Now that MI->getRegClassConstraint() can also handle inline assembly,
don't bail when recomputing the register class of a virtual register
used by inline asm.
This fixes PR11078.
llvm-svn: 141836
Most instructions have some requirements for their register operands.
Usually, this is expressed as register class constraints in the
MCInstrDesc, but for inline assembly the constraints are encoded in the
flag words.
llvm-svn: 141835
The inline asm operand constraint is initially encoded in the virtual
register for the operand, but that register class may change during
coalescing, and the original constraint is lost.
Encode the original register class as part of the flag word for each
inline asm operand. This makes it possible to recover the actual
constraint required by inline asm, just like we can for normal
instructions.
llvm-svn: 141833
our current machine instruction defines a register with the same register class
as what's being replaced. This showed up in the SPEC 403.gcc benchmark, where it
would ICE because a tail call was expecting one register class but was given
another. (The machine instruction verifier catches this situation.)
<rdar://problem/10270968>
llvm-svn: 141830
rather than the previous index. If a block has a single instruction, the
previous index may be in a different basic block.
I have no clue how this used to work on all of test-suite, because now this
failure is seen quite often when trying to compile code with -strong-phi-elim.
This fixes PR10252.
llvm-svn: 141812
containing loop's header to see if that's a landing pad. If it is, then we don't
want to hoist instructions out of the loop and above the header.
llvm-svn: 141767
1. The speculation check may not have been performed if the BB hasn't had a load
LICM candidate.
2. If the candidate would be CSE'ed, then go ahead and speculatively LICM the
instruction even if it's in high register pressure situation.
llvm-svn: 141747
file. Since it should only be used when necessary propagate it through
the backend code generation and tweak testcases accordingly.
This helps with code like in clang's test/CodeGen/debug-info-line.c where
we have multiple #line directives within a single lexical block and want
to generate only a single block that contains each file change.
Part of rdar://10246360
llvm-svn: 141729
The blocks with invokes have branches to the dispatch block, because that more
correctly models the behavior of the CFG. The dispatch of course has edges to
the landing pads. Those landing pads could contain invokes, which then have
branches back to the dispatch. This creates a loop. The machine LICM pass looks
at this loop and thinks it can hoist elements out of it. But because the
dispatch is an alternate entry point into the program, the hoisted instructions
won't be executed.
I wasn't able to get a testcase which was small and could reproduce all of the
time. The function_try_block.cpp in llvm-test was where this showed up.
llvm-svn: 141726
Allow targets to expand COPY and other standard pseudo-instructions
before they are expanded with copyPhysReg().
This allows the target to examine the COPY instruction for extra
operands indicating it can be widened to a preferable super-register
copy. See the ARM -widen-vmovs option.
llvm-svn: 141578
PhysReg operands are not allowed to have sub-register indices at all.
For virtual registers with sub-reg indices, check that all registers in
the register class support the sub-reg index.
llvm-svn: 141220
EXTRACT_SUBREG is emitted as %dst = COPY %src:sub, so there is no need to
constrain the %dst register class. RegisterCoalescer will apply the
necessary constraints if it decides to eliminate the COPY.
The %src register class does need to be constrained to something with
the right sub-registers, though. This is currently done manually with
COPY_TO_REGCLASS nodes. They can possibly be removed after this patch.
llvm-svn: 141207
The register class created by INSERT_SUBREG and SUBREG_TO_REG must be
legal and support the SubIdx sub-registers.
The new getSubClassWithSubReg() hook can compute that.
This may create INSERT_SUBREG instructions defining a larger register
class than the sub-register being inserted. That is OK,
RegisterCoalescer will constrain the register class as needed when it
eliminates the INSERT_SUBREG instructions.
llvm-svn: 141198
TwoAddressInstructionPass should annotate instructions with <undef>
flags when it lower REG_SEQUENCE instructions. LiveIntervals should not
be in the business of modifying code (except for kill flags, perhaps).
llvm-svn: 141187
For example:
%vreg10:dsub_0<def,undef> = COPY %vreg1
%vreg10:dsub_1<def> = COPY %vreg2
is rewritten as:
%D2<def> = COPY %D0, %Q1<imp-def>
%D3<def> = COPY %D1, %Q1<imp-use,kill>, %Q1<imp-def>
The first COPY doesn't care about the previous value of %Q1, so it
doesn't read that register.
The second COPY is a partial redefinition of %Q1, so it implicitly kills
and redefines that register.
This makes it possible to recognize instructions that can harmlessly
clobber the full super-register. The write and don't read the
super-register.
llvm-svn: 141139
RegisterCoalescer can create sub-register defs when it is joining a
register with a sub-register. Add <undef> flags to these new
sub-register defs where appropriate.
llvm-svn: 141138
The <undef> flag says that a MachineOperand doesn't read its register,
or doesn't depend on the previous value of its register.
A full register def never depends on the previous register value. A
partial register def may depend on the previous value if it is intended
to update part of a register.
For example:
%vreg10:dsub_0<def,undef> = COPY %vreg1
%vreg10:dsub_1<def> = COPY %vreg2
The first copy instruction defines the full %vreg10 register with the
bits not covered by dsub_0 defined as <undef>. It is not considered a
read of %vreg10.
The second copy modifies part of %vreg10 while preserving the rest. It
has an implicit read of %vreg10.
This patch adds a MachineOperand::readsReg() method to determine if an
operand reads its register.
Previously, this was modelled by adding a full-register <imp-def>
operand to the instruction. This approach makes it possible to
determine directly from a MachineOperand if it reads its register. No
scanning of MI operands is required.
llvm-svn: 141124
and the alignment is 0 (i.e., it's defined globally in one file and declared in
another file) it could get an alignment which is larger than the ABI allows for
that type, resulting in aligned moves being used for unaligned loads.
For instance, in file A.c:
struct S s;
In file B.c:
struct {
// something long
};
extern S s;
void foo() {
struct S p = s;
// ...
}
this copy is a 'memcpy' which is turned into a series of 'movaps' instructions
on X86. But this is wrong, because 'struct S' has alignment of 4, not 16.
llvm-svn: 140902
Jakob Stoklund Olesen