nested-name-specifier (e.g., "class T::foo") fails to find a tag
member in the scope nominated by the
nested-name-specifier. Previously, we gave a bland
error: 'Nested' does not name a tag member in the specified scope
which didn't actually say where we were looking, which was rather
horrible when the nested-name-specifier was instantiated. Now, we give
something a bit better:
error: no class named 'Nested' in 'NoDepBase<T>'
llvm-svn: 100060
This introduces FunctionType::ExtInfo to hold the calling convention and the
noreturn attribute. The next patch will extend it to include the regparm
attribute and fix the bug.
llvm-svn: 99920
since we have absolutely no way to match them when they are declared
nor do we have a way to represent these parsed-but-not-checked friend
declarations.
llvm-svn: 99407
template <> friend void foo(int);
we need to change it to
friend void foo<>(int);
or else the user won't get the template specialization they obviously want.
llvm-svn: 99390
entering a function or block definition, not on every single declaration.
Unfortunately we don't have previous-lookup results around when it's time
to make this decision, so we have to redo the lookup. The alternative is
to use delayed diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 99172
This object controls when the warnings are executed, allowing the client code
in Sema to selectively disable warnings as needed.
Centralizing the logic for analysis-based warnings allows us to optimize
when and how they are run.
Along the way, remove the redundant logic for the 'check fall-through' warning
for blocks; now the same logic is used for both blocks and functions.
llvm-svn: 99085
ActOnStartCXXMemberDeclaration. We haven't started the field collector on this
class yet, so don't stop it. Fixes a crash in the VS buildbot and a memory error
on all the others.
llvm-svn: 98760
on unqualified declarations.
Patch by Enea Zaffanella! Minimal adjustments: allocate the ExtInfo nodes
with the ASTContext and delete them during Destroy(). I audited a bunch of
Destroy methods at the same time, to ensure that the correct teardown was
being done.
llvm-svn: 98540
instantiation. Based on a patch by Enea Zaffanella! I found a way to
reduce some of the redundancy between TreeTransform's "standard"
FunctionProtoType transformation and TemplateInstantiator's override,
and I killed off the old SubstFunctionType by adding type source info
for the last cases where we were creating FunctionDecls without TSI
(at least that get passed through template instantiation).
llvm-svn: 98252
injected class name of a class template or class template partial specialization.
This is a non-canonical type; the canonical type is still a template
specialization type. This becomes the TypeForDecl of the pattern declaration,
which cleans up some amount of code (and complicates some other parts, but
whatever).
Fixes PR6326 and probably a few others, primarily by re-establishing a few
invariants about TypeLoc sizes.
llvm-svn: 98134
uninitialized. This seems not to be the case in C++0x, where we still
call the (trivial) default constructor for a POD class
(!). Previously, we had implemented only the C++0x rules; now we
implement both. Fixes PR6536.
llvm-svn: 97928
which has the label map, switch statement stack, etc. Previously, we
had a single set of maps in Sema (for the function) along with a stack
of block scopes. However, this lead to funky behavior with nested
functions, e.g., in the member functions of local classes.
The explicit-stack approach is far cleaner, and we retain a 1-element
cache so that we're not malloc/free'ing every time we enter a
function. Fixes PR6382.
Also, tweaked the unused-variable warning suppression logic to look at
errors within a given Scope rather than within a given function. The
prior code wasn't looking at the right number-of-errors count when
dealing with blocks, since the block's count would be deallocated
before we got to ActOnPopScope. This approach works with nested
blocks/functions, and gives tighter error recovery.
llvm-svn: 97518
re-declare them. This fixes PR6317. Also add the beginnings of an interesting
test case for p1 of [class.friend] which also covers PR6317.
llvm-svn: 97499
a fixme and PR6451.
Only perform jump checking if the containing function has no errors,
and add the infrastructure needed to do this.
On the testcase in the PR, we produce:
t.cc:6:3: error: illegal goto into protected scope
goto later;
^
t.cc:7:5: note: jump bypasses variable initialization
X x;
^
llvm-svn: 97497
Chris Lattner