r267296 used std::piecewise_construct without using
std::forward_as_tuple, and r267298 hacked it out (using an emplace_back
followed by a couple of reset() calls) because of a problem on a bot.
I'm finally circling back to call forward_as_tuple as I should have to
begin with (thanks to David Blaikie for pointing out the missing piece).
Note that this code uses emplace_back() instead of
push_back(make_pair()) because the move constructor for TrackingMDRef is
expensive (cheaper than a copy, but still expensive).
llvm-svn: 272306
Summary:
Now DISubroutineType has a 'cc' field which should be a DW_CC_ enum. If
it is present and non-zero, the backend will emit it as a
DW_AT_calling_convention attribute. On the CodeView side, we translate
it to the appropriate enum for the LF_PROCEDURE record.
I added a new LLVM vendor specific enum to the list of DWARF calling
conventions. DWARF does not appear to attempt to standardize these, so I
assume it's OK to do this until we coordinate with GCC on how to emit
vectorcall convention functions.
Reviewers: dexonsmith, majnemer, aaboud, amccarth
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21114
llvm-svn: 272197
This will be necessary to allow the global merge pass to attach
multiple debug info metadata nodes to global variables once we reverse
the edge from DIGlobalVariable to GlobalVariable.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20414
llvm-svn: 271358
This patch adds an IR, assembly and bitcode representation for metadata
attachments for globals. Future patches will port existing features to use
these new attachments.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20074
llvm-svn: 271348
When we have "Image Info Version" module flag but don't have "Class Properties"
module flag, set "Class Properties" module flag to 0, so we can correctly emit
errors when one module has the flag set and another module does not.
rdar://26469641
llvm-svn: 270791
Calls are initialized from a DenseMap. We can sort them using the
value id to recover some determinism during serialization.
From: mehdi_amini <mehdi_amini@91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8>
llvm-svn: 269638
GlobalVars Refs are initialized from a DenseSet. We can sort them
using the value id to recover some determinism during serialization.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 269635
Calls are initialized from a DenseMap. We can sort them using the
value id to recover some determinism during serialization.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 269634
Refs are initialized from a DenseSet. We can sort them using the
value id to recover some determinism during serialization.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 269629
This fixes a debug assert on Windows from the new iterator
implementation added in r269059. The Windows std::vector iterator
operator== checks in debug mode that the containers being iterated over
are the same, which they may not be.
Fixed by checking that we are iterating over the same container before
comparing the container iterators.
llvm-svn: 269232
This restores commit r268627:
Summary:
When launching ThinLTO backends in a distributed build (currently
supported in gold via the thinlto-index-only plugin option), emit
an individual index file for each backend process as described here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098272.html
...
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19556
Address msan failures by avoiding std::prev on map.end(), the
theory is that this is causing issues due to some known UB problems
in __tree.
llvm-svn: 269059
The bitcode upgrade I added for DISubprogram in r266446 was based on the
assumption that the CU node for the subprogram was already materialized by the
time the DISubprogram is visited. This assumption may not hold true as future
versions of LLVM may decide to write out bitcode in a different order. This
patch corrects this by introducing a versioning bit next to the distinct flag to
unambiguously differentiate the new from the old record layouts.
Note for people stabilizing LLVM out-of-tree: This patch introduces a bitcode
incompatibility with llvm trunk revisions from r266446 — this commit. (But
D19987 will ensure that it degrades gracefully).
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20004
rdar://problem/26074194
llvm-svn: 268816
Summary:
When launching ThinLTO backends in a distributed build (currently
supported in gold via the thinlto-index-only plugin option), emit
an individual index file for each backend process as described here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098272.html
The individual index file encodes the summary and module information
required for implementing the importing/exporting decisions made
for a given module in the thin link step.
This is in place of the current mechanism that uses the combined index
to make importing decisions in each back end independently. It is an
enabler for doing global summary based optimizations in the thin link
step (which will be recorded in the individual index files), and reduces
the size of the index that must be sent to each backend process, and
the amount of work to scan it in the backends.
Rather than create entirely new ModuleSummaryIndex structures (and all
the included unique_ptrs) for each backend index file, a map is created
to record all of the GUID and summary pointers needed for a particular
index file. The IndexBitcodeWriter walks this map instead of the full
index (hiding the details of managing the appropriate summary iteration
in a new iterator subclass). This is more efficient than walking the
entire combined index and filtering out just the needed summaries during
each backend bitcode index write.
Depends on D19481.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits, joker.eph
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19556
llvm-svn: 268627
Summary:
With the removal of support for lazy parsing of combined index summary
records (e.g. r267344), we no longer need to include the summary record
bitcode offset in the VST entries for definitions. Change the combined
index format to be similar to the per-module index format in using value
ids to cross-reference from the summary record to the VST entry (rather
than the summary record bitcode offset to cross-reference in the other
direction).
The visible changes are:
1) Add the value id to the combined summary records
2) Remove the summary offset from the combined VST records, which has
the following effects:
- No longer need the VST_CODE_COMBINED_GVDEFENTRY record, as all
combined index VST entries now only contain the value id and
corresponding GUID.
- No longer have duplicate VST entries in the case where there are
multiple definitions of a symbol (e.g. weak/linkonce), as they all
have the same value id and GUID.
An implication of #2 above is that in order to hook up an alias to the
correct aliasee based on the value id of the aliasee recorded in the
combined index alias record, we need to scan the entries in the index
for that GUID to find the one from the same module (i.e. the case where
there are multiple entries for the aliasee). But the reader no longer
has to maintain a special map to hook up the alias/aliasee.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19481
llvm-svn: 267712
There's hardly any functionality change here. Instead of calling
materializeMetadata on the first call to materialize(GlobalValue*), wait
until the first one that's actually going to do something. Noticed by
inspection; I don't have a concrete case where this makes a difference.
Added an assertion in materializeMetadata to be sure this (or a future
change) doesn't delay materializeMetadata after function-level metadata.
llvm-svn: 267345
Summary:
Remove the GlobalValueInfo and change the ModuleSummaryIndex to directly
reference summary objects. The info structure was there to support lazy
parsing of the combined index summary objects, which is no longer
needed and not supported.
Reviewers: joker.eph
Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19462
llvm-svn: 267344
Add tests for some missing cases to bitcode upgrade in r267296.
- DICompositeType with an 'elements:' field, which will cause it to be
involved in a cycle after the upgrade.
- A DIDerivedType that references a class in 'extraData:'.
I updated test/Bitcode/dityperefs-3.8.ll with the missing cases and
regenerated test/Bitcode/dityperefs-3.8.ll.bc.
llvm-svn: 267332
Right now it only contains the LinkageType, but will be extended
with "hasSection", "isOptSize", "hasInlineAssembly", etc.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19404
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 267319
Summary:
As discussed in D18298, some local globals can't
be renamed/promoted (because they have a section, or because
they are referenced from inline assembly).
To be able to detect naming collision, we need to keep around
the "GUID" using their original name without taking the linkage
into account.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19454
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 267304
Eliminate DITypeIdentifierMap and make DITypeRef a thin wrapper around
DIType*. It is no longer legal to refer to a DICompositeType by its
'identifier:', and DIBuilder no longer retains all types with an
'identifier:' automatically.
Aside from the bitcode upgrade, this is mainly removing logic to resolve
an MDString-based reference to an actualy DIType. The commits leading
up to this have made the implicit type map in DICompileUnit's
'retainedTypes:' field superfluous.
This does not remove DITypeRef, DIScopeRef, DINodeRef, and
DITypeRefArray, or stop using them in DI-related metadata. Although as
of this commit they aren't serving a useful purpose, there are patchces
under review to reuse them for CodeView support.
The tests in LLVM were updated with deref-typerefs.sh, which is attached
to the thread "[RFC] Lazy-loading of debug info metadata":
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098318.html
llvm-svn: 267296
Since forward references for uniqued node operands are expensive (and
those for distinct node operands are cheap due to
DistinctMDOperandPlaceholder), minimize forward references in uniqued
node operands.
Moreover, guarantee that when a cycle is broken by a distinct node, none
of the uniqued nodes have any forward references. In
ValueEnumerator::EnumerateMetadata, enumerate uniqued node subgraphs
first, delaying distinct nodes until all uniqued nodes have been
handled. This guarantees that uniqued nodes only have forward
references when there is a uniquing cycle (since r267276 changed
ValueEnumerator::organizeMetadata to partition distinct nodes in front
of uniqued nodes as a post-pass).
Note that a single uniqued subgraph can hit multiple distinct nodes at
its leaves. Ideally these would themselves be emitted in post-order,
but this commit doesn't attempt that; I think it requires an extra pass
through the edges, which I'm not convinced is worth it (since
DistinctMDOperandPlaceholder makes forward references quite cheap
between distinct nodes).
I've added two testcases:
- test/Bitcode/mdnodes-distinct-in-post-order.ll is just like
test/Bitcode/mdnodes-in-post-order.ll, except with distinct nodes
instead of uniqued ones. This confirms that, in the absence of
uniqued nodes, distinct nodes are still emitted in post-order.
- test/Bitcode/mdnodes-distinct-nodes-break-cycles.ll is the minimal
example where a naive post-order traversal would cause one uniqued
node to forward-reference another. IOW, it's the motivating test.
llvm-svn: 267278
When an operand of a distinct node hasn't been read yet, the reader can
use a DistinctMDOperandPlaceholder. This is much cheaper than forward
referencing from a uniqued node. Change
ValueEnumerator::organizeMetadata to partition distinct nodes and
uniqued nodes to reduce the overhead of cycles broken by distinct nodes.
Mehdi measured this for me; this removes most of the RAUW from the
importing step of -flto=thin, even after a WIP patch that removes
string-based DITypeRefs (introducing many more cycles to the metadata
graph).
llvm-svn: 267276
Summary:
As discussed in on the mailing list yesterday, I have refactored
BitcodeWriter.cpp to use classes to manage the bitcode writing process,
instead of passing around long lists of parameters between static
functions. See:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-April/098610.html
I created a parent BitcodeWriter class to own the BitstreamWriter,
write the header, and contain the main entry point into the writing
process. There are two derived classes, one for writing a module and one
for writing a combined index file (for ThinLTO), which manage the
writing process specific to those bitcode file types.
I also changed the functions to conform to LLVM coding standards
(lowercase function name first letter). The only two routines that still
start with an uppercase letter are the two external interfaces, which
can be fixed as a follow-on (I wanted to keep this round just within
BitcodeWriter.cpp).
Reviewers: dexonsmith, joker.eph
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19447
llvm-svn: 267273
Mehdi's pattern recognition pulled this one out. This is cleaner with
std::find_if than with the strange helper function that took an iterator
by reference and updated it.
llvm-svn: 267271
Each reference to an unresolved MDNode is expensive, since the RAUW
support in MDNode uses a separate allocation and side map. Since
a distinct MDNode doesn't require its operands on creation (unlike
uniuqed nodes, there's no need to check for structural equivalence),
use nullptr for any of its unresolved operands. Besides reducing the
burden on MDNode maps, this can avoid allocating temporary MDNodes in
the first place.
We need some way to track operands. Invent DistinctMDOperandPlaceholder
for this purpose, which is a Metadata subclass that holds an ID and
points at its single user. DistinctMDOperandPlaceholder::replaceUseWith
is just like RAUW, but its name highlights that there is only ever
exactly one use.
There is no support for moving (or, obviously, copying) these. Move
support would be possible but expensive; leaving it unimplemented
prevents user error. In the BitcodeReader I originally considered
allocating on a BumpPtrAllocator and keeping a vector of pointers to
them, and then I realized that std::deque implements exactly this.
A couple of obvious follow-ups:
- Change ValueEnumerator to emit distinct nodes first to take more
advantage of this optimization. (How convenient... I think I might
have a couple of patches for this.)
- Change DIBuilder and its consumers (like CGDebugInfo in clang) to
use something like this when constructing debug info in the first
place.
llvm-svn: 267270
Consistently use the IsDistinct variable and start relying on it in
GET_OR_DISTINCT. This change has NFC, but prepares for using IsDistinct
to optimize the behaviour of the getMD() and getMDOrNull() helpers.
llvm-svn: 267268
The only functionality change was removing an error check from the
BitcodeReader (and an assertion from DILocation::getImpl) that is
already caught by Verifier::visitDILocation. The Verifier is a better
place for this anyway, and being inconsistent with other subclasses of
MDNode isn't serving anyone.
llvm-svn: 267267
Re-layer the functions in the new (i.e., newly correct) post-order
traversals in ValueEnumerator (r266947) and ValueMapper (r266949).
Instead of adding a node to the worklist in a helper function and
returning a flag to say what happened, return the node itself. This
makes the code way cleaner: the worklist is local to the main function,
there is no flag for an early loop exit (since we can cleanly bury the
loop), and it's perfectly clear when pointers into the worklist might be
invalidated.
I'm fixing both algorithms in the same commit to avoid repeating the
commit message; if you take the time to understand one the other should
be easy. The diff itself isn't entirely obvious since the traversals
have some noise (i.e., things to do), but here's the high-level change:
auto helper = [&WL](T *Op) { auto helper = [](T **&I, T **E) {
=> while (I != E) {
if (shouldVisit(Op)) { T *Op = *I++;
WL.push(Op, Op->begin()); if (shouldVisit(Op)) {
return true; return Op;
} }
return false; return nullptr;
}; };
=>
WL.push(S, S->begin()); WL.push(S, S->begin());
while (!empty()) { while (!empty()) {
auto *N = WL.top().N; auto *N = WL.top().N;
auto *&I = WL.top().I; auto *&I = WL.top().I;
bool DidChange = false;
while (I != N->end())
if (helper(*I++)) { => if (T *Op = helper(I, N->end()) {
DidChange = true; WL.push(Op, Op->begin());
break; continue;
} }
if (DidChange)
continue;
POT.push(WL.pop()); => POT.push(WL.pop());
} }
Thanks to Mehdi for helping me find a better way to layer this.
llvm-svn: 267099
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith