Summary:
Each of the four methods had a dozen lines and was doing almost exactly
the same thing: get the appropriate accelerator table kind and insert an
entry into it. I move this common logic to a helper function and make
these methods delegate to it.
This came up in the context of D49493, where I've needed to make adding
a string to a string pool slightly more complicated, and it seemed to
make sense to do it in one place instead of five.
To make this work I've needed to unify the interface of the AccelTable
data types, as some used to store DIE& and others DIE*. I chose to unify
to a reference as that's what the caller uses.
This technically isn't NFC, because it changes the StringPool used for
apple tables in the DWO case (now it uses the main file like DWARF v5
instead of the DWO file). However, that shouldn't matter, as DWO is not
a thing on apple targets (clang frontend simply ignores -gsplit-dwarf).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, probinson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49542
llvm-svn: 337562
When merging through a TokenFactor we need to check that the
load may be ordered such that no other aliasing memory operations may
happen. It is not sufficient to just check that the load is a member
of the chain token factor as it there may be a indirect chain. Require
the load's chain has only one use.
This fixes PR37826.
Reviewers: spatel, davide, efriedma, craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49388
llvm-svn: 337560
Summary:
This patch makes us generate the debug_names section in response to some
user-facing commands (previously it was only generated if explicitly
selected via the -accel-tables option).
My goal was to make this work for DWARF>=5 (as it's an official part of
that standard), and also, as an extension, for DWARF<5 if one is
explicitly tuning for lldb as a debugger (because it brings a large
performance improvement there).
This is slightly complicated by the fact that the debug_names tables are
incompatible with the DWARF v4 type units (they assume that the type
units are in the debug_info section), and unfortunately, right now we
generate DWARF v4-style type units even for -gdwarf-5. For this reason,
I disable all accelerator tables if the user requested type unit
generation. I do this even for apple tables, as they have the same
problem (in fact generating type units for apple targets makes us crash
even before we get around to emitting the accelerator tables).
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie, echristo, probinson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49420
llvm-svn: 337544
Since DWARFv5 rnglists are self descriptive and have distinct encodings
for base-relative (offset_pair) and absolute (start_length) entries,
there's no need to use a base address specifier when describing a lone
address range in a section.
Use that, and improve the test coverage a bit here to include cases like
this and others.
llvm-svn: 337411
Summary:
If unfolding an SUnit results in both load or the operation using it which
already exist in the DAG, abort the unfold if they are already scheduled.
If not, make sure we don't add duplicate dependencies.
This fixes PR37916.
Reviewers: davide, eli.friedman, fhahn, bogner
Subscribers: MatzeB, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48666
llvm-svn: 337409
The presence of these symbols in the symbol table can cause symbol type
mismatch errors (or undefined symbol errors on emulated TLS targets)
and they can't be ICF'd anyway.
llvm-svn: 337338
Summary:
Part of the adjustCopiesBackFrom method wasn't correctly dealing with SubRange
intervals when updating.
2 changes. The first to ensure that bogus SubRange Segments aren't propagated when
encountering Segments of the form [1234r, 1234d:0) when preparing to merge value
numbers. These can be removed in this case.
The second forces a shrinkToUses call if SubRanges end on the copy index
(instead of just the parent register).
V2: Addressed review comments, plus MIR test instead of ll test
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40308
Change-Id: I1d2b2b4beea802fce11da01edf71feb2064aab05
llvm-svn: 337273
If we are only extracting vector elements via EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT(s) we may be able to use SimplifyDemandedVectorElts to avoid unnecessary vector ops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49262
llvm-svn: 337258
As discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-May/123292.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124400.html
We want to add rotate intrinsics because the IR expansion of that pattern is 4+ instructions,
and we can lose pieces of the pattern before it gets to the backend. Generalizing the operation
by allowing 2 different input values (plus the 3rd shift/rotate amount) gives us a "funnel shift"
operation which may also be a single hardware instruction.
Initially, I thought we needed to define new DAG nodes for these ops, and I spent time working
on that (much larger patch), but then I concluded that we don't need it. At least as a first
step, we have all of the backend support necessary to match these ops...because it was required.
And shepherding these through the IR optimizer is the primary concern, so the IR intrinsics are
likely all that we'll ever need.
There was also a question about converting the intrinsics to the existing ROTL/ROTR DAG nodes
(along with improving the oversized shift documentation). Again, I don't think that's strictly
necessary (as the test results here prove). That can be an efficiency improvement as a small
follow-up patch.
So all we're left with is documentation, definition of the IR intrinsics, and DAG builder support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49242
llvm-svn: 337221
trivially rematerializable.
We run into a case where machineLICM hoists a large number of live ranges
outside of a big loop because it thinks those live ranges are trivially
rematerializable. In regalloc, global splitting is tried out first for those
live ranges before they are spilled and rematerialized. Because the global
splitting algorithm is quadratic, increasing a lot of global splitting
candidates causes huge compile time increase (50s to 1400s on my local
machine when compiling a module).
However, we think for live ranges which are very large and are trivially
rematerialiable, it is better to just skip global splitting so as to save
compile time with little chance of sacrificing performance. We uses the
segment size of live range to indirectly evaluate whether the global
splitting of the live range can introduce high cost, and use an option
as a knob to adjust the size limit threshold.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49353
llvm-svn: 337186
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38149 | PR38149 ]]
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D49179#1158957 and later,
the IR for 'check for [no] signed truncation' pattern can be improved:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/gBf
^ that pattern will be produced by Implicit Integer Truncation sanitizer,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
in signed case, therefore it is probably a good idea to improve it.
But the IR-optimal patter does not lower efficiently, so we want to undo it..
This handles the simple pattern.
There is a second pattern with predicate and constants inverted.
NOTE: we do not check uses here. we always do the transform.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49266
llvm-svn: 337166
Summary:
If the high part of the load is not used the offset to the next element
will not be set correctly.
For example, on Sparc V8, the following code will read val2 from offset 4
instead of 8.
```
int val = __builtin_va_arg(va, long long);
int val2 = __builtin_va_arg(va, int);
```
Reviewers: jyknight
Reviewed By: jyknight
Subscribers: fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48595
llvm-svn: 337161
For dsymutil we want to store offsets in the accelerator table entries
rather than DIE pointers. In addition, we need a way to communicate
which CU a DIE belongs to. This patch provides support for both of these
issues.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49102
llvm-svn: 337158
This is almost the same as an existing IR canonicalization in instcombine,
so I'm assuming this is a good early generic DAG combine too.
The motivation comes from reduced bit-hacking for select-of-constants in IR
after rL331486. We want to restore that functionality in the DAG as noted in
the commit comments for that change and the llvm-dev discussion here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-July/124433.html
The PPC and AArch tests show that those targets are already doing something
similar. x86 will be neutral in the minimal case and generally better when
this pattern is extended with other ops as shown in the signbit-shift.ll tests.
Note the asymmetry: we don't include the (extend (ifneg X)) transform because
it already exists in SimplifySelectCC(), and that is verified in the later
unchanged tests in the signbit-shift.ll files. Without the 'not' op, the
general transform to use a shift is always a win because that's a single
instruction.
Alive proofs:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ysli
Name: if pos, get -1
%c = icmp sgt i16 %x, -1
%r = sext i1 %c to i16
=>
%n = xor i16 %x, -1
%r = ashr i16 %n, 15
Name: if pos, get 1
%c = icmp sgt i16 %x, -1
%r = zext i1 %c to i16
=>
%n = xor i16 %x, -1
%r = lshr i16 %n, 15
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48970
llvm-svn: 337130
The MachineOutliner was doing an std::for_each from the call (inserted
before the outlined sequence) to the iterator at the end of the
sequence.
std::for_each needs the iterator past the end, so the last instruction
was not taken into account when propagating the liveness information.
This fixes the machine verifier issue in machine-outliner-disubprogram.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49295
llvm-svn: 337090
Spectre variant #1 for x86.
There is a lengthy, detailed RFC thread on llvm-dev which discusses the
high level issues. High level discussion is probably best there.
I've split the design document out of this patch and will land it
separately once I update it to reflect the latest edits and updates to
the Google doc used in the RFC thread.
This patch is really just an initial step. It isn't quite ready for
prime time and is only exposed via debugging flags. It has two major
limitations currently:
1) It only supports x86-64, and only certain ABIs. Many assumptions are
currently hard-coded and need to be factored out of the code here.
2) It doesn't include any options for more fine-grained control, either
of which control flow edges are significant or which loads are
important to be hardened.
3) The code is still quite rough and the testing lighter than I'd like.
However, this is enough for people to begin using. I have had numerous
requests from people to be able to experiment with this patch to
understand the trade-offs it presents and how to use it. We would also
like to encourage work to similar effect in other toolchains.
The ARM folks are actively developing a system based on this for
AArch64. We hope to merge this with their efforts when both are far
enough along. But we also don't want to block making this available on
that effort.
Many thanks to the *numerous* people who helped along the way here. For
this patch in particular, both Eric and Craig did a ton of review to
even have confidence in it as an early, rough cut at this functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44824
llvm-svn: 336990
During the execution of long functions or functions that have a lot of
inlined code it could come to the situation where tracked value could be
transferred from one register to another. The transfer is recognized only if
destination register is a callee saved register and if source register is
killed. We do not salvage caller-saved registers since there is a great
chance that killed register would outlive it.
Patch by Nikola Prica.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44016
llvm-svn: 336978
This re-applies r336929 with a fix to accomodate for the Mips target
scheduling multiple SelectionDAG instances into the pass pipeline.
PrologEpilogInserter and StackColoring depend on the StackProtector analysis
being alive from the point it is run until PEI, which requires that they are all
scheduled in the same FunctionPassManager. Inserting a (machine) ModulePass
between StackProtector and PEI results in these passes being in separate
FunctionPassManagers and the StackProtector is not available for PEI.
PEI and StackColoring don't use much information from the StackProtector pass,
so transfering the required information to MachineFrameInfo is cleaner than
keeping the StackProtector pass around. This commit moves the SSP layout
information to MFI instead of keeping it in the pass.
This patch set (D37580, D37581, D37582, D37583, D37584, D37585, D37586, D37587)
is a first draft of the pagerando implementation described in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/113794.html.
Patch by Stephen Crane <sjc@immunant.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49256
llvm-svn: 336964
PrologEpilogInserter and StackColoring depend on the StackProtector analysis
being alive from the point it is run until PEI, which requires that they are all
scheduled in the same FunctionPassManager. Inserting a (machine) ModulePass
between StackProtector and PEI results in these passes being in separate
FunctionPassManagers and the StackProtector is not available for PEI.
PEI and StackColoring don't use much information from the StackProtector pass,
so transfering the required information to MachineFrameInfo is cleaner than
keeping the StackProtector pass around. This commit moves the SSP layout
information to MFI instead of keeping it in the pass.
This patch set (D37580, D37581, D37582, D37583, D37584, D37585, D37586, D37587)
is a first draft of the pagerando implementation described in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-June/113794.html.
Patch by Stephen Crane <sjc@immunant.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49256
llvm-svn: 336929
and no use of DW_FORM_rnglistx with the DW_AT_ranges attribute.
Reviewer: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49214
llvm-svn: 336927
This is marginally helpful for removing redundant extensions, and the
code is easier to read, so it seems like an all-around win. In the new
test i8-phi-ext.ll, we used to emit an AssertSext i8; now we emit an
AssertZext i2, which allows the extension of the return value to be
eliminated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49004
llvm-svn: 336868
Reuse this function as to test correctness and profitability of
reducing width of either load or store operations.
Reviewsers: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48624
llvm-svn: 336800
This allows us to use SelectionDAG::isKnownNeverZero in DAGCombiner::visitREM (visitSDIVLike/visitUDIVLike handle the checking for constants).
llvm-svn: 336779
First stage in PR38057 - support non-uniform constant vectors in the combine to reuse the division-by-constant logic.
We can definitely do better for srem pow2 remainders (and avoid that extra multiply....) but this at least helps keep everything on the vector unit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48975
llvm-svn: 336774
As suggested by @efriedma on D48975, this patch separates the BuildDiv/Pow2 style optimizations from the rest of the visitSDIV/visitUDIV to make it easier to reuse the combines and will allow us to avoid some rather nasty node recursive combining in visitREM.
llvm-svn: 336656
This is prep for DWARF v5 range list emission. Emission of a single range list is moved
to a static helper function.
Reviewer: jdevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49098
llvm-svn: 336621
Summary:
This patch adds support for the atomicrmw instructions and the strong
cmpxchg instruction to the IRTranslator.
I've left out weak cmpxchg because LangRef.rst isn't entirely clear on what
difference it makes to the backend. As far as I can tell from the code, it
only matters to AtomicExpandPass which is run at the LLVM-IR level.
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, volkan, javed.absar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, javed.absar, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40092
llvm-svn: 336589
Summary:
This adds a reverse transform for the instcombine canonicalizations
that were added in D47980, D47981.
As discussed later, that was worse at least for the code size,
and potentially for the performance, too.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Zmpl
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: reames, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48768
llvm-svn: 336585
This is similar to what is done for binops. I don't know if this would have helped us catch the bug fixed in r336566 earlier or not, but I figured it couldn't hurt.
llvm-svn: 336576
When emitting the DWARF accelerator tables from dsymutil, we don't have
a DwarfDebug instance and we use a custom class to represent Dwarf
compile units. This patch adds an interface AccelTableWriterInfo to
abstract these from the Dwarf5AccelTableWriter, so we can have a custom
implementation for this in dsymutil.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49031
llvm-svn: 336529
Pavel Labath