an explicitly-defaulted default constructor would be constexpr. This is
necessary in weird (but well-formed) cases where a class has more than one copy
or move constructor.
Cleanup of now-unused parts of CXXRecordDecl to follow.
llvm-svn: 158289
constexpr until we get to the end of the class definition. When that happens,
be sure to remember that the class actually does have a constexpr constructor.
This is a stopgap solution, which still doesn't cover the case of a class with
multiple copy constructors (only some of which are constexpr). We should be
performing constructor lookup when implicitly defining a constructor in order
to determine whether all constructors it invokes are constexpr.
llvm-svn: 158228
are otherwise too short to try to correct.
The TODOs added to two of the tests are for existing deficiencies in the
typo correction code that could be exposed by using longer identifiers.
llvm-svn: 158109
This comes up in the begin/end calls of a range-for (see the included test
case). Other suggestions are welcome, though this seems to do the trick without
regressing anything.
llvm-svn: 157553
Disambiguate past such a potential problem, and use the absence of 'typename'
to break ties in favor of a parenthesized thingy being an initializer, if
nothing else in the declaration disambiguates it as declaring a function.
llvm-svn: 156963
lambda as referring to a local in an enclosing scope if we're in the
enclosing scope of the lambda (not it's function call operator). Also,
turn the test into an IR generation test, since that's where the
crashes occurred. Really fixes PR12746 / <rdar://problem/11465120>.
llvm-svn: 156926
Moves the bool bail-out down a little in SemaChecking - so now
-Wnull-conversion and -Wliteral-conversion can fire when the target type is
bool.
Also improve the wording/details in the -Wliteral-conversion warning to match
the -Wconstant-conversion.
llvm-svn: 156826
into one. These were all performing almost identical checks, with different bugs
in each of them.
This fixes PR12806 (we weren't setting the exception specification for an
explicitly-defaulted, non-user-provided default constructor) and enforces
8.4.2/2's rule that an in-class defaulted member must exactly match the implicit
parameter type.
llvm-svn: 156802
so that we actually accumulate all the delayed diagnostics. Do
this so that we can restore those diagnostics to good standing
if it turns out that we were wrong to suppress, e.g. if the
tag specifier is actually an elaborated type specifier and not
a declaration.
llvm-svn: 156291
in-class initializer for one of its fields. Value-initialization of such
a type should use the in-class initializer!
The former was just a bug, the latter is a (reported) standard defect.
llvm-svn: 156274
victim. Don't crash if we have a delay-parsed exception specification for a
class member which is invalid in a way which precludes building a FunctionDecl.
llvm-svn: 155788
Don't try to query whether an incomplete type has a trivial copy constructor
when determining whether a move constructor should be declared.
llvm-svn: 155575
non-const reference parameter type if the class had any subobjects with deleted
copy constructors. This causes a rejects-valid if the class's copy constructor
is explicitly defaulted (as happens for some implementations of std::pair etc).
llvm-svn: 155218
We have a new flavor of exception specification, EST_Uninstantiated. A function
type with this exception specification carries a pointer to a FunctionDecl, and
the exception specification for that FunctionDecl is instantiated (if needed)
and used in the place of the function type's exception specification.
When a function template declaration with a non-trivial exception specification
is instantiated, the specialization's exception specification is set to this
new 'uninstantiated' kind rather than being instantiated immediately.
Expr::CanThrow has migrated onto Sema, so it can instantiate exception specs
on-demand. Also, any odr-use of a function triggers the instantiation of its
exception specification (the exception specification could be needed by IRGen).
In passing, fix two places where a DeclRefExpr was created but the corresponding
function was not actually marked odr-used. We used to get away with this, but
don't any more.
Also fix a bug where instantiating an exception specification which refers to
function parameters resulted in a crash. We still have the same bug in default
arguments, which I'll be looking into next.
This, plus a tiny patch to fix libstdc++'s common_type, is enough for clang to
parse (and, in very limited testing, support) all of libstdc++4.7's standard
headers.
llvm-svn: 154886
exception specifications on member functions until after the closing
'}' for the containing class. This allows, for example, a member
function to throw an instance of its own class. Fixes PR12564 and a
fairly embarassing oversight in our C++98/03 support.
llvm-svn: 154844
in the declaration of a non-static member function after the
(optional) cv-qualifier-seq, which in practice means in the exception
specification and late-specified return type.
The new scheme here used to manage 'this' outside of a member function
scope is more general than the Scope-based mechanism previously used
for non-static data member initializers and late-parsesd attributes,
because it can also handle the cv-qualifiers on the member
function. Note, however, that a separate pass is required for static
member functions to determine whether 'this' was used, because we
might not know that we have a static function until after declaration
matching.
Finally, this introduces name mangling for 'this' and for the implicit
'this', which is intended to match GCC's mangling. Independent
verification for the new mangling test case would be appreciated.
Fixes PR10036 and PR12450.
llvm-svn: 154799
* In C++11, '[[' is ill-formed unless it starts an attribute-specifier. Reject
array sizes and array indexes which begin with a lambda-expression. Recover by
parsing the lambda as a lambda.
* In Objective-C++11, either '[' could be the start of a message-send.
Fully disambiguate this case: it turns out that the grammars of message-sends,
lambdas and attributes do not actually overlap. Accept any occurrence of '[['
where either '[' starts a message send, but reject a lambda in an array index
just like in C++11 mode.
Implement a couple of changes to the attribute wording which occurred after our
attributes implementation landed:
* In a function-declaration, the attributes go after the exception specification,
not after the right paren.
* A reference type can have attributes applied.
* An 'identifier' in an attribute can also be a keyword. Support for alternative
tokens (iso646 keywords) in attributes to follow.
And some bug fixes:
* Parse attributes after declarator-ids, even if they are not simple identifiers.
* Do not accept attributes after a parenthesized declarator.
* Accept attributes after an array size in a new-type-id.
* Partially disamiguate 'delete' followed by a lambda. More work is required
here for the case where the lambda-introducer is '[]'.
llvm-svn: 154369
base-class subojects.
Incidentally, thinking about virtual bases makes it clear to me that
we're not appropriately computing the access to the virtual base's
member because we're not computing the best possible access to the
virtual base at all; in fact, we're basically assuming it's public.
I'll file a separate PR about that.
llvm-svn: 154346
to define a special member function as deleted so that it properly
establishes an object context for the accesses to the base subobject
members.
llvm-svn: 154343
- The [class.protected] restriction is non-trivial for any instance
member, even if the access lacks an object (for example, if it's
a pointer-to-member constant). In this case, it is equivalent to
requiring the naming class to equal the context class.
- The [class.protected] restriction applies to accesses to constructors
and destructors. A protected constructor or destructor can only be
used to create or destroy a base subobject, as a direct result.
- Several places were dropping or misapplying object information.
The standard could really be much clearer about what the object type is
supposed to be in some of these accesses. Usually it's easy enough to
find a reasonable answer, but still, the standard makes a very confident
statement about accesses to instance members only being possible in
either pointer-to-member literals or member access expressions, which
just completely ignores concepts like constructor and destructor
calls, using declarations, unevaluated field references, etc.
llvm-svn: 154248
a constant expression' error into a DefaultError ExtWarn, so that it can be
disabled and is suppressed in system headers. libstdc++4.7 contains some such
functions which we currently can't evaluate as constant expressions.
llvm-svn: 154115
* s/nonstatic/non-static/ in the diagnostics, since the latter form outvoted
the former by 28-2 in our diagnostics.
* Fix the "use of member in static member function" diagnostic to correctly
detect this situation inside a block or lambda.
* Produce a more specific "invalid use of non-static member" diagnostic for
the case where a nested class member refers to a member of a
lexically-surrounding class.
llvm-svn: 154073
This diagnostic seems to be production ready, it's just an oversight that it
wasn't turned on by default.
The test changes are a bit of a mixed bag. Some tests that seemed like they
clearly didn't need to use this behavior have been modified not to use it.
Others that I couldn't be sure about, I added the necessary expected-warnings
to.
It's possible the diagnostic message could be improved to make it clearer that
this warning can be suppressed by using a value that won't lose precision when
converted to the target type (but can still be a floating point literal, such
as "bool b = 1.0;").
llvm-svn: 154068
Douglas Gregor