There were two problems with the initial fix.
1. The added tests flushed out that we misconfigured _LIBCPP_EXPLICIT with GCC.
2. Because the boolean type was a member function template it caused weird link
errors. I'm assuming due to the vague linkage rules. This time the bool type
is a non-template member function pointer. That seems to have fixed the
failing tests. Plus it will end up generating less symbols overall, since
the bool type is no longer per instantiation.
original commit message below
-----------------------------
std::basic_ios has an operator bool(). In C++11 and later
it is explicit, and only allows contextual implicit conversions.
However explicit isn't available in C++03 which causes std::istream (et al)
to have an implicit conversion to int. This can easily cause ambiguities
when calling operator<< and operator>>.
This patch uses a "bool-like" type in C++03 to work around this. The
"bool-like" type is an arbitrary pointer to member function type. It
will not convert to either int or void*, but will convert to bool.
llvm-svn: 290754
std::basic_ios has an operator bool(). In C++11 and later
it is explicit, and only allows contextual implicit conversions.
However explicit isn't available in C++03 which causes std::istream (et al)
to have an implicit conversion to int. This can easily cause ambiguities
when calling operator<< and operator>>.
This patch uses a "bool-like" type in C++03 to work around this. The
"bool-like" type is an arbitrary pointer to member function type. It
will not convert to either int or void*, but will convert to bool.
llvm-svn: 290750
Skip tests that expect an exception be thrown. Also add
some missing asserts in the original test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26512
llvm-svn: 286823
The initial buildbot run found a few missing bits in the initial XFAIL list
for the no-exceptions libc++ variant. These discrepancies are as follows:
[1] Following two tests need XFAILs on the no-exceptions library variant.
My local runs had these two disabled for other reasons (unsupported):
- localization/locales/locale/locale.cons/char_pointer.pass.cpp
- numerics/complex.number/complex.ops/complex_divide_complex.pass.cpp
[2] These three does not need XFAILs, they were failing on my local runs for
other reasons:
- depr/depr.c.headers/uchar_h.pass.cpp
- input.output/iostreams.base/ios/basic.ios.members/copyfmt.pass.cpp
- .../category.collate/locale.collate.byname/transform.pass.cpp
(these are failing on my box for the default build as well)
The current patch fixes both the cases above. Additionally, I've run the
following scan to make sure I've covered all the cases:
> grep ' catch \| try \| throw ' -R . | perl -pe 's|(.*?):.*|\1|' | sort | \
uniq > 1.txt
> grep 'libcpp-no-exceptions' -R . | perl -pe 's|(.*?):.*|\1|' | sort | \
uniq > 2.txt
> diff 1.txt 2.txt
This showed up a few extra interesting cases:
[3] These two tests do not use try/catch/throw statements, but they fail at
runtime. Need to be investigated, I've left the XFAILs in.
- std/thread/futures/futures.shared_future/dtor.pass.cpp
- std/thread/futures/futures.unique_future/dtor.pass.cpp
[4] These tests use a macro named TEST_HAS_NO_EXCEPTIONS to conditionally
exclude try/catch/throw statements when running without exceptions. I'm not
entirely sure why this was needed (AFAIK, we didn't have a no-exceptions
library build before). The macro's defintion is quite similar to that of
_LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS. I will investigate if this can be reused for my test
fixes or if it should be replaced with _LIBCPP_NO_EXCEPTIONS.
- std/experimental/any/*
Change-Id: I9ad1e0edd78f305406eaa0ab148b1ab693f7e26a
llvm-svn: 252870
Fixes a small omission in libcxx that prevents libcxx being built when
-DLIBCXX_ENABLE_EXCEPTIONS=0 is specified.
This patch adds XFAILS to all those tests that are currently failing
on the new -fno-exceptions library variant. Follow-up patches will
update the tests (progressively) to cope with the new library variant.
Change-Id: I4b801bd8d8e4fe7193df9e55f39f1f393a8ba81a
llvm-svn: 252598
Eric Fiselier