ActOnFinishFullExpr that some of its checks only apply to discarded-value
expressions. This adds missing checks for unexpanded variadic template
parameter packs to a handful of constructs.
llvm-svn: 172485
copy-list-initialization (and doesn't add an additional copy step):
Fill in the ListInitialization bit when creating a CXXConstructExpr. Use it
when instantiating initializers in order to correctly handle instantiation of
copy-list-initialization. Teach TreeTransform that function arguments are
initializations, and so need this special treatment too. Finally, remove some
hacks which were working around SubstInitializer's shortcomings.
llvm-svn: 170489
This does limit these typedefs to being sequences, but no current usage
requires them to be contiguous (we could expand this to a more general
iterator pair range concept at some point).
Also, it'd be nice if SmallVector were constructible directly from an ArrayRef
but this is a bit tricky since ArrayRef depends on SmallVectorBaseImpl for the
inverse conversion. (& generalizing over all range-like things, while nice,
would require some nontrivial SFINAE I haven't thought about yet)
llvm-svn: 170482
definition, rather than at the end of the definition of the set of nested
classes. We still defer checking of the user-specified exception specification
to the end of the nesting -- we can't check that until we've parsed the
in-class initializers for non-static data members.
llvm-svn: 169805
the cases where we can't determine whether special members would be trivial
while building the class, we eagerly declare those special members. The impact
of this is bounded, since it does not trigger implicit declarations of special
members in classes which merely *use* those classes.
In order to determine whether we need to apply this rule, we also need to
eagerly declare move operations and destructors in cases where they might be
deleted. If a move operation were supposed to be deleted, it would instead
be suppressed, and we could need overload resolution to determine if we fall
back to a trivial copy operation. If a destructor were implicitly deleted,
it would cause the move constructor of any derived classes to be suppressed.
As discussed on cxx-abi-dev, C++11's selected constructor rules are also
retroactively applied as a defect resolution in C++03 mode, in order to
identify that class B has a non-trivial copy constructor (since it calls
A's constructor template, not A's copy constructor):
struct A { template<typename T> A(T &); };
struct B { mutable A a; };
llvm-svn: 169673
Remove pre-standard restriction on explicitly-defaulted copy constructors with
'incorrect' parameter types, and instead just make those special members
non-trivial as the standard requires.
This required making CXXRecordDecl correctly handle classes which have both a
trivial and a non-trivial special member of the same kind.
This also fixes PR13217 by reimplementing DiagnoseNontrivial in terms of the
new triviality computation technology.
llvm-svn: 169667
uncovered.
This required manually correcting all of the incorrect main-module
headers I could find, and running the new llvm/utils/sort_includes.py
script over the files.
I also manually added quite a few missing headers that were uncovered by
shuffling the order or moving headers up to be main-module-headers.
llvm-svn: 169237
performed, to determine whether that special member is deleted or constexpr.
That overload resolution process can in turn trigger the instantiation of a
template, which can do anything, including triggering the declaration of that
very same special member function. When this happens, do not try to recursively
declare the special member -- that's impossible. Instead, only try to realise
the truth. There is no special member.
llvm-svn: 168847
constructor/assignment operator with a const-qualified parameter type. The
prior method for determining this incorrectly used overload resolution.
llvm-svn: 168775
a special member" diagnostic from warning to error, and fix the cases where it
produced diagnostics with incorrect wording.
We don't support this as an extension, and we ban it even in C++98 mode. This
breaks too much (for instance, the ABI-specified calling convention for a type
can change if it acquires a copy constructor through the addition of a default
argument).
llvm-svn: 168769
Separate out the notions of 'has a trivial special member' and 'has a
non-trivial special member', and use them appropriately. These are not
opposites of one another (there might be no special member, or in C++11 there
might be a trivial one and a non-trivial one). The CXXRecordDecl predicates
continue to produce incorrect results, but do so in fewer cases now, and
they document the cases where they might be wrong.
No functionality changes are intended here (they will come when the predicates
start producing the right answers...).
llvm-svn: 168119
- In C++11, perform overload resolution over all assignment operators, rather than just looking for copy/move assignment operators.
- Clean up after temporaries produced by operator= immediately, rather than accumulating them until the end of the function.
llvm-svn: 167798
assignment generation. This incidentally avoids reusing the same Expr* across
multiple statements in the same object; that was generating slightly broken
ASTs, but I couldn't trigger any observable bad behavior, so no test.
llvm-svn: 167779
would have diagnosed this at instantiation time anyway, if only we
didn't hang on all of these test cases. Fixes <rdar://problem/12629723>
llvm-svn: 167651
since it also has an implicit exception specification. Downgrade the error to
an extwarn, since at least for operator delete, system headers like to declare
it as 'noexcept' whereas the implicit definition does not have an explicit
exception specification. Move the exception specification for user-declared
'operator delete' functions from the type-as-written into the type, to reflect
reality and to allow us to detect whether there was an implicit exception spec
or not.
llvm-svn: 166372
source locations in places where it is necessary for diagnostics. By itself,
this causes assertions, so while I'm here, also fix property synthesis
for properties of C++ class type so we use so we properly set up a scope
and mark variable declarations.
<rdar://problem/12514189>.
llvm-svn: 166219
GCC and Clang both do not warn on:
struct a { virtual void func(); };
struct b: a { virtual void func(); void func(int); };
struct c: b { void func(int); using b::func; };
but if the "using" was using a::func GCC would still remain silent where Clang
would warn. This change makes Clang consistent with GCC's existing behavior.
llvm-svn: 166154
When suggesting "foo::bar" as a correction for "fob::bar" we mistakenly
replaced only "bar" with "foo::bar" producing "fob::foo::bar" which was broken.
This corrects that replacement in as many places as I could find & provides
test cases for all those cases I could find a test case for. There are a couple
that don't seem to be reachable (one looks entirely dead, the other just
doesn't seem to ever get called with a namespace to namespace change).
Review by Richard Smith ( http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D57 ).
llvm-svn: 165817
a non-inline namespace, then reopens it as inline to try to add its symbols to
the surrounding namespace. In this one special case, permit the namespace to be
reopened as inline, and patch up the name lookup tables to match.
llvm-svn: 165263
Clang will now honor the FP_CONTRACT pragma and emit LLVM
fmuladd intrinsics for expressions of the form A * B + C (when they occur in a
single statement).
llvm-svn: 164989
This makes the wording more informative, and consistent with the other
warnings about uninitialized variables.
Also, me and David who reviewed this couldn't figure out why we would
need to do a lookup to get the name of the variable; so just print the
name directly.
llvm-svn: 164366
This makes Clang warn about self references in in-class initializers,
for example:
struct S {
int a = a + 42;
};
This basically just moves UninitializedFieldVisitor up a bit in
SemaDeclCXX.cpp, and adds a call to it from ActOnCXXInClassMemberInitializer.
llvm-svn: 164131
type checking for non-static data member initializers in a dependent
class, because our ASTs lose too much information to when
type-checking an initializer. Fixes <rdar://problem/11974632>,
although the result is still rather unsatisfactory.
llvm-svn: 163871
Richard Smith