On Windows, the permission bits are mapped down to essentially only
two possible states; readonly or readwrite. Normalize the checked
permission bitmask to match what the implementation will return.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101728
For some reason clang-10 can't match the expected errors produced by
passing icomplete arrays to range access functions. Disabling the tests
is a stop-gap solution to fix the bots.
Turn this test into a normal mode as it contains well-formed code and
checks for defined behavior. It still can be run in debug mode as of D100866.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102192
C++17 deprecates `std::raw_storage_iterator` and C++20 removes it.
Implements part of:
* P0174R2 'Deprecating Vestigial Library Parts in C++17'
* P0619R4 'Reviewing Deprecated Facilities of C++17 for C++20'
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101730
The standard leaves it up to the implementation to decide whether or not
these operators are hidden friends. There are several (well-documented)
reasons to prefer hidden friends, as well as an argument for improved
readability.
Depends on D100342.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101707
* `operator!=` isn't in the spec
* `<compare>` is designed to work with `operator<=>` so it doesn't
really make sense to have `operator<=>`-less friendly sections.
Depends on D100283.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100342
`weak_equality` and `strong_equality` were removed before being
standardised, and need to be removed.
Also adjusts `common_comparison_category` since its test needed
adjusting due to the equality deletions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100283
The aim is to define _LIBCPP_ELAST for AIX since strerror/strerror_r
can't handle out-of-range errno values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100986
This fixes a long standing issue where the triple is not always set
consistently in all configurations. This change also moves the
back-deployment Lit features to using the proper target triple
instead of using something ad-hoc.
This will be necessary for using from scratch Lit configuration files
in both normal testing and back-deployment testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102012
This resolves issues when the CMake in use on the host is too old to
configure libc++ properly, but Xcode has a sufficiently recent version.
It is technically possible for the reverse issue to happen, where the
Xcode version would be too old and the user-installed version would be
better, however in the context of our build bots, we use AppleClang on
Apple platforms, and the CMake shipped with Xcode should work with the
AppleClang shipped alongside that Xcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102083
Jobs that test with a more recent standard version run more tests, so
they take longer. We'll decrease the average latency by running them
first instead of last.
And remove the dedicated debug-iterator tests; we want to test this in all modes.
We have a CI step for testing the whole test suite with `--debug_level=1` now.
Part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D102003
And remove the dedicated debug-iterator test; we want to test this in all modes.
We have a CI step for testing the whole test suite with `--debug_level=1` now.
Part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D102003
This is a rough reapplication of the change that fixed std::to_address
to avoid relying on element_type (da456167). It is somewhat different
because the fix to avoid breaking Clang (which caused it to be reverted
in 347f69c55) was a bit more involved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101638
This simply applies Howard's commit 4c80bfbd53 consistently
across all the associative and unordered container tests.
"unord.set/insert_hint_const_lvalue.pass.cpp" failed with `-D_LIBCPP_DEBUG=1`
before this patch; it was the only one that incorrectly reused
invalid iterator `e`. The others already used valid iterators
(generally `c.end()`); I'm just making them all match the same pattern
of usage: "e, then r, then c.end() for the rest."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101679
`__debug_less` ends up running the comparator up-to-twice per comparison,
because whenever `(x < y)` it goes on to verify that `!(y < x)`.
This breaks the strict "Complexity" guarantees of algorithms like
`inplace_merge`, which we test in the test suite. So, just skip the
complexity assertions in debug mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101677
The range of char pointers [data, data+size] is a valid closed range,
but the range [begin, end) is valid only half-open.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101676
This appears to be a bug in our string::assign: when assigning into
a longer string, from a shorter snippet of itself, we invalidate
iterators before doing the copy. We should invalidate them afterward.
Also drive-by improve the formatting of a function header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101675
This allocator is not intended for libc++'s users to use;
it's strictly an implementation detail of `src/locale.cpp`.
So, move it to the `src/include/` directory.
Drive-by const-qualify its comparison operators.
For consistency with `__hidden_allocator` (defined in `src/thread.cpp`),
do *not* remove it from "libcxx/lib/libc++unexp.exp",
"libcxx/utils/symcheck-blacklists/linux_blacklist.txt", etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101293
On Windows, static vs DLL linking affects details in quite a few
cases, so it's good to have coverage for both cases.
Testing with static linking also increases coverage for a number of
cases and individual checks that have had to be waived for the DLL
case, and allows testing libc++experimental, increasing the number
of test cases actually executed by 180 (176 new tests from
libc++experimental and 4 ones that are XFAIL windows-dll).
Also drop the "generic-" prefix from these configuration names, as
they're perhaps not what the "generic" prefix intended originally
in the other generic-posix configurations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101565
This reverts commit da456167, which broke the Clang build. I'm able to
reproduce it but I want to give myself a bit more time to investigate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101638
In std::tuple, we should try to avoid calling std::is_copy_constructible
whenever we can to avoid surprising interactions with (I believe) compiler
builtins. This bug was reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523#2730953.
The issue was that when tuple<_Up...> was the same as tuple<_Tp...>, we
would short-circuit the _Or (because sizeof...(_Tp) != 1) and go evaluate
the following `is_constructible<_Tp, const _Up&>...`. That shouldn't
actually be a problem, but see the analysis in https://reviews.llvm.org/D101770#2736470
for why it is with Clang and GCC.
Instead, after this patch, we check whether the constructed-from tuple
is the same as the current tuple regardless of the number of elements,
since we should always prefer the normal copy constructor in that case
anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101770
This makes the libc++ tests more portable -- almost all of them should
now work on Windows, except for some tests that assume a shell is
available on the target. We should probably provide a way to exclude
those anyway for the purpose of running tests on embedded targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89495
This fixes the issue by implementing _And using the short-circuiting
SFINAE trick that we previously used only in std::tuple. One thing we
could look into is use the naive recursive implementation for disjunctions
with a small number of arguments, and use that trick with larger numbers
of arguments. It might be the case that the constant overhead for setting
up the SFINAE trick makes it only worth doing for larger packs, but that's
left for further work.
This problem was raised in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96523.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101661
This patch gets rid of technical debt around std::pointer_safety which,
I claim, is entirely unnecessary. I don't think anybody has used
std::pointer_safety in actual code because we do not implement the
underlying garbage collection support. In fact, P2186 even proposes
removing these facilities entirely from a future C++ version. As such,
I think it's entirely fine to get rid of complex workarounds whose goals
were to avoid breaking the ABI back in 2017.
I'm putting this up both to get reviews and to discuss this proposal for
a breaking change. I think we should be comfortable with making these
tiny breaks if we are confident they won't hurt anyone, which I'm fairly
confident is the case here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100410
Vladimir Vereschaka