Dummy is a word with inappropriate associations. This patch updates the
references to it in clangd code base with more precise ones.
The only user-visible change is the default variable name used when extracting a
variable. It will be named as `placeholder` from now on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99065
Implement initial support for pull-based diagnostics in ClangdServer.
This is planned for LSP 3.17, and initial proposal is in
d15eb0671e/protocol/src/common/proposed.diagnostic.ts (L111).
We chose to serve the requests only when clangd has a fresh preamble
available. In case of a stale preamble we just drop the request on the
floor.
This patch doesn't plumb this to LSP layer yet, as pullDiags is still a
proposal with only an implementation in vscode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98623
Refactor cross file rename to use a Filesystem instead of a function for getting buffer contents of open files.
Depends on D94554
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95043
Create a `ThreadsafeFS` in the `DraftStore` that overlays the dirty file contents over another `ThreadsafeFS`.
This provides a nice thread-safe interface for using dirty file contents throughout the codebase, for example cross file refactoring.
Creating a Filesystem view will overlay a snapshot of the current contents, so if the draft store is updated while the view is being used, it will contain stale contents.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94554
As pointed out in D96244, "Module" is already pretty overloaded to refer
to clang and llvm modules. (And clangd deals directly with the former).
FeatureModule is a bit of a mouthful but it's pretty self-descriptive.
I think it might be better than "Component" which doesn't really capture
the "common interface" aspect - it's IMO confusing to refer to
"components" but exclude CDB for example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97950
Clangd can invalidate client state of features like semantic higlighting
without client explicitly triggering, for example after a preamble build
caused by an onSave notification on a different file.
This patch introduces a mechanism to let client know of such actions,
and also calls the workspace/semanticTokens/refresh request to
demonstrate the situation after each preamble build.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/699.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97548
ClangdServer already gets notified of every change, so it makes sense for it to
be the source of truth.
This is a step towards having ClangdServer expose a FS that includes dirty
buffers: D94554
Related changes:
- version is now optional for ClangdServer, to preserve our existing fuzziness
in this area (missing version ==> autoincrement)
- ClangdServer::format{File,Range} are now more regular ClangdServer functions
that don't need the code passed in. While here, combine into one function.
- incremental content update logic is moved from DraftStore to
ClangdLSPServer, with most of the implementation in SourceCode.cpp.
DraftStore is now fairly trivial, and will probably ultimately be
*replaced* by the dirty FS stuff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97738
blockUntilIdle of a parent can't always be correctly implemented as
return ChildA.blockUntilIdle() && ChildB.blockUntilIdle()
The problem is that B can schedule work on A while we're waiting on it.
I believe this is theoretically possible today between CDB and background index.
Modules open more possibilities and it's hard to reason about all of them.
I don't have a perfect fix, and the abstraction is too good to lose. this patch:
- calls out why we block on workscheduler first, and asserts correctness
- documents the issue
- reduces the practical possibility of spuriously returning true significantly
This function is ultimately only for testing, so we're driving down flake rate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96856
This is obsoleted by the standard semanticTokens request family.
As well as the protocol details, this allows us to remove a bunch of plumbing
around pushing highlights to clients.
This should not land until the new protocol has feature parity, see D77702.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95576
This allows quick tasks without dependencies that
need to run fast to run ASAP. This is mostly useful
for code formatting.
----------------------------
This fixes something that's been annoying me:
- Open your IDE workspace and its 20 open files
- Clangd spends 5 minutes parsing it all
- In the meantime you start to work
- Save a file, trigger format-on-save, which hangs because clangd is busy
- You're stuck waiting until clangd is done parsing your files before the formatting and save takes place
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94875
This is a step towards allowing CDB behavior to being configurable.
Previously ClangdServer itself created the configs and installed them into
contexts. This was natural as it knows how to deal with resulting diagnostics.
However this prevents config being used in CDB, which must be created before
ClangdServer. So we extract the context provider (config loader) as a separate
object, which publishes diagnostics to a ClangdServer::Callbacks itself.
Now initialization looks like:
- First create the config::Provider
- Then create the ClangdLSPServer, passing config provider
- Next, create the context provider, passing config provider + diagnostic callbacks
- now create the CDB, passing context provider
- finally create ClangdServer, passing CDB, context provider, and diagnostic callbacks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95087
These force a couple of flags or that are now on by default.
So the flags don't currently do anything unless the compile command has
-fno-recovery-ast explicitly.
(For turning recovery *off* for debugging we can inject the flag with config)
This leaves the command-line flags around with no effect, I'm planning to add
a "retired flag" mechanism shortly in a separate patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94724
This patch only introduces new signals but does not use their value
in scoring a CC candidate. Usage of these signals in CC ranking in both
heiristics and ML model will be introduced in later patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94473
clangd actions have various naming schemes, the most
common being PascalCase. This commit applies PascalCase
to all clangd actions, and fix the status rendering
in `renderTUAction` to look more consistent.
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93546
We don't act as a language server for these files (e.g. don't get open/close
notifications for them), but just blindly publish diagnostics for them.
This works reasonably well in coc.nvim and vscode: they show up in the
workspace diagnostic list and when you open the file.
The only update after the file is reparsed, not as you type which is a bit
janky, but seems a lot better than nothing.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/614
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92704
Added some new ClangTidyOptionsProvider like classes designed for clangd work flow.
These providers are designed to source the options on the worker thread but in a thread safe manner.
This is done through making the options getter take a pointer to the filesystem used by the worker thread which natuarally is from a ThreadsafeFS.
Internal caching in the providers is also guarded.
The providers don't inherit from `ClangTidyOptionsProvider` instead they share a base class which is able to create a provider for the `ClangTidyContext` using a specific FileSystem.
This approach means one provider can be used for multiple contexts even though `ClangTidyContext` owns its provider.
Depends on D90531
Reviewed By: sammccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91029
This is a mass-market version of the "dump AST" tweak we have behind
-hidden-features.
I think in this friendlier form it'll be useful for people outside clang
developers, which would justify making it a real feature.
It could be useful as a step towards lightweight clang-AST tooling in clangd
itself (like matcher-based search).
Advantages over the tweak:
- simplified information makes it more accessible, likely somewhat useful
without learning too much clang internals
- can be shown in a tree view
- structured information gives some options for presentation (e.g.
icon + two text colors + tooltip in vscode)
- clickable nodes jump to the corresponding code
Disadvantages:
- a bunch of code to handle different node types
- likely missing some important info vs dump-ast due to brevity/oversight
- may end up chasing/maintaining support for the long tail of nodes
Demo with VSCode support: https://imgur.com/a/6gKfyIV
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89571
If the NewName is provided, prepareRename would perform a name
validation.
The motivation is to allow our internal embeder implement the customized
"canRenameInto" functionality on top of prepareRename.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88881
several changes:
- return a structure result in rename API;
- prepareRename now returns more information (main-file occurrences);
- remove the duplicated detecting-touch-identifier code in prepareRename (which is implemented in rename API);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88634
Intent was a nice idea but it ends up being a bit awkward/heavyweight
without adding much.
In particular, it makes it hard to implement `CodeActionParams.only` properly
(there's an inheritance hierarchy for kinds).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88427
Summary:
This is considerably terser than the makeStringError and friends, and
avoids verbosity cliffs that discourage adding log information.
It follows the syntax used in log/elog/vlog/dlog that have been successful.
The main caveats are:
- it's strictly out-of-place in logger.h, though kind of fits thematically and
in implementation
- it claims the "error" identifier, which seems a bit too opinionated
to put higher up in llvm
I've updated some users of StringError mostly at random - there are lots
more mechanical changes but I'd like to get this reviewed before making
them all.
Reviewers: kbobyrev, hokein
Subscribers: mgorny, ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83419
Summary: This will be needed to support call hierarchy
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83536
Summary:
This enables sharing the logic between standalone clangd and embedders
of it. The new approach should be same performance-wise, as it is only called
once per addDocument call.
This patch also introduces a blacklisting code path for disabling crashy or
high-noise tests, until we figure out a way to make them work with clangd-setup.
The biggest difference is the way we make use of preambles, hence those checks
can't see directives coming from the preamble section of the file. The second
thing is the fact that code might-not be compiling while clangd is trying to
build an AST, hence some checks might choke on those incomplete ASTs.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83224
I've dropped the background context parameter, since we in practice just pass the
current context there, and we now have a different way to specify context too.
While here, clean up a couple of comments.
Reviewed By: kadircet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83157
This lets basic AST-consuming actions be defined outside clangdserver.
(it essentially exposes TUScheduler::runWithAST).
Two use cases for now:
- replace ClangdServer::dumpAST, which doesn't really belong in the public
interface (a followup patch will do this)
- allow embedders to add/experiment with extra features
(e.g. I know some who want to try crazy AST+ML code completion...)
Maybe in the future we should use this sort of mechanism to make ClangdServer
less of a monolith, but that's not in scope for now.
This would probably require a richer and more carefully-thought-out API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85883
Summary:
This is motivated by:
- code completion: nice to do no i/o on the request path
- background index: deciding whether to enqueue each file would stat the config
file thousands of times in quick succession.
Currently it's applied uniformly to all requests though.
This gives up on performing stat() outside the lock, all this achieves is
letting multiple threads stat concurrently (and thus finish without contention
for nonexistent files).
The ability to finish without IO (just mutex lock + integer check) should
outweigh this, and is less sensitive to platform IO characteristics.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83755
Summary:
This patch introduces basic textDocument/foldingRange support. It relies on
textDocument/documentSymbols to collect all symbols and uses takes ranges
to create folds.
The next steps for textDocument/foldingRange support would be:
* Implementing FoldingRangeClientCapabilities and respecting respect client
preferences
* Specifying folding range kind
* Migrating from DocumentSymbol implementation to custom RecursiveASTVisitor flow that will allow more flexibility
* Supporting more folding range types: comments, PP conditional regions, includes and other code regions (e.g. public/private/protected sections of classes, control flow statement bodies)
Tested: (Neo)Vim (coc-clangd) and VSCode.
Related issue: https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/310
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: nridge, ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82436
Kadir Cetinkaya