The constexpr evaluator was erroring out because these templates weren't
defined. Despite being used in a discarded statement, we still need to constexpr
evaluate them, which means that we need to instantiate them. Fixes PR37585.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48322
llvm-svn: 336233
Existing code always allocates for on the declarator's attribute pool,
but sometimes adds it to the declspec. This patch ensures that the
correct pool is used.
Discovered while testing: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48788
llvm-svn: 336225
D48768 may turn some of these into shifts.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: spatel, RKSimon, llvm-commits, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48767
llvm-svn: 336224
Summary:
The C interceptors were using `SIZE_T` defined in the interception library as
a `__sanitizer::uptr`. On some 32-bit platforms, this lead to the following
warning:
```
warning: declaration of ‘void* malloc(SIZE_T)’ conflicts with built-in declaration ‘void* malloc(unsigned int)’ [-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
INTERCEPTOR_ATTRIBUTE void *malloc(SIZE_T size) {
```
`__sanitizer::uptr` is indeed defined as an `unsigned long` on those.
So just include `stddef.h` and use `size_t` instead.
Reviewers: alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: delcypher, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48885
llvm-svn: 336221
This happened during a recent refactor. toStringRefArray() returns
a vector<StringRef>, which was being implicitly converted to an
ArrayRef<StringRef>, and then the vector was immediately being
destroyed, so the ArrayRef<> was losing its backing storage.
Fix this by making sure the vector gets permanent storage.
llvm-svn: 336219
This patch adds a new token type specifically for (%dx). We will now always create this token when we parse (%dx). After all operands have been parsed, if the mnemonic is in/out we'll morph this token to a regular register token. Otherwise we keep it as the special DX token which won't match any instructions.
This removes the need for passing Mnemonic through the parsing functions. It also seems closer to gas where when its used on the wrong instruction it just gets diagnosed as an invalid operand rather than a bad memory address.
llvm-svn: 336218
This might make the error message added in r335668 unneeded, but I'm not sure yet.
The check for RIP is technically unnecessary since RIP is in GR64, but that fact is kind of surprising so be explicit.
llvm-svn: 336217
As the test diffs show, the current users of getBinOpIdentity()
are InstCombine and Reassociate. SLP vectorizer is a candidate
for using this functionality too (D28907).
The InstCombine shuffle improvements are part of the planned
enhancements noted in D48830.
InstCombine actually has several other uses of getBinOpIdentity()
via SimplifyUsingDistributiveLaws(), but we don't call that for
any FP ops. Fixing that might be another part of removing the
custom reassociation in InstCombine that is only done for fadd+fmul.
llvm-svn: 336215
Summary:
In conjunction with the clang side change D48833, this will enable Scudo on
PPC64. I tested `check-scudo` on a powerpc64le box and everything passes.
Reviewers: eugenis, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: mgorny, delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48834
llvm-svn: 336213
r336120 resulted in falling back to SelectionDAG more often due to the G_STORE
MMOs not matching the vreg size. This fixes that by explicitly any-extending the
value.
llvm-svn: 336209
Unpredicated FP-multiply of SVE vector with a vector-element given by
vector[index], for example:
fmul z0.s, z1.s, z2.s[0]
which performs an unpredicated FP-multiply of all 32-bit elements in
'z1' with the first element from 'z2'.
This patch adds restricted register classes for SVE vectors:
ZPR_3b (only z0..z7 are allowed) - for indexed vector of 16/32-bit elements.
ZPR_4b (only z0..z15 are allowed) - for indexed vector of 64-bit elements.
Reviewers: rengolin, fhahn, SjoerdMeijer, samparker, javed.absar
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48823
llvm-svn: 336205
Summary:
Scudo works on PPC64 as is, so mark the architecture as supported for it. This
will also require a change to config-ix.cmake on the compiler-rt side.
Update the tests accordingly.
Reviewers: eugenis, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48833
llvm-svn: 336202
Summary: The new API allows to find a list of compile units related to target/module.
Reviewers: aprantl, clayborg
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: jingham, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48801
llvm-svn: 336200
This is the last significant change suggested in PR37806:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37806#c5
...though there are several follow-ups noted in the code comments
in this patch to complete this transform.
It's possible that a binop feeding a select-shuffle has been eliminated
by earlier transforms (or the code was just written like this in the 1st
place), so we'll fail to match the patterns that have 2 binops from:
D48401,
D48678,
D48662,
D48485.
In that case, we can try to materialize identity constants for the remaining
binop to fill in the "ghost" lanes of the vector (where we just want to pass
through the original values of the source operand).
I added comments to ConstantExpr::getBinOpIdentity() to show planned follow-ups.
For now, we only handle the 5 commutative integer binops (add/mul/and/or/xor).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48830
llvm-svn: 336196
With a view to support parallel operations that have their results
stored to memory, refactor the consecutive access helper out so it
could support stores instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48872
llvm-svn: 336195
This adds the following system registers:
- RAS registers,
- MPAM registers,
- Activitiy monitor registers,
- Trace Extension registers,
- Timing insensitivity of data processing instructions,
- Enhanced Support for Nested Virtualization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48871
llvm-svn: 336193
Summary:
When salvaging a dbg.declare/dbg.addr we should not add
DW_OP_stack_value to the DIExpression
(see test/Transforms/InstCombine/salvage-dbg-declare.ll).
Consider this example
%vla = alloca i32, i64 2
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %vla, metadata !1, metadata !DIExpression())
Instcombine will turn it into
%vla1 = alloca [2 x i32]
%vla1.sub = getelementptr inbounds [2 x i32], [2 x i32]* %vla, i64 0, i64 0
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata [2 x i32]* %vla1.sub, metadata !19, metadata !DIExpression())
If the GEP can be eliminated, then the dbg.declare will be salvaged
and we should get
%vla1 = alloca [2 x i32]
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata [2 x i32]* %vla1, metadata !19, metadata !DIExpression())
The problem was that salvageDebugInfo did not recognize dbg.declare
as being indirect (%vla1 points to the value, it does not hold the
value), so we incorrectly got
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata [2 x i32]* %vla1, metadata !19, metadata !DIExpression(DW_OP_stack_value))
I also made sure that llvm::salvageDebugInfo and
DIExpression::prependOpcodes do not add DW_OP_stack_value to
the DIExpression in case no new operands are added to the
DIExpression. That way we avoid to, unneccessarily, turn a
register location expression into an implicit location expression
in some situations (see test11 in test/Transforms/LICM/sinking.ll).
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: aprantl, vsk
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48837
llvm-svn: 336191
The signature of setRegToConstant changed in r336171, so adjust the AArch64
unit test in a similar way to how the X86 unit test was changed in that commit.
llvm-svn: 336188
The target does just enough to be able to run llvm-exegesis in latency mode for
at least some opcodes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48780
llvm-svn: 336187
Lower more than 4 arguments using stack. This patch targets MIPS32.
It supports only functions with arguments of type i32.
Patch by Petar Avramovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47934
llvm-svn: 336185
LLD removes empty output sections otherwise specified in the linker
script. Prior to this change however, if section descriptions included
ANY kind of symbol assignment, then the consequent output section would
not be removed, even if the assignment was marked with PROVIDE and not
actually triggered (i.e. the symbol was never referenced). This change
modifies the isDiscarable function to ignore such directives when
determining whether a section should be discarded, in keeping with
bfd's behaviour. Symbol assignments that do result in a symbol
definition will continue to result in a kept section (this is not
actually the same as bfd's behaviour, but it is simpler, and probably
makes more sense).
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48771
llvm-svn: 336184
unswitching loops.
Original patch trying to address this was sent in D47624, but that
didn't quite handle things correctly. There are two key principles used
to select whether and how to invalidate SCEV-cached information about
loops:
1) We must invalidate any info SCEV has cached before unswitching as we
may change (or destroy) the loop structure by the act of unswitching,
and make it hard to recover everything we want to invalidate within
SCEV.
2) We need to invalidate all of the loops whose CFGs are mutated by the
unswitching. Notably, this isn't the *entire* loop nest, this is
every loop contained by the outermost loop reached by an exit block
relevant to the unswitch.
And we need to do this even when doing trivial unswitching.
I've added more focused tests that directly check that SCEV starts off
with imprecise information and after unswitching (and simplifying
instructions) re-querying SCEV will produce precise information. These
tests also specifically work to check that an *outer* loop's information
becomes precise.
However, the testing here is still a bit imperfect. Crafting test cases
that reliably fail to be analyzed by SCEV before unswitching and succeed
afterward proved ... very, very hard. It took me several hours and
careful work to build these, and I'm not optimistic about necessarily
coming up with more to cover more elaborate possibilities. Fortunately,
the code pattern we are testing here in the pass is really
straightforward and reliable.
Thanks to Max Kazantsev for the initial work on this as well as the
review, and to Hal Finkel for helping me talk through approaches to test
this stuff even if it didn't come to much.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47624
llvm-svn: 336183
Erik Pilkington