })
- Handle instantiation of blocks where the return type was not
explicitly specified. (unrelated, but necessary for my tests).
Together, these fixes should make blocks and variadic templates work
reasonably well together. Note that BlockDeclRefExpr is still broken
w.r.t. its computation of type and value dependence, which will still
cause problems for blocks in templates.
llvm-svn: 123849
a pack expansion, e.g., the parameter pack Values in:
template<typename ...Types>
struct Outer {
template<Types ...Values>
struct Inner;
};
This new implementation approach introduces the notion of an
"expanded" non-type template parameter pack, for which we have already
expanded the types of the parameter pack (to, say, "int*, float*",
for Outer<int*, float*>) but have not yet expanded the values. Aside
from creating these expanded non-type template parameter packs, this
patch updates template argument checking and non-type template
parameter pack instantiation to make use of the appropriate types in
the parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 123845
non-variadic function template over a variadic one. This matches GCC
and the intent of the C++0x wording, in a way that I think is likely
to be acceptable to the committee.
llvm-svn: 123581
template template parameter pack that cannot be fully expanded because
its enclosing pack expansion could not be expanded. This form of
TemplateName plays the same role as SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType and
SubstNonTypeTemplateParmPackExpr do for template type parameter packs
and non-type template parameter packs, respectively.
We should now handle these multi-level pack expansion substitutions
anywhere. The largest remaining gap in our variadic-templates support
is that we cannot cope with non-type template parameter packs whose
type is a pack expansion.
llvm-svn: 123521
that captures the substitution of a non-type template argument pack
for a non-type template parameter pack within a pack expansion that
cannot be fully expanded. This follows the approach taken by
SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType.
llvm-svn: 123506
expansion in it, we may end up instantiating to an empty
expression-list. In this case, the variable is uninitialized; tweak
the instantiation logic to handle this case. Fixes PR8977.
llvm-svn: 123449
expansion, when it is known due to the substitution of an out
parameter pack. This allows us to properly handle substitution into
pack expansions that involve multiple parameter packs at different
template parameter levels, even when this substitution happens one
level at a time (as with partial specializations of member class
templates and the signatures of member function templates).
Note that the diagnostic we provide when there is an arity mismatch
between an outer parameter pack and an inner parameter pack in this
case isn't as clear as the normal diagnostic for an arity
mismatch. However, this doesn't matter because these cases are very,
very rare and (even then) only typically occur in a SFINAE context.
The other kinds of pack expansions (expression, template, etc.) still
need to support optional tracking of the number of expansions, and we
need the moral equivalent of SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType for
substituted argument packs of template template and non-type template
parameters.
llvm-svn: 123448
involve template parameter packs at multiple template levels that
occur within the signatures members of class templates (and partial
specializations thereof). This is a work-in-progress that is deficient
in several ways, notably:
- It only works for template type parameter packs, but we need to
also support non-type template parameter packs and template template
parameter packs.
- It doesn't keep track of the lengths of the substituted argument
packs in the expansion, so it can't properly diagnose length
mismatches.
However, this is a concrete step in the right direction.
llvm-svn: 123425
when we're actually matching a template template argument to a
template template parameter. Otherwise, use strict matching.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8859985> clang++: variadics and out-of-line definitions.
llvm-svn: 123385
matching of variadic template template parameters to template
arguments. This paragraph was the subject of ISO C++ committee
document N2555: Extending Variadic Template Template Parameters.
llvm-svn: 123348
another pack expansion type. This can happen when rebuilding types in
the current instantiation.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8848837> (Clang crashing on libc++ <functional>).
llvm-svn: 123316
and function templates that contain variadic templates. This involves
three small-ish changes:
(1) When transforming a pack expansion, if the transformed argument
still contains unexpanded parameter packs, build a pack
expansion. This can happen during the substitution that occurs into
class template partial specialiation template arguments during
partial ordering.
(2) When performing template argument deduction where the argument
is a pack expansion, match against the pattern of that pack
expansion.
(3) When performing template argument deduction against a non-pack
parameter, or a non-expansion template argument, deduction fails if
the argument itself is a pack expansion (C++0x
[temp.deduct.type]p22).
llvm-svn: 123279
expression kinds. This is (indirectly) a test verifying that the
recursive AST visitor is visiting the children of these expression
nodes.
llvm-svn: 123198
allows an argument pack determines via explicit specification of
function template arguments to be extended by further, deduced
arguments. For example:
template<class ... Types> void f(Types ... values);
void g() {
f<int*, float*>(0, 0, 0); // Types is deduced to the sequence int*, float*, int
}
There are a number of FIXMEs in here that indicate places where we
need to implement + test retained expansions, plus a number of other
places in deduction where we need to correctly cope with the
explicitly-specified arguments when deducing an argument
pack. Furthermore, it appears that the RecursiveASTVisitor needs to be
auditied; it's missing some traversals (especially w.r.t. template
arguments) that cause it not to find unexpanded parameter packs when
it should.
The good news, however, is that the tr1::tuple implementation now
works fully, and the tr1::bind example (both from N2080) is actually
working now.
llvm-svn: 123163
tuple class template. This implementation is boosted directly from the
variadic templates proposal. N2080.
Note that one section is #ifdef'd out. I'll implement that aspect of
template argument deduction next.
llvm-svn: 123016
1) Declaration of function parameter packs
2) Instantiation of function parameter packs within function types.
3) Template argument deduction of function parameter packs when
matching two function types.
We're missing all of the important template-instantiation logic for
function template definitions, along with template argument deduction
from the argument list of a function call, so don't even think of
trying to use these for real yet.
llvm-svn: 122926
Douglas Gregor