This change clarifies that for Not-NonAffine-SubRegions we actually iterate over
the subnodes and for both NonAffine-SubRegions and BasicBlocks, we perform the
schedule construction. As a result, the tree traversal becomes trivial, the
special case for a scop consisting just of a single non-affine region
disappears and the indentation of the code is reduced.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 256940
Providing an explicit PointerLikeTypeTraits implementation became necessary
since LLVM started in https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@256620
to automatically derive the pointer alignment from the pointer element type,
which does not work for incomplete types as used by isl. To ensure our code
still compiles, we provide an instantiation of PointerLikeTypeTraits for isl_id
which assumes no minimal alignment. isl pointers are likely to have a "higher"
alignment. We can exploit this later in case this becomes performance relevant.
llvm-svn: 256650
At code generation, scalar reads are generated before the other
statement's instructions, respectively scalar writes after them, in
contrast to array accesses which are "executed" with the instructions
they are linked to. Therefore it makes sense to not map the scalar
accesses to a place of execution. Follow-up patches will also remove
some of the directs links from a scalar access to a single instruction,
such that only having array accesses in InstructionToAccess ensures
consistency.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13676
llvm-svn: 256298
We clarify that certain code is only executed if LSchedule is != nullptr.
Previously some of these functions have been executed, but they only passed
a nullptr through. This caused some confusion when reading the code.
llvm-svn: 256209
Besides improving the documentation and the code we now assert in case the input
is invalid (N < 0) and also do not any more return a nullptr in case USet is
empty. This should make the code more readable.
llvm-svn: 256208
If a loop has a sufficiently large amount of compute instruction in its loop
body, it is unlikely that our rewrite of the loop iterators introduces large
performance changes. As Polly can also apply beneficical optimizations (such
as parallelization) to such loop nests, we mark them as profitable.
This option is currently "disabled" by default, but can be used to run
experiments. If enabled by setting it e.g. to 40 instructions, we currently
see some compile-time increases on LNT without any significant run-time
changes.
llvm-svn: 256199
.. and add some documentation. We also simplify the code by dropping an early
check that is also covered by the the later checks. This might have a small
compile time impact, but as the scops that are skipped are small we should
probably only add this back in the unlikely case that this has a notable
compile-time cost.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 256149
As we already log an error when calling invalid, scops unprofitable scops are in
any case marked invalid, but returning immediately safes (a tiny bit of) compile
time and is consistent with our use of 'invalid' in the remainder of the file.
Found by inspection.
llvm-svn: 256140
Without this return we still log the incorrect array size (and do not detect
this scop), but we would unnecessarily continue to verify that access functions
are affine. As we do not need to do this, we can return right ahead and
consequently safe compile time.
This issue was found by inspection.
llvm-svn: 256139
Instead of counting all array memory accesses associated with a load
instruction, we now explicitly check that the single array access that could
(potentially) be associated with a load instruction does not exist. This helps
to document the current behavior of Polly where load instructions can indeed
have at most one associated array access. In the unlikely case this changes
in the future, we add an assert for the case where two load accesses would
prevent us to return a single memory access, but we still should communicate
that not all array memory accesses have been removed.
This addresses post-commit comments from Johannes Doerfert for commit 255776.
llvm-svn: 256136
Scops that contain many complex branches are likely to result in complex domain
conditions that consist of a large (> 100) number of conjucts. Transforming
such domains is expensive and unlikely to result in efficient code. To avoid
long compile times we detect this case and skip such scops. In the future we may
improve this by either using non-affine subregions to hide such complex
condition structures or by exploiting in certain cases properties (e.g.,
dominance) that allow us to construct the domains of a scop in a way that
results in a smaller number improving conjuncts.
Example of a code that results in complex iteration spaces:
loop.header
/ | \ \
A0 A2 A4 \
\ / \ / \
A1 A3 \
/ \ / \ |
B0 B2 B4 |
\ / \ / |
B1 B3 ^
/ \ / \ |
C0 C2 C4 |
\ / \ / /
C1 C3 /
\ / /
loop backedge
llvm-svn: 256123
The patch fixes Bug 25759 produced by inappropriate handling of unsigned
maximum SCEV expressions by SCEVRemoveMax. Without a fix, we get an infinite
loop and a segmentation fault, if we try to process, for example,
'((-1 + (-1 * %b1)) umax {(-1 + (-1 * %yStart)),+,-1}<%.preheader>)'.
It also fixes a potential issue related to signed maximum SCEV expressions.
Tested-by: Roman Gareev <gareevroman@gmail.com>
Fixed-by: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15563
llvm-svn: 255922
When running 'clang -O3 -mllvm -polly -mllvm -polly-show' we now only show the
CFGs of functions with at least one detected scop. For larger files/projects
this reduces the number of graphs printed significantly and is likely what
developers want to see. The new option -polly-view-all enforces all graphs to be
printed and the exiting option -poll-view-only limites the graph printing to
functions that match a certain pattern.
This patch requires https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@255889 (and
vice versa) to compile correctly.
llvm-svn: 255891
Load instructions may possibly be related to multiple memory accesses, but we
are only interested in the array read access that describes the memory location
the load instructions loads from. By using getArrayAccessfor we ensure to always
obtain the right memory access.
This issue was found by inspection without having a failing test case.
llvm-svn: 255716
getAccessFor does not guarantee a certain access to be returned in case an
instruction is related to multiple accesses. However, in the vector code
generation we want to know the stride of the array access of a store
instruction. By using getArrayAccessFor we ensure we always get the correct
memory access.
This patch fixes a potential bug, but I was unable to produce a failing test
case. Several existing test cases cover this code, but all of them already
passed out of luck (or the specific but not-guaranteed order in which we build
memory accesses).
llvm-svn: 255715
When generating scalar loads/stores separately the vector code has not been
updated. This commit adds code to generate scalar loads for vector code as well
as code to assert in case scalar stores are encountered within a vector loop.
llvm-svn: 255714
When rewriting the access functions of load/store statements, we are only
interested in the actual array memory location. The current code just took
the very first memory access, which could be a scalar or an array access. As
a result, we failed to update access functions even though this was requested
via .jscop.
llvm-svn: 255713
This change should not change the behavior of Polly today, but it allows
external constants to be remapped e.g. when targetting multiple LLVM modules.
llvm-svn: 255506
This reverts commit r255471.
Johannes raised in the post-commit review of r255471 the concern that PHI
writes in non-affine regions with two exiting blocks are not really MUST_WRITE,
but we just know that at least one out of the set of all possible PHI writes
will be executed. Modeling all PHI nodes as MUST_WRITEs is probably save, but
adding the needed documentation for such a special case is probably not worth
the effort. Michael will be proposing a new patch that ensures only a single
PHI_WRITE is created for non-affine regions, which - besides other benefits -
should also allow us to use a single well-defined MUST_WRITE for such PHI
writes.
(This is not a full revert, but the condition and documentation have been
slightly extended)
llvm-svn: 255503
Before this commit, only the region's entry block was assumed to always
execute in a non-affine subregion. We replace this by a test whether it
dominates the exit block (this necessarily includes the entry block)
which should be more accurate.
llvm-svn: 255473
LLVM's IR guarantees that a value definition occurs before any use, and
also the value of a PHI must be one of the incoming values, "written"
in one of the incoming blocks. Hence, such writes are never conditional
in the context of a non-affine subregion.
llvm-svn: 255471
Over time different vocabulary has been introduced to describe the different
memory objects in Polly, resulting in different - often inconsistent - naming
schemes in different parts of Polly. We now standartize this to the following
scheme:
KindArray, KindValue, KindPHI, KindExitPHI
| ------- isScalar -----------|
In most cases this naming scheme has already been used previously (this
minimizes changes and ensures we remain consistent with previous publications).
The main change is that we remove KindScalar to clearify the difference between
a scalar as a memory object of kind Value, PHI or ExitPHI and a value (former
KindScalar) which is a memory object modeling a llvm::Value.
We also move all documentation to the Kind* enum in the ScopArrayInfo class,
remove the second enum in the MemoryAccess class and update documentation to be
formulated from the perspective of the memory object, rather than the memory
access. The terms "Implicit"/"Explicit", formerly used to describe memory
accesses, have been dropped. From the perspective of memory accesses they
described the different memory kinds well - especially from the perspective of
code generation - but just from the perspective of a memory object it seems more
straightforward to talk about scalars and arrays, rather than explicit and
implicit arrays. The last comment is clearly subjective, though. A less
subjective reason to go for these terms is the historic use both in mailing list
discussions and publications.
llvm-svn: 255467
Use it to print "null" if a MemoryAccess's access relation is not
available instead of printing nothing.
Suggested-by: Johannes Doerfert
llvm-svn: 255466
Introduce a function getStmtForRegionNode() to the corresponding
ScopStmt of a RegionNode. We can use it to call the existing
ScopStmt::isEmpty() function instead of searching for accesses.
llvm-svn: 255465
Tobias Grosser