The "macosx" OS type is still the canonical type. In the future "macos" will
become the canonical OS type (but we will still support "macosx").
rdar://27043820
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32748
llvm-svn: 302011
Summary: This is a common pattern that arise when legalizing large integers operations. Only do it when Y + 1 cannot overflow as this would change the carry behavior of uaddo .
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32687
llvm-svn: 301922
Summary: Common pattern when legalizing large integers operations. Similar to D32687, when the carry isn't used.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32738
llvm-svn: 301919
PR31088 demonstrated that we were assuming that only integers require promotion from <1 x iX> types, when in fact float types may require it as well - in this case half floats.
This patch adds support for extension/truncation for both integer and float types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32391
llvm-svn: 301910
The existing code only looks at half of the tree when matching bswap + rol patterns ending in an OR tree (as opposed to a cascade).
Patch originally introduced by Jim Lewis.
Submitted on the behalf of Dinar Temirbulatov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32039
llvm-svn: 301907
This tracks whether MaxCallFrameSize is computed yet. Ideally we would
assert and fail when the value is queried before it is computed, however
this fails various targets that need to be fixed first.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32570
llvm-svn: 301851
This is the SelectionDAG version of D32521. If know where at least one 1 is located in the input to these intrinsics we can place an upper bound on the number of bits needed to represent the count and thus increase the number of known zeros in the output.
I think we can also refine this further for CTTZ_UNDEF/CTLZ_UNDEF by assuming that the answer will never be BitWidth. I've left this out for now because it caused other test failures across multiple targets. Usually because of turning ADD into OR based on this new information.
I'll fix CTPOP in a future patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32692
llvm-svn: 301806
We discussed shrinking/widening of selects in IR in D26556, and I'll try to get back to that
patch eventually. But I'm hoping that this transform is less iffy in the DAG where we can check
legality of the select that we want to produce.
A few things to note:
1. We can't wait until after legalization and do this generically because (at least in the x86
tests from PR14657), we'll have PACKSS and bitcasts in the pattern.
2. This might benefit more of the SSE codegen if we lifted the legal-or-custom requirement, but
that requires a closer look to make sure we don't end up worse.
3. There's a 'vblendv' opportunity that we're missing that results in andn/and/or in some cases.
That should be fixed next.
4. I'm assuming that AVX1 offers the worst of all worlds wrt uneven ISA support with multiple
legal vector sizes, but if there are other targets like that, we should add more tests.
5. There's a codegen miracle in the multi-BB tests from PR14657 (the gcc auto-vectorization tests):
despite IR that is terrible for the target, this patch allows us to generate the optimal loop
code because something post-ISEL is hoisting the splat extends above the vector loops.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32620
llvm-svn: 301781
Summary: As per discution on how to get better codegen an large int legalization, it became clear that using a glue for the carry was preventing several desirable optimizations. Passing the carry down as a value allow for more flexibility.
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29872
llvm-svn: 301775
Summary:
Predicate<> now has a field to indicate how often it must be recomputed.
Currently, there are two frequencies, per-module (RecomputePerFunction==0)
and per-function (RecomputePerFunction==1). Per-function predicates are
currently recomputed more frequently than necessary since the only predicate
in this category is cheap to test. Per-module predicates are now computed in
getSubtargetImpl() while per-function predicates are computed in selectImpl().
Tablegen now manages the PredicateBitset internally. It should only be
necessary to add the required includes.
Also fixed a problem revealed by the test case where
constrainSelectedInstRegOperands() would attempt to tie operands that
BuildMI had already tied.
Reviewers: ab, qcolombet, t.p.northover, rovka, aditya_nandakumar
Reviewed By: rovka
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32491
llvm-svn: 301750
Fixes the issue highlighted in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2014-June/037500.html.
The DW_AT_decl_file and DW_AT_decl_line attributes on namespaces can
prevent LLVM from uniquing types that are in the same namespace. They
also don't carry any meaningful information.
rdar://problem/17484998
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32648
llvm-svn: 301706
Reapplied r299221 after fix for nondeterminism in ThinLTO builder (rL301599), with extra check for implicit truncation of inserted element.
llvm-svn: 301644
This is a follow up to the fix in r298360 to improve the handling of debug
values when redundant LEAs are removed. The fix in r298360 effectively
discarded the debug values. This patch now attempts to preserve the debug
values by using the DWARF DW_OP_stack_value operation via prependDIExpr.
Moved functions appendOffset and prependDIExpr from Local.cpp to
DebugInfoMetadata.cpp and made them available as static member functions of
DIExpression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31604
llvm-svn: 301630
Summary:
In some cases LLVM (especially the SLP vectorizer) will create vectors
that are 256 bytes (or larger). Given that this is intentional[0] is
likely to get more common, this patch updates the StackMap binary
format to deal with the spill locations for said vectors.
This change also bumps the stack map version from 2 to 3.
[0]: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32533#738350
Reviewers: reames, kavon, skatkov, javed.absar
Subscribers: mcrosier, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32629
llvm-svn: 301615
Summary:
The type of the target frame index is intptr, not the type of the value we're
going to store into it. Without this change we crash in the attached test case
when trying to type-legalize a TargetFrameIndex.
Patchpoint lowering types the target frame index as intptr as well.
Reviewers: reames, bogner, arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32256
llvm-svn: 301566
Besides better codegen, the motivation is to be able to canonicalize this pattern
in IR (currently we don't) knowing that the backend is prepared for that.
This may also allow removing code for special constant cases in
DAGCombiner::foldSelectOfConstants() that was added in D30180.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31944
llvm-svn: 301457
Build vectors have magical truncation powers, so we have things like this:
v4i1 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i32<1>, Constant:i32<1>, Constant:i32<1>, Constant:i32<1>
v4i16 = BUILD_VECTOR Constant:i32<1>, Constant:i32<1>, Constant:i32<1>, Constant:i32<1>
If we don't truncate the splat node returned by getConstantSplatNode(), then we won't find
truth when ZeroOrNegativeOneBooleanContent is the rule.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32505
llvm-svn: 301408
This patch reapplies r301309 with the fix to the MIR test to fix the assertion
triggered by r301309. Had trimmed a little bit too much from the MIR!
llvm-svn: 301317
This patch fixes a bug with the updating of DBG_VALUE's in
BreakAntiDependencies. Previously, it would only attempt to update the first
DBG_VALUE following the instruction whose register is being changed,
potentially leaving DBG_VALUE's referring to the wrong register. Now the code
will update all DBG_VALUE's that immediately follow the instruction.
This issue was detected as a result of an optimized codegen difference with
"-g" where an X86 byte/word fixup was not performed due to a DBG_VALUE
referencing the wrong register.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31755
llvm-svn: 301309
I'm proposing a fold for increment-of-sexted-bool in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31944
...so we need to know what happens in more cases like these.
llvm-svn: 301269
When functions are terminated by unreachable instructions, the last
instruction might trigger a CFI instruction to be generated. However,
emitting it would be be illegal since the function (and thus the FDE
the CFI is in) has already ended with the previous instruction.
Darwin's dwarfdump --verify --eh-frame complains about this and the
specification supports this.
Relevant bits from the DWARF 5 standard (6.4 Call Frame Information):
"[The] address_range [field in an FDE]: The number of bytes of
program instructions described by this entry."
"Row creation instructions: [...]
The new location value is always greater than the current one."
The first quotation implies that a CFI cannot describe a target
address outside of the enclosing FDE's range.
rdar://problem/26244988
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32246
llvm-svn: 301219
While we use BaseIndexOffset in FindBetterNeighborChains to
appropriately realize they're almost the same address and should be
improved concurrently we do not use it in isAlias using the non-index
understanding FindBaseOffset instead. Adding a BaseIndexOffset check
in isAlias like should allow indexed stores to be merged.
FindBaseOffset to be excised in subsequent patch.
Reviewers: jyknight, aditya_nandakumar, bogner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31987
llvm-svn: 301187
Since Split DWARF needs to name the actual .dwo file that is generated,
it can't be known at the time the llvm::Module is produced as it may be
merged with other Modules before the object is generated and that object
may be generated with any name.
By passing the Split DWARF file name when LLVM is producing object code
the .dwo file name in the object file can match correctly.
The support for Split DWARF for implicit modules remains the same -
using metadata to store the dwo name and dwo id so that potentially
multiple skeleton CUs referring to different dwo files can be generated
from one llvm::Module.
llvm-svn: 301062
In addition to the original commit, tighten the condition for when to
pad empty functions to COFF Windows. This avoids running into problems
when targeting e.g. Win32 AMDGPU, which caused test failures when this
was committed initially.
llvm-svn: 301047
Empty functions can lead to duplicate entries in the Guard CF Function
Table of a binary due to multiple functions sharing the same RVA,
causing the kernel to refuse to load that binary.
We had a terrific bug due to this in Chromium.
It turns out we were already doing this for Mach-O in certain
situations. This patch expands the code for that in
AsmPrinter::EmitFunctionBody() and renames
TargetInstrInfo::getNoopForMachoTarget() to simply getNoop() since it
seems it was used for not just Mach-O anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32330
llvm-svn: 301040
places based on it.
Existing constant hoisting pass will merge a group of contants in a small range
and hoist the const materialization code to the common dominator of their uses.
However, if the uses are all in cold pathes, existing implementation may hoist
the materialization code from cold pathes to a hot place. This may hurt performance.
The patch introduces BFI to the pass and selects the best insertion places based
on it.
The change is controlled by an option consthoist-with-block-frequency which is
off by default for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28962
llvm-svn: 300989
when the subtarget has fast strings.
This has two advantages:
- Speed is improved. For example, on Haswell thoughput improvements increase
linearly with size from 256 to 512 bytes, after which they plateau:
(e.g. 1% for 260 bytes, 25% for 400 bytes, 40% for 508 bytes).
- Code is much smaller (no need to handle boundaries).
llvm-svn: 300957
Debug information is calculated with getFrameIndexReference() which was
missing some logic for the fixed object cases (= parameters on the stack).
rdar://24557797
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32204
llvm-svn: 300781
I've changed one of the tests to not fold away, but we didn't and still don't do the transform
that the comment claims we do (and I don't know why we'd want to do that).
Follow-up to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300725https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300763
llvm-svn: 300772
This allows forming more 'not' ops, so we get improvements for ISAs that have and-not.
Follow-up to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300725
llvm-svn: 300763
The patch itself is simple: stop discriminating against vectors in visitAnd() and again in
SimplifyDemandedBits().
Some notes for reference:
1. We're not consistent about calls to SimplifyDemandedBits in the various visitXXX functions.
Sometimes, we check if the RHS is a constant first. Other times (like here), we just dive in.
2. I'd like to break the vector shackles in steps for the sake of risk minimization, but we could
make similar simultaneous changes in other places if we think that would be better.
3. I don't know what the intent of the changed tests in this patch was supposed to be, but since
they wiggled in a positive way, I'm just going with that. :)
4. In the rotate tests, note that we can see through non-splat constants. This is a result of D24253.
5. My motivation for being here now is to make D31944 look better, so this is step 1 of N towards
improving the vector codegen in that patch without writing any actual new code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32230
llvm-svn: 300725
Android x86_64 target uses f128 type and stores f128 values in %xmm* registers.
SoftenFloatRes_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT should not convert result value
from f128 to i128.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D32102
llvm-svn: 300583
Remove non-consecutive stores from store merge candidate search as
they cannot be merged and will prevent us from finding subsequent
mergeable store cases.
Reviewers: jyknight, bogner, javed.absar, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32086
llvm-svn: 300561
Our 16 bit support is assembler-only + the terrible hack that is
.code16gcc. Simply using 32 bit registers does the right thing for the
latter.
Fixes PR32681.
llvm-svn: 300429
Summary:
In PR32594, inline assembly using the 'A' constraint on x86_64 causes
llvm to crash with a "Cannot select" stack trace. This is because
`X86TargetLowering::getRegForInlineAsmConstraint` hardcodes that 'A'
means the EAX and EDX registers.
However, on x86_64 it means the RAX and RDX registers, and on 16-bit x86
(ia16?) it means the old AX and DX registers.
Add new register classes in `X86RegisterInfo.td` to support these cases,
and amend the logic in `getRegForInlineAsmConstraint` to cope with
different subtargets. Also add a test case, derived from PR32594.
Reviewers: craig.topper, qcolombet, RKSimon, ab
Reviewed By: ab
Subscribers: ab, emaste, royger, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31902
llvm-svn: 300404
MOVNTDQA non-temporal aligned vector loads can be correctly represented using generic builtin loads, allowing us to remove the existing x86 intrinsics.
Clang companion patch: D31766.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31767
llvm-svn: 300325
Check if the scale operand is identical (doesn't have to be 1) and
do not check the chaain operand.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31833
llvm-svn: 299986
The math works out where it can actually be counter-productive. The probability
calculations correctly handle the case where the alternative is 0 probability,
rely on those calculations.
Includes a test case that demonstrates the problem.
llvm-svn: 299892
Qin may be large, and Succ may be more frequent than BB. Take these both into
account when deciding if tail-duplication is profitable.
llvm-svn: 299891
Alex Lorenz