class C {
void g(C c);
virtual void f() = 0;
};
In this case, C is not known to be abstract when doing semantic analysis on g. This is done by recursively traversing the abstract class and checking the types of member functions.
llvm-svn: 67594
a class template. At present, we can only instantiation normal
methods, but not constructors, destructors, or conversion operators.
As ever, this contains a bit of refactoring in Sema's type-checking. In
particular:
- Split ActOnFunctionDeclarator into ActOnFunctionDeclarator
(handling the declarator itself) and CheckFunctionDeclaration
(checking for the the function declaration), the latter of which
is also used by template instantiation.
- We were performing the adjustment of function parameter types in
three places; collect those into a single new routine.
- When the type of a parameter is adjusted, allocate an
OriginalParmVarDecl to keep track of the type as it was written.
- Eliminate a redundant check for out-of-line declarations of member
functions; hide more C++-specific checks on function declarations
behind if(getLangOptions().CPlusPlus).
llvm-svn: 67575
QualifiedNameType and QualifiedDeclRefExpr. We now keep track of the
exact nested-name-specifier spelling for a QualifiedDeclRefExpr, and
use that spelling when printing ASTs. This fixes PR3493.
llvm-svn: 67283
specialization names. This way, we keep track of sugared types like
std::vector<Real>
I believe we are now using QualifiedNameTypes everywhere we can. Next
step: QualifiedDeclRefExprs.
llvm-svn: 67268
qualified name, e.g.,
foo::x
so that we retain the nested-name-specifier as written in the source
code and can reproduce that qualified name when printing the types
back (e.g., in diagnostics). This is PR3493, which won't be complete
until finished the other tasks mentioned near the end of this commit.
The parser's representation of nested-name-specifiers, CXXScopeSpec,
is now a bit fatter, because it needs to contain the scopes that
precede each '::' and keep track of whether the global scoping
operator '::' was at the beginning. For example, we need to keep track
of the leading '::', 'foo', and 'bar' in
::foo::bar::x
The Action's CXXScopeTy * is no longer a DeclContext *. It's now the
opaque version of the new NestedNameSpecifier, which contains a single
component of a nested-name-specifier (either a DeclContext * or a Type
*, bitmangled).
The new sugar type QualifiedNameType composes a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers with a representation of the type we're actually
referring to. At present, we only build QualifiedNameType nodes within
Sema::getTypeName. This will be extended to other type-constructing
actions (e.g., ActOnClassTemplateId).
Also on the way: QualifiedDeclRefExprs will also store a sequence of
NestedNameSpecifiers, so that we can print out the property
nested-name-specifier. I expect to also use this for handling
dependent names like Fibonacci<I - 1>::value.
llvm-svn: 67265
class members to the corresponding in-class declaration.
Diagnose the erroneous use of 'static' on out-of-line definitions of
class members.
llvm-svn: 66740
template. More importantly, start to sort out the issues regarding
complete types and nested-name-specifiers, especially the question of:
when do we instantiate a class template specialization that occurs to
the left of a '::' in a nested-name-specifier?
llvm-svn: 66662
- When we are declaring a function in local scope, we can merge with
a visible declaration from an outer scope if that declaration
refers to an entity with linkage. This behavior now works in C++
and properly ignores entities without linkage.
- Diagnose the use of "static" on a function declaration in local
scope.
- Diagnose the declaration of a static function after a non-static
declaration of the same function.
- Propagate the storage specifier to a function declaration from a
prior declaration (PR3425)
- Don't name-mangle "main"
llvm-svn: 65360
information about types. We often print diagnostics where we say
"foo_t" is bad, but the user doesn't know how foo_t is declared
(because it is a typedef). Fix this by expanding sugar when present
in a diagnostic (and not one of a few special cases, like vectors).
Before:
t.m:5:2: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' and 'typeof(F)')
MAX(P, F);
^~~~~~~~~
t.m:1:78: note: instantiated from:
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
^
After:
t.m:5:2: error: invalid operands to binary expression ('typeof(P)' (aka 'struct mystruct') and 'typeof(F)' (aka 'float'))
MAX(P, F);
^~~~~~~~~
t.m:1:78: note: instantiated from:
#define MAX(A,B) ({ __typeof__(A) __a = (A); __typeof__(B) __b = (B); __a < __b ? __b : __a; })
^
llvm-svn: 65081
(as GCC does), except when we've performed overload resolution and
found an unavailable function: in this case, we actually error.
Merge the checking of unavailable functions with the checking for
deprecated functions. This unifies a bit of code, and makes sure that
we're checking for unavailable functions in the right places. Also,
this check can cause an error. We may, eventually, want an option to
make "unavailable" warnings into errors.
Implement much of the logic needed for C++0x deleted functions, which
are effectively the same as "unavailable" functions (but always cause
an error when referenced). However, we don't have the syntax to
specify deleted functions yet :)
llvm-svn: 64955
to do in this area, since there are other places that reference
FunctionDecls.
Don't allow "overloadable" functions (in C) to be declared without a
prototype.
llvm-svn: 64897
complex conversions where the conversion between the real types is an
integral promotion. This is how G++ handles complex promotions for its
complex integer extension.
llvm-svn: 64344
system. Since C99 doesn't have overloading and C++ doesn't have
_Complex, there is no specification for this. Here's what I think
makes sense.
Complex conversions come in several flavors:
- Complex promotions: a complex -> complex conversion where the
underlying real-type conversion is a floating-point promotion. GCC
seems to call this a promotion, EDG does something else. This is
given "promotion" rank for determining the best viable function.
- Complex conversions: a complex -> complex conversion that is
not a complex promotion. This is given "conversion" rank for
determining the best viable function.
- Complex-real conversions: a real -> complex or complex -> real
conversion. This is given "conversion" rank for determining the
best viable function.
These rules are the same for C99 (when using the "overloadable"
attribute) and C++. However, there is one difference in the handling
of floating-point promotions: in C99, float -> long double and double
-> long double are considered promotions (so we give them "promotion"
rank), while C++ considers these conversions ("conversion" rank).
llvm-svn: 64343
Also, put Objective-C protocols into their own identifier
namespace. Otherwise, we find protocols when we don't want to in C++
(but not in C).
llvm-svn: 63877
extension. The interaction with designated initializers is a
bit... interesting... but we follow GNU's lead and don't permit too
much crazy code in this area.
Also, make the "excess initializers" error message a bit more
informative.
Addresses PR2561: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2561
llvm-svn: 63785
unqualified-id '('
in C++. The unqualified-id might not refer to any declaration in our
current scope, but declarations by that name might be found via
argument-dependent lookup. We now do so properly.
As part of this change, CXXDependentNameExpr, which was previously
designed to express the unqualified-id in the above constructor within
templates, has become UnresolvedFunctionNameExpr, which does
effectively the same thing but will work for both templates and
non-templates.
Additionally, we cope with all unqualified-ids, since ADL also applies
in cases like
operator+(x, y)
llvm-svn: 63733
a.k.a. Koenig lookup) in C++. Most of the pieces are in place, but for
two:
- In an unqualified call g(x), even if the name does not refer to
anything in the current scope, we can still find functions named
"g" based on ADL. We don't yet have this ability.
- ADL will need updating for friend functions and templates.
llvm-svn: 63692
direct-initialization following a user-defined conversion can select
any constructor; it just can't employ any user-defined
conversions. So we ban those conversions and classify the constructor
call based on the relationship between the "from" and "to" types in
the conversion.
llvm-svn: 63554
sequence. Previously, we weren't permitting the second step to call
copy constructors, which left user-defined conversion sequences
surprisingly broken.
Now, we perform overload resolution among all of the constructors, but
only accept the result if it makes the conversion a standard
conversion. Note that this behavior is different from both GCC and EDG
(which don't agree with each other, either); I've submitted a core
issue on the matter.
llvm-svn: 63450
- Support initialization of reference members; complain if any
reference members are left uninitialized.
- Use C++ copy-initialization for initializing each element (falls
back to constraint checking in C)
- Make sure we diagnose when one tries to provide an initializer
list for a non-aggregate.
- Don't complain about empty initializers in C++ (they are permitted)
- Unrelated but necessary: don't bother trying to convert the
decl-specifier-seq to a type when we're dealing with a C++
constructor, destructor, or conversion operator; it results in
spurious warnings.
llvm-svn: 63431
Fix a stupid mistake in UnwrapSimilarPointers that made any two member pointers compatible as long as the pointee was the same.
Make a few style corrections as suggested by Chris.
llvm-svn: 63215
new DiagnoseIncompleteType. It provides additional information about
struct/class/union/enum types when possible, either by pointing to the
forward declaration of that type or by pointing to the definition (if
we're in the process of defining that type).
Fixes <rdar://problem/6500531>.
llvm-svn: 62521
even when we are still defining the TagDecl. This is required so that
qualified name lookup of a class name within its definition works (see
the new bits in test/SemaCXX/qualified-id-lookup.cpp).
As part of this, move the nested redefinition checking code into
ActOnTag. This gives us diagnostics earlier (when we try to perform
the nested redefinition, rather than when we try to complete the 2nd
definition) and removes some code duplication.
llvm-svn: 62386
analysis and AST-building for the cases where we have N != 1
arguments. For N == 1 arguments, we need to finish the C++
implementation of explicit type casts (C++ [expr.cast]).
llvm-svn: 62329
This change refactors and cleans up our handling of name lookup with
LookupDecl. There are several aspects to this refactoring:
- The criteria for name lookup is now encapsulated into the class
LookupCriteria, which replaces the hideous set of boolean values
that LookupDecl currently has.
- The results of name lookup are returned in a new class
LookupResult, which can lazily build OverloadedFunctionDecls for
overloaded function sets (and, eventually, eliminate the need to
allocate member for OverloadedFunctionDecls) and contains a
placeholder for handling ambiguous name lookup (for C++).
- The primary entry points for name lookup are now LookupName (for
unqualified name lookup) and LookupQualifiedName (for qualified
name lookup). There is also a convenience function
LookupParsedName that handles qualified/unqualified name lookup
when given a scope specifier. Together, these routines are meant
to gradually replace the kludgy LookupDecl, but this won't happen
until after we have base class lookup (which forces us to cope
with ambiguities).
- Documented the heck out of name lookup. Experimenting a little
with using Doxygen's member groups to make some sense of the Sema
class. Feedback welcome!
- Fixes some lingering issues with name lookup for
nested-name-specifiers, which now goes through
LookupName/LookupQualifiedName.
llvm-svn: 62245
Small cleanup in the handling of user-defined conversions.
Also, implement an optimization when constructing a call. We avoid
recomputing implicit conversion sequences and instead use those
conversion sequences that we computed as part of overload resolution.
llvm-svn: 62231
C++ handle anonymous structs/unions in the same way. Addresses several
bugs:
<rdar://problem/6259534>
<rdar://problem/6481130>
<rdar://problem/6483159>
The test case in PR clang/1750 now passes with -fsyntax-only, but
CodeGen for inline assembler still fails.
llvm-svn: 62112
that is neither a definition nor a forward declaration and where X has
not yet been declared as a tag, introduce a declaration
into the appropriate scope (which is likely *not* to be the current
scope). The rules for the placement of the declaration differ slightly
in C and C++, so we implement both and test the various corner
cases. This implementation isn't 100% correct due to some lingering
issues with the function prototype scope (for a function parameter
list) not being the same scope as the scope of the function
definition. Testcase is FIXME'd; this probably isn't an important issue.
Addresses <rdar://problem/6484805>.
llvm-svn: 62014
introduce a Scope for the body of a tag. This reduces the number of
semantic differences between C and C++ structs and unions, and will
help with other features (e.g., anonymous unions) in C. Some important
points:
- Fields are now in the "member" namespace (IDNS_Member), to keep
them separate from tags and ordinary names in C. See the new test
in Sema/member-reference.c for an example of why this matters. In
C++, ordinary and member name lookup will find members in both the
ordinary and member namespace, so the difference between
IDNS_Member and IDNS_Ordinary is erased by Sema::LookupDecl (but
only in C++!).
- We always introduce a Scope and push a DeclContext when we're
defining a tag, in both C and C++. Previously, we had different
actions and different Scope/CurContext behavior for enums, C
structs/unions, and C++ structs/unions/classes. Now, it's one pair
of actions. (Yay!)
There's still some fuzziness in the handling of struct/union/enum
definitions within other struct/union/enum definitions in C. We'll
need to do some more cleanup to eliminate some reliance on CurContext
before we can solve this issue for real. What we want is for something
like this:
struct X {
struct T { int x; } t;
};
to introduce T into translation unit scope (placing it at the
appropriate point in the IdentifierResolver chain, too), but it should
still have struct X as its lexical declaration
context. PushOnScopeChains isn't smart enough to do that yet, though,
so there's a FIXME test in nested-redef.c
llvm-svn: 61940
Duplicate-member checking within classes is still a little messy, and
anonymous unions are still completely broken in C. We'll need to unify
the handling of fields in C and C++ to make this code applicable in
both languages.
llvm-svn: 61878
information for declarations that were referenced via a qualified-id,
e.g., N::C::value. We keep track of the location of the start of the
nested-name-specifier. Note that the difference between
QualifiedDeclRefExpr and DeclRefExpr does have an effect on the
semantics of function calls in two ways:
1) The use of a qualified-id instead of an unqualified-id suppresses
argument-dependent lookup
2) If the name refers to a virtual function, the qualified-id
version will call the function determined statically while the
unqualified-id version will call the function determined dynamically
(by looking up the appropriate function in the vtable).
Neither of these features is implemented yet, but we do print out
qualified names for QualifiedDeclRefExprs as part of the AST printing.
llvm-svn: 61789
Make C++ classes track the POD property (C++ [class]p4)
Track the existence of a copy assignment operator.
Implicitly declare the copy assignment operator if none is provided.
Implement most of the parsing job for the G++ type traits extension.
Fully implement the low-hanging fruit of the type traits:
__is_pod: Whether a type is a POD.
__is_class: Whether a type is a (non-union) class.
__is_union: Whether a type is a union.
__is_enum: Whether a type is an enum.
__is_polymorphic: Whether a type is polymorphic (C++ [class.virtual]p1).
llvm-svn: 61746
DeclContexts whose members are visible from enclosing DeclContexts up
to (and including) the innermost enclosing non-transparent
DeclContexts. Transparent DeclContexts unify the mechanism to be used
for various language features, including C enumerations, anonymous
unions, C++0x inline namespaces, and C++ linkage
specifications. Please refer to the documentation in the Clang
internals manual for more information.
Only enumerations and linkage specifications currently use transparent
DeclContexts.
Still to do: use transparent DeclContexts to implement anonymous
unions and GCC's anonymous structs extension, and, later, the C++0x
features. We also need to tighten up the DeclContext/ScopedDecl link
to ensure that every ScopedDecl is in a single DeclContext, which
will ensure that we can then enforce ownership and reduce the memory
footprint of DeclContext.
llvm-svn: 61735
semantics and improve our handling of default arguments. Specifically,
we follow this order:
- As soon as the see the '}' in the class definition, the class is
complete and we add any implicit declarations (default constructor,
copy constructor, etc.) to the class.
- If there are any default function arguments, parse them
- If there were any inline member function definitions, parse them
As part of this change, we now keep track of the the fact that we've
seen unparsed default function arguments within the AST. See the new
ParmVarDecl::hasUnparsedDefaultArg member. This allows us to properly
cope with calls inside default function arguments to other functions
where we're making use of the default arguments.
Made some C++ error messages regarding failed initializations more
specific.
llvm-svn: 61406
- Overloading has to cope with having both static and non-static
member functions in the overload set.
- The call may or may not have an implicit object argument,
depending on the syntax (x.f() vs. f()) and the context (static
vs. non-static member function).
- We now generate MemberExprs for implicit member access expression.
- We now cope with mutable whenever we're building MemberExprs.
llvm-svn: 61329
which can refer to static data members, enumerators, and member
functions as well as to non-static data members.
Implement correct lvalue computation for member references in C++.
Compute the result type of non-static data members of reference type properly.
llvm-svn: 61294
become useful or correct until we (1) parse template arguments
correctly, (2) have some way to turn template-ids into types,
declarators, etc., and (3) have a real representation of templates.
llvm-svn: 61208
warning: statement was disambiguated as declaration
because it is currently firing in cases where the declaration would
not actually parse as a statement. We'd love to bring this warning
back if we can make it more accurate.
llvm-svn: 61137
is completely defined (C++ [class.mem]p2).
Reverse the order in which we process the definitions of member
functions specified inline. This way, we'll get diagnostics in the
order in which the member functions were declared in the class.
llvm-svn: 61103
N::X only skips those entities specified in C++ [basic.lookup.qual]p1.
Note that both EDG and GCC currently get this wrong. EDG has confirmed
that the bug will be fixed in a future version.
llvm-svn: 61079
functions. They work except that name lookup within the default
arguments needs to be deferred until the class definition is complete
(see FIXME in the test).
llvm-svn: 61059
specifiers. Specifically:
* Determine when an out-of-line function definition does not match
any declaration within the class or namespace (including coping
with overloaded functions).
* Complain about typedefs and parameters that have scope specifiers.
* Complain about out-of-line declarations that aren't also
definitions.
* Complain about non-static data members being declared out-of-line.
* Allow cv-qualifiers on out-of-line member function definitions.
llvm-svn: 61058
just like all other members, and remove the special variables in
CXXRecordDecl to store them. This eliminates a lot of special-case
code for constructors and destructors, including
ActOnConstructor/ActOnDeclarator and special lookup rules in
LookupDecl. The result is far more uniform and manageable.
Diagnose the redeclaration of member functions.
llvm-svn: 61048
the type of the enumeration once the enumeration has been defined.
Fix the overloading test-case to properly create enums that promote
the way we want them to.
Implement C++0x promotions from enumeration types to long
long/unsigned long long. We're using these promotions in Carbon.h
(since long long is a common extension).
Fixes PR clang/2954: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=2954
llvm-svn: 60917
and separates lexical name lookup from qualified name lookup. In
particular:
* Make DeclContext the central data structure for storing and
looking up declarations within existing declarations, e.g., members
of structs/unions/classes, enumerators in C++0x enums, members of
C++ namespaces, and (later) members of Objective-C
interfaces/implementations. DeclContext uses a lazily-constructed
data structure optimized for fast lookup (array for small contexts,
hash table for larger contexts).
* Implement C++ qualified name lookup in terms of lookup into
DeclContext.
* Implement C++ unqualified name lookup in terms of
qualified+unqualified name lookup (since unqualified lookup is not
purely lexical in C++!)
* Limit the use of the chains of declarations stored in
IdentifierInfo to those names declared lexically.
* Eliminate CXXFieldDecl, collapsing its behavior into
FieldDecl. (FieldDecl is now a ScopedDecl).
* Make RecordDecl into a DeclContext and eliminates its
Members/NumMembers fields (since one can just iterate through the
DeclContext to get the fields).
llvm-svn: 60878
"else" clause, e.g.,
if (int X = foo()) {
} else {
if (X) { // warning: X is always zero in this context
}
}
Fixes rdar://6425550 and lets me think about something other than
DeclContext.
llvm-svn: 60858
template<typename T> void f(T x) {
g(x); // g is a dependent name, so don't even bother to look it up
g(); // error: g is not a dependent name
}
Note that when we see "g(", we build a CXXDependentNameExpr. However,
if none of the call arguments are type-dependent, we will force the
resolution of the name "g" and replace the CXXDependentNameExpr with
its result.
GCC actually produces a nice error message when you make this
mistake, and even offers to compile your code with -fpermissive. I'll
do the former next, but I don't plan to do the latter.
llvm-svn: 60618
expressions, and value-dependent expressions. This permits us to parse
some template definitions.
This is not a complete solution; we're missing type- and
value-dependent computations for most of the expression types, and
we're missing checks for dependent types and type-dependent
expressions throughout Sema.
llvm-svn: 60615
specific targets default them to on. Default blocks to on on 10.6 and later.
Add a -fblocks option that allows the user to override the target's default.
Use -fblocks in the various testcases that use blocks.
llvm-svn: 60563
instead of converting them to strings first. This also fixes a
bunch of minor inconsistencies in the diagnostics emitted by clang
and adds a bunch of FIXME's to DiagnosticKinds.def.
llvm-svn: 59948
with implicit quotes around them. This has a bunch of follow-on
effects and requires tweaking to a whole lot of code. This causes
a regression in two tests (xfailed) by causing it to emit things like:
Line 10: duplicate interface declaration for category 'MyClass1' ('Category1')
instead of:
Line 10: duplicate interface declaration for category 'MyClass1(Category1)'
I will fix this in a follow-up commit.
As part of this, I had to start switching stuff to use ->getDeclName() instead
of Decl::getName() for consistency. This is good, but I was planning to do this
as an independent patch. There will be several follow-on patches
to clean up some of the mess, but this patch is already too big.
llvm-svn: 59917
Douglas Gregor