This is more targeted, as it simply provides toggle actions for the parser to
turn access checking on and off. We then use these to suppress access checking
only while we parse the template-id (included scope specifier) of an explicit
instantiation and explicit specialization of a class template. The
specialization behavior is an extension, as it seems likely a defect that the
standard did not exempt them as it does explicit instantiations.
This allows the very common practice of specializing trait classes to work for
private, internal types. This doesn't address instantiating or specializing
function templates, although those apparently already partially work.
The naming and style for the Action layer isn't my favorite, comments and
suggestions would be appreciated there.
llvm-svn: 106993
introduced by using decls are hidden even if their template parameter lists
or return types differ from the "overriding" declaration.
Propagate using shadow declarations around more effectively when looking up
template-ids. Reperform lookup for template-ids in member expressions so that
access control is properly set up.
Fix some number of latent bugs involving template-ids with totally invalid
base types. You can only actually get these with a scope specifier, since
otherwise the template-id won't parse as a template-id.
Fixes PR7384.
llvm-svn: 106093
a member template, and you try to call the member template with an explicit
template argument. See PR7247
For example, this downgrades the error to a warning in:
template<typename T> struct set{};
struct Value {
template<typename T>
void set(T value) {
}
};
void foo() {
Value v;
v.set<double>(3.2); // Warning here.
}
llvm-svn: 105518
the x86-64 __va_list_tag with this attribute. The attribute causes the
affected type to behave like a fundamental type when considered by ADL.
(x86-64 is the only target we currently provide with a struct-based
__builtin_va_list)
Fixes PR6762.
llvm-svn: 104941
template names. We were completely missing naming classes for many unqualified
lookups, but this didn't trigger code paths that need it. This removes part of
an optimization that re-uses the template name lookup done by the parser to
determine if explicit template arguments actually form a template-id.
Unfortunately the technique for avoiding the duplicate lookup lost needed data
such as the class context in which the lookup succeeded.
llvm-svn: 104117
Revert much of the implementation of C++98/03 [temp.friend]p5 in
r103943 and its follow-ons r103948 and r103952. While our
implementation was technically correct, other compilers don't seem to
implement this paragraph (which forces the instantiation of friend
functions defined in a class template when a class template
specialization is instantiated), and doing so broke a bunch of Boost
libraries.
Since this behavior has changed in C++0x (which instantiates the
friend function definitions when they are used), we're going to skip
the nowhere-implemented C++98/03 semantics and go straight to the
C++0x semantics.
This commit is a band-aid to get Boost up and running again. It
doesn't really fix PR6952 (which this commit un-fixes), but it does
deal with the way Boost.Units abuses this particular paragraph.
llvm-svn: 104014
within class templates be instantiated along with each class template
specialization, even if the functions are not used. Do so, as a baby
step toward PR6952.
llvm-svn: 103943
member function (default constructor, copy constructor, copy
assignment operator, destructor), emit a note showing where that
implicit definition was required.
llvm-svn: 103619
referenced unless we see one of them defined (or the key function
defined, if it as one) or if we need the vtable for something. Fixes
PR7114.
llvm-svn: 103497
explicit instantiations of template. C++0x clarifies the intent
(they're ill-formed in some cases; see [temp.explicit] for
details). However, one could squint at the C++98/03 standard and
conclude they are permitted, so reduce the error to a warning
(controlled by -Wc++0x-compat) in C++98/03 mode.
llvm-svn: 103482
specific message that includes the template arguments, e.g.,
test/SemaTemplate/overload-candidates.cpp:27:20: note: candidate template
ignored: substitution failure [with T = int *]
typename T::type get_type(const T&); // expected-note{{candidate ...
^
llvm-svn: 103348
many/too few arguments, use the same diagnostic we use for arity
mismatches in non-templates (but note that it's a function template).
llvm-svn: 103341
conflicting deduced template argument values, give a more specific
reason along with those values, e.g.,
test/SemaTemplate/overload-candidates.cpp:4:10: note: candidate template
ignored: deduced conflicting types for parameter 'T' ('int' vs. 'long')
const T& min(const T&, const T&);
^
llvm-svn: 103339
assignment operators.
Previously, Sema provided type-checking and template instantiation for
copy assignment operators, then CodeGen would synthesize the actual
body of the copy constructor. Unfortunately, the two were not in sync,
and CodeGen might pick a copy-assignment operator that is different
from what Sema chose, leading to strange failures, e.g., link-time
failures when CodeGen called a copy-assignment operator that was not
instantiation, run-time failures when copy-assignment operators were
overloaded for const/non-const references and the wrong one was
picked, and run-time failures when by-value copy-assignment operators
did not have their arguments properly copy-initialized.
This implementation synthesizes the implicitly-defined copy assignment
operator bodies in Sema, so that the resulting ASTs encode exactly
what CodeGen needs to do; there is no longer any special code in
CodeGen to synthesize copy-assignment operators. The synthesis of the
body is relatively simple, and we generate one of three different
kinds of copy statements for each base or member:
- For a class subobject, call the appropriate copy-assignment
operator, after overload resolution has determined what that is.
- For an array of scalar types or an array of class types that have
trivial copy assignment operators, construct a call to
__builtin_memcpy.
- For an array of class types with non-trivial copy assignment
operators, synthesize a (possibly nested!) for loop whose inner
statement calls the copy constructor.
- For a scalar type, use built-in assignment.
This patch fixes at least a few tests cases in Boost.Spirit that were
failing because CodeGen picked the wrong copy-assignment operator
(leading to link-time failures), and I suspect a number of undiagnosed
problems will also go away with this change.
Some of the diagnostics we had previously have gotten worse with this
change, since we're going through generic code for our
type-checking. I will improve this in a subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 102853
specializations, substitute the deduced template arguments and check
the resulting substitution before concluding that template argument
deduction succeeds. This marvelous little fix makes a bunch of
Boost.Spirit tests start working.
llvm-svn: 102601
template argument deduction or (more importantly) the final substitution
required by such deduction. Makes access control magically work in these
cases.
Fixes PR6967.
llvm-svn: 102572
way that C does. Among other differences, elaborated type specifiers
are defined to skip "non-types", which, as you might imagine, does not
include typedefs. Rework our use of IDNS masks to capture the semantics
of different kinds of declarations better, and remove most current lookup
filters. Removing the last remaining filter is more complicated and will
happen in a separate patch.
Fixes PR 6885 as well some spectrum of unfiled bugs.
llvm-svn: 102164
method parameter, provide a note pointing at the parameter itself so
the user does not have to manually look for the function/method being
called and match up parameters to arguments. For example, we now get:
t.c:4:5: warning: incompatible pointer types passing 'long *' to
parameter of
type 'int *' [-pedantic]
f(long_ptr);
^~~~~~~~
t.c:1:13: note: passing argument to parameter 'x' here
void f(int *x);
^
llvm-svn: 102038
a qualified name. We weren't checking for an empty
nested-name-specifier when dealing with friend class templates
(although we were checking in the other places where we deal with this
paragraph). Fixes a Boost.Serialization showstopper.
llvm-svn: 101724
reference binding to an rvalue of reference-compatible type, check
parameters after the first for complete parameter types and build any
required default function arguments. We're effectively simulating the
type-checking for a call without building the call itself.
llvm-svn: 101705
reference-compatible type, the implementation is permitted to make a
copy of the rvalue (or many such copies, even). However, even though
we don't make that copy, we are required to check for the presence of
a suitable copy constructor. With this change, we do.
Note that in C++0x we are not allowed to make these copies, so we test
both dialects separately.
Also note the FIXME in one of the C++03 tests, where we are not
instantiating default function arguments for the copy constructor we
pick (but do not call). The fix is obvious; eliminating the infinite
recursion it causes is not. Will address that next.
llvm-svn: 101704
intended for redeclarations, fixing those that need it. Fixes PR6831.
This uncovered an issue where the C++ type-specifier-seq parsing logic
would try to perform name lookup on an identifier after it already had
a type-specifier, which could also lead to spurious ambiguity errors
(as in PR6831, but with a different test case).
llvm-svn: 101419
that have reference or const scalar members, since those members can
never be initializer or modified. Fixes <rdar://problem/7804350>.
llvm-svn: 101316
from a conversion function template specialization to one of exact
match rank. We only know how to test this in C++0x with default
function template arguments, but it's also in the C++03 spec. Fixes
PR6285.
llvm-svn: 101089
name-lookup ambiguities when there are multiple base classes that are
all specializations of the same class template. This is part of a
general cleanup for ambiguities in template-name lookup. Fixes
PR6717.
llvm-svn: 101065
specializations when the explicit instantiation was... explicitly
written, i.e., not the product of an explicit instantiation of an
enclosing class. Fixes this spurious warning when Clang builds LLVM:
/Volumes/Data/dgregor/Projects/llvm/lib/CodeGen/MachineDominators.cpp:22:1:
warning: explicit instantiation of 'addRoot' that occurs after an
explicit specialization will be ignored (C++0x extension) [-pedantic]
llvm-svn: 100900
Remove -faccess-control from -cc1; add -fno-access-control.
Make the driver pass -fno-access-control by default.
Update a bunch of tests to be correct under access control.
llvm-svn: 100880
destination type for initialization, assignment, parameter-passing,
etc. The main issue fixed here is that we used rather confusing
wording for diagnostics such as
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char const [2]' discards qualifiers,
expected 'char *' [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
We're not initializing a 'char const [2]', we're initializing a 'char
*' with an expression of type 'char const [2]'. Similar problems
existed for other diagnostics in this area, so I've normalized them all
with more precise descriptive text to say what we're
initializing/converting/assigning/etc. from and to. The warning for
the code above is now:
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char *' from an expression of type
'char const [2]' discards qualifiers [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
Fixes <rdar://problem/7447179>.
llvm-svn: 100832
parameter, explicitly ask the user to give it arguments. We used to
complain that it wasn't a type and expect the user to figure it out.
llvm-svn: 100729
- When instantiating a friend type template, perform semantic
analysis on the resulting type.
- Downgrade the errors concerning friend type declarations that do
not refer to classes to ExtWarns in C++98/03. C++0x allows
practically any type to be befriended, and ignores the friend
declaration if the type is not a class.
llvm-svn: 100635
that protected members be used on objects of types which derive from the
naming class of the lookup. My first N attempts at this were poorly-founded,
largely because the standard is very badly worded here.
llvm-svn: 100562
an object or function. Our previous checking was too lax, and ended up
allowing missing or extraneous address-of operators, among other
evils. The new checking provides better diagnostics and adheres more
closely to the standard.
Fixes PR6563 and PR6749.
llvm-svn: 100125
nested-name-specifier (e.g., "class T::foo") fails to find a tag
member in the scope nominated by the
nested-name-specifier. Previously, we gave a bland
error: 'Nested' does not name a tag member in the specified scope
which didn't actually say where we were looking, which was rather
horrible when the nested-name-specifier was instantiated. Now, we give
something a bit better:
error: no class named 'Nested' in 'NoDepBase<T>'
llvm-svn: 100060
(such as "class T::foo") from an ElaboratedType of a TypenameType to a
DependentNameType, which more accurately models the underlying
concept.
Improve template instantiation for DependentNameType nodes that
represent nested-name-specifiers, by performing tag name lookup and
checking the resulting tag appropriately. Fixes PR5681.
There is still much testing and cleanup to do in this area.
llvm-svn: 100054
name in the outermost block of a if/else that declares the same name
is ill-formed. Turns out that Clang and MSVC were right about PR6739;
GCC is too lax.
llvm-svn: 99937
the underlying/instantiated decl) through a lot of API, including "intermediate"
MemberExprs required for (e.g.) template instantiation. This is necessary
because of the access semantics of member accesses to using declarations:
only the base class *containing the using decl* need be accessible from the
naming class.
This allows us to complete an access-controlled selfhost, if there are no
recent regressions.
llvm-svn: 99936
check deduced non-type template arguments and template template
arguments against the template parameters for which they were deduced,
performing conversions as appropriate so that deduced template
arguments get the same treatment as explicitly-specified template
arguments. This is the bulk of PR6723.
Also keep track of whether deduction of a non-type template argument
came from an array bound (vs. anywhere else). With this information,
we enforce C++ [temp.deduct.type]p17, which requires exact type
matches when deduction deduces a non-type template argument from
something that is not an array bound.
Finally, when in a SFINAE context, translate the "zero sized
arrays are an extension" extension diagnostic into a hard error (for
better standard conformance), which was a minor part of PR6723.
llvm-svn: 99734
nested within, and suddenly local classes start working. Wouldn't be
necessary if I hadn't used local classes in Clang in the first place.
Or, well, wouldn't be necessary yet. :)
llvm-svn: 99709
Douglas Gregor