This fixes a couple of BtVer2 missing instructions that weren't been handled in the override.
NOTE: There are still a lot of overrides that still need cleaning up!
llvm-svn: 331770
I've created the necessary classes but there are still a lot of overrides that need cleaning up.
NOTE: The Znver1 model was missing some div/idiv variants in the instregex patterns and wasn't setting the resource cycles at all in the overrides.
llvm-svn: 331767
Summary:
This patch removes InstRW overrides for basic arithmetic/logic instructions. To do this I've added the store address port to RMW. And used a WriteSequence to make the latency additive. It does not cover ADC/SBB because they have different latency.
Apparently we were inconsistent about whether the store has latency or not thus the test changes.
I've also left out Sandy Bridge because the load latency there is currently 4 cycles and should be 5.
Reviewers: RKSimon, andreadb
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45351
llvm-svn: 329416
Give them both the same itineraries. Add hasSideEffects = 0 to ADOX since they don't have patterns. Rename source operands to $src1 and $src2 instead of $src0 and $src. Add ReadAfterLd to the memory form SchedRW.
llvm-svn: 328952
This also moves to define it in the same way as ADCX which seems to use
constraints a bit better.
This is pulled out of the review for reducing the use of popf for
restoring EFLAGS, but is independent. There are still more problems with
our definitions for these instructions that Craig is going to look at
but this is at least less broken and he can start from this to improve
them more fully.
Thanks to Craig for the review here.
llvm-svn: 328945
They were incorrectly marked as RMW operations. Some of the CMP instrucions worked, but the ones that use a similar encoding as RMW form of ADD ended up marked as RMW.
TEST used the same tablegen class as some of the CMPs.
llvm-svn: 327947
Sometimes we used the same itinerary for MEM and REG forms, but that seems inconsistent with our usual usage.
We also used the MUL8 itinerary for MULX32/64 which was also weird.
The test changes are because we were using IIC_IMUL32_RR and IIC_IMUL64_RR instead of IIC_IMUL32_REG/IIC_IMUL64_REG for the 32 and 64 bit multiplies that produce double width result.
llvm-svn: 327866
This allows the immediate to folded into the and instead of being forced to move into a register. This can sometimes result in shorter encodings since the and can sign extend an immediate.
This also allows us to match an and to a movzx after a not.
This can cause an extra move if the input to the separate NOT has an additional user which requires a copy before the NOT.
llvm-svn: 324260
Summary:
It seems it's main effect is to create addition copies when values are inr register that do not support this trick, which increase register pressure and makes the code bigger.
Reviewers: craig.topper, niravd, spatel, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42646
llvm-svn: 323888
Summary:
It seems it's main effect is to create addition copies when values are inr register that do not support this trick, which increase register pressure and makes the code bigger.
The main noteworthy regression I was able to observe was pattern of the type (setcc (trunc (and X, C)), 0) where C is such as it would benefit from the hi register trick. To prevent this, a new pattern is added to materialize such pattern using a 32 bits test. This has the added benefit of working with any constant that is materializable as a 32bits immediate, not just the ones that can leverage the high register trick, as demonstrated by the test case in test-shrink.ll using the constant 2049 .
Reviewers: craig.topper, niravd, spatel, hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42646
llvm-svn: 323690
The asm parser wasn't preventing these from being accepted in 32-bit mode. Instructions that use a GR64 register are protected by the parser rejecting the register in 32-bit mode.
llvm-svn: 320846
Summary:
Intel documentation shows the memory operand as the first operand. But we currently treat it as the second operand. Conceptually the order doesn't matter since it doesn't write memory. We have aliases to parse with the operands in either order and the isel matching is commutable.
For the register®ister form order does matter for the assembly parser. PR22995 was previously filed and fixed by changing the register®ister form from MRMSrcReg to MRMDestReg to match gas. Ideally the memory form should match by using MRMDestMem.
I believe this supercedes D38025 which was trying to switch the register®ister form back to pre-PR22995.
Reviewers: aymanmus, RKSimon, zvi
Reviewed By: aymanmus
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38120
llvm-svn: 314639
Summary:
Just because INC/DEC is a little slow on some processors doesn't mean we shouldn't prefer it when optimizing for size.
This appears to match gcc behavior.
Reviewers: chandlerc, zvi, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37177
llvm-svn: 312866
Some register-register instructions can be encoded in 2 different ways, this happens when 2 register operands can be folded (separately).
For example if we look at the MOV8rr and MOV8rr_REV, both instructions perform exactly the same operation, but are encoded differently. Here is the relevant information about these instructions from Intel's 64-ia-32-architectures-software-developer-manual:
Opcode Instruction Op/En 64-Bit Mode Compat/Leg Mode Description
8A /r MOV r8,r/m8 RM Valid Valid Move r/m8 to r8.
88 /r MOV r/m8,r8 MR Valid Valid Move r8 to r/m8.
Here we can see that in order to enable the folding of the output and input registers, we had to define 2 "encodings", and as a result we got 2 move 8-bit register-register instructions.
In the X86 backend, we define both of these instructions, usually one has a regular name (MOV8rr) while the other has "_REV" suffix (MOV8rr_REV), must be marked with isCodeGenOnly flag and is not emitted from CodeGen.
Automatically generating the memory folding tables relies on matching encodings of instructions, but in these cases where we want to map both memory forms of the mov 8-bit (MOV8rm & MOV8mr) to MOV8rr (not to MOV8rr_REV) we have to somehow point from the MOV8rr_REV to the "regular" appropriate instruction which in this case is MOV8rr.
This field enable this "pointing" mechanism - which is used in the TableGen backend for generating memory folding tables.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32683
llvm-svn: 304087
This patch handles 64-bit constants which can be encoded as 32-bit immediates.
It extends the functionality added by https://reviews.llvm.org/D11363 for 32-bit constants to 64-bit constants.
Patch by Sunita Marathe!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23391
llvm-svn: 278857
First step in preventing immediates that occur more than once within a single
basic block from being pulled into their users, in order to prevent unnecessary
large instruction encoding .Currently enabled only when optimizing for size.
Patch by: zia.ansari@intel.com
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11363
llvm-svn: 244601
Overall this seems simpler. It reduces duplication of patterns between both modes and it simplifies the memory folding/unfolding tables as they don't need to create fake instructions just to keep track of 64-bitness.
llvm-svn: 225252
These should end up (in ELF) as R_X86_64_32S relocs, not R_X86_64_32.
Kill the horrid and incomplete special case and FIXME in
EncodeInstruction() and set things up so it can infer the signedness
from the ImmType just like it can the size and whether it's PC-relative.
llvm-svn: 200495
This fixes the bulk of 16-bit output, and the corresponding test case
x86-16.s now looks mostly like the x86-32.s test case that it was
originally based on. A few irrelevant instructions have been dropped,
and there are still some corner cases to be fixed in subsequent patches.
llvm-svn: 198752
That's what it actually means, and with 16-bit support it's going to be
a little more relevant since in a few corner cases we may actually want
to distinguish between 16-bit and 32-bit mode (for example the bare 'push'
aliases to pushw/pushl etc.)
Patch by David Woodhouse
llvm-svn: 197768
Implements Instruction scheduler latencies for Silvermont,
using latencies from the Intel Silvermont Optimization Guide.
Auto detects SLM.
Turns on post RA scheduler when generating code for SLM.
llvm-svn: 190717
Simon Pilgrim