Details:
Emit suspend expression which roughly looks like:
auto && x = CommonExpr();
if (!x.await_ready()) {
llvm_coro_save();
x.await_suspend(...); (*)
llvm_coro_suspend(); (**)
}
x.await_resume();
where the result of the entire expression is the result of x.await_resume()
(*) If x.await_suspend return type is bool, it allows to veto a suspend:
if (x.await_suspend(...))
llvm_coro_suspend();
(**) llvm_coro_suspend() encodes three possible continuations as a switch instruction:
%where-to = call i8 @llvm.coro.suspend(...)
switch i8 %where-to, label %coro.ret [ ; jump to epilogue to suspend
i8 0, label %yield.ready ; go here when resumed
i8 1, label %yield.cleanup ; go here when destroyed
]
llvm-svn: 298784
attributes.
These patches don't work because we can't currently access the parameter
information in a reliable way when building attributes. I thought this
would be relatively straightforward to fix, but it seems not to be the
case. Fixing this will requrie a substantial re-plumbing of machinery to
allow attributes to be handled in this location, and several other fixes
to the attribute machinery should probably be made at the same time. All
of this will make the patch .... substantially more complicated.
Reverting for now as there are active miscompiles caused by the current
version.
llvm-svn: 298695
Summary:
Clang companion patch to LLVM patch D31027, which adds support
for emitting minimized bitcode file for use in the thin link step.
Add a cc1 option -fthin-link-bitcode=<file> to trigger this behavior.
Depends on D31027.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, pcc
Subscribers: cfe-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31050
llvm-svn: 298639
After r297760, __isOSVersionAtLeast in compiler-rt loads the CoreFoundation
symbols at runtime. This means that `@available` will always fail when used in a
binary without a linked CoreFoundation.
This commit forces Clang to emit a reference to a CoreFoundation symbol when
`@available` is used to ensure that linking will fail when CoreFoundation isn't
linked with the build product.
rdar://31039592
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30977
llvm-svn: 298588
It seems MS headers have started using __readgsqword, and since it's
used in a header that doesn't include intrin.h, we can't implement it as
an inline function anymore.
That was already the case for __readfsdword, which Saleem added support
for in r220859. This patch reuses that codegen to implement all of
__read[fg]s{byte,word,dword,qword}.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31248
llvm-svn: 298538
explaining why we have to ignore errors here even though in other parts
of codegen we can be more strict with builtins.
Also add a test case based on the code in a TSan test that found this
issue.
llvm-svn: 298494
declarations and calls instead of just definitions, and then teach it to
*not* attach such attributes even if the source code contains them.
This follows the design direction discussed on cfe-dev here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-January/052066.html
The idea is that for C standard library builtins, even if the library
vendor chooses to annotate their routines with __attribute__((nonnull)),
we will ignore those attributes which pertain to pointer arguments that
have an associated size. This allows the widespread (and seemingly
reasonable) pattern of calling these routines with a null pointer and
a zero size. I have only done this for the library builtins currently
recognized by Clang, but we can now trivially add to this set. This will
be controllable with -fno-builtin if anyone should care to do so.
Note that this does *not* change the AST. As a consequence, warnings,
static analysis, and source code rewriting are not impacted.
This isn't even a regression on any platform as neither Clang nor LLVM
have ever put 'nonnull' onto these arguments for declarations. All this
patch does is enable it on other declarations while preventing us from
ever accidentally enabling it on these libc functions due to a library
vendor.
It will also allow any other libraries using this annotation to gain
optimizations based on the annotation even when only a declaration is
visible.
llvm-svn: 298491
Summary:
Because SamplePGO passes will be invoked twice in ThinLTO build: once at compile phase, the other at backend. We want to make sure the IR at the 2nd phase matches the hot part in pro
file, thus we do not want to inline hot callsites in the first phase.
Reviewers: tejohnson, eraman
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31202
llvm-svn: 298429
Setting dllexport on a declaration has no effect, as we do not emit export
directives for declarations.
Part of the fix for PR32334.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31162
llvm-svn: 298330
In doing so, clean up the MD5 interface a little. Most
existing users only care about the lower 8 bytes of an MD5,
but for some users that care about the upper and lower,
there wasn't a good interface. Furthermore, consumers
of the MD5 checksum were required to handle endianness
details on their own, so it seems reasonable to abstract
this into a nicer interface that just gives you the right
value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31105
llvm-svn: 298322
This is a follow-up to r297700 (Add a nullability sanitizer).
It addresses some FIXME's re: using nullability-specific diagnostic
handlers from compiler-rt, now that the necessary handlers exist.
check-ubsan test updates to follow.
llvm-svn: 297750
Teach UBSan to detect when a value with the _Nonnull type annotation
assumes a null value. Call expressions, initializers, assignments, and
return statements are all checked.
Because _Nonnull does not affect IRGen, the new checks are disabled by
default. The new driver flags are:
-fsanitize=nullability-arg (_Nonnull violation in call)
-fsanitize=nullability-assign (_Nonnull violation in assignment)
-fsanitize=nullability-return (_Nonnull violation in return stmt)
-fsanitize=nullability (all of the above)
This patch builds on top of UBSan's existing support for detecting
violations of the nonnull attributes ('nonnull' and 'returns_nonnull'),
and relies on the compiler-rt support for those checks. Eventually we
will need to update the diagnostic messages in compiler-rt (there are
FIXME's for this, which will be addressed in a follow-up).
One point of note is that the nullability-return check is only allowed
to kick in if all arguments to the function satisfy their nullability
preconditions. This makes it necessary to emit some null checks in the
function body itself.
Testing: check-clang and check-ubsan. I also built some Apple ObjC
frameworks with an asserts-enabled compiler, and verified that we get
valid reports.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30762
llvm-svn: 297700
Change ASTFileSignature from a random 32-bit number to the hash of the
PCM content.
- Move definition ASTFileSignature to Basic/Module.h so Module and
ASTSourceDescriptor can use it.
- Change the signature from uint64_t to std::array<uint32_t,5>.
- Stop using (saving/reading) the size and modification time of PCM
files when there is a valid SIGNATURE.
- Add UNHASHED_CONTROL_BLOCK, and use it to store the SIGNATURE record
and other records that shouldn't affect the hash. Because implicit
modules reuses the same file for multiple levels of -Werror, this
includes DIAGNOSTIC_OPTIONS and DIAG_PRAGMA_MAPPINGS.
This helps to solve a PCH + implicit Modules dependency issue: PCH files
are handled by the external build system, whereas implicit modules are
handled by internal compiler build system. This prevents invalidating a
PCH when the compiler overwrites a PCM file with the same content
(modulo the diagnostic differences).
Design and original patch by Manman Ren!
llvm-svn: 297655
x86 has undef SSE/AVX intrinsics that should represent a bogus register operand.
This is not the same as LLVM's undef value which can take on multiple bit patterns.
There are better solutions / follow-ups to this discussed here:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32176
...but this should prevent miscompiles with a one-line code change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30834
llvm-svn: 297588
It's possible to load out-of-range values from bitfields backed by a
boolean or an enum. Check for UB loads from bitfields.
This is the motivating example:
struct S {
BOOL b : 1; // Signed ObjC BOOL.
};
S s;
s.b = 1; // This is actually stored as -1.
if (s.b == 1) // Evaluates to false, -1 != 1.
...
Changes since the original commit:
- Single-bit bools are a special case (see CGF::EmitFromMemory), and we
can't avoid dealing with them when loading from a bitfield. Don't try to
insert a check in this case.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30423
llvm-svn: 297389
It's possible to load out-of-range values from bitfields backed by a
boolean or an enum. Check for UB loads from bitfields.
This is the motivating example:
struct S {
BOOL b : 1; // Signed ObjC BOOL.
};
S s;
s.b = 1; // This is actually stored as -1.
if (s.b == 1) // Evaluates to false, -1 != 1.
...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30423
llvm-svn: 297298
This patch honors the unaligned type qualifier (currently available through he
keyword __unaligned and -fms-extensions) in CodeGen. In the current form the
patch affects declarations and expressions. It does not affect fields of
classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30166
llvm-svn: 297276
Summary:
Because of the existence branches out of GNU statement expressions, it
is possible that emitting cleanups for a full expression may cause the
new insertion point to not be dominated by the result of the inner
expression. Consider this example:
struct Foo { Foo(); ~Foo(); int x; };
int g(Foo, int);
int f(bool cond) {
int n = g(Foo(), ({ if (cond) return 0; 42; }));
return n;
}
Before this change, result of the call to 'g' did not dominate its use
in the store to 'n'. The early return exit from the statement expression
branches to a shared cleanup block, which ends in a switch between the
fallthrough destination (the assignment to 'n') or the function exit
block.
This change solves the problem by spilling and reloading expression
evaluation results when any of the active cleanups have branches.
I audited the other call sites of enterFullExpression, and they don't
appear to keep and Values live across the site of the cleanup, except in
ARC code. I wasn't able to create a test case for ARC that exhibits this
problem, though.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30590
llvm-svn: 297084
Summary:
Added co_return statement emission.
Tweaked coro-alloc.cpp test to use co_return to trigger coroutine processing instead of co_await, since this change starts emitting the body of the coroutine and await expression handling has not been upstreamed yet.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, EricWF, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: majnemer, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29979
llvm-svn: 297076
block copy/destroy routines
This is a preparation commit for work on merging unique block copy/destroy
helper functions.
rdar://22950898
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30345
llvm-svn: 297023
Summary:
Functions with the "xray_log_args" attribute will tell LLVM to emit a special
XRay sled for compiler-rt to copy any call arguments to your logging handler.
Reviewers: dberris
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29704
llvm-svn: 296999
UBSan's nonnull argument check applies when a parameter has the
"nonnull" attribute. The check currently works for FunctionDecls, but
not for ObjCMethodDecls. This patch extends the check to work for ObjC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30599
llvm-svn: 296996
easily extend the aggregate-builder API. Stupid missing language
features.
Also add APIs for constructing a relative reference and computing
the offset of a position from the start of the initializer.
llvm-svn: 296979
When clang emits an inheriting C++ constructor it may inline code
during the CodeGen phase. This patch ensures that any debug info in
this inlined code gets a proper inlined location. Otherwise we can end
up with invalid debug info metadata, since all inlined local variables
and function arguments would be reparented into the call site.
Analogous to ApplyInlineLocation this patch introduces a
ApplyInlineDebugLocation scoped helper to facilitate entering an
inlined scope and cleaning up afterwards.
This fixes one of the issues discovered in PR32042.
rdar://problem/30679307
llvm-svn: 296388
Essentially, as a base class constructor does not construct virtual bases, such
a constructor for an abstract class does not need the corresponding base class
construction to be valid, and likewise for destructors.
This creates an awkward situation: clang will sometimes generate references to
the complete object and deleting destructors for an abstract class (it puts
them in the construction vtable for a derived class). But we can't generate a
"correct" version of these because we can't generate references to base class
constructors any more (if they're template specializations, say, we might not
have instantiated them and can't assume any other TU will emit a copy).
Fortunately, we don't need to, since no correct program can ever invoke them,
so instead emit symbols that just trap.
We should stop emitting references to these symbols, but still need to emit
definitions for compatibility.
llvm-svn: 296275
2nd attempt: the first was in r296231, but it had a use after lifetime
bug.
Clang has logic to lower certain conditional expressions directly into llvm
select instructions. However, it does not emit the correct profile counter
increment as it does this: it emits an unconditional increment of the counter
for the 'then branch', even if the value selected is from the 'else branch'
(this is PR32019).
That means, given the following snippet, we would report that "0" is selected
twice, and that "1" is never selected:
int f1(int x) {
return x ? 0 : 1;
^2 ^0
}
f1(0);
f1(1);
Fix the problem by using the instrprof_increment_step intrinsic to do the
proper increment.
llvm-svn: 296245
Clang has logic to lower certain conditional expressions directly into
llvm select instructions. However, it does not emit the correct profile
counter increment as it does this: it emits an unconditional increment
of the counter for the 'then branch', even if the value selected is from
the 'else branch' (this is PR32019).
That means, given the following snippet, we would report that "0" is
selected twice, and that "1" is never selected:
int f1(int x) {
return x ? 0 : 1;
^2 ^0
}
f1(0);
f1(1);
Fix the problem by using the instrprof_increment_step intrinsic to do
the proper increment.
llvm-svn: 296231
Teach ubsan to diagnose remainder operations which have undefined
behavior due to signed overflow (e.g INT_MIN % -1).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29437
llvm-svn: 296214
Gor Nishanov