This renames the expression value categories from rvalue to prvalue,
keeping nomenclature consistent with C++11 onwards.
C++ has the most complicated taxonomy here, and every other language
only uses a subset of it, so it's less confusing to use the C++ names
consistently, and mentally remap to the C names when working on that
context (prvalue -> rvalue, no xvalues, etc).
Renames:
* VK_RValue -> VK_PRValue
* Expr::isRValue -> Expr::isPRValue
* SK_QualificationConversionRValue -> SK_QualificationConversionPRValue
* JSON AST Dumper Expression nodes value category: "rvalue" -> "prvalue"
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103720
This patch starts to produce a very obvious false-positives,
despite the fact the preexisting tests already cover the pattern.
they clearly don't actually cover it.
https://godbolt.org/z/3zdqvbfxj
This reverts commit 1709bb8c73.
This is the only remaining check that creates `std::move` includes but doesn't add a `<utility>` include.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97683
If C++17 mode is enabled and the assert doesn't have a string literal, we can emit a static assert with no message in favour of one with an empty message.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97313
Tweak the diagnostics to create small replacements rather than grabbing source text from the lexer.
Also simplified the diagnostic message.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97632
Fix up cases where diag is called by piecing together a string in favour of placeholders.
Fix up cases where select could be used instead of duplicating the message for sake of 1 word difference.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97488
Add methods for emitting diagnostics with no location as well as a special diagnostic for configuration errors.
These show up in the errors as [clang-tidy-config].
The reason to use a custom name rather than the check name is to distinguish the error isn't the same category as the check that reported it.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91885
Update clang-tools-extra, clang/tools, clang/unittests to migrate from
`SourceManager::getBuffer`, which returns an always dereferenceable
`MemoryBuffer*`, to `getBufferOrNone` or `getBufferOrFake`, both of
which return a `MemoryBufferRef`, depending on whether the call site was
checking for validity of the buffer. No functionality change intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89416
Just adds the storeOptions for Checks that weren't already storing their options.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82223
Fix various tool libraries not to link to clang's .a libraries and dylib
simultaneously. This may cause breakage, in particular through
duplicate command-line option declarations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81967
Summary: This was done with a script that looks for calls to Options.get(GlobalOrLocal) that take an integer for the second argument and the result is either compared not equal to 0 or implicitly converted to bool. There may be other occurances
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, gribozavr2
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, xazax.hun, kbarton, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77831
Summary:
Previously, the check would fix
```
using fn = void(int);
void f(fn *);
void test() {
// CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+2]]:12: warning: parameter 'I' is unused
// CHECK-FIXES: {{^}} f([](int /*I*/) {
f([](int I) { return; });
}
```
into
`f([]() { return; });` which breaks compilation. Now the check is disabled from Lambdas.
The AST is not so easy to use. For
```
auto l = [](int) { return; };
f(l);
```
one gets
```
`-CallExpr <line:7:5, col:8> 'void'
|-ImplicitCastExpr <col:5> 'void (*)(fn *)' <FunctionToPointerDecay>
| `-DeclRefExpr <col:5> 'void (fn *)' lvalue Function 0x55a91a545e28 'f' 'void (fn *)'
`-ImplicitCastExpr <col:7> 'void (*)(int)' <UserDefinedConversion>
`-CXXMemberCallExpr <col:7> 'void (*)(int)'
`-MemberExpr <col:7> '<bound member function type>' .operator void (*)(int) 0x55a91a546850
`-ImplicitCastExpr <col:7> 'const (lambda at line:6:14)' lvalue <NoOp>
`-DeclRefExpr <col:7> '(lambda at line:6:14)':'(lambda at line:6:14)' lvalue Var 0x55a91a5461c0 'l' '(lambda at line:6:14)':'(lambda at line:6:14)'
```
There is no direct use of the `operator()(int I)` of the lambda, so the `!Indexer->getOtherRefs(Function).empty()`
does not fire. In the future, we might be able to use the conversion operator `operator void (*)(int)` to mark
the call operator as having an "other ref".
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, njames93
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77680
This reverts commit 97aa593a83 as it
causes problems (PR45453) https://reviews.llvm.org/D77574#1966321.
This additionally adds an explicit reference to FrontendOpenMP to
clang-tidy where ASTMatchers is used.
This is hopefully just a temporary solution. The dependence on
`FrontendOpenMP` from `ASTMatchers` should be handled by CMake
implicitly, not us explicitly.
Reviewed By: aheejin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77666
Summary:
Bugzilla: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27702
I wasn't sure how this type of thing is usually tested. So any advice would be appreciated.
`check-llvm`, `check-clang` and `check-clang-tools` are clean for me.
**C++98**
```
tetsuo@garland-c-16-sgp1-01:~/dev/llvm-project/test$ cat compile_commands.json
[
{
"directory": "/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test",
"command": "/usr/bin/c++ -std=gnu++98 -o CMakeFiles/test.dir/test.cpp.o -c /home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp",
"file": "/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp"
}
]
tetsuo@garland-c-16-sgp1-01:~/dev/llvm-project/test$ ../build/bin/clang-tidy --checks=misc-unconventional-assign-operator test.cpp
3053 warnings generated.
/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp:7:3: warning: operator=() should take 'Foo const&' or 'Foo' [misc-unconventional-assign-operator]
Foo &operator=(Foo &Other) {
^
Suppressed 3052 warnings (3052 in non-user code).
Use -header-filter=.* to display errors from all non-system headers. Use -system-headers to display errors from system headers as well.
```
**C++17**
```
tetsuo@garland-c-16-sgp1-01:~/dev/llvm-project/test$ cat compile_commands.json
[
{
"directory": "/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test",
"command": "/usr/bin/c++ -std=gnu++17 -o CMakeFiles/test.dir/test.cpp.o -c /home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp",
"file": "/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp"
}
]
tetsuo@garland-c-16-sgp1-01:~/dev/llvm-project/test$ ../build/bin/clang-tidy --checks=misc-unconventional-assign-operator test.cpp
5377 warnings generated.
/home/tetsuo/dev/llvm-project/test/test.cpp:7:3: warning: operator=() should take 'Foo const&', 'Foo&&' or 'Foo' [misc-unconventional-assign-operator]
Foo &operator=(Foo &Other) {
^
Suppressed 5376 warnings (5376 in non-user code).
Use -header-filter=.* to display errors from all non-system headers. Use -system-headers to display errors from system headers as well.
```
Reviewers: njames93, MaskRay, alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: njames93
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75901
readability-redundant-expression now detects expressions where a logical
or bitwise operator had equivalent LHS and RHS where the equivalent
operands were separated by more operands.
Summary:
Recursion is a powerful tool, but like any tool
without care it can be dangerous. For example,
if the recursion is unbounded, you will
eventually run out of stack and crash.
You can of course track the recursion depth
but if it is hardcoded, there can always be some
other environment when that depth is too large,
so said magic number would need to be env-dependent.
But then your program's behavior is suddenly more env-dependent.
Also, recursion, while it does not outright stop optimization,
recursive calls are less great than normal calls,
for example they hinder inlining.
Recursion is banned in some coding guidelines:
* SEI CERT DCL56-CPP. Avoid cycles during initialization of static objects
* JPL 2.4 Do not use direct or indirect recursion.
* I'd say it is frowned upon in LLVM, although not banned
And is plain unsupported in some cases:
* OpenCL 1.2, 6.9 Restrictions: i. Recursion is not supported.
So there's clearly a lot of reasons why one might want to
avoid recursion, and replace it with worklist handling.
It would be great to have a enforcement for it though.
This implements such a check.
Here we detect both direct and indirect recursive calls,
although since clang-tidy (unlike clang static analyzer)
is CTU-unaware, if the recursion transcends a single standalone TU,
we will naturally not find it :/
The algorithm is pretty straight-forward:
1. Build call-graph for the entire TU.
For that, the existing `clang::CallGraph` is re-used,
although it had to be modified to also track the location of the call.
2. Then, the hard problem: how do we detect recursion?
Since we have a graph, let's just do the sane thing,
and look for Strongly Connected Function Declarations - widely known as `SCC`.
For that LLVM provides `llvm::scc_iterator`,
which is internally an Tarjan's DFS algorithm, and is used throught LLVM,
so this should be as performant as possible.
3. Now that we've got SCC's, we discard those that don't contain loops.
Note that there may be more than one loop in SCC!
4. For each loopy SCC, we call out each function, and print a single example
call graph that shows recursion -- it didn't seem worthwhile enumerating
every possible loop in SCC, although i suppose it could be implemented.
* To come up with that call graph cycle example, we start at first SCC node,
see which callee of the node is within SCC (and is thus known to be in cycle),
and recurse into it until we hit the callee that is already in call stack.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, ffrankies, Eugene.Zelenko, erichkeane, NoQ
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Charusso, Naghasan, bader, riccibruno, mgorny, Anastasia, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #llvm, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72362
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Do not warn for redundant conditional expressions when the true and false
branches are expanded from different macros even when they are defined by
one another.
Patch by Daniel Krupp.
The static analyzer is warning about potential null dereferences, but in these cases we should be able to use castAs<> directly and if not assert will fire for us.
llvm-svn: 375102
Summary:
The check was generating a fix without taking qualifiers in return type
into account. This patch changes the insertion location to be before qualifers.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67213
llvm-svn: 371022
The previous matcher "hasAnyTemplateArgument(templateArgument())" only
matches the first template argument, but the check wants to iterate all
template arguments. This patch fixes this.
Also some refactorings in this patch (to make the code reusable).
llvm-svn: 370760
Haojian Wu