when the top elements of a vector are undefined. This happens all
the time for X86-64 ABI stuff because only the low 2 elements of
a 4 element vector are defined. For example, on:
_Complex float f32(_Complex float A, _Complex float B) {
return A+B;
}
We used to produce (with SSE2, SSE4.1+ uses insertps):
_f32: ## @f32
movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
addss %xmm1, %xmm2
pshufd $16, %xmm2, %xmm2
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm1
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm0
addss %xmm1, %xmm0
pshufd $16, %xmm0, %xmm1
movdqa %xmm2, %xmm0
unpcklps %xmm1, %xmm0
ret
We now produce:
_f32: ## @f32
movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
addss %xmm1, %xmm2
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm1
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm3
addss %xmm1, %xmm3
movaps %xmm2, %xmm0
unpcklps %xmm3, %xmm0
ret
This implements rdar://8368414
llvm-svn: 112378
expanding: e.g. <2 x float> -> <4 x float> instead of -> 2 floats. This
affects two places in the code: handling cross block values and handling
function return and arguments. Since vectors are already widened by
legalizetypes, this gives us much better code and unblocks x86-64 abi
and SPU abi work.
For example, this (which is a silly example of a cross-block value):
define <4 x float> @test2(<4 x float> %A) nounwind {
%B = shufflevector <4 x float> %A, <4 x float> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1>
%C = fadd <2 x float> %B, %B
br label %BB
BB:
%D = fadd <2 x float> %C, %C
%E = shufflevector <2 x float> %D, <2 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef>
ret <4 x float> %E
}
Now compiles into:
_test2: ## @test2
## BB#0:
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
ret
previously it compiled into:
_test2: ## @test2
## BB#0:
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1
## kill: XMM0<def> XMM0<kill> XMM0<def>
insertps $0, %xmm0, %xmm0
insertps $16, %xmm1, %xmm0
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
ret
This implements rdar://8230384
llvm-svn: 112101
comparison is in a different basic block from the branch. In such
cases, the comparison's operands may not have initialized virtual
registers available.
llvm-svn: 111709
where the step value is an induction variable from an outer loop, to
avoid trouble trying to re-expand such expressions. This effectively
hides such expressions from indvars and lsr, which prevents them
from getting into trouble.
llvm-svn: 111317
- Make foldMemoryOperandImpl aware of 256-bit zero vectors folding and support the 128-bit counterparts of AVX too.
- Make sure MOV[AU]PS instructions are only selected when SSE1 is enabled, and duplicate the patterns to match AVX.
- Add a testcase for a simple 128-bit zero vector creation.
llvm-svn: 110946
term goal here is to be able to match enough of vector_shuffle and build_vector
so all avx intrinsics which aren't mapped to their own built-ins but to
shufflevector calls can be codegen'd. This is the first (baby) step, support
building zeroed vectors.
llvm-svn: 110897
nice farm in the country where it can play with other tests. And bunnies.
It is not clear what is being tested, and the revision history shows a bunch of
random changes to the expected instruction count. Clearly, we are just fudging
it to pass whenever it fails.
llvm-svn: 110118
away from a computer now.
--- Reverse-merging r109881 into '.':
D test/CodeGen/X86/avx-intrinsics-x86.ll
D test/CodeGen/X86/avx-intrinsics-x86_64.ll
llvm-svn: 109959
Dan Gohman