extern "C" declarations should be considered like global declarations
for mangling purposes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7718
llvm-svn: 229724
What's going on here is that the ternary operator produces a std::string rvalue
that the StringRef points to. I'd hoped bugs like this were a thing of the past
with our asan testing but apparently this code path is only used when LLVM is
configured with a custom --with-c-include-dirs setting.
Unbreaks bootstrapping with GCC5 on Fedora (PR22625), patch by Jonathan Wakely!
llvm-svn: 229719
This fixes PR22492, which is in response to CWG issue #1204.
Per the CWG issue 'contexpr' variables are now allowed in
for range loops.
llvm-svn: 229716
This adds support for JavaScript class definitions (again following
TypeScript & AtScript style). This only required support for
visibility modifiers in JS, everything else was already working.
Patch by Martin Probst, thank you.
llvm-svn: 229701
This patch adds support for type annotations that follow TypeScript's,
Flow's, and AtScript's syntax style.
Patch by Martin Probst, thank you.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7721
llvm-svn: 229700
Not all targets generate 'store atomic' instructions for
'_Atomic(_Complex int)'. Some targets use the __atomic_store builtin instead.
This commit makes the test accept either one.
llvm-svn: 229676
The member gets invalidated as elements are added to the dense set. Directly
access the underlying pointer instead. Not sure how to create a test case for
this :-(. Maybe Richard can help.
llvm-svn: 229673
Add some of the missing M and R class Cortex CPUs, namely:
Cortex-M0+ (called Cortex-M0plus for GCC compatibility)
Cortex-M1
SC000
SC300
Cortex-R5
llvm-svn: 229661
We attempted to be compatible with GCC's buggy mangling for templates
with a declaration for a template argument.
However, we weren't completely successful in copying their bug in cases
like:
char foo;
template <char &C> decltype(C) f() { return foo; };
template char &f<foo>();
Instead, just follow the ABI specification. This fixes PR22621.
llvm-svn: 229644
The motivation is to fix a crash on
struct S {} s;
Foo S::~S() { s.~S(); }
What was happening here was that S::~S() was marked as invalid since its
return type is invalid, and as a consequence CheckFunctionDeclaration() wasn't
called and S::~S() didn't get merged into S's implicit destructor. This way,
the class ended up with two destructors, which confused the overload printer
when it suddenly had to print two possible destructors for `s.~S()`.
In addition to fixing the crash, this change also seems to improve diagnostics
in a few other places, see test changes.
Crash found by SLi's bot.
llvm-svn: 229639
Un-parameterize the warning as there is exactly one attribute added in C++14.
Partially addresses post-commit review comments from Richard Smith.
llvm-svn: 229636
Our mangling of <destructor-name> wasn't quite right: we'd introduce
mangling substitutions where one shouldn't be possible. We also didn't
correctly handle the case where the destroyed type was not dependent but
still a TemplateSpecializationType.
N.B. There isn't a mangling for a template-template parameter showing up
as the destroyed type. We do the 'obvious' thing and mangle the index
of the parameter.
llvm-svn: 229615
This is typically used to suppress warnings about calling snprintf and
other "deprecated" POSIX functions. Accepting this flag helps avoid tons
of useless warnings when trying out clang-cl on a new project.
Patch by Scott Graham!
llvm-svn: 229583
They autotools build has a number of missing features, supports less
OS, architectures, build configurations, doesn't have any tests and
is hard to support in sync with CMake build.
llvm-svn: 229554
This fixes PR22492, which is in response to CWG issue #1204.
Per the CWG issue 'contexpr' variables are now allowed in
for range loops.
llvm-svn: 229543
ParsePostfixExpressionSuffix() for '->' (or '.') postfixes first calls
ActOnStartCXXMemberReference() to inform sema that a member reference is about
to start, and that function lets the parser know if sema thinks that the
base expression's type could allow a pseudo destructor from a semantic point of
view (for example, if the the base expression has a dependent type).
ParsePostfixExpressionSuffix() then calls ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier() and
passes MayBePseudoDestructor on to that function, expecting the function to
set it to false if a pseudo destructor is impossible from a syntactic point of
view (due to a lack of '~' sigil). However, ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier()
had early-outs for ::new and __super, so MayBePseudoDestructor stayed true,
so we tried to parse a pseudo dtor, and then became confused since we couldn't
find a '~'. Move the snippet in ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier() that sets
MayBePseudoDestructor to false above the early exits.
Parts of this found by SLi's bot.
llvm-svn: 229449
The deprecated attribute was adopted as part of the C++14, however, there is a
GNU version available in C++11. When using C++ earlier than C++14, diagnose the
use of the attribute without the GNU scope, but only when using the generalised
attribute syntax.
llvm-svn: 229447
In the case that we diagnosed an invalid attribute due to missing or present
arguments, we would return false, indicating to the caller that the parsing
failed. However, we would have added the attribute in ParseAttributeArgsCommon
(which may have been called indirectly through ParseGNUAttributeArgs).
Returning true in this case ensures that a second copy of the attribute is not
added.
I haven't added a test case for this as the existing test will cover this with
the next commit which diagnoses a C++14 attribute applied in C++11 mode. Rather
than duplicating the existing test case, allow the tree to remain without a test
between this and the next change. We would see double warnings in the
[[deprecated()]] applied to a declaration in C++11 mode, which will cause an
error in the cxx0x-attributes test.
llvm-svn: 229446
David Majnemer