- Exports MLIR targets to be used out-of-tree.
- mimicks `add_clang_library` and `add_flang_library`.
- Fixes libMLIR.so
After https://reviews.llvm.org/D77515 libMLIR.so was no longer containing
any object files. We originally had a cludge there that made it work with
the static initalizers and when switchting away from that to the way the
clang shlib does it, I noticed that MLIR doesn't create a `obj.{name}` target,
and doesn't export it's targets to `lib/cmake/mlir`.
This is due to MLIR using `add_llvm_library` under the hood, which adds
the target to `llvmexports`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78773
[MLIR] Fix libMLIR.so and LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB
Primarily, this patch moves all mlir references to LLVM libraries into
either LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS or LINK_COMPONENTS. This enables magic in
the llvm cmake files to automatically replace reference to LLVM components
with references to libLLVM.so when necessary. Among other things, this
completes fixing libMLIR.so, which has been broken for some configurations
since D77515.
Unlike previously, the pattern is now that mlir libraries should almost
always use add_mlir_library. Previously, some libraries still used
add_llvm_library. However, this confuses the export of targets for use
out of tree because libraries specified with add_llvm_library are exported
by LLVM. Instead users which don't need/can't be linked into libMLIR.so
can specify EXCLUDE_FROM_LIBMLIR
A common error mode is linking with LLVM libraries outside of LINK_COMPONENTS.
This almost always results in symbol confusion or multiply defined options
in LLVM when the same object file is included as a static library and
as part of libLLVM.so. To catch these errors more directly, there's now
mlir_check_all_link_libraries.
To simplify usage of add_mlir_library, we assume that all mlir
libraries depend on LLVMSupport, so it's not necessary to separately specify
it.
tested with:
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=on,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB,
BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=off + LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB + LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79067
[MLIR] Move from using target_link_libraries to LINK_LIBS
This allows us to correctly generate dependencies for derived targets,
such as targets which are created for object libraries.
By: Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xilinx.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79243
Three commits have been squashed to avoid intermediate build breakage.
This method has been commented as deprecated for a while. Remove
it and replace all uses with the equivalent getCalledOperand().
I also made a few cleanups in here. For example, to removes use
of getElementType on a pointer when we could just use getFunctionType
from the call.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78882
This change makes the ModuleTranslation threadsafe by locking on the
LLVMContext. Furthermore, we now clone the llvm module into a new
context when compiling to PTX similar to what the OrcJit does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78207
This class implements a switch-like dispatch statement for a value of 'T' using dyn_cast functionality. Each `Case<T>` takes a callable to be invoked if the root value isa<T>, the callable is invoked with the result of dyn_cast<T>() as a parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78070
Summary:
Remove usages of asserting vector getters in Type in preparation for the
VectorType refactor. The existence of these functions complicates the
refactor while adding little value.
Reviewers: rriddle, efriedma, sdesmalen
Reviewed By: sdesmalen
Subscribers: frgossen, mehdi_amini, rriddle, jpienaar, burmako, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, Joonsoo, grosul1, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77258
This patch adds support for taskwait and taskyield operations in OpenMP dialect and translation of the these constructs to LLVM IR. The OpenMP IRBuilder is used for this translation.
The patch includes code changes and a testcase modifications.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77634
Now that we have scalable vectors, there's a distinction that isn't
getting captured in the original SequentialType: some vectors don't have
a known element count, so counting the number of elements doesn't make
sense.
In some cases, there's a better way to express the commonality using
other methods. If we're dealing with GEPs, there's GEP methods; if we're
dealing with a ConstantDataSequential, we can query its element type
directly.
In the relatively few remaining cases, I just decided to write out
the type checks. We're talking about relatively few places, and I think
the abstraction doesn't really carry its weight. (See thread "[RFC]
Refactor class hierarchy of VectorType in the IR" on llvmdev.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75661
Summary:
LLVM IR functions can have arbitrary attributes attached to them, some of which
affect may affect code transformations. Until we can model all attributes
consistently, provide a pass-through mechanism that forwards attributes from
the LLVMFuncOp in MLIR to LLVM IR functions during translation. This mechanism
relies on LLVM IR being able to recognize string representations of the
attributes and performs some additional checking to avoid hitting assertions
within LLVM code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77072
This change adds a new option to the StandardToLLVM lowering to configure
the bitwidth of the index type independently of the target architecture's
pointer size.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76353
The Vector Dialect [document](https://mlir.llvm.org/docs/Dialects/Vector/) discusses the vector abstractions that MLIR supports and the various tradeoffs involved.
One of the layer that is missing in OSS atm is the Hardware Vector Ops (HWV) level.
This revision proposes an AVX512-specific to add a new Dialect/Targets/AVX512 Dialect that would directly target AVX512-specific intrinsics.
Atm, we rely too much on LLVM’s peephole optimizer to do a good job from small insertelement/extractelement/shufflevector. In the future, when possible, generic abstractions such as VP intrinsics should be preferred.
The revision will allow trading off HW-specific vs generic abstractions in MLIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75987
MLIR supports terminators that have the same successor block with different
block operands, which cannot be expressed in the LLVM's phi-notation as the
block identifier is used to tell apart the predecessors. This limitation can be
worked around by branching to a new block instead, with this new block
unconditionally branching to the original successor and forwarding the
argument. Until now, this transformation was performed during the conversion
from the Standard to the LLVM dialect. This does not scale well to multiple
dialects targeting the LLVM dialect as all of them would have to be aware of
this limitation and perform the preparatory transformation. Instead, do it as a
separate pass and run it immediately before the translation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75619
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
CMake allows calling target_link_libraries() without a keyword,
but this usage is not preferred when also called with a keyword,
and has surprising behavior. This patch explicitly specifies a
keyword when using target_link_libraries().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75725
Summary:
This revision removes all of the functionality related to successor operands on the core Operation class. This greatly simplifies a lot of handling of operands, as well as successors. For example, DialectConversion no longer needs a special "matchAndRewrite" for branching terminator operations.(Note, the existing method was also broken for operations with variadic successors!!)
This also enables terminator operations to define their own relationships with successor arguments, instead of the hardcoded "pass-through" behavior that exists today.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75318
The existing API for successor operands on operations is in the process of being removed. This revision simplifies a later one that completely removes the existing API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75316
This allows for simplifying OpDefGen, as well providing specializing accessors for the different successor counts. This mirrors the existing traits for operands and results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75313
Summary:
This patch adds support for translation of the OpenMP barrier construct to LLVM
IR. The OpenMP IRBuilder is used for this translation. In this patch the code
for translation is added to the existing LLVM dialect translation to LLVM IR.
The patch includes code changes and a testcase.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, nicolasvasilache, ftynse, rriddle, mehdi_amini
Reviewed By: ftynse, rriddle, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72962
Some attribute kinds are not supported as "value" attributes of
`llvm.mlir.constant` when translating to LLVM IR. We were correctly reporting
an error, but continuing the translation using an "undef" value instead,
leading to a surprising mix of error messages and output IR. Abort the
translation after the error is reported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75450
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components.
Previous version of this patch broke depencies on TableGen
targets. This appears to be because it compiled all
libraries to OBJECT libraries (probably because cmake
is generating different target names). Avoiding object
libraries results in correct dependencies.
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Putting this up mainly for discussion on
how this should be done. I am interested in MLIR from
the Julia side and we currently have a strong preference
to dynamically linking against the LLVM shared library,
and would like to have a MLIR shared library.
This patch adds a new cmake function add_mlir_library()
which accumulates a list of targets to be compiled into
libMLIR.so. Note that not all libraries make sense to
be compiled into libMLIR.so. In particular, we want
to avoid libraries which primarily exist to support
certain tools (such as mlir-opt and mlir-cpu-runner).
Note that the resulting libMLIR.so depends on LLVM, but
does not contain any LLVM components. As a result, it
is necessary to link with libLLVM.so to avoid linkage
errors. So, libMLIR.so requires LLVM_BUILD_LLVM_DYLIB=on
FYI, Currently it appears that LLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB is broken
because mlir-tblgen is linked against libLLVM.so and
and independent LLVM components
(updated by Stephen Neuendorffer)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73130
When compiling libLLVM.so, add_llvm_library() manipulates the link libraries
being used. This means that when using add_llvm_library(), we need to pass
the list of libraries to be linked (using the LINK_LIBS keyword) instead of
using the standard target_link_libraries call. This is preparation for
properly dealing with creating libMLIR.so as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74864
Summary:
This revision adds basic support for emitting line table information when exporting to LLVMIR. We don't yet have a story for supporting all of the LLVM debug metadata, so this revision stubs some features(like subprograms) to enable emitting line tables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73934
Summary:
MLIR materializes various enumeration-based LLVM IR operands as enumeration
attributes using ODS. This requires bidirectional conversion between different
but very similar enums, currently hardcoded. Extend the ODS modeling of
LLVM-specific enumeration attributes to include the name of the corresponding
enum in the LLVM C++ API as well as the names of specific enumerants. Use this
new information to automatically generate the conversion functions between enum
attributes and LLVM API enums in the two-way conversion between the LLVM
dialect and LLVM IR proper.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73468
Summary:
LLVM importer to MLIR was implemented mostly as a prototype. As such, it did
not deal handle errors in a consistent way, reporting them out stderr in some
cases and continuing the execution in the error state until eventually
crashing. This is not desirable for a user-facing tool. Make sure errors are
returned from functions, consistently checked at call sites and propagated
further. Functions returning nullable IR values return nullptr to denote the
error state. Other functions return LogicalResult. LLVM importer in
mlir-translate should no longer crash on unsupported inputs.
The errors are reported without association with the source file (and therefore
cannot be checked using -verify-diagnostics). Attaching them to the actual
input file is left for future work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72839
Summary:
Implement the handling of llvm::ConstantDataSequential and
llvm::ConstantAggregate for (nested) array and vector types when imporitng LLVM
IR to MLIR. In all cases, the result is a DenseElementsAttr that can be used in
either a `llvm.mlir.global` or a `llvm.mlir.constant`. Nested aggregates are
unpacked recursively until an element or a constant data is found. Nested
arrays with innermost scalar type are represented as DenseElementsAttr of
tensor type. Nested arrays with innermost vector type are represented as
DenseElementsAttr with (multidimensional) vector type.
Constant aggregates of struct type are not yet supported as the LLVM dialect
does not have a well-defined way of modeling struct-type constants.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72834