extern "C" declarations should be considered like global declarations
for mangling purposes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7718
llvm-svn: 229724
We attempted to be compatible with GCC's buggy mangling for templates
with a declaration for a template argument.
However, we weren't completely successful in copying their bug in cases
like:
char foo;
template <char &C> decltype(C) f() { return foo; };
template char &f<foo>();
Instead, just follow the ABI specification. This fixes PR22621.
llvm-svn: 229644
Our mangling of <destructor-name> wasn't quite right: we'd introduce
mangling substitutions where one shouldn't be possible. We also didn't
correctly handle the case where the destroyed type was not dependent but
still a TemplateSpecializationType.
N.B. There isn't a mangling for a template-template parameter showing up
as the destroyed type. We do the 'obvious' thing and mangle the index
of the parameter.
llvm-svn: 229615
We had two bugs:
- We were missing the "on" prefix for unresolved operators.
- We didn't handle the mangling of destructors at all.
This fixes PR22584.
llvm-svn: 229255
Matches the existing code for scalar default arguments. Complex default
arguments probably need the same handling too (test/fix to that coming
next).
llvm-svn: 228588
After r228258, Clang started emitting C++ EH IR that LLVM wasn't ready
to deal with, even when exceptions were disabled with /EHs-. This time,
make /EHs- turn off -fexceptions while still emitting exceptional
constructs in functions using __try. Since Sema rejects C++ exception
handling constructs before CodeGen, landingpads should only appear in
such functions as the result of a __try.
llvm-svn: 228329
initializer of the form {x}, where x is of type C or a type derived from C,
perform *non-list* initialization of the entity from x, but create a
CXXConstructExpr that knows that we used list-initialization syntax.
Plus some fixes to ensure we mangle correctly in this and related cases.
llvm-svn: 228276
It caused a chromium base unittest that tests throwing and catching SEH
exceptions to fail (http://crbug.com/455488) and I suspect it might also
be the cause of the chromium clang win 64-bit shared release builder timing
out during compiles. So revert to see if that's true.
llvm-svn: 228262
Now if you break on a dtor and go 'up' in your debugger (or you get an
asan failure in a dtor) during an exception unwind, you'll have more
context. Instead of all dtors appearing to be called from the '}' of the
function, they'll be attributed to the end of the scope of the variable,
the same as the non-exceptional dtor call.
This doesn't /quite/ remove all uses of CurEHLocation (which might be
nice to remove, for a few reasons) - it's still used to choose the
location for some other work in the landing pad. It'd be nice to
attribute that code to the same location as the exception calls within
the block and to remove CurEHLocation.
llvm-svn: 228181
We would synthesize memcpy intrinsics when emitting calls to trivial C++
constructors but we wouldn't take into account the alignment of the
destination.
llvm-svn: 228061
There are four major kinds of declarations that cause code generation:
- FunctionDecl (includes CXXMethodDecl etc)
- ObjCMethodDecl
- BlockDecl
- CapturedDecl
This patch tracks __try usage on FunctionDecls and diagnoses __try usage
in other decls. If someone wants to use __try from ObjC, they can use it
from a free function, since the ObjC code will need an ObjC-style EH
personality.
Eventually we will want to look through CapturedDecls and track SEH
usage on the parent FunctionDecl, if present.
llvm-svn: 228058
To handle default arguments in C++ in the debug info, we disable code
updating the debug location during the emission of default arguments.
This code was buggy in the case of default arguments which, themselves,
have default arguments - the inner default argument would re-enable
debug info when it was finished, but before the outer default argument
was finished.
This was already a bug, but got worse (because a crasher instead of just
a quality bug) with the recent improvements to debug info line quality
because... The ApplyDebugLocation scoped device would find the debug
info disabled and not save any debug location. But then in
~ApplyDebugLocation it would find the debug info had been enabled and
would then apply the no-location. Then the outer function call would be
emitted without any location. That's bad.
Arguably we could /also/ fix the ApplyDebugLocation to assert on this
situation (where debug info was disabled in the ctor and enabled in the
dtor, or the other way around) but this is at least the necessary fix
regardless.
(also, I imagine this disabling behavior might need to be in-place for
CGExprComplex and CGExprAgg too, maybe... ?)
And I seem to recall seeing some weird default arg stepping behavior
recently which might be related to this too... I'll have to look into
it.
llvm-svn: 228053
This is half a fix for a GDB test suite failure that expects to start at
'a' in the following code:
void func(int a)
if (a
&&
b)
...
But instead, without this change, the comparison was assigned to '&&'
(well, worse actually - because there was a chained 'a && b && c' and it
was assigned to the second '&&' because of a recursive application of
this bug) and then the load folded into the comparison so breaking on
the function started at '&&' instead of 'a'.
The other part of this needs to be fixed in LLVM where it's ignoring the
location of the icmp and instead using the location of the branch
instruction.
The fix to the conditional operator is actually a no-op currently,
because the conditional operator's location coincides with 'a' (the
start of the conditional expression) but should probably be '?' instead.
See the FIXME in the test case that mentions the ARCMigration tool
failures when I tried to make that change.
llvm-svn: 227356
clang currently calls MarkVTableUsed() for classes that get their virtual
methods called or that participate in a dynamic_cast. This is unnecessary,
since CodeGen only emits vtables when it generates constructor, destructor, and
vtt code. (*)
Note that Sema::MarkVTableUsed() doesn't cause the emission of a vtable.
Its main user-visible effect is that it instantiates virtual member functions
of template classes, to make sure that if codegen decides to write a vtable
all the entries in the vtable are defined.
While this shouldn't change the behavior of codegen (other than being faster),
it does make clang more permissive: virtual methods of templates (in particular
destructors) end up being instantiated less often. In particular, classes that
have members that are smart pointers to incomplete types will now get their
implicit virtual destructor instantiated less frequently. For example, this
used to not compile but does now compile:
template <typename T> struct OwnPtr {
~OwnPtr() { static_assert((sizeof(T) > 0), "TypeMustBeComplete"); }
};
class ScriptLoader;
struct Base { virtual ~Base(); };
struct Sub : public Base {
virtual void someFun() const {}
OwnPtr<ScriptLoader> m_loader;
};
void f(Sub *s) { s->someFun(); }
The more permissive behavior matches both gcc (where this is not often
observable, since in practice most things with virtual methods have a key
function, and Sema::DefineUsedVTables() skips vtables for classes with key
functions) and cl (which is my motivation for this change) – this fixes
PR20337. See this issue and the review thread for some discussions about
optimizations.
This is similar to r213109 in spirit. r225761 was a prerequisite for this
change.
Various tests relied on "a->f()" marking a's vtable as used (in the sema
sense), switch these to just construct a on the stack. This forces
instantiation of the implicit constructor, which will mark the vtable as used.
(*) The exception is -fapple-kext mode: In this mode, qualified calls to
virtual functions (`a->Base::f()`) still go through the vtable, and since the
vtable pointer off this doesn't point to Base's vtable, this needs to reference
Base's vtable directly. To keep this working, keep referencing the vtable for
virtual calls in apple kext mode.
llvm-svn: 227073
They are referenced from the vtable. (This worked fine, but I couldn't find
an existing test for this. Maybe I didn't look hard enough.)
llvm-svn: 227072
I broke this locally while working on PR20337 and no test caught that. Now
there's coverage for this, and a comment explaining why this is needed.
llvm-svn: 227068
lit.cfg has never supported running .C files, so these tests were never
executed by check-clang. Rename them to .cpp so that they run as part of
the test suite, and minorly tweak two of them that look like they were broken
when checked in to actually pass.
llvm-svn: 227029
This causes things like assignment to refer to the '=' rather than the
LHS when attributing the store instruction, for example.
There were essentially 3 options for this:
* The beginning of an expression (this was the behavior prior to this
commit). This meant that stepping through subexpressions would bounce
around from subexpressions back to the start of the outer expression,
etc. (eg: x + y + z would go x, y, x, z, x (the repeated 'x's would be
where the actual addition occurred)).
* The end of an expression. This seems to be what GCC does /mostly/, and
certainly this for function calls. This has the advantage that
progress is always 'forwards' (never jumping backwards - except for
independent subexpressions if they're evaluated in interesting orders,
etc). "x + y + z" would go "x y z" with the additions occurring at y
and z after the respective loads.
The problem with this is that the user would still have to think
fairly hard about precedence to realize which subexpression is being
evaluated or which operator overload is being called in, say, an asan
backtrace.
* The preferred location or 'exprloc'. In this case you get sort of what
you'd expect, though it's a bit confusing in its own way due to going
'backwards'. In this case the locations would be: "x y + z +" in
lovely postfix arithmetic order. But this does mean that if the op+
were an operator overload, say, and in a backtrace, the backtrace will
point to the exact '+' that's being called, not to the end of one of
its operands.
(actually the operator overload case doesn't work yet for other reasons,
but that's being fixed - but this at least gets scalar/complex
assignments and other plain operators right)
llvm-svn: 227027
In ItaniumCXXABI::EmitCXXDestructors we first emit the base destructor
and then try to emit the complete one as an alias.
If in the base ends up calling the complete destructor, the GD for the
complete will be in the list of deferred decl by the time we replace
it with an alias and delete the original GV.
llvm-svn: 226896
Currently we emit DeferredDeclsToEmit in reverse order. This patch changes that.
The advantages of the change are that
* The output order is a bit closer to the source order. The change to
test/CodeGenCXX/pod-member-memcpys.cpp is a good example.
* If we decide to deffer more, it will not cause as large changes in the
estcases as it would without this patch.
llvm-svn: 226751
David Majnemer