Summary:
This form was replaced by a form taking an instruction instead of opcode and
return type in r258391. After committing this change (and some depending,
follow-up changes) it turned out in the review thread to be controversial. The
discussion didn't come to a conclusion yet. I'm re-adding the old form to fix
the API regression and to provide a better base for discussion, possibly on
llvm-dev.
A difference to the original function is that it can't be called with GEPs
(similarly to how it was already the case for compares). In order to support
opaque pointers in the future, folding GEPs needs to be passed the source
element type, which is not possible with the current API.
Reviewers: dberlin, reames
Subscribers: dblaikie, eddyb
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17901
llvm-svn: 263501
If anybody is actually using this, it probably doesn't do what they
think it does. This actually causes the dylib to *export* a
__cxa_atexit symbol, so anything that links it probably loses their
exit time destructors as well as disabling LLVM's.
This just removes the option entirely. If somebody does need this
behaviour we should figure out a more principled way to do it.
This is effectively a revert of r223805.
llvm-svn: 263498
Summary:
llvm-config --libs does not produce correct output since commit r260263
(llvm-config: Add preliminary Windows support) changed naming format of
the libraries. This patch updates llvm-config to recognize new naming
format and output correct linker flags.
Ref: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26581
Patch by Vedran Miletić
Reviewers: ehsan, rnk, pxli168
Subscribers: pxli168
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17300
llvm-svn: 263497
Summary: There are places in MachineBlockPlacement where a worklist is filled in pretty much identical way. The code is duplicated. This refactor it so that the same code is used in both scenarii.
Reviewers: chandlerc, majnemer, rafael, MatzeB, escha, silvas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18077
llvm-svn: 263495
With the changes in r263275, there are now more than just functions in
the summary. Completed the renaming of data structures (started in
r263275) to reflect the wider scope. In particular, changed the
FunctionIndex* data structures to ModuleIndex*, and renamed related
variables and comments. Also renamed the files to reflect the changes.
A companion clang patch will immediately succeed this patch to reflect
this renaming.
llvm-svn: 263490
Summary:
This check was added in rL152620, and has started causing downstream warnings in Julia:
```
In file included from /home/tkelman/Julia/julia-0.5/src/codegen.cpp:22:0:
/home/tkelman/Julia/julia-0.5/usr/include/llvm/ExecutionEngine/JITEventListener.h:84:5: warning: "LLVM_USE_INTEL_JITEVENTS" is not defined [-Wundef]
#if LLVM_USE_INTEL_JITEVENTS
^
/home/tkelman/Julia/julia-0.5/usr/include/llvm/ExecutionEngine/JITEventListener.h💯5: warning: "LLVM_USE_OPROFILE" is not defined [-Wundef]
#if LLVM_USE_OPROFILE
^
```
Patch by Tony Kelman.
Reviewers: loladiro
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17254
llvm-svn: 263487
As noted in:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26636
This doesn't accomplish anything on its own. It's the first step towards preserving
and using branch weights with selects.
The next step would be to make sure we're propagating the info in all of the other
places where we create selects (SimplifyCFG, InstCombine, etc). I don't think there's
an easy fix to make this happen; we have to look at each transform individually to
determine how to correctly propagate the weights.
Along with that step, we need to then use the weights when making subsequent transform
decisions such as discussed in http://reviews.llvm.org/D16836.
The inliner test is independent but closely related. It verifies that metadata is
preserved when both branches and selects are cloned.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18133
llvm-svn: 263482
Summary:
Previously we had a notion of convergent functions but not of convergent
calls. This is insufficient to correctly analyze calls where the target
is unknown, e.g. indirect calls.
Now a call is convergent if it targets a known-convergent function, or
if it's explicitly marked as convergent. As usual, we can remove
convergent where we can prove that no convergent operations are
performed in the call.
Originally landed as r261544, then reverted in r261544 for (incidental)
build breakage. Re-landed here with no changes.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jingyue
Subscribers: llvm-commits, tra, jhen, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17739
llvm-svn: 263481
Some instructions were missing isBranch, isCall, or isTerminator
flags. This didn't really affect code generation since most of
the affected patterns were used only for the AsmParser and/or
disassembler.
However, it could affect tools using the MC layer to disassemble
and parse binary code (e.g. via MCInstrDesc::mayAffectControlFlow).
llvm-svn: 263478
The bad behavior happens when we have a function with a long linear chain of
basic blocks, and have a live range spanning most of this chain, but with very
few uses.
Let say we have only 2 uses.
The Hopfield network is only seeded with two active blocks where the uses are,
and each iteration of the outer loop in `RAGreedy::growRegion()` only adds two
new nodes to the network due to the completely linear shape of the CFG.
Meanwhile, `SpillPlacer->iterate()` visits the whole set of discovered nodes,
which adds up to a quadratic algorithm.
This is an historical accident effect from r129188.
When the Hopfield network is expanding, most of the action is happening on the
frontier where new nodes are being added. The internal nodes in the network are
not likely to be flip-flopping much, or they will at least settle down very
quickly. This means that while `SpillPlacer->iterate()` is recomputing all the
nodes in the network, it is probably only the two frontier nodes that are
changing their output.
Instead of recomputing the whole network on each iteration, we can maintain a
SparseSet of nodes that need to be updated:
- `SpillPlacement::activate()` adds the node to the todo list.
- When a node changes value (i.e., `update()` returns true), its neighbors are
added to the todo list.
- `SpillPlacement::iterate()` only updates the nodes in the list.
The result of Hopfield iterations is not necessarily exact. It should converge
to a local minimum, but there is no guarantee that it will find a global
minimum. It is possible that updating nodes in a different order will cause us
to switch to a different local minimum. In other words, this is not NFC, but
although I saw a few runtime improvements and regressions when I benchmarked
this change, those were side effects and actually the performance change is in
the noise as expected.
Huge thanks to Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund@2pi.dk> for his feedbacks,
guidance and time for the review.
llvm-svn: 263460
When the SP in not changed because of realignment/VLAs etc., we restore the SP
by using the previous value of SP and not the FP. Breaking the dependency will
help in cases when the epilog of a callee is close to the epilog of the caller;
for then "sub sp, fp, #" depends on the load restoring the FP in the epilog of
the callee.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D18060
Patch by Aditya Kumar and Evandro Menezes.
llvm-svn: 263458
Converting masked vector loads to regular vector loads for x86 AVX should always be a win.
I raised the legality issue of reading the extra memory bytes on llvm-dev. I did not see any
objections.
1. x86 already does this kind of optimization for multiple scalar loads -> vector load.
2. If other targets have the same flexibility, we could move this transform up to CGP or DAGCombiner.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18094
llvm-svn: 263446
Summary:
MIPSR6 introduces a class of branches called compact branches. Unlike the
traditional MIPS branches which have a delay slot, compact branches do not
have a delay slot. The instruction following the compact branch is only
executed if the branch is not taken and must not be a branch.
It works by generating compact branches for MIPS32R6 when the delay slot
filler cannot fill a delay slot. Then, inspecting the generated code for
forbidden slot hazards (a compact branch with an adjacent branch or other
CTI) and inserting nops to clear this hazard.
Patch by Simon Dardis.
Reviewers: vkalintiris, dsanders
Subscribers: MatzeB, dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16353
llvm-svn: 263444
Summary:
When multiple threads perform an atomic op with the same arguments, they
will usually see different return values.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18101
llvm-svn: 263440
On the z13, it turns out to be more efficient to access a full
floating-point register than just the upper half (as done e.g.
by the LE and LER instructions).
Current code already takes this into account when loading from
memory by using the LDE instruction in place of LE. However,
we still generate LER, which shows the same performance issues
as LE in certain circumstances.
This patch changes the back-end to emit LDR instead of LER to
implement FP32 register-to-register copies on z13.
llvm-svn: 263431
Summary:
With the addition of checks to ensure that operands have a strict ordering
it has become tricky to manage the order in the way I originally intended.
This patch linearizes the ordering which simplifies the implementation but
requires an order that is arbitrary in places. Here are some examples:
* uimm4 < uimm5 < uimm6
* simm4 < uimm4 < simm5 < uimm5
* uimm5 < uimm5_plus1 (1..32) < uimm5_plus32 (32..63) < uimm6
The term 'superset' starts to break down here since the *_plus* classes
are not true supersets of uimm5 (but they are still subsets of uimm6).
* uimm5 < uimm5_64, and uimm5 < vsplat_uimm5
This is entirely arbitrary. We need an ordering and what we pick is
unimportant since only one is possible for a given mnemonic.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17723
llvm-svn: 263423
s_bitset0_b64, s_bitset1_b64 has 32-bit src0, not 64-bit.
s_rfe_b64 has just one destination operand and no source.
Uncomment S_BITCMP* and S_SETVSKIP, adjust SOPC_* classes for that.
Add s_memrealtime test and change comments in smem.s to follow common style.
Change test for s_memtime to use non-zero register to make it really test encoding.
Add tests for s_buffer_load*.
Add tests for SOPC instructions (same for SI and VI)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18040
llvm-svn: 263420
It's failing to build on VS2015 with:
C:\b\build\slave\ClangToTWin\build\src\third_party\llvm\lib\Target\WebAssembly\WebAssemblyRegStackify.cpp(520):
error C2668: 'llvm::make_reverse_iterator': ambiguous call to overloaded function
C:\b\build\slave\ClangToTWin\build\src\third_party\llvm\include\llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h(217):
note: could be 'std::reverse_iterator<llvm::MachineBasicBlock::iterator>
llvm::make_reverse_iterator<llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr>>(IteratorTy)'
with
[
IteratorTy=llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr>
]
C:\b\depot_tools\win_toolchain\vs_files\391bbf1220d3edcd3cc3fccdb56224181e3b13a7\win_sdk\bin\..\..\VC\include\xutility(1217):
note: or 'std::reverse_iterator<llvm::MachineBasicBlock::iterator>
std::make_reverse_iterator<llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr>>(_RanIt)' [found using argument-dependent lookup]
with
[
_RanIt=llvm::MachineInstrBundleIterator<llvm::MachineInstr>
]
I don't have VS2015 locally at the moment, but hopefully this will help.
llvm-svn: 263418
The motivating example is this
for (j = n; j > 1; j = i) {
i = j / 2;
}
The signed division is safely to be changed to an unsigned division (j is known
to be larger than 1 from the loop guard) and later turned into a single shift
without considering the sign bit.
llvm-svn: 263406
Summary: This comes from work to make attribute manipulable via the C API.
Reviewers: gottesmm, hfinkel, baldrick, echristo, tejohnson
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18128
llvm-svn: 263404
Summary:
There is no definition about MinLatency any more.
Reviewers: mcrosier, spatel, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18079
llvm-svn: 263403
Manuel Jacob