Summary:
I hit this while trying to add a config-over-LSP lit test, which I think
is an appropriate way to test this feature.
That needs a few more changes though...
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83802
Summary:
We've been testing this internally for a couple weeks now and it seems
to be stable enough. Let's flip the flag before branch cut to increase testing
coverage and have enough time to revert if need be.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83290
Summary:
ClangdServer owns the question of exactly which config to create, but
TUScheduler/BackgroundIndex control threads and so decide at which point
to inject it.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83095
Summary: Depends on D80198.
This patch implies ASTs might be built with stale preambles without
blocking for a fresh one. It also drops any guarantees on every preamble
version being built. In case of multiple preamble build requests, in
addition to being debounced.
Any preamble requested with a WantDiags::Yes will always be built, this
is ensured by blocking enqueueing of any subsequent reqest.
AST worker will still block for initial preamble to reduce duplicate
work.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80293
Summary:
This is achieved by calculating newly added includes and implicitly
parsing them as if they were part of the main file.
This also gets rid of the need for consistent preamble reads.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77392
Summary:
We want to be sure they don't cause AST rebuilds or evict items from the cache.
D77847 is going to start sending spurious no-op changes (in case the preamble
was invalidated), this is cheap enough but we shouldn't regress that in future.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78048
Summary:
TUStatus api had a single thread in mind. This introudces a section
action to represent state of the preamble thread. In the file status extension,
we keep old behavior almost the same. We only prepend current task with a
`parsing includes` if preamble thread is working. We omit the idle thread in the
output unless both threads are idle.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76304
Summary:
This ties to an LSP feature (diagnostic versioning) but really a lot
of the value is in being able to log what's happening with file versions
and queues more descriptively and clearly.
As such it's fairly invasive, for a logging patch :-\
Key decisions:
- at the LSP layer, we don't reqire the client to provide versions (LSP
makes it mandatory but we never enforced it). If not provided,
versions start at 0 and increment. DraftStore handles this.
- don't propagate magically using contexts, but rather manually:
addDocument -> ParseInputs -> (ParsedAST, Preamble, various callbacks)
Context-propagation would hide the versions from ClangdServer, which
would make producing good log messages hard
- within ClangdServer, treat versions as opaque and unordered.
std::string is a convenient type for this, and allows richer versions
for embedders. They're "mandatory" but "null" is a reasonable default.
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75582
Summary:
Otherwise they can force us to build lots of snapshots that we don't need.
Particularly, try to do this for operations that are frequently
generated by editors without explicit user interaction, and where
editing the file makes the result less useful. (Code action
enumeration is a good example).
https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/298
This doesn't return the "right" LSP error code (ContentModified) to the client,
we need to teach the cancellation API to distinguish between different causes.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75602
Summary:
Currently we delay AST rebuilds by 500ms after each edit, to wait for
further edits. This is a win if a rebuild takes 5s, and a loss if it
takes 50ms.
This patch sets debouncepolicy = clamp(min, ratio * rebuild_time, max).
However it sets min = max = 500ms so there's no policy change or actual
customizability - will do that in a separate patch.
See https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/275
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73873
Summary:
This is the initial version. The cross-file rename is purely based on
the index.
It is hidden under a command-line flag, and only available for a small set
of symbols.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, sammccall
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69263
Summary:
Those errors are exposed at the first character of a file,
for a lack of a better place.
Previously, all errors were stored inside the AST and report
accordingly. However, errors in command-line argument parsing could
result in failure to produce the AST, so we need an alternative ways to
report those errors.
We take the following approach in this patch:
- buildCompilerInvocation() now requires an explicit DiagnosticConsumer.
- TUScheduler and TestTU now collect the diagnostics produced when
parsing command line arguments.
If pasing of the AST failed, diagnostics are reported via a new
ParsingCallbacks::onFailedAST method.
If parsing of the AST succeeded, any errors produced during
command-line parsing are stored alongside the AST inside the
ParsedAST instance and reported as previously by calling the
ParsingCallbacks::onMainAST method;
- The client code that uses ClangdServer's DiagnosticConsumer
does not need to change, it will receive new diagnostics in the
onDiagnosticsReady() callback
Errors produced when parsing command-line arguments are collected using
the same StoreDiags class that is used to collect all other errors. They
are recognized by their location being invalid. IIUC, the location is
invalid as there is no source manager at this point, it is created at a
later stage.
Although technically we might also get diagnostics that mention the
command-line arguments FileID with after the source manager was created
(and they have valid source locations), we choose to not handle those
and they are dropped as not coming from the main file. AFAICT, those
diagnostics should always be notes, therefore it's safe to drop them
without loosing too much information.
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: nridge, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits, gribozavr
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66759
llvm-svn: 370177
Summary:
By exposing a callback that can guard code publishing results of
'onMainAST' callback in the same manner we guard diagnostics.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, hokein, jvikstrom, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64985
llvm-svn: 366577
Summary:
In practice, opening Foo.h will still often result in Foo.cpp making the
second index build instead of the first, as the rebuild policy doesn't
know to wait.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64575
llvm-svn: 365888
Summary:
This makes addDocument non-blocking and would also allow code completion
(in fallback mode) to run when worker waits for the compile command.
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60607
llvm-svn: 358400
Summary:
When calling TUScehduler::runWithPreamble (e.g. in code compleiton), allow
entering a fallback mode when compile command or preamble is not ready, instead of
waiting. This allows clangd to perform naive code completion e.g. using identifiers
in the current file or symbols in the index.
This patch simply returns empty result for code completion in fallback mode. Identifier-based
plus more advanced index-based completion will be added in followup patches.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: sammccall, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59811
llvm-svn: 357916
Summary:
This enables include insertion by adding canonical includes into
preambledata.
Reviewers: ioeric, ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57508
llvm-svn: 353054
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Previously, removeDoc followed by an addDoc to TUScheduler resulted in
racy diagnostic responses, i.e. the old dianostics could be delivered
to the client after the new ones by TUScheduler.
To workaround this, we tracked a version number in ClangdServer and
discarded stale diagnostics. After this commit, the TUScheduler will
stop delivering diagnostics for removed files and the workaround in
ClangdServer is not required anymore.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54829
llvm-svn: 347468
Summary:
- Reads are never executed if canceled before ready-to run.
In practice, we finalize cancelled reads eagerly and out-of-order.
- Cancelled reads don't prevent prior updates from being elided, as they don't
actually depend on the result of the update.
- Updates are downgraded from WantDiagnostics::Yes to WantDiagnostics::Auto when
cancelled, which allows them to be elided when all dependent reads are
cancelled and there are subsequent writes. (e.g. when the queue is backed up
with cancelled requests).
The queue operations aren't optimal (we scan the whole queue for cancelled
tasks every time the scheduler runs, and check cancellation twice in the end).
However I believe these costs are still trivial in practice (compared to any
AST operation) and the logic can be cleanly separated from the rest of the
scheduler.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54746
llvm-svn: 347450
Summary:
To enable this, TUScheduler has to provide a way to run async tasks without
needing a preamble or AST!
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53644
llvm-svn: 345268
Summary:
- DynamicIndex doesn't implement ParsingCallbacks, to make its role clearer.
ParsingCallbacks is a separate object owned by the receiving TUScheduler.
(I tried to get rid of the "index-like-object that doesn't implement index"
but it was too messy).
- Clarified(?) docs around DynamicIndex - fewer details up front, more details
inside.
- Exposed dynamic index from ClangdServer for memory monitoring and more
direct testing of its contents (actual tests not added here, wanted to get
this out for review)
- Removed a redundant and sligthly confusing filename param in a callback
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51221
llvm-svn: 341325
Summary:
After code completion inserts a header, running signature help using the old
preamble will usually fail. So we add support for consistent preamble reads.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51438
llvm-svn: 341076
Summary:
For index-based code completion, send an asynchronous speculative index
request, based on the index request for the last code completion on the same
file and the filter text typed before the cursor, before sema code completion
is invoked. This can reduce the code completion latency (by roughly latency of
sema code completion) if the speculative request is the same as the one
generated for the ongoing code completion from sema. As a sequence of code
completions often have the same scopes and proximity paths etc, this should be
effective for a number of code completions.
Trace with speculative index request:{F6997544}
Reviewers: hokein, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: javed.absar, jfb, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50962
llvm-svn: 340604
Summary:
Will be used for updating the dynamic index on updates to the open files.
Currently we collect only information coming from the preamble
AST. This has a bunch of limitations:
- Dynamic index misses important information from the body of the
file, e.g. locations of definitions.
- XRefs cannot be collected at all, since we can only obtain full
information for the current file (preamble is parsed with skipped
function bodies, therefore not reliable).
This patch only adds the new callback, actually updates to the index
will be done in a follow-up patch.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: kadircet, javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50847
llvm-svn: 340401
Summary:
This allows implementations like different symbol indexes to know what
the current active file is. For example, some customized index implementation
might decide to only return results for some files.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50446
llvm-svn: 339320
Summary:
To avoid doing extra work of processing headers in the preamble
mutilple times in parallel.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48940
llvm-svn: 336538
Summary:
After this commit, clangd will only keep the last 3 accessed ASTs in
memory. Preambles for each of the opened files are still kept in
memory to make completion and AST rebuilds fast.
AST rebuilds are usually fast enough, but having the last ASTs in
memory still considerably improves latency of operations like
findDefinition and documeneHighlight, which are often sent multiple
times a second when moving around the code. So keeping some of the last
accessed ASTs in memory seems like a reasonable tradeoff.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: malaperle, arphaman, klimek, javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47063
llvm-svn: 333737
Summary:
This is more efficient and avoids data races when reading files that
come from the preamble. The staleness can occur when reading a file
from disk that changed after the preamble was built. This can lead to
crashes, e.g. when parsing comments.
We do not to rely on symbols from the main file anyway, since any info
that those provide can always be taken from the AST.
Reviewers: ioeric, sammccall
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: malaperle, klimek, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47272
llvm-svn: 333196
Summary:
It was previously an easy way to concurrently access a mutable vfs,
which is a recipe for disaster.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits, ioeric
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44463
llvm-svn: 327537
Kadir Cetinkaya