into and/shift would cause nodes to move around and a dangling pointer
to happen. The code tried to avoid this with a HandleSDNode, but
got the details wrong.
llvm-svn: 123578
There's an inherent tension in DAGCombine between assuming
that things will be put in canonical form, and the Depth
mechanism that disables transformations when recursion gets
too deep. It would not surprise me if there's a lot of little
bugs like this one waiting to be discovered. The mechanism
seems fragile and I'd suggest looking at it from a design viewpoint.
llvm-svn: 123191
Instead encode llvm IR level property "HasSideEffects" in an operand (shared
with IsAlignStack). Added MachineInstrs::hasUnmodeledSideEffects() to check
the operand when the instruction is an INLINEASM.
This allows memory instructions to be moved around INLINEASM instructions.
llvm-svn: 123044
The theory is it's still faster than a pair of movq / a quad of movl. This
will probably hurt older chips like P4 but should run faster on current
and future Intel processors. rdar://8817010
llvm-svn: 122955
up freebsd bootloader. However, this doesn't make much sense for Darwin, whose
-Os is meant to optimize for size only if it doesn't hurt performance.
rdar://8821501
llvm-svn: 122936
prologue and epilogue if the adjustment is 8. Similarly, use pushl / popl if
the adjustment is 4 in 32-bit mode.
In the epilogue, takes care to pop to a caller-saved register that's not live
at the exit (either return or tailcall instruction).
rdar://8771137
llvm-svn: 122783
This allows us to compile:
void test(char *s, int a) {
__builtin_memset(s, a, 15);
}
into 1 mul + 3 stores instead of 3 muls + 3 stores.
llvm-svn: 122710
We could implement a DAGCombine to turn x * 0x0101 back into logic operations
on targets that doesn't support the multiply or it is slow (p4) if someone cares
enough.
Example code:
void test(char *s, int a) {
__builtin_memset(s, a, 4);
}
before:
_test: ## @test
movzbl 8(%esp), %eax
movl %eax, %ecx
shll $8, %ecx
orl %eax, %ecx
movl %ecx, %eax
shll $16, %eax
orl %ecx, %eax
movl 4(%esp), %ecx
movl %eax, 4(%ecx)
movl %eax, (%ecx)
ret
after:
_test: ## @test
movzbl 8(%esp), %eax
imull $16843009, %eax, %eax ## imm = 0x1010101
movl 4(%esp), %ecx
movl %eax, 4(%ecx)
movl %eax, (%ecx)
ret
llvm-svn: 122707
loads properly. We miscompiled the testcase into:
_test: ## @test
movl $128, (%rdi)
movzbl 1(%rdi), %eax
ret
Now we get a proper:
_test: ## @test
movl $128, (%rdi)
movsbl (%rdi), %eax
movzbl %ah, %eax
ret
This fixes PR8757.
llvm-svn: 122392
count operand. These should be the same but apparently are
not always, and this is cleaner anyway. This improves the
code in an existing test.
llvm-svn: 122354
the same as setcc. Optimize ADDC(0,0,FLAGS) -> SET_CARRY(FLAGS). This is
a step towards finishing off PR5443. In the testcase in that bug we now get:
movq %rdi, %rax
addq %rsi, %rax
sbbq %rcx, %rcx
testb $1, %cl
setne %dl
ret
instead of:
movq %rdi, %rax
addq %rsi, %rax
movl $0, %ecx
adcq $0, %rcx
testq %rcx, %rcx
setne %dl
ret
llvm-svn: 122219
doesn't, match it back to setb.
On a 64-bit version of the testcase before we'd get:
movq %rdi, %rax
addq %rsi, %rax
sbbb %dl, %dl
andb $1, %dl
ret
now we get:
movq %rdi, %rax
addq %rsi, %rax
setb %dl
ret
llvm-svn: 122217
regB = move RCX
regA = op regB, regC
RAX = move regA
where both regB and regC are killed. If regB is constrainted to non-compatible
physical registers but regC is not constrainted at all, then it's better to
commute the instruction.
movl %edi, %eax
shlq $32, %rcx
leaq (%rcx,%rax), %rax
=>
movl %edi, %eax
shlq $32, %rcx
orq %rcx, %rax
rdar://8762995
llvm-svn: 121793
when the wider type is legal. This allows us to compile:
define zeroext i16 @test1(i16 zeroext %x) nounwind {
entry:
%div = udiv i16 %x, 33
ret i16 %div
}
into:
test1: # @test1
movzwl 4(%esp), %eax
imull $63551, %eax, %eax # imm = 0xF83F
shrl $21, %eax
ret
instead of:
test1: # @test1
movw $-1985, %ax # imm = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFF83F
mulw 4(%esp)
andl $65504, %edx # imm = 0xFFE0
movl %edx, %eax
shrl $5, %eax
ret
Implementing rdar://8760399 and example #4 from:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320
We should implement the same thing for [su]mul_hilo, but I don't
have immediate plans to do this.
llvm-svn: 121696
the output to the correct register. Fixes a hidden problem uncovered
by the last patch where we'd try to DAG combine our MVT::Other node
oddly.
llvm-svn: 121358
result. This allows us to compile:
void *test12(long count) {
return new int[count];
}
into:
test12:
movl $4, %ecx
movq %rdi, %rax
mulq %rcx
movq $-1, %rdi
cmovnoq %rax, %rdi
jmp __Znam ## TAILCALL
instead of:
test12:
movl $4, %ecx
movq %rdi, %rax
mulq %rcx
seto %cl
testb %cl, %cl
movq $-1, %rdi
cmoveq %rax, %rdi
jmp __Znam
Of course it would be even better if the regalloc inverted the cmov to 'cmovoq',
which would eliminate the need for the 'movq %rdi, %rax'.
llvm-svn: 120936
backend that they were all implemented except umul. This one fell back
to the default implementation that did a hi/lo multiply and compared the
top. Fix this to check the overflow flag that the 'mul' instruction
sets, so we can avoid an explicit test. Now we compile:
void *func(long count) {
return new int[count];
}
into:
__Z4funcl: ## @_Z4funcl
movl $4, %ecx ## encoding: [0xb9,0x04,0x00,0x00,0x00]
movq %rdi, %rax ## encoding: [0x48,0x89,0xf8]
mulq %rcx ## encoding: [0x48,0xf7,0xe1]
seto %cl ## encoding: [0x0f,0x90,0xc1]
testb %cl, %cl ## encoding: [0x84,0xc9]
movq $-1, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0xc7,0xc7,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff]
cmoveq %rax, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0x0f,0x44,0xf8]
jmp __Znam ## TAILCALL
instead of:
__Z4funcl: ## @_Z4funcl
movl $4, %ecx ## encoding: [0xb9,0x04,0x00,0x00,0x00]
movq %rdi, %rax ## encoding: [0x48,0x89,0xf8]
mulq %rcx ## encoding: [0x48,0xf7,0xe1]
testq %rdx, %rdx ## encoding: [0x48,0x85,0xd2]
movq $-1, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0xc7,0xc7,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xff]
cmoveq %rax, %rdi ## encoding: [0x48,0x0f,0x44,0xf8]
jmp __Znam ## TAILCALL
Other than the silly seto+test, this is using the o bit directly, so it's going in the right
direction.
llvm-svn: 120935
legalization time. Since at legalization time there is no mapping from
SDNode back to the corresponding LLVM instruction and the return
SDNode is target specific, this requires a target hook to check for
eligibility. Only x86 and ARM support this form of sibcall optimization
right now.
rdar://8707777
llvm-svn: 120501
if the extension types were not the same. The result was that if you
fed a select with sext and zext loads, as in the testcase, then it
would get turned into a zext (or sext) of the select, which is wrong
in the cases when it should have been an sext (resp. zext). Reported
and diagnosed by Sebastien Deldon.
llvm-svn: 119728
and testing is easier. A good example is the unknown-location.ll test that
now can just look for ".loc 1 0 0". We also don't use a DW_LNE_set_address for
every address change anymore.
llvm-svn: 119613
Rafael Espindola