We need to relax constraints on invariant loads so that they do not
create fake RAW dependences. So, we do not consider invariant loads as
scalar dependences in a region.
During these changes, it turned out that we do not consider `llvm::Value`
replacements correctly within `PPCGCodeGeneration` and `ISLNodeBuilder`.
The replacements dictated by `ValueMap` were not being followed in all
places. This was fixed in this commit. There is no clean way to decouple
this change because this bug only seems to arise when the relaxed
version of invariant load hoisting was enabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35120
llvm-svn: 307907
This makes it easier to read and possibly even modify the test cases, as there
is no need to keep the variable increment in steps of one. More importantly, by
using explicit variable names we do not need to rely on the implicit numbering
of statements when dumping the scop information.
This makes it easier to read and possibly even modify the test cases.
Furthermore, by using explicit variables we do not need to rely on the implicit
numbering of statements when dumping the scop information. In a future commit,
this implicit numbering will likely not be used any more to refer to LLVM-IR
values as it is very expensive to construct.
llvm-svn: 301689
This will make it easier to switch the default of Polly's invariant load
hoisting strategy and also makes it very clear that these test cases
indeed require invariant code hoisting to work.
llvm-svn: 278667
Affine branches are fully modeled and regenerated from the polyhedral domain and
consequently do not require any input conditions to be propagated.
llvm-svn: 263678
The previously implemented approach is to follow value definitions and
create write accesses ("push defs") while searching for uses. This
requires the same relatively validity- and requirement conditions to be
replicated at multiple locations (PHI instructions, other instructions,
uses by PHIs).
We replace this by iterating over the uses in a SCoP ("pull in
requirements"), and add writes only when at least one read has been
added. It turns out to be simpler code because each use is only iterated
over once and writes are added for the first access that reads it. We
need another iteration to identify escaping values (uses not in the
SCoP), which also makes the difference between such accesses more
obvious. As a side-effect, the order of scalar MemoryAccess can change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15706
llvm-svn: 259987
ISL 0.16 will change how sets are printed which breaks 117 unit tests
that text-compare printed sets. This patch re-formats most of these unit
tests using a script and small manual editing on top of that. When
actually updating ISL, most work is done by just re-running the script
to adapt to the changed output.
Some tests that compare IR and tests with single CHECK-lines that can be
easily updated manually are not included here.
The re-format script will also be committed afterwards. The per-test
formatter invocation command lines options will not be added in the near
future because it is ad hoc and would overwrite the manual edits.
Ideally it also shouldn't be required anymore because ISL's set printing
has become more stable in 0.16.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16095
llvm-svn: 257851
We do not need to model read-only statements in the SCoP as they will
not cause any side effects that are visible to the outside anyway.
Removing them should safe us time and might even simplify the ASTs we
generate.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14272
llvm-svn: 251948
Siddharth Bhat