Summary:
SSBS (Speculative Store Bypass Safe) is only mandatory from 8.5
onwards but is optional from Armv8.0-A. This patch adds a command
line option to enable SSBS, as it was previously only possible to
enable by selecting -march=armv8.5-a.
Similar patch upstream in GNU binutils:
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-09/msg00274.html
Reviewers: olista01, samparker, aemerson
Reviewed By: samparker
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, kristina, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54629
llvm-svn: 348137
separate files to enable future changes.
This moves ARM and AArch64 target parsing into their
own files. They are still accessible through
TargetParser.h as before.
Several functions in AArch64 which were just forwarders to ARM
have been removed. All except AArch64::getFPUName were unused,
and that was only used in a test. Which itself was overlapping
one in ARM, so it has also been removed.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53980
llvm-svn: 347741
This adds the memory tagging extension, which is an optional extension
introduced in v8.5A. The new instructions and registers will be added by
subsequent patches.
Patch by Pablo Barrio!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52486
llvm-svn: 343563
The ARMTargetParser.def contains an entry for arm1176j-s which is the
default for the ArmV6K architecture. This cpu does not exist, there are
only arm1176jz-s and arm1176jzf-s and they are both architecture ArmV6KZ.
The only CPUs that are actually ArmV6K are the mpcore, mpcore_nofpu and
later revisions of the arm1136 family r1px (which we don't have a table
entry for).
This patch removes the arm1176j-s and makes mpcore the default for armv6k.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52594
llvm-svn: 343303
This adds two new system registers, used to generate random numbers.
This is an optional extension to v8.5-A, and will be controlled by the
"+rng" modifier of the -march= and -mcpu= options.
Patch by Pablo Barrio!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52481
llvm-svn: 343217
This patch allows targeting Armv8.5-A, adding the architecture to
tablegen and setting the options to be identical to Armv8.4-A for the
time being. Subsequent patches will add support for the different
features included in the Armv8.5-A Reference Manual.
Patch by Pablo Barrio!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52470
llvm-svn: 343102
Add +fp16fml feature for new FP16 instructions, which are a
mandatory part of FP16 from v8.4-A and an optional part of FP16
from v8.2-A. It doesn't seem to be possible to model this in
LLVM, but the relationship between the options is handled by
the related clang patch.
In keeping with what I think is the usual practice, the fp16fml
extension is accepted regardless of base architecture version.
Builds on/replaces Sjoerd Meijer's patch to add these instructions at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49839.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50228
llvm-svn: 340013
Adds some missing tests for the FP16 extension,
fixes an existing test that misnames it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50227
llvm-svn: 340012
'size' of a vector is unsigned, and I accidentially compared
it to an int through GTEST. I switched it to unsigned, which
is the template parameter type anyway.
llvm-svn: 324625
This is a support change for a CFE change (https://reviews.llvm.org/D42978)
that allows march and -target-cpu to list the valid targets in a note. The changes
are limited to the ARM/AArch64, since this is the only target that gets the CPU
list from LLVM.
llvm-svn: 324623
This change adds the missing armv8l variant as an alias of armv8 architecture.
The issue was observed with several regressions in validation on armv8l
hardware (for instance ExecutionEngine/frem.ll failed due to lack of neon fpu).
Tested with regression testsuite passed without regression on ARM and x86_64.
Patch by Yvan Roux.
Reviewers: rengolin, rogfer01, olista01, fhahn
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41859
llvm-svn: 322098
Summary:
This fixes a crash when invalid -march options like `armv` are provided.
Based on a patch by Will Lovett.
Reviewers: rengolin, samparker, mcrosier
Reviewed By: samparker
Subscribers: aemerson, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41429
llvm-svn: 321166
Summary:
Using c++11 enum classes ensures that only valid enum values are used
for ArchKind, ProfileKind, VersionKind and ISAKind. This removes the
need for checks that the provided values map to a proper enum value,
allows us to get rid of AK_LAST and prevents comparing values from
different enums. It also removes a bunch of static_cast
from unsigned to enum values and vice versa, at the cost of introducing
static casts to access AArch64ARCHNames and ARMARCHNames by ArchKind.
FPUKind and ArchExtKind are the only remaining old-style enum in
TargetParser.h. I think it's beneficial to keep ArchExtKind as old-style
enum, but FPUKind can be converted too, but this patch is quite big, so
could do this in a follow-up patch. I could also split this patch up a
bit, if people would prefer that.
Reviewers: rengolin, javed.absar, chandlerc, rovka
Reviewed By: rovka
Subscribers: aemerson, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35882
llvm-svn: 309287
clang-format (https://reviews.llvm.org/D33932) to keep primary headers
at the top and handle new utility headers like 'gmock' consistently with
other utility headers.
No other change was made. I did no manual edits, all of this is
clang-format.
This should allow other changes to have more clear and focused diffs,
and is especially motivated by moving some headers into more focused
libraries.
llvm-svn: 304786
Otherwise, each CPU has to manually specify the extensions it supports,
even though they have to be a superset of the base arch extensions.
And when there's redundant data there's stale data, so most of the CPUs
lie about the features they support (almost none lists AEK_FP).
Instead, do the saner thing: add the optional extensions on top of the
base extensions provided by the architecture.
The ARM TargetParser has the same behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32780
llvm-svn: 302078
The hardware div feature refers only to Thumb, but because of its name
it is tempting to use it to check for hardware division in general,
which may cause problems in ARM mode. See https://reviews.llvm.org/D32005.
This patch adds "Thumb" to its name, to make its scope clear. One
notable place where I haven't made the change is in the feature flag
(used with -mattr), which is still hwdiv. Changing it would also require
changes in a lot of tests, including clang tests, and it doesn't seem
like it's worth the effort.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32160
llvm-svn: 300827
Broadcom Vulcan is now Cavium ThunderX2T99.
LLVM Bugzilla: http://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32113
Minor fixes for the alignments of loops and functions for
ThunderX T81/T83/T88 (better performance).
Patch was tested with SpecCPU2006.
Patch by Stefan Teleman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30510
llvm-svn: 297190
This set of patches adds support for Cavium ThunderX ARM64 processors:
* ThunderX
* ThunderX T81
* ThunderX T83
* ThunderX T88
Patch by Stefan Teleman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28891
llvm-svn: 295475
Gcc supports target armv7ve which is armv7-a with virtualization
extensions. This change adds support for this in llvm for gcc
compatibility.
Also remove redundant FeatureHWDiv, FeatureHWDivARM for a few models as
this is specified automatically by FeatureVirtualization.
Patch by Manoj Gupta.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29472
llvm-svn: 294661
Add both cores to the target parser and TableGen. Test that eabi
attributes are set correctly for both cores. Additionally, test the
absence and presence of MOVT in Cortex-M23 and Cortex-M33, respectively.
Committed on behalf of Sanne Wouda.
Reviewers : rengolin, olista01.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29073
llvm-svn: 293761
String pooling is not guaranteed by the standard, so if
you're comparing two different string literals for equality,
you have to use strcmp.
llvm-svn: 277831
These loop from 0 to AEK_XSCALE, which is currently defined as 0x80000000, and
thus the tests loop over the entire int range, which is unreasonable
and also too slow in debug builds.
llvm-svn: 276969
Add unittest to {ARM | AArch64}TargetParser,and by the way correct problems as below:
1.Correct a incorrect indexing problem in AArch64TargetParser. The architecture enumeration
is shared across ARM and AArch64 in original implementation.But In the code,I just used the
index which was offset by the ARM, and this would index into the array incorrectly. To make
AArch64 has its own arch enum,or we will do a lot of slowly iterating.
2.Correct a spelling error. The parameter of llvm::AArch64::getArchExtName.
3.Correct a writing mistake, in llvm::ARM::parseArchISA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21785
llvm-svn: 276957
The architecture enumeration is shared across ARM and AArch64. However, the
data is not. The code incorrectly would index into the array using the
architecture index which was offset by the ARMv7 architecture enumeration. We
do not have a marker for indicating the architectural family to which the
enumeration belongs so we cannot be clever about offsetting the index (at least
it is not immediately apparent to me). Instead, fall back to the tried-and-true
method of slowly iterating the array (its not a large array, so the impact of
this is not too high).
Because of the incorrect indexing, if we were lucky, we would crash, but usually
we would return an invalid StringRef. We did not have any tests for the AArch64
target parser previously;. Extend the previous tests I had added for ARM to
cover AArch64 for ensuring that we return expected StringRefs.
Take the opportunity to change some iterator types to references.
This work is needed to support parsing `.arch name` directives in the AArch64
target asm parser.
llvm-svn: 272145
The ARM TargetParser would construct invalid StringRefs. This would cause
asserts to trigger. Add some tests in LLVM to ensure that we dont regress on
this in the future. Although there is a test for this in clang, this ensures
that the changes would get caught in the same repository.
llvm-svn: 262790
Pablo Barrio