Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Anton Yartsev 6ca45c92a9 [analyzer] Move the NewDeleteLeaks checker from CplusplusAlpha to Cplusplus package.
llvm-svn: 220289
2014-10-21 12:41:36 +00:00
Anna Zaks a1de8567fc [analyzer] Shorten the malloc checker’s leak message
As per Ted’s suggestion!

llvm-svn: 178938
2013-04-06 00:41:36 +00:00
Jordan Rose 10ad081fc6 [analyzer] Re-enable cplusplus.NewDelete (but not NewDeleteLeaks).
As mentioned in the previous commit message, the use-after-free and
double-free warnings for 'delete' are worth enabling even while the
leak warnings still have false positives.

llvm-svn: 178891
2013-04-05 17:55:07 +00:00
Jordan Rose 26330563f2 [analyzer] Split new/delete checker into use-after-free and leaks parts.
This splits the leak-checking part of alpha.cplusplus.NewDelete into a
separate user-level checker, alpha.cplusplus.NewDeleteLeaks. All the
difficult false positives we've seen with the new/delete checker have been
spurious leak warnings; the use-after-free warnings and mismatched
deallocator warnings, while rare, have always been valid.

<rdar://problem/6194569>

llvm-svn: 178890
2013-04-05 17:55:00 +00:00
Anton Yartsev e3377fbca2 [analyzer] Reduced the unwanted correlations between checkers living inside MallocChecker.cpp
This fixes an issue pointed to by Jordan: if unix.Malloc and unix.MismatchedDeallocator are both on, then we end up still tracking leaks of memory allocated by new.
Moved the guards right before emitting the bug reports to unify and simplify the logic of handling of multiple checkers. Now all the checkers perform their checks regardless of if they were enabled, or not, and it is decided just before the emitting of the report, if it should be emitted. (idea from Anna).

Additional changes: 
improved test coverage for checker correlations;
refactoring: BadDealloc -> MismatchedDealloc

llvm-svn: 178814
2013-04-04 23:46:29 +00:00