Summary:
Replace getDataLayout() with a createDataLayout() method to make
explicit that it is intended to create a DataLayout only and not
accessing it for other purpose.
This change is the last of a series of commits dedicated to have a
single DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned
by the module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11103
(cherry picked from commit 5609fc56bca971e5a7efeaa6ca4676638eaec5ea)
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 243114
This reverts commit 0f720d984f419c747709462f7476dff962c0bc41.
It breaks clang too badly, I need to prepare a proper patch for clang
first.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 243089
Summary:
Replace getDataLayout() with a createDataLayout() method to make
explicit that it is intended to create a DataLayout only and not
accessing it for other purpose.
This change is the last of a series of commits dedicated to have a
single DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned
by the module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11103
(cherry picked from commit 5609fc56bca971e5a7efeaa6ca4676638eaec5ea)
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 243083
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
This patch is quite boring overall, except for some uglyness in
ASMPrinter which has a getDataLayout function but has some clients
that use it without a Module (llmv-dsymutil, llvm-dwarfdump), so
some methods are taking a DataLayout as parameter.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11090
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 242386
We have a detailed def/use lists for every physical register in
MachineRegisterInfo anyway, so there is little use in maintaining an
additional bitset of which ones are used.
Removing it frees us from extra book keeping. This simplifies
VirtRegMap.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10911
llvm-svn: 242173
This changes TargetFrameLowering::processFunctionBeforeCalleeSavedScan():
- Rename the function to determineCalleeSaves()
- Pass a bitset of callee saved registers by reference, thus avoiding
the function-global PhysRegUsed bitset in MachineRegisterInfo.
- Without PhysRegUsed the implementation is fine tuned to not save
physcial registers which are only read but never modified.
Related to rdar://21539507
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10909
llvm-svn: 242165
Force all creators of `MCSubtargetInfo` to immediately initialize it,
merging the default constructor and the initializer into an initializing
constructor. Besides cleaning up the code a little, this makes it clear
that the initializer is never called again later.
Out-of-tree backends need a trivial change: instead of calling:
auto *X = new MCSubtargetInfo();
InitXYZMCSubtargetInfo(X, ...);
return X;
they should call:
return createXYZMCSubtargetInfoImpl(...);
There's no real functionality change here.
llvm-svn: 241957
Summary:
Remove empty subclass in the process.
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren, ted
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11045
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241780
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11042
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241779
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11037
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241776
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, ted, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11028
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241775
- Implement copying ASR to/from GPR regs.
- Mark ASRs as non-allocatable, so it won't try to arbitrarily use
them inappropriately.
- Instead of inserting explicit WRASR/RDASR nodes in the MUL/DIV
routines, just do normal register copies.
- Also...mark div as using Y, not just writing it.
Added a test case with some code which previously died with an
assertion failure (with -O0), or produced wrong code (otherwise).
(Third time's the charm?)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10401
llvm-svn: 241686
Summary:
This concludes the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
At this point, the StringRef-form of GNU Triples should only be used in the
public API (including IR serialization) and a couple objects that directly
interact with the API (most notably the Module class). The next step is to
replace these Triple objects with the TargetTuple object that will represent
our authoratative/unambiguous internal equivalent to GNU Triples.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski, ted, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10962
llvm-svn: 241472
These are mostly from the chart in the SparcV8 spec, section "A.3
Synthetic Instructions".
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9834
llvm-svn: 241461
There is some functional change here because it changes target code from
atoi(3) to StringRef::getAsInteger which has error checking. For valid
constraints there should be no difference.
llvm-svn: 241411
Move some instructions into order of sections in the spec, as the rest
already were.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9102
llvm-svn: 241163
represented by uint64_t, this patch replaces these
usages with the FeatureBitset (std::bitset) type.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10542
llvm-svn: 241058
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
They had been getting emitted as a section + offset reference, which
is bogus since the value needs to be the offset within the GOT, not
the actual address of the symbol's object.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10441
llvm-svn: 240020
Summary:
For the moment, TargetMachine::getTargetTriple() still returns a StringRef.
This continues the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
Reviewers: rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: ted, llvm-commits, rengolin, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10362
llvm-svn: 239554
Summary:
This continues the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
Reviewers: rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: rafael, ted, jfb, llvm-commits, rengolin, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10311
llvm-svn: 239467
Summary:
This continues the patch series to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU triples
from the internals of LLVM that began in r239036.
Reviewers: echristo, rafael
Reviewed By: rafael
Subscribers: rafael, llvm-commits, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10243
llvm-svn: 239464
Summary:
This is the first of several patches to eliminate StringRef forms of GNU
triples from the internals of LLVM. After this is complete, GNU triples
will be replaced by a more authoratitive representation in the form of
an LLVM TargetTuple.
Reviewers: rengolin
Reviewed By: rengolin
Subscribers: ted, llvm-commits, rengolin, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10236
llvm-svn: 239036
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first several times this was committed (e.g. r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
Apparently the reason for most failures was both clang and gcc's inability to deal with large numbers (> 10K) of bitset constructor calls in tablegen-generated initializers of instruction info tables.
This should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 238192
This starts merging MCSection and MCSectionData.
There are a few issues with the current split between MCSection and
MCSectionData.
* It optimizes the the not as important case. We want the production
of .o files to be really fast, but the split puts the information used
for .o emission in a separate data structure.
* The ELF/COFF/MachO hierarchy is not represented in MCSectionData,
leading to some ad-hoc ways to represent the various flags.
* It makes it harder to remember where each item is.
The attached patch starts merging the two by moving the alignment from
MCSectionData to MCSection.
Most of the patch is actually just dropping 'const', since
MCSectionData is mutable, but MCSection was not.
llvm-svn: 237936
This pseudo-instruction expands into 'sethi' and 'or' instructions,
or, just one of them, if the other isn't necessary for a given value.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9089
llvm-svn: 237585
- Adds support for the asm syntax, which has an immediate integer
"ASI" (address space identifier) appearing after an address, before
a comma.
- Adds the various-width load, store, and swap in alternate address
space instructions. (ldsba, ldsha, lduba, lduha, lda, stba, stha,
sta, swapa)
This does not attempt to hook these instructions up to pointer address
spaces in LLVM, although that would probably be a reasonable thing to
do in the future.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8904
llvm-svn: 237581
(Note that register "Y" is essentially just ASR0).
Also added some test cases for divide and multiply, which had none before.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8670
llvm-svn: 237580
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first two times this was committed (r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM and MIPS ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 237234
This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find safe points that are cheaper than the entry and exits
blocks.
As an example and to avoid regressions to be introduce, this patch also
implements the required bits to enable the shrink-wrapping pass for AArch64.
** Context **
Currently we insert the prologue and epilogue of the method/function in the
entry and exits blocks. Although this is correct, we can do a better job when
those are not immediately required and insert them at less frequently executed
places.
The job of the shrink-wrapping pass is to identify such places.
** Motivating example **
Let us consider the following function that perform a call only in one branch of
a if:
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%tmp = alloca i32, align 4
%tmp2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
br i1 %tmp2, label %true, label %false
true:
store i32 %a, i32* %tmp, align 4
%tmp4 = call i32 @doSomething(i32 0, i32* %tmp)
br label %false
false:
%tmp.0 = phi i32 [ %tmp4, %true ], [ %a, %0 ]
ret i32 %tmp.0
}
On AArch64 this code generates (removing the cfi directives to ease
readabilities):
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
LBB0_2: ; %false
mov sp, x29
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
ret
With shrink-wrapping we could generate:
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
add sp, x29, #16 ; =16
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
LBB0_2: ; %false
ret
Therefore, we would pay the overhead of setting up/destroying the frame only if
we actually do the call.
** Proposed Solution **
This patch introduces a new machine pass that perform the shrink-wrapping
analysis (See the comments at the beginning of ShrinkWrap.cpp for more details).
It then stores the safe save and restore point into the MachineFrameInfo
attached to the MachineFunction.
This information is then used by the PrologEpilogInserter (PEI) to place the
related code at the right place. This pass runs right before the PEI.
Unlike the original paper of Chow from PLDI’88, this implementation of
shrink-wrapping does not use expensive data-flow analysis and does not need hack
to properly avoid frequently executed point. Instead, it relies on dominance and
loop properties.
The pass is off by default and each target can opt-in by setting the
EnableShrinkWrap boolean to true in their derived class of TargetPassConfig.
This setting can also be overwritten on the command line by using
-enable-shrink-wrap.
Before you try out the pass for your target, make sure you properly fix your
emitProlog/emitEpilog/adjustForXXX method to cope with basic blocks that are not
necessarily the entry block.
** Design Decisions **
1. ShrinkWrap is its own pass right now. It could frankly be merged into PEI but
for debugging and clarity I thought it was best to have its own file.
2. Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some
point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, the impacted
component would then be:
- The pass itself: New algorithm needed.
- MachineFrameInfo: Hold a list or set of Save/Restore point instead of one
pointer.
- PEI: Should loop over the save point and restore point.
Anyhow, at least for this first iteration, I do not believe this is interesting
to support the complex cases. We should revisit that when we motivating
examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9210
<rdar://problem/3201744>
llvm-svn: 236507
Mehdi Amini