This adds legalization for G_SEXT, G_ZEXT, and G_ANYEXT for v8s8s.
We were falling back on G_ZEXT in arm64-vabs.ll before, preventing us from
selecting the @llvm.aarch64.neon.sabd.v8i8 intrinsic.
This adds legalizer support for those 3, which gives us selection via the
importer. Update the relevant tests (legalize-ext.mir, select-int-ext.mir) and
add a GISel line to arm64-vabs.ll.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60881
llvm-svn: 358715
combineVectorTruncationWithPACKUS is currently splitting the upper bit bit masking into 128-bit subregs and then concatenating them back together.
This was originally done to avoid regressions that caused existing subregs to be concatenated to the larger type just for the AND masking before being extracted again. This was fixed by @spatel (notably rL303997 and rL347356).
This also lets SimplifyDemandedBits do some further improvements before it hits the recursive depth limit.
My only annoyance with this is that we were broadcasting some xmm masks but we seem to have lost them by moving to ymm - but that's a known issue as the logic in lowerBuildVectorAsBroadcast isn't great.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60375#inline-539623
llvm-svn: 358692
This replaces the MOVMSK combine introduced at D52121/rL342326
(movmsk (setne (and X, (1 << C)), 0)) -> (movmsk (X << C))
with the more general icmp lowering so it can pick up more cases through bitcasts - notably vXi8 cases which use vXi16 shifts+masks, this patch can remove the mask and use pcmpgtb(0,x) for the sra.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60625
llvm-svn: 358651
Summary:
This issue from the bugzilla: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41177
When the two operands for BUILD_VECTOR are same, we will get assert error.
llvm::SDValue combineBVOfConsecutiveLoads(llvm::SDNode*, llvm::SelectionDAG&):
Assertion `!(InputsAreConsecutiveLoads && InputsAreReverseConsecutive) &&
"The loads cannot be both consecutive and reverse consecutive."' failed.
This error caused by the wrong ElemSIze when calling isConsecutiveLS(). We
should use `getScalarType().getStoreSize();` to get the ElemSize instread of
`getScalarSizeInBits() / 8`.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60811
llvm-svn: 358644
fneg combining attempts to turn it into fadd(fneg(A), fneg(0)), but
creating the new fadd folds to just fneg(A). When A has multiple uses,
this confuses it and you get an assert. Fixed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60633
Change-Id: I0ddc9b7286abe78edc0cd8d734fdeb05ff09821c
llvm-svn: 358640
The test file has pairs of tests that are logically equivalent:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/2zQ
%t4 = and i8 %t1, 8
%t5 = zext i8 %t4 to i16
%sh = shl i16 %t5, 2
%t6 = add i16 %sh, %t0
=>
%t4 = and i8 %t1, 8
%sh2 = shl i8 %t4, 2
%z5 = zext i8 %sh2 to i16
%t6 = add i16 %z5, %t0
...so if we can fold the shift op into LEA in the 1st pattern, then we
should be able to do the same in the 2nd pattern (unnecessary 'movzbl'
is a separate bug I think).
We don't want to do this any sooner though because that would conflict
with generic transforms that try to narrow the width of the shift.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60789
llvm-svn: 358622
Legalize things like i24 load/store by splitting them into smaller power of 2 operations.
This matches how SelectionDAG handles these operations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59971
llvm-svn: 358613
Summary:
None of these derived classes do anything that the base class cannot.
If we remove these case statements, then the base class can handle them
just fine.
Reviewers: peter.smith, echristo
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60803
llvm-svn: 358603
Summary: This fixes a large Dawn of War 3 performance regression with RADV from Mesa 19.0 to master which was caused by creating less code in some branches.
Reviewers: arsen, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60824
llvm-svn: 358592
This will change with the proposal in D60214.
Unfortunately, the triple is not supported for auto-generation
via script, and the multiple RUN lines have diffs on this test,
but I can't tell exactly what is required by this test.
PR7162 was an assert/crash, so hopefully, this is good enough.
llvm-svn: 358587
Improves codegen demonstrated by D60512 - instructions represented by X86ISD::PERMV/PERMV3 can never memory fold the operand used for their index register.
This patch updates the 'isUseOfShuffle' helper into the more capable 'isFoldableUseOfShuffle' that recognises that the op is used for a X86ISD::PERMV/PERMV3 index mask and can't be folded - allowing us to use broadcast/subvector-broadcast ops to reduce the size of the mask constant pool data.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60562
llvm-svn: 358516
When not optimizing for minimum size (-Oz) we custom lower wide shifts
(SHL_PARTS, SRA_PARTS, SRL_PARTS) instead of expanding to a libcall.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59477
llvm-svn: 358498
The original commit caused false positives from AddressSanitizer's
use-after-scope checks, which have now been fixed in r358478.
> The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
> one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
> we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
>
> That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
> "instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
> the need to special-case stores.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 358483
Since non-pow-2 types are going to get split up into multiple loads anyway,
don't do the [SZ]EXTLOAD combine for those and save us trouble later in
legalization.
llvm-svn: 358458
The pattern we replaced these with may be too hard to match as demonstrated by
PR41496 and PR41316.
This patch restores the intrinsics and then we can start focusing
on the optimizing the intrinsics.
I've mostly reverted the original patch that removed them. Though I modified
the avx512 intrinsics to not have masking built in.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60674
llvm-svn: 358427
Summary:
Use KnownBits::computeForAddSub/computeForAddCarry
in SelectionDAG::computeKnownBits when doing value
tracking for addition/subtraction.
This should improve the precision of the known bits,
as we only used to make a simple estimate of known
zeroes. The KnownBits support functions are also
able to deduce bits that are known to be one in the
result.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, nikic, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: nikic, javed.absar, lebedev.ri, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60460
llvm-svn: 358372
Apparently there are some stray IMPLICIT_DEF operations that weren't in the
checks. Not sure if they've always been there or something changed at some
point.
llvm-svn: 358371
Other opcodes shouldn't be CSE'd until we can be sure debug info quality won't
be degraded.
This change also improves the IRTranslator so that in most places, but not all,
it creates constants using the MIRBuilder directly instead of first creating a
new destination vreg and then creating a constant. By doing this, the
buildConstant() method can just return the vreg of an existing G_CONSTANT
instead of having to create a COPY from it.
I measured a 0.2% improvement in compile time and a 0.9% improvement in code
size at -O0 ARM64.
Compile time:
Program base cse diff
test-suite...ark/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 9.04 9.12 0.8%
test-suite...Mark/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 2.68 2.66 -0.7%
test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 5.53 5.51 -0.4%
test-suite :: CTMark/lencod/lencod.test 5.30 5.28 -0.3%
test-suite :: CTMark/Bullet/bullet.test 25.82 25.76 -0.2%
test-suite...:: CTMark/ClamAV/clamscan.test 6.92 6.90 -0.2%
test-suite...TMark/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 34.24 34.17 -0.2%
test-suite :: CTMark/SPASS/SPASS.test 6.25 6.24 -0.1%
test-suite...:: CTMark/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 1.66 1.66 -0.1%
test-suite :: CTMark/kimwitu++/kc.test 13.61 13.60 -0.0%
Geomean difference -0.2%
Code size:
Program base cse diff
test-suite...-typeset/consumer-typeset.test 1315632 1266480 -3.7%
test-suite...:: CTMark/ClamAV/clamscan.test 1313892 1297508 -1.2%
test-suite :: CTMark/lencod/lencod.test 1439504 1423112 -1.1%
test-suite...TMark/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 2936980 2904172 -1.1%
test-suite :: CTMark/Bullet/bullet.test 3478276 3445460 -0.9%
test-suite...ark/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4.test 8082868 8033492 -0.6%
test-suite :: CTMark/kimwitu++/kc.test 3870380 3853972 -0.4%
test-suite :: CTMark/SPASS/SPASS.test 1434904 1434896 -0.0%
test-suite...Mark/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 764528 764528 0.0%
test-suite...:: CTMark/sqlite3/sqlite3.test 782092 782092 0.0%
Geomean difference -0.9%
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60580
llvm-svn: 358369
We had many tablegen patterns for these instructions. And due to the
commutability of the patterns, tablegen expands them to even more patterns. All
together VPTESTMD patterns accounted for more the 50K of the 610K isel table.
This had gotten bad when we stopped canonicalizing AND to vXi64. This required
a pattern for every combination of bitcast input type.
This change moves the matching to custom code where it is easier to look through
the bitcasts without being concerned with the specific types.
The test changes are because we are now stricter with one use checks as its
required to make load folding legal. We now require the AND and any BITCAST to
only have a single use. This prevents forming VPTESTM and a VPAND with the same
inputs.
We now support broadcast loads for 128/256 patterns without VLX. We'll widen to
512-bit like and still fold the broadcast since the amount of memory read
doesn't change.
There are a few tests that got slightly longer because are now prefering
load + VPTESTM over XOR+VPCMPEQ for (seteq (load), allzeros). Previously we were
able to share the XOR with multiple VPTESTM instructions.
llvm-svn: 358359
We're better of emitting a single compare + kand rather than a compare for the
other use and a masked compare.
I'm looking into using custom instruction selection for VPTESTM to reduce the
ridiculous number of permutations of patterns in the isel table. Putting a one
use check on all masked compare folding makes load fold matching in the custom
code easier.
llvm-svn: 358358
Summary:
The Linux kernel uses PC-relative mode, so allow that when the code model is
"kernel".
Reviewers: craig.topper
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kees, nickdesaulniers
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60643
llvm-svn: 358343
This enables the simple copy combine that already exists in the CombinerHelper.
However, it exposed a bug in the GISelChangeObserver where it wouldn't clear a
set of MIs to process, and so would end up causing a crash when deleted MIs were
being added to the combiner worklist again.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60579
llvm-svn: 358318
This crash was introduced in r358032 as we try to construct an EVT from an MVT
in order to find the register type for the calling conv. Fall back instead of
trying to do this with an invalid MVT coming from i256.
llvm-svn: 358314
If a shufflevector's mask vector has an element with "undef" then the generic
instruction defining that element register is a G_IMPLICT_DEF instead of G_CONSTANT.
This fixes the selector to handle this case, and for now assumes that undef just means
zero. In future we'll optimize this case properly.
llvm-svn: 358312
Summary: This brings the backend in line with Clang.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60594
llvm-svn: 358310
The Hexagon Vector Loop Carried Reuse pass was allowing reuse between
two shufflevectors with different masks. The reason is that the masks
are not instruction objects, so the code that checks each operand
just skipped over the operands.
This patch fixes the bug by checking if the operands are the same
when they are not instruction objects. If the objects are not the
same, then the code assumes that reuse cannot occur.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60019
llvm-svn: 358292
// shuffle (concat X, undef), (concat Y, undef), Mask -->
// concat (shuffle X, Y, Mask0), (shuffle X, Y, Mask1)
The ARM changes with 'vtrn' and narrowed 'vuzp' are improvements.
The x86 changes look neutral or better. There's one test with an
extra instruction, but that could be reversed for a subtarget with
the right attributes. But by default, we want to avoid the 256-bit
op when possible (in my motivating benchmark, a handful of ymm ops
sprinkled into a sequence of xmm ops are triggering frequency
throttling on Haswell resulting in significantly worse perf).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60545
llvm-svn: 358291
Currently combineHorizontalPredicateResult only handles anyof/allof reduction patterns of legal types, which can be tricky to match as type legalization of bools can introduce bitcasts/truncs/extensions.
This patch extends combineHorizontalPredicateResult to recognise vXi1 bool reductions as well and uses the existing combineBitcastvxi1 helper to create the MOVMSK necessary to then compare the signmask result.
This ensures the accuracy of the reduction costs added in D60403 which assume the MOVMSK generation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60610
llvm-svn: 358286
It causes clang to crash while building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/952230
for reproducer.
> The PrologEpilogInserter need to insert a DW_OP_deref_size before
> prepending a memory location expression to an already implicit
> expression to avoid having the existing expression act on the memory
> address instead of the value behind it.
>
> The reason for using DW_OP_deref_size and not plain DW_OP_deref is that
> big-endian targets need to read the right size as simply truncating a
> larger read would yield the wrong result (LSB bytes are not at the lower
> address).
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59687
llvm-svn: 358281
Summary:
Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters.
But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error:
llc test.ll -stop-after ppc-early-ret
LLVM ERROR: "ppc-early-ret" pass is not registered.
Below pass-names have the pass is not registered error:
ppc-ctr-loops
ppc-ctr-loops-verify
ppc-loop-preinc-prep
ppc-toc-reg-deps
ppc-vsx-copy
ppc-early-ret
ppc-vsx-fma-mutate
ppc-vsx-swaps
ppc-reduce-cr-ops
ppc-qpx-load-splat
ppc-branch-coalescing
ppc-branch-select
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60248
llvm-svn: 358271
The PrologEpilogInserter need to insert a DW_OP_deref_size before
prepending a memory location expression to an already implicit
expression to avoid having the existing expression act on the memory
address instead of the value behind it.
The reason for using DW_OP_deref_size and not plain DW_OP_deref is that
big-endian targets need to read the right size as simply truncating a
larger read would yield the wrong result (LSB bytes are not at the lower
address).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59687
llvm-svn: 358268
If the upper bits of the SHL result aren't used, we might be able to use a narrower shift. For example, on X86 this can turn a 64-bit into 32-bit enabling a smaller encoding.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60358
llvm-svn: 358257
Summary:
Some llc debug options need pass-name as the parameters.
But if we use the pass-name ppc-early-ret, we will get below error:
llc test.ll -stop-after ppc-early-ret
LLVM ERROR: "ppc-early-ret" pass is not registered.
Below pass-names have the pass is not registered error:
ppc-ctr-loops
ppc-ctr-loops-verify
ppc-loop-preinc-prep
ppc-toc-reg-deps
ppc-vsx-copy
ppc-early-ret
ppc-vsx-fma-mutate
ppc-vsx-swaps
ppc-reduce-cr-ops
ppc-qpx-load-splat
ppc-branch-coalescing
ppc-branch-select
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60248
llvm-svn: 358256
There are 3 operands of maddld, (add (mul %1, %2), %3) and sometimes
they are constant. If there is constant operand, it takes extra li to
materialize the operand, and one more extra register too. So it's not
profitable to use maddld to optimize mul-add pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60181
llvm-svn: 358253
Sanjay Patel