This patch is a big sed to rename the following variables:
s/PYTHON_LIBRARIES/Python3_LIBRARIES/g
s/PYTHON_INCLUDE_DIRS/Python3_INCLUDE_DIRS/g
s/PYTHON_EXECUTABLE/Python3_EXECUTABLE/g
s/PYTHON_RPATH/Python3_RPATH/g
I've also renamed the CMake module to better express its purpose and for
consistency with FindLuaAndSwig.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85976
It seems like only the unittests are building with
BUILD_WITH_INSTALL_RPATH set to OFF. Of course when I did my last change
I only ran check-lldb-unit. Not sure why this difference exists, why
would you even install the unittest?
For the LLDB framework we do need different build and install RPATHs.
Currently that logic lives downstream. I plan to upstream that in the
near future. For now I'm just trying to make it possible to run the
test.
The install name for the Python 3 framework in Xcode is relative to
the framework's location and not the dylib itself.
@rpath/Python3.framework/Versions/3.x/Python3
This means that we need to compute the path to the Python3.framework
and use that as the RPATH instead of the usual dylib's directory.
Generate the LLDB_PLUGIN_DECLARE macros with CMake and a def file. I'm
landing D73067 in pieces so I can bisect what exactly is breaking the
Windows bot.
This patch changes the way we initialize and terminate the plugins in
the system initializer. It uses an approach similar to LLVM's
TARGETS_TO_BUILD with a def file that enumerates the plugins.
The previously landed patch got reverted because it was lacking:
(1) A plugin definition for the Objective-C language runtime,
(2) The dependency between the Static and WASM dynamic loader,
(3) Explicit initialization of ScriptInterpreterNone for lldb-test.
All issues have been addressed in this patch.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067
This patch changes the way we initialize and terminate the plugins in
the system initializer. It uses an approach similar to LLVM's
TARGETS_TO_BUILD with a def file that enumerates the plugins.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73067
This avoids having to define additional macros in the cmake file, and
and also makes the logic in the cpp files more compact. It is also
easily extendible to other plugin types (instruction emulation?) that
should only be initialized if the corresponding llvm target is built.
Thanks to Ilya Birukov for pointing me to this file.
llvm-svn: 372952
Summary:
I was recently surprised to learn that there is a total of 2 (two) users
of the register info definitions contained in the ABI plugins. Yet, the
defitions themselves span nearly 10kLOC.
The two users are:
- dwarf expression pretty printer
- the mechanism for augmenting the register info definitions obtained
over gdb-remote protocol (AugmentRegisterInfoViaABI)
Both of these uses need the DWARF an EH register numbers, which is
information that is already available in LLVM. This patch makes it
possible to do so.
It adds a GetMCRegisterInfo method to the ABI class, which every class
is expected to implement. Normally, it should be sufficient to obtain
the definitions from the appropriate llvm::Target object (for which I
provide a utility function), but the subclasses are free to construct it
in any way they deem fit.
We should be able to always get the MCRegisterInfo object from llvm,
with one important exception: if the relevant llvm target was disabled
at compile time. To handle this, I add a mechanism to disable the
compilation of ABI plugins based on the value of LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD
cmake setting. This ensures all our existing are able to create their
MCRegisterInfo objects.
The new MCRegisterInfo api is not used yet, but the intention is to make
use of it in follow-up patches.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, aprantl, JDevlieghere, tatyana-krasnukha
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, atanasyan, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67965
llvm-svn: 372862
This is basically a proof-of-concept and starting point for having a
testing-centric tool in LLDB. I'm sure this leaves a lot of room to be
desired, but this at least allows us to have something to build on.
Right now there is only one command, the `module-sections` command, and I
created this command not because it was particularly special, but
because it addressed an immediate use case and was extremely simple.
Run the tool as `lldb-test module-sections <path-to-object>`.
Feel free to add testing related stuff to your heart's content after
this goes in. Implementing the commands themselves takes some work, but
once they're there they can be reused without writing any code and
result in very easy to use and maintain tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40636
llvm-svn: 319504
Jonas Devlieghere