Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bill Wendling 23242098e7 The transform is:
(or (bool?A:B),(bool?C:D)) --> (bool?(or A,C):(or B,D))

By the time the OR is visited, both the SELECTs have been visited and not
optimized and the OR itself hasn't been transformed so we do this transform in
the hopes that the new ORs will be optimized.

The transform is explicitly disabled for vector-selects until "codegen matures
to handle them better".

Patch by Muhammad Tauqir!

llvm-svn: 175380
2013-02-16 23:41:36 +00:00
Nadav Rotem 513bd8a73c InstCombine: canonicalize sext-and --> select
sext-not-and --> select.

Patch by Muhammad Tauqir Ahmad.

llvm-svn: 173901
2013-01-30 06:35:22 +00:00
Chris Lattner 64ffd11d49 fix logical-select to invoke filecheck right, and fix hte instcombine
xform it is checking to actually pass.  There is no need to match
m_SelectCst<0, -1> since instcombine canonicalizes that into not(sext).

Add matches for sext(not(x)) in addition to not(sext(x)).

llvm-svn: 95420
2010-02-05 19:53:02 +00:00
Chris Lattner 1b35bbe813 change the canonical form of "cond ? -1 : 0" to be
"sext cond" instead of a select.  This simplifies some instcombine
code, matches the policy for zext (cond ? 1 : 0 -> zext), and allows
us to generate better code for a testcase on ppc.

llvm-svn: 94339
2010-01-24 00:09:49 +00:00
Dan Gohman 72a13d2476 Use opt -S instead of piping bitcode output through llvm-dis.
llvm-svn: 81257
2009-09-08 22:34:10 +00:00
Dan Gohman 9737a63ed8 Change these tests to feed the assembly files to opt directly, instead
of using llvm-as, now that opt supports this.

llvm-svn: 81226
2009-09-08 16:50:01 +00:00
Chris Lattner c3f3b059d0 Handle the case where there is no "not". It is possible it got
folded into the select.

llvm-svn: 59389
2008-11-16 04:25:26 +00:00
Chris Lattner 645f60141b make this actually test what it is trying to.
llvm-svn: 59386
2008-11-16 04:21:51 +00:00
Dan Gohman 13cbcf1c18 Canonicalize sext(i1) to i1?-1:0, and update various instcombine
optimizations accordingly.

llvm-svn: 58457
2008-10-30 20:40:10 +00:00
Dan Gohman 2c34c130bf (A & sext(C)) | (B & ~sext(C) -> C ? A : B
llvm-svn: 58351
2008-10-28 22:38:57 +00:00