Ffter commit at rev219046 512-bit broadcasts lowering become non-optimal. Most of tests on broadcasting and embedded broadcasting were changed and they doesn’t produce efficient code.
Example below is from commit changes (it’s the first test from test/CodeGen/X86/avx512-vbroadcast.ll):
define <16 x i32> @_inreg16xi32(i32 %a) {
; CHECK-LABEL: _inreg16xi32:
; CHECK: ## BB#0:
-; CHECK-NEXT: vpbroadcastd %edi, %zmm0
+; CHECK-NEXT: vmovd %edi, %xmm0
+; CHECK-NEXT: vpbroadcastd %xmm0, %ymm0
+; CHECK-NEXT: vinserti64x4 $1, %ymm0, %zmm0, %zmm0
; CHECK-NEXT: retq
%b = insertelement <16 x i32> undef, i32 %a, i32 0
%c = shufflevector <16 x i32> %b, <16 x i32> undef, <16 x i32> zeroinitializer
ret <16 x i32> %c
}
Here, 256-bit broadcast was generated instead of 512-bit one.
In this patch
1) I added vector-shuffle lowering through broadcasts
2) Removed asserts and branches likes because this is incorrect
- assert(Subtarget->hasDQI() && "We can only lower v8i64 with AVX-512-DQI");
3) Fixed lowering tests
llvm-svn: 220774
No functionality change. No change in X86.td.expanded except that we only set
the CD8 attributes for the memory variants. (This shouldn't be used unless we
have a memory operand.)
llvm-svn: 220736
1) i512mem -> f512mem (this is the packed FP input being permuted)
2) element size is 64 bits in EVEX_CD8 for PD.
(A good illustration why X86VectorVTInfo is useful)
llvm-svn: 220734
This is asm/diasm-only support, similar to AVX.
For ISeling the register variant, they are no different from 213 other than
whether the multiplication or the addition operand is destructed.
For ISeling the memory variant, i.e. to fold a load, they are no different
than the 132 variant. The addition operand (op3) in both cases can come from
memory. Again the ony difference is which operand is destructed.
There could be a post-RA pass that would convert a 213 or 132 into a 231.
Part of <rdar://problem/17082571>
llvm-svn: 220540
This multiclass generates the different forms: 213, 231, 132 in AVX.
132 in AVX512 is a separate class but I am planning to use this same
multiclass to generate 231 relying on the nice the null_frag trick from AVX to
disable codegen pattern for 231.
No functionality change, no change in X86.td.expanded except for the different
instruction definition names.
llvm-svn: 220539
In AVX512f we support 64x2 and 32x8 inserts via matching them to 32x4 and 64x4
respectively. These are matched by "Alt" Pat<>'s (Alt stands for alternative
VTs).
Since DQ has native support for these intructions, I peeled off the non-"Alt"
part of the baseclass into vinsert_for_size_no_alt. The DQ instructions are
derived from this multiclass. The "Alt" Pat<>'s are disabled with DQ.
Fixes <rdar://problem/18426089>
llvm-svn: 219874
The new attributes are NumElts and the CD8TupleForm. This prepares the code
to enable x8 and x2 inserts.
NFC, no change in X86.td.expanded except for the new attributes.
llvm-svn: 219871
It's the W bit that selects between 32 or 64 elt type and not the opcode. The
opcode selects between the width of the insert (128 or 256).
llvm-svn: 219870
No functional change.
This is the current AVX512_maskable multiclass hierarchy:
maskable_custom
/ \
/ \
maskable_common maskable_in_asm
/ \
/ \
maskable maskable_3src
llvm-svn: 219363
This adds the Pat<>'s for the intrinsics. These are necessary because we
don't lower these intrinsics to SDNodes but match them directly. See the
rational in the previous commit.
llvm-svn: 219362
These derive from the new asm-only masking definitions.
Unfortunately I wasn't able to find a ISel pattern that we could legally
generate for the masking variants. The problem is that since the destination
is v4* we would need VK4 register classes and v4i1 value types to express the
masking. These are however not legal types/classes in AVX512f but only in VL,
so things get complicated pretty quickly. We can revisit this question later
if we have a more pressing need to express something like this.
So the ISel patterns are empty for the masking instructions and the next patch
will add Pat<>s instead to match the intrinsics calls with instructions.
llvm-svn: 219361
No functional change.
No change in X86.td.expanded except for the appearance of the new attributes.
The new attributes will be used in the subsequent patch.
llvm-svn: 219360
No functional change intended.
Very similar to the change I made for subvector extract in r218480.
test/CodeGen/X86/avx512-insert-extract.ll covers this.
llvm-svn: 218928
Fixed lowering of this intrinsics in case when mask is v2i1 and v4i1.
Now cmp intrinsics lower in the following way:
(i8 (int_x86_avx512_mask_pcmpeq_q_128
(v2i64 %a), (v2i64 %b), (i8 %mask))) ->
(i8 (bitcast
(v8i1 (insert_subvector undef,
(v2i1 (and (PCMPEQM %a, %b),
(extract_subvector
(v8i1 (bitcast %mask)), 0))), 0))))
llvm-svn: 218669
No functionality change.
Makes the code more compact (see the FMA part).
This needs a new type attribute MemOpFrag in X86VectorVTInfo. For now I only
defined this in the simple cases. See the commment before the attribute.
Diff of X86.td.expanded before and after is empty except for the appearance of
the new attribute.
llvm-svn: 218637
No functional change.
I initially thought that pulling the Pat<> into the instruction pattern was
not possible because it was doing a transform on the index in order to convert
it from a per-element (extract_subvector) index into a per-chunk (vextract*x4)
index.
Turns out this also works inside the pattern because the vextract_extract
PatFrag has an OperandTransform EXTRACT_get_vextract{128,256}_imm, so the
index in $idx goes through the same conversion.
The existing test CodeGen/X86/avx512-insert-extract.ll extended in the
previous commit provides coverage for this change.
llvm-svn: 218480
No functional change.
These are now implemented as two levels of multiclasses heavily relying on the
new X86VectorVTInfo class. The multiclass at the first level that is called
with float or int provides the 128 or 256 bit subvector extracts. The second
level provides the register and memory variants and some more Pat<>s.
I've compared the td.expanded files before and after. One change is that
ExeDomain for 64x4 is SSEPackedDouble now. I think this is correct, i.e. a
bugfix.
(BTW, this is the change that was blocked on the recent tablegen fix. The
class-instance values X86VectorVTInfo inside vextract_for_type weren't
properly evaluated.)
Part of <rdar://problem/17688758>
llvm-svn: 218478
td pattern). Currently we only model the immediate operand variation of
VPERMILPS and VPERMILPD, we should make that clear in the pseudos used.
Will be adding support for the variable mask variant in my next commit.
llvm-svn: 218282
parsing (and latent bug in the instruction definitions).
This is effectively a revert of r136287 which tried to address
a specific and narrow case of immediate operands failing to be accepted
by x86 instructions with a pretty heavy hammer: it introduced a new kind
of operand that behaved differently. All of that is removed with this
commit, but the test cases are both preserved and enhanced.
The core problem that r136287 and this commit are trying to handle is
that gas accepts both of the following instructions:
insertps $192, %xmm0, %xmm1
insertps $-64, %xmm0, %xmm1
These will encode to the same byte sequence, with the immediate
occupying an 8-bit entry. The first form was fixed by r136287 but that
broke the prior handling of the second form! =[ Ironically, we would
still emit the second form in some cases and then be unable to
re-assemble the output.
The reason why the first instruction failed to be handled is because
prior to r136287 the operands ere marked 'i32i8imm' which forces them to
be sign-extenable. Clearly, that won't work for 192 in a single byte.
However, making thim zero-extended or "unsigned" doesn't really address
the core issue either because it breaks negative immediates. The correct
fix is to make these operands 'i8imm' reflecting that they can be either
signed or unsigned but must be 8-bit immediates. This patch backs out
r136287 and then changes those places as well as some others to use
'i8imm' rather than one of the extended variants.
Naturally, this broke something else. The custom DAG nodes had to be
updated to have a much more accurate type constraint of an i8 node, and
a bunch of Pat immediates needed to be specified as i8 values.
The fallout didn't end there though. We also then ceased to be able to
match the instruction-specific intrinsics to the instructions so
modified. Digging, this is because they too used i32 rather than i8 in
their signature. So I've also switched those intrinsics to i8 arguments
in line with the instructions.
In order to make the intrinsic adjustments of course, I also had to add
auto upgrading for the intrinsics.
I suspect that the intrinsic argument types may have led everything down
this rabbit hole. Pretty happy with the result.
llvm-svn: 217310
We discussed the issue of generality vs. readability of the AVX512 classes
recently. I proposed this approach to try to hide and centralize the mappings
we commonly perform based on the vector type. A new class X86VectorVTInfo
captures these.
The idea is to pass an instance of this class to classes/multiclasses instead
of the corresponding ValueType. Then the class/multiclass can use its field
for things that derive from the type rather than passing all those as separate
arguments.
I modified avx512_valign to demonstrate this new approach. As you can see
instead of 7 related template parameters we now have one. The downside is
that we have to refer to fields for the derived values. I named the argument
'_' in order to make this as invisible as possible. Please let me know if you
absolutely hate this. (Also once we allow local initializations in
multiclasses we can recover the original version by assigning the fields to
local variables.)
Another possible use-case for this class is to directly map things, e.g.:
RegisterClass KRC = X86VectorVTInfo<32, i16>.KRC
llvm-svn: 216209
This change further evolves the base class AVX512_masking in order to make it
suitable for the masking variants of the FMA instructions.
Besides AVX512_masking there is now a new base class that instructions
including FMAs can use: AVX512_masking_3src. With three-source (destructive)
instructions one of the sources is already tied to the destination. This
difference from AVX512_masking is captured by this new class. The common bits
between _masking and _masking_3src are broken out into a new super class
called AVX512_masking_common.
As with valign, there is some corresponding restructuring of the underlying
format classes. The idea is the same we want to derive from two classes
essentially: one providing the format bits and another format-independent
multiclass supplying the various masking and non-masking instruction variants.
Existing fma tests in avx512-fma*.ll provide coverage here for the non-masking
variants. For masking, the next patches in the series will add intrinsics and
intrinsic tests.
For AVX512_masking_3src to work, the (ins ...) dag has to be passed *without*
the leading source operand that is tied to dst ($src1). This is necessary to
properly construct the (ins ...) for the different variants. For the record,
I did check that if $src is mistakenly included, you do get a fairly intuitive
error message from the tablegen backend.
Part of <rdar://problem/17688758>
llvm-svn: 215660
Added avx512_movnt_vl multiclass for handling 256/128-bit forms of instruction.
Added encoding and lowering tests.
Reviewed by Elena Demikhovsky <elena.demikhovsky@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 215536
I think that this will scale better in most cases than adding a Pat<> for each
mapping from the intrinsic DAG to the intruction (i.e. rri, rrik, rrikz). We
can just lower to the SDNode and have the resulting DAG be matches by the DAG
patterns.
Alternatively (long term), we could keep the Pat<>s but generate them via the
new AVX512_masking multiclass. The difficulty is that in order to formulate
that we would have to concatenate DAGs. Currently this is only supported if
the operators of the input DAGs are identical.
llvm-svn: 215473
This completes one item from the todo-list of r215125 "Generate masking
instruction variants with tablegen".
The AddedComplexity is needed just like for the k variant.
Added a codegen test based on valignq.
llvm-svn: 215173
After adding the masking variants to several instructions, I have decided to
experiment with generating these from the non-masking/unconditional
variant. This will hopefully reduce the amount repetition that we currently
have in order to define an instruction with all its variants (for a reg/mem
instruction this would be 6 instruction defs and 2 Pat<> for the intrinsic).
The patch is the first cut that is currently only applied to valignd/q to make
the patch small.
A few notes on the approach:
* In order to stitch together the dag for both the conditional and the
unconditional patterns I pass the RHS of the set rather than the full
pattern (set dest, RHS).
* Rather than subclassing each instruction base class (e.g. AVX512AIi8),
with a masking variant which wouldn't scale, I derived the masking
instructions from a new base class AVX512 (this is just I<> with
Requires<HasAVX512>). The instructions derive from this now, plus a new set
of classes that add the format bits and everything else that instruction
base class provided (i.e. AVX512AIi8 vs. AVX512AIi8Base).
I hope we can go incrementally from here. I expect that:
* We will need different variants of the masking class. One example is
instructions requiring three vector sources. In this case we tie one of the
source operands to dest rather than a new implicit source operand ($src0)
* Add the zero-masking variant
* Add more AVX512*Base classes as new uses are added
I've looked at X86.td.expanded before and after to make sure that nothing got
lost for valignd/q.
llvm-svn: 215125
Robert Khasanov