The original commit was reverted in r283329 due to a miscompile in
Chromium. That turned out to be the same issue as PR31257, which was
fixed in r295262.
llvm-svn: 295357
This reverts r294348, which removed support for conditional tail calls
due to the PR above. It fixes the PR by marking live registers as
implicitly used and defined by the now predicated tailcall. This is
similar to how IfConversion predicates instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29856
llvm-svn: 295262
They are currently modelled incorrectly (as calls, which clobber
registers, confusing e.g. Machine Copy Propagation).
Reverting until we figure out the proper solution.
llvm-svn: 294348
We can't use Jcc to leave a Win64 function in general, because that
confuses the unwinder. However, for "leaf" functions, that is, functions
where the return address is always on top of the stack and which don't
have unwind info, it's OK.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24836
llvm-svn: 282920
That confuses e.g. machine basic block placement, which then doesn't
realize that control can fall through a block that ends with a conditional
tail call. Instead, isBranch=1 should be set.
Also, mark EFLAGS as used by these instructions.
llvm-svn: 281281
This extends the optimization in r280832 to also work for 64-bit. The only
quirk is that we can't do this for 64-bit Windows (yet).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24423
llvm-svn: 281113
When branching to a block that immediately tail calls, it is possible to fold
the call directly into the branch if the call is direct and there is no stack
adjustment, saving one byte.
Example:
define void @f(i32 %x, i32 %y) {
entry:
%p = icmp eq i32 %x, %y
br i1 %p, label %bb1, label %bb2
bb1:
tail call void @foo()
ret void
bb2:
tail call void @bar()
ret void
}
before:
f:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
cmpl 8(%esp), %eax
jne .LBB0_2
jmp foo
.LBB0_2:
jmp bar
after:
f:
movl 4(%esp), %eax
cmpl 8(%esp), %eax
jne bar
.LBB0_1:
jmp foo
I don't expect any significant size savings from this (on a Clang bootstrap I
saw 288 bytes), but it does make the code a little tighter.
This patch only does 32-bit, but 64-bit would work similarly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24108
llvm-svn: 280832
Hans Wennborg