Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov 04e586151e [InstCombine] Fix worklist management when removing guard intrinsic
When multiple guard intrinsics are merged into one, currently the
result of eraseInstFromFunction() is returned -- however, this
should only be done if the current instruction is being removed.
In this case we're removing a different instruction and should
instead report that the current one has been modified by returning it.

For this test case, this reduces the number of instcombine iterations
from 5 to 2 (the minimum possible).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72558
2020-01-14 21:47:48 +01:00
Davide Italiano c32f0ff92f [InstCombine] Fix call guard difference with dbg
Patch by Chris Ye!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68004
2019-11-22 13:35:53 -08:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Philip Reames 79e917d117 [InstCombine] Widen guards with conditions between
The previous handling for guard widening in InstCombine was extremely restrictive. In particular, it didn't handle the common case where we had two guards separated by a single icmp. Handle this by scanning through a small fixed window of instructions to find the next guard if needed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46203

llvm-svn: 331935
2018-05-09 22:56:32 +00:00
Sanjoy Das e0e5795f6b [InstCombine] Allow InstCombine to merge adjacent guards
Summary:
If there are two adjacent guards with different conditions, we can
remove one of them and include its condition into the condition of
another one. This patch allows InstCombine to merge them by the
following pattern:

    guard(a); guard(b) -> guard(a & b).

Reviewers: reames, apilipenko, igor-laevsky, anna, sanjoy

Reviewed By: sanjoy

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29378

llvm-svn: 293778
2017-02-01 16:34:55 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 7516192a71 Revert a couple of InstCombine/Guard checkins
This change reverts:

r293061: "[InstCombine] Canonicalize guards for NOT OR condition"
r293058: "[InstCombine] Canonicalize guards for AND condition"

They miscompile cases like:

```
declare void @llvm.experimental.guard(i1, ...)

define void @test_guard_not_or(i1 %A, i1 %B) {
  %C = or i1 %A, %B
  %D = xor i1 %C, true
  call void(i1, ...) @llvm.experimental.guard(i1 %D, i32 20, i32 30)[ "deopt"() ]
  ret void
}
```

because they do transfer the `i32 20, i32 30` parameters to newly
created guard instructions.

llvm-svn: 293227
2017-01-26 23:38:11 +00:00
Artur Pilipenko b85f7a5d99 [InstCombine] Canonicalize guards for NOT OR condition
This is a partial fix for Bug 31520 - [guards] canonicalize guards in instcombine

Reviewed By: apilipenko

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29075

Patch by Maxim Kazantsev.

llvm-svn: 293061
2017-01-25 14:45:12 +00:00
Artur Pilipenko 4df4c4a4aa [InstCombine] Canonicalize guards for AND condition
This is a partial fix for Bug 31520 - [guards] canonicalize guards in instcombine

Reviewed By: apilipenko

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29074

Patch by Maxim Kazantsev.

llvm-svn: 293058
2017-01-25 14:20:52 +00:00
Artur Pilipenko e812ca00bb [InstCombine] Allow InstrCombine to remove one of adjacent guards if they are equivalent
This is a partial fix for Bug 31520 - [guards] canonicalize guards in instcombine

Reviewed By: majnemer, apilipenko

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29071

Patch by Maxim Kazantsev.

llvm-svn: 293056
2017-01-25 14:12:12 +00:00