Summary: This is in preparation for LoopSink pass which calls replaceDominatedUsesWith to update after sinking.
Reviewers: chandlerc, davidxl, danielcdh
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24170
llvm-svn: 280427
This was a real restriction in the original version of SinkIfThenCodeToEnd. Now it's been rewritten, the restriction can be lifted.
As part of this, we handle a very common and useful case where one of the incoming branches is actually conditional. Consider:
if (a)
x(1);
else if (b)
x(2);
This produces the following CFG:
[if]
/ \
[x(1)] [if]
| | \
| | \
| [x(2)] |
\ | /
[ end ]
[end] has two unconditional predecessor arcs and one conditional. The conditional refers to the implicit empty 'else' arc. This same pattern can also be caused by an empty default block in a switch.
We can't sink the call to x() down to end because no call to x() happens on the third incoming arc (assume that x() has sideeffects for the sake of argument; if something is safe to speculate we could indeed sink nevertheless but this cannot happen in the general case and causes many extra selects).
We are now able to detect this case and split off the unconditional arcs to a common successor:
[if]
/ \
[x(1)] [if]
| | \
| | \
| [x(2)] |
\ / |
[sink.split] |
\ /
[ end ]
Now we can sink the call to x() into %sink.split. This can cause significant code simplification in many testcases.
llvm-svn: 280364
r279460 rewrote this function to be able to handle more than two incoming edges and took pains to ensure this didn't regress anything.
This time we change the logic for determining if an instruction should be sunk. Previously we used a single pass greedy algorithm - sink instructions until one requires more than one PHI node or we run out of instructions to sink.
This had the problem that sinking instructions that had non-identical but trivially the same operands needed extra logic so we sunk them aggressively. For example:
%a = load i32* %b %d = load i32* %b
%c = gep i32* %a, i32 0 %e = gep i32* %d, i32 1
Sinking %c and %e would naively require two PHI merges as %a != %d. But the loads are obviously equivalent (and maybe can't be hoisted because there is no common predecessor).
This is why we implemented the fairly complex function areValuesTriviallySame(), to look through trivial differences like this. However it's just not clever enough.
Instead, throw areValuesTriviallySame away, use pointer equality to check equivalence of operands and switch to a two-stage algorithm.
In the "scan" stage, we look at every sinkable instruction in isolation from end of block to front. If it's sinkable, we keep track of all operands that required PHI merging.
In the "sink" stage, we iteratively sink the last non-terminator in the source blocks. But when calculating how many PHIs are actually required to be inserted (to work out if we should stop or not) we remove any values that have already been sunk from the set of PHI-merges required, which allows us to be more aggressive.
This turns an algorithm with potentially recursive lookahead (looking through GEPs, casts, loads and any other instruction potentially not CSE'd) to two linear scans.
llvm-svn: 280351
We iterate over the result from SafeToMergeTerminators, so make it a SmallSetVector instead of a SmallPtrSet.
Should fix stage3 convergence builds.
llvm-svn: 280342
A very important case is not handled here: multiple arcs to a single block with a PHI. Consider:
a:
%1 = icmp %b, 1
br %1, label %c, label %e
c:
%2 = icmp %b, 2
br %2, label %d, label %e
d:
br %e
e:
phi [0, %a], [1, %c], [2, %d]
FoldValueComparisonIntoPredecessors will refuse to fold this, as it doesn't know how to deal with two arcs to a common destination with different PHI values. The answer is obvious - just split all conflicting arcs.
llvm-svn: 280338
We check that a sinking candidate is used by only one PHI node during our legality checks. However for instructions that are used by other sinking candidates our heuristic is less conservative. This can result in a candidate actually being illegal when we come to sink it because of how we sunk a predecessor. Do the used-by-only-one-PHI checks again during sinking to ensure we don't crash.
llvm-svn: 280228
We're sinking stores, which is a good thing, but in the process creating selects for the store address operand, which SROA/Mem2Reg can't look through, which caused serious regressions.
The real fix is in SROA, which I'll be looking into.
llvm-svn: 280219
A very important case is not handled here: multiple arcs to a single block with a PHI. Consider:
a:
%1 = icmp %b, 1
br %1, label %c, label %e
c:
%2 = icmp %b, 2
br %2, label %d, label %e
d:
br %e
e:
phi [0, %a], [1, %c], [2, %d]
FoldValueComparisonIntoPredecessors will refuse to fold this, as it doesn't know how to deal with two arcs to a common destination with different PHI values. The answer is obvious - just split all conflicting arcs.
llvm-svn: 280218
This was a real restriction in the original version of SinkIfThenCodeToEnd. Now it's been rewritten, the restriction can be lifted.
As part of this, we handle a very common and useful case where one of the incoming branches is actually conditional. Consider:
if (a)
x(1);
else if (b)
x(2);
This produces the following CFG:
[if]
/ \
[x(1)] [if]
| | \
| | \
| [x(2)] |
\ | /
[ end ]
[end] has two unconditional predecessor arcs and one conditional. The conditional refers to the implicit empty 'else' arc. This same pattern can also be caused by an empty default block in a switch.
We can't sink the call to x() down to end because no call to x() happens on the third incoming arc (assume that x() has sideeffects for the sake of argument; if something is safe to speculate we could indeed sink nevertheless but this cannot happen in the general case and causes many extra selects).
We are now able to detect this case and split off the unconditional arcs to a common successor:
[if]
/ \
[x(1)] [if]
| | \
| | \
| [x(2)] |
\ / |
[sink.split] |
\ /
[ end ]
Now we can sink the call to x() into %sink.split. This can cause significant code simplification in many testcases.
llvm-svn: 280217
r279460 rewrote this function to be able to handle more than two incoming edges and took pains to ensure this didn't regress anything.
This time we change the logic for determining if an instruction should be sunk. Previously we used a single pass greedy algorithm - sink instructions until one requires more than one PHI node or we run out of instructions to sink.
This had the problem that sinking instructions that had non-identical but trivially the same operands needed extra logic so we sunk them aggressively. For example:
%a = load i32* %b %d = load i32* %b
%c = gep i32* %a, i32 0 %e = gep i32* %d, i32 1
Sinking %c and %e would naively require two PHI merges as %a != %d. But the loads are obviously equivalent (and maybe can't be hoisted because there is no common predecessor).
This is why we implemented the fairly complex function areValuesTriviallySame(), to look through trivial differences like this. However it's just not clever enough.
Instead, throw areValuesTriviallySame away, use pointer equality to check equivalence of operands and switch to a two-stage algorithm.
In the "scan" stage, we look at every sinkable instruction in isolation from end of block to front. If it's sinkable, we keep track of all operands that required PHI merging.
In the "sink" stage, we iteratively sink the last non-terminator in the source blocks. But when calculating how many PHIs are actually required to be inserted (to work out if we should stop or not) we remove any values that have already been sunk from the set of PHI-merges required, which allows us to be more aggressive.
This turns an algorithm with potentially recursive lookahead (looking through GEPs, casts, loads and any other instruction potentially not CSE'd) to two linear scans.
llvm-svn: 280216
This was deliberately disabled during my rewrite of SinkIfThenToEnd to keep behaviour
at least vaguely consistent with the previous version and keep it as close to NFC as
I could.
There's no real reason not to merge sideeffect calls though, so let's do it! Small fixup
along the way to ensure we don't create indirect calls.
Should fix PR28964.
llvm-svn: 280215
Summary: No functional changes, just refactoring to make D23947 simpler.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23954
llvm-svn: 279982
We can't mark ORE (a function pass) preserved as required by the loop
passes because that is how we ensure that the required passes like
LazyBFI are all available any time ORE is used. See the new comments in
the patch.
Instead we use it directly just like the inliner does in D22694.
As expected there is some additional overhead after removing the caching
provided by analysis passes. The worst case, I measured was
LNT/CINT2006_ref/401.bzip2 which regresses by 12%. As before, this only
affects -Rpass-with-hotness and not default compilation.
llvm-svn: 279829
when unroll runtime iteration loop.
In llvm::UnrollRuntimeLoopRemainder, if the loop to be unrolled is the inner
loop inside a loop nest, the scalar evolution needs to be dropped for its
parent loop which is done by ScalarEvolution::forgetLoop. However, we can
postpone forgetLoop to the end of UnrollRuntimeLoopRemainder so TripCountSC
expansion can still reuse existing value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23572
llvm-svn: 279748
Given that we're not currently using blocker info, and whether or not we
will end up using it it is unclear, don't waste 8 (or 4) bytes of memory
per path node.
llvm-svn: 279493
[Recommitting now an unrelated assertion in SROA is sorted out]
The new version has several advantages:
1) IMSHO it's more readable and neater
2) It handles loads and stores properly
3) It can handle any number of incoming blocks rather than just two. I'll be taking advantage of this in a followup patch.
With this change we can now finally sink load-modify-store idioms such as:
if (a)
return *b += 3;
else
return *b += 4;
=>
%z = load i32, i32* %y
%.sink = select i1 %a, i32 5, i32 7
%b = add i32 %z, %.sink
store i32 %b, i32* %y
ret i32 %b
When this works for switches it'll be even more powerful.
Round 4. This time we should handle all instructions correctly, and not replace any operands that need to be constant with variables.
This was really hard to determine safely, so the helper function should be put into the Instruction API. I'll do that as a followup.
llvm-svn: 279460
The new version has several advantages:
1) IMSHO it's more readable and neater
2) It handles loads and stores properly
3) It can handle any number of incoming blocks rather than just two. I'll be taking advantage of this in a followup patch.
With this change we can now finally sink load-modify-store idioms such as:
if (a)
return *b += 3;
else
return *b += 4;
=>
%z = load i32, i32* %y
%.sink = select i1 %a, i32 5, i32 7
%b = add i32 %z, %.sink
store i32 %b, i32* %y
ret i32 %b
When this works for switches it'll be even more powerful.
Round 4. This time we should handle all instructions correctly, and not replace any operands that need to be constant with variables.
This was really hard to determine safely, so the helper function should be put into the Instruction API. I'll do that as a followup.
llvm-svn: 279443
Summary:
We are going to combine poisoning of red zones and scope poisoning.
PR27453
Reviewers: kcc, eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23623
llvm-svn: 279373
CGSCC use a WeakVH to track call sites. RAUW a call within a function
can result in that WeakVH getting confused about whether or not the call
site is still around.
llvm-svn: 279268
The new version has several advantages:
1) IMSHO it's more readable and neater
2) It handles loads and stores properly
3) It can handle any number of incoming blocks rather than just two. I'll be taking advantage of this in a followup patch.
With this change we can now finally sink load-modify-store idioms such as:
if (a)
return *b += 3;
else
return *b += 4;
=>
%z = load i32, i32* %y
%.sink = select i1 %a, i32 5, i32 7
%b = add i32 %z, %.sink
store i32 %b, i32* %y
ret i32 %b
When this works for switches it'll be even more powerful.
llvm-svn: 279229
Summary:
We are going to combine poisoning of red zones and scope poisoning.
PR27453
Reviewers: kcc, eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23623
llvm-svn: 279020
minimal and boring form than the old pass manager's version.
This pass does the very minimal amount of work necessary to inline
functions declared as always-inline. It doesn't support a wide array of
things that the legacy pass manager did support, but is alse ... about
20 lines of code. So it has that going for it. Notably things this
doesn't support:
- Array alloca merging
- To support the above, bottom-up inlining with careful history
tracking and call graph updates
- DCE of the functions that become dead after this inlining.
- Inlining through call instructions with the always_inline attribute.
Instead, it focuses on inlining functions with that attribute.
The first I've omitted because I'm hoping to just turn it off for the
primary pass manager. If that doesn't pan out, I can add it here but it
will be reasonably expensive to do so.
The second should really be handled by running global-dce after the
inliner. I don't want to re-implement the non-trivial logic necessary to
do comdat-correct DCE of functions. This means the -O0 pipeline will
have to be at least 'always-inline,global-dce', but that seems
reasonable to me. If others are seriously worried about this I'd like to
hear about it and understand why. Again, this is all solveable by
factoring that logic into a utility and calling it here, but I'd like to
wait to do that until there is a clear reason why the existing
pass-based factoring won't work.
The final point is a serious one. I can fairly easily add support for
this, but it seems both costly and a confusing construct for the use
case of the always inliner running at -O0. This attribute can of course
still impact the normal inliner easily (although I find that
a questionable re-use of the same attribute). I've started a discussion
to sort out what semantics we want here and based on that can figure out
if it makes sense ta have this complexity at O0 or not.
One other advantage of this design is that it should be quite a bit
faster due to checking for whether the function is a viable candidate
for inlining exactly once per function instead of doing it for each call
site.
Anyways, hopefully a reasonable starting point for this pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23299
llvm-svn: 278896
When comparing a User* to a BasicBlock::iterator in
passingValueIsAlwaysUndefined, don't dereference the iterator in case it
is end().
llvm-svn: 278872
Clearing out the AssumptionCache can cause us to rescan the entire
function for assumes. If there are many loops, then we are scanning
over the entire function many times.
Instead of clearing out the AssumptionCache, register all cloned
assumes.
llvm-svn: 278854
This reverts commit r278660.
It causes downstream assertion failure in InstCombine on shuffle
instructions. Comes up in __mm_swizzle_epi32.
llvm-svn: 278672
The new version has several advantages:
1) IMSHO it's more readable and neater
2) It handles loads and stores properly
3) It can handle any number of incoming blocks rather than just two. I'll be taking advantage of this in a followup patch.
With this change we can now finally sink load-modify-store idioms such as:
if (a)
return *b += 3;
else
return *b += 4;
=>
%z = load i32, i32* %y
%.sink = select i1 %a, i32 5, i32 7
%b = add i32 %z, %.sink
store i32 %b, i32* %y
ret i32 %b
When this works for switches it'll be even more powerful.
llvm-svn: 278660
They aren't static, and moving them to the entry block across something
else will only result in tears.
Root cause of http://crbug.com/636558.
llvm-svn: 278571
Summary:
Port the NameAnonFunction pass and add a test.
Depends on D23439.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23440
llvm-svn: 278509
We are seeing r276077 drastically increasing compiler time for our larger
benchmarks in PGO profile generation build (both clang based and IR based
mode) -- it can be 20x slower than without the patch (like from 30 secs to
780 secs)
The increased time are all in pass LCSSA. The problematic code is about
PostProcessPHIs after use-rewrite. Note that the InsertedPhis from ssa_updater
is accumulating (never been cleared). Since the inserted PHIs are added to the
candidate for each rewrite, The earlier ones will be repeatedly added. Later
when adding the new PHIs to the work-list, we don't check the duplication
either. This can result in extremely long work-list that containing tons of
duplicated PHIs.
This patch fixes the issue by hoisting the code out of the loop.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D23344
llvm-svn: 278250
Hal pointed out that the semantic of our intrinsic and the libc
call are slightly different. Add a comment while I'm here to
explain why we can't emit an intrinsic. Thanks Hal!
llvm-svn: 278200
Summary:
This hopefully fixes PR28825. The problem now was that a value from the
original loop was used in a subloop, which became a sibling after separation.
While a subloop doesn't need an lcssa phi node, a sibling does, and that's
where we broke LCSSA. The most natural way to fix this now is to simply call
formLCSSA on the original loop: it'll do what we've been doing before plus
it'll cover situations described above.
I think we don't need to run formLCSSARecursively here, and we have an assert
to verify this (I've tried testing it on LLVM testsuite + SPECs). I'd be happy
to be corrected here though.
I also changed a run line in the test from '-lcssa -loop-unroll' to
'-lcssa -loop-simplify -indvars', because it exercises LCSSA
preservation to the same extent, but also makes less unrelated
transformation on the CFG, which makes it easier to verify.
Reviewers: chandlerc, sanjoy, silvas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23288
llvm-svn: 278173
Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection
allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that
requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out
cleanly.
Thanks to David for the suggestion.
llvm-svn: 278077
Summary:
Ensure that the MemorySSA object never changes address when using the
new pass manager since the walkers contained by MemorySSA cache pointers
to it at construction time. This is achieved by wrapping the
MemorySSAAnalysis result in a unique_ptr. Also add some asserts that
check for this bug.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv, dberlin
Subscribers: mcrosier, hfinkel, chandlerc, silvas, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23171
llvm-svn: 278028
Summary:
In the use optimizer, we need to keep of whether the lower bound still
dominates us or else we may decide a lower bound is still valid when it
is not due to intervening pushes/pops. Fixes PR28880 (and probably a
bunch of other things).
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: MatzeB, llvm-commits, sebpop
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23237
llvm-svn: 277978
Summary:
The correctness fix here is that when we CSE a load with another load,
we need to combine the metadata on the two loads. This matches the
behavior of other passes, like instcombine and GVN.
There's also a minor optimization improvement here: for load PRE, the
aliasing metadata on the inserted load should be the same as the
metadata on the original load. Not sure why the old code was throwing
it away.
Issue found by inspection.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21460
llvm-svn: 277977
Summary:
Originally the plan was to use the custom worklist to do some block popping,
and because we don't actually need a visited set. The custom one we have
here is slightly broken, and it's not worth fixing vs using depth_first_iterator since we aren't going to go the route we originally
were.
Fixes PR28874
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits, gberry
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23187
llvm-svn: 277880
This fixes PR28825. The problem was that we only checked if a value from
a created inner loop is used in the outer loop, and fixed LCSSA for
them. But we missed to fixup LCSSA for values used in exits of the outer
loop.
llvm-svn: 277877
Summary: We do not care about intrinsic calls when assigning discriminators.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23212
llvm-svn: 277843
This generated IR based on the order of evaluation, which is different
between GCC and Clang. With that in mind you get bootstrap miscompares
if you compare a Clang built with GCC-built Clang vs. Clang built with
Clang-built Clang. Diagnosing that made my head hurt.
This also reverts commit r277337, which "fixed" the test case.
llvm-svn: 277820
Not a correctness issue, but it would be nice if we didn't have to
recompute our block numbering (worst-case) every time we move MSSA.
llvm-svn: 277652
This reverts commit r277611 and the followup r277614.
Bootstrap builds and chromium builds are crashing during inlining after
this change.
llvm-svn: 277642
This is a follow-up to r277637. It teaches MemorySSA that invariant
loads (and loads of provably constant memory) are always liveOnEntry.
llvm-svn: 277640
This patch makes MemorySSA recognize atomic/volatile loads, and makes
MSSA treat said loads specially. This allows us to be a bit more
aggressive in some cases.
Administrative note: Revision was LGTM'ed by reames in person.
Additionally, this doesn't include the `invariant.load` recognition in
the differential revision, because I feel it's better to commit that
separately. Will commit soon.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D16875
llvm-svn: 277637
It is possible for the value map to not have an entry for some value
that has already been removed.
I don't have a testcase, this is fall-out from a buildbot.
llvm-svn: 277614
We were able to figure out that the result of a call is some constant.
While propagating that fact, we added the constant to the value map.
This is problematic because it results in us losing the call site when
processing the value map.
This fixes PR28802.
llvm-svn: 277611
This fixes a bug where we'd sometimes cache overly-conservative results
with our walker. This bug was made more obvious by r277480, which makes
our cache far more spotty than it was. Test case is llvm-unit, because
we're likely going to use CachingWalker only for def optimization in the
future.
The bug stems from that there was a place where the walker assumed that
`DefNode.Last` was a valid target to cache to when failing to optimize
phis. This is sometimes incorrect if we have a cache hit. The fix is to
use the thing we *can* assume is a valid target to cache to. :)
llvm-svn: 277559
Summary: We really want to move towards MemoryLocOrCall (or fix AA) everywhere, but for now, this lets us have a single instructionClobbersQuery.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23072
llvm-svn: 277530
As agreed in post-commit review of r265388, I'm switching the flag to
its original value until the 90% runtime performance regression on
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Stanford/Bubblesort is addressed.
llvm-svn: 277524
Fixes PR28670
Summary:
Rewrite the use optimizer to be less memory intensive and 50% faster.
Fixes PR28670
The new use optimizer works like a standard SSA renaming pass, storing
all possible versions a MemorySSA use could get in a stack, and just
tracking indexes into the stack.
This uses much less memory than caching N^2 alias query results.
It's also a lot faster.
The current version defers phi node walking to the normal walker.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23032
llvm-svn: 277480
Added ability to estimate the entry count of the extracted function and
the branch probabilities of the exit branches.
Patch by River Riddle!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22744
llvm-svn: 277411
Using RAUW was wrong here; if we have a switch transform such as:
18 -> 6 then
6 -> 0
If we use RAUW, while performing the second transform the *transformed* 6
from the first will be also replaced, so we end up with:
18 -> 0
6 -> 0
Found by clang stage2 bootstrap; testcase added.
llvm-svn: 277332
If a switch is sparse and all the cases (once sorted) are in arithmetic progression, we can extract the common factor out of the switch and create a dense switch. For example:
switch (i) {
case 5: ...
case 9: ...
case 13: ...
case 17: ...
}
can become:
if ( (i - 5) % 4 ) goto default;
switch ((i - 5) / 4) {
case 0: ...
case 1: ...
case 2: ...
case 3: ...
}
or even better:
switch ( ROTR(i - 5, 2) {
case 0: ...
case 1: ...
case 2: ...
case 3: ...
}
The division and remainder operations could be costly so we only do this if the factor is a power of two, and emit a right-rotate instead of a divide/remainder sequence. Dense switches can be lowered significantly better than sparse switches and can even be transformed into lookup tables.
llvm-svn: 277325
When extracting a set of blocks make sure to inherit all of the target
dependent attributes to make sure that the function will be valid for
lowering. One example is the "target-features" attribute for x86, if the
extracted region has functionality that relies on a specific feature it
will fail to be lowered.
This also allows for extracted functions to be valid for inlining, at
least back into the parent function, as the target attributes are tested
when inlining for compatibility.
Patch by River Riddle!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22713
llvm-svn: 277315
Added ability to estimate the entry count of the extracted function and
the branch probabilities of the exit branches.
Patch by River Riddle!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22744
llvm-svn: 277313
Dehao Chen