Using arguments with attribute inalloca creates problems for verification
of machine representation. This attribute instructs the backend that the
argument is prepared in stack prior to CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END
sequence (see http://llvm.org/docs/InAlloca.htm for details). Frame size
stored in CALLSEQ_START in this case does not count the size of this
argument. However CALLSEQ_END still keeps total frame size, as caller can
be responsible for cleanup of entire frame. So CALLSEQ_START and
CALLSEQ_END keep different frame size and the difference is treated by
MachineVerifier as stack error. Currently there is no way to distinguish
this case from actual errors.
This patch adds additional argument to CALLSEQ_START and its
target-specific counterparts to keep size of stack that is set up prior to
the call frame sequence. This argument allows MachineVerifier to calculate
actual frame size associated with frame setup instruction and correctly
process the case of inalloca arguments.
The changes made by the patch are:
- Frame setup instructions get the second mandatory argument. It
affects all targets that use frame pseudo instructions and touched many
files although the changes are uniform.
- Access to frame properties are implemented using special instructions
rather than calls getOperand(N).getImm(). For X86 and ARM such
replacement was made previously.
- Changes that reflect appearance of additional argument of frame setup
instruction. These involve proper instruction initialization and
methods that access instruction arguments.
- MachineVerifier retrieves frame size using method, which reports sum of
frame parts initialized inside frame instruction pair and outside it.
The patch implements approach proposed by Quentin Colombet in
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27481#c1.
It fixes 9 tests failed with machine verifier enabled and listed
in PR27481.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32394
llvm-svn: 302527
Hoisting common code can cause registers that live-in in the successor
blocks to no longer be live-in. The live-in information needs to be
updated to reflect this, or otherwise incorrect code can be generated
later on.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32661
llvm-svn: 302228
Allocframe and the following stores on the stack have a latency of 2 cycles
when not in the same packet. This happens because R29 is needed early by the
store instruction. Since one of such stores can be packetized along with
allocframe and use old value of R29, we can assign it 0 cycle latency
while leaving latency of other stores to the default value of 2 cycles.
Patch by Jyotsna Verma.
llvm-svn: 302034
The compiler was generating code that ends up ignoring a multiple
latency dependence between two instructions by scheduling the
intructions in back-to-back packets.
The packetizer needs to end a packet if the latency of the current
current insruction and the source in the previous packet is
greater than 1 cycle. This case occurs when there is still room in
the current packet, but scheduling the instruction causes a stall.
Instead, the packetizer should start a new packet. Also, if the
current packet already contains a stall, then it is okay to add
another instruction to the packet that also causes a stall. This
occurs when there are no instructions that can be scheduled in
between the producer and consumer instructions.
This patch changes the latency for loads to 2 cycles from 3 cycles.
This change refects that a load only needs to be separated by
one extra packet to eliminate the stall.
Patch by Ikhlas Ajbar.
llvm-svn: 301954
When a PHI operand has a subregister, create a COPY instead of simply
replacing the PHI output with the input it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32650
llvm-svn: 301699
Also, make a few changes to allow using the pass in .mir testcases.
Among other things, change the abbreviation from opt-amode to amode-opt,
because otherwise lit would expand the "opt" part to the full path to
the opt binary.
llvm-svn: 300707
- Avoid explosive growth of the simplification queue by not queuing
expressions that are alredy in it.
- Add an iteration counter and abort after a sufficiently large number
of iterations (assuming that it's a symptom of an infinite loop).
llvm-svn: 298655
[Hexagon] Recognize polynomial-modulo loop idiom again
Regain the ability to recognize loops calculating polynomial modulo
operation. This ability has been lost due to some changes in the
preceding optimizations. Add code to preprocess the IR to a form
that the pattern matching code can recognize.
llvm-svn: 298400
Regain the ability to recognize loops calculating polynomial modulo
operation. This ability has been lost due to some changes in the
preceding optimizations. Add code to preprocess the IR to a form
that the pattern matching code can recognize.
llvm-svn: 298282
- Fix the insertion point, which occasionally could have been incorrect.
- Avoid creating multiple bitsplits with the same operands, if an old one
could be reused.
llvm-svn: 297414
When extracting a bitfield from the high register in a register pair,
the final offset should be relative to the high register (for 32-bit
extracts).
llvm-svn: 297288
If a block has non-analyzable branches, the listed successors don't need
to add up to one. For example, if a block has a conditional tail call,
that tail call will not have a corresponding successor in the successor
list, but will still be a possible branch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30556
llvm-svn: 297054
Merge the tail block into the loop in cases where the main loop body
exits early, subject to profitability constraints. This will coalesce
the loop body into fewer blocks.
For example:
loop: loop:
// loop body // loop body
if (...) jump exit --> // more body
more: if (...) jump exit
// more body jump loop
jump loop
llvm-svn: 297033
The code in updateDeadFlags removed unnecessary <dead> flags, but there
can be cases where such a flag is not set, and yet a register has become
dead. For example, if a mux with identical inputs is replaced with a COPY,
the predicate register may no longer be used after that.
llvm-svn: 297032
On Hexagon, values of type i1 are passed in registers of type i32,
even though i1 is not a legal value for these registers. This is a
special case and needs special handling to maintain consistency of
the lowering information.
This fixes PR32089.
llvm-svn: 296645
The motivation for filling out these select-of-constants cases goes back to D24480,
where we discussed removing an IR fold from add(zext) --> select. And that goes back to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL75531https://reviews.llvm.org/rL159230
The idea is that we should always canonicalize patterns like this to a select-of-constants
in IR because that's the smallest IR and the best for value tracking. Note that we currently
do the opposite in some cases (like the cases in *this* patch). Ie, the proposed folds in
this patch already exist in InstCombine today:
https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/Transforms/InstCombine/InstCombineSelect.cpp#L1151
As this patch shows, most targets generate better machine code for simple ext/add/not ops
rather than a select of constants. So the follow-up steps to make this less of a patchwork
of special-case folds and missing IR canonicalization:
1. Have DAGCombiner convert any select of constants into ext/add/not ops.
2 Have InstCombine canonicalize in the other direction (create more selects).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30180
llvm-svn: 296137
Serge Pavlov