It turned out that readonly argmemonly is not enough.
store 42, %p
%b = barrier(%p)
store 43, %b
the first store is dead, but because barrier was marked as
reading argument memory, it was considered alive. With
inaccessiblememonly it doesn't read the argument, but
it also can't be CSEd.
based on: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32006
llvm-svn: 331338
Summary:
This is a follow up to rL331182. A PHI node can be split up into
several MIR PHI nodes when being selected. When there is a
dbg.value intrinsic that uses the result of such a PHI node we
need to select several DBG_VALUE instructions, with fragment
expressions, in order to do a correct selection.
Reviewers: rnk, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: mattd, llvm-commits, JDevlieghere, aprantl, gbedwell, rnk
Tags: #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46329
llvm-svn: 331337
Summary:
This brings the filenames in accordance to the style guide and LLVM
conventions for C++ filenames.
As suggested by rnk@ in D46068.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: mgorny, mgrang, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46301
llvm-svn: 331321
The logic remains the same. Eventually, I see the RCU acting as its own separate stage in the instruction pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46331
llvm-svn: 331316
and (or (lshr X, C), ...), 1 --> (X & C') != 0
I initially thought about implementing the minimal pattern in instcombine as mentioned here:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37098#c6
...but we need to do better to catch the more general sequence from the motivating test
(more than 2 bits in the compare). And a test-suite run with statistics showed that this
pattern only happened 2 times currently. It would potentially happen more often if
reassociation worked better (D45842), but it's probably still not too frequent?
This is small enough that I didn't see a need to create a whole new class/file within
AggressiveInstCombine. There are likely other relatively small matchers like what was
discussed in D44266 that would slide under foldUnusualPatterns() (name suggestions welcome).
We could potentially also consolidate matchers for ctpop, bswap, etc under here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45986
llvm-svn: 331311
As mentioned in D45986, there's a potential ordering dependency
between instcombine and aggressive-instcombine for detecting these,
so I'm adding a few tests to confirm that the expected folds occur
using -O3 (because aggressive-instcombine only runs at -O3 currently).
llvm-svn: 331308
While running the lit tests for the most recent version of D45916
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D45916), I found that a couple tests for this pass
suddenly started segfaulting. Since the outliner wasn't actually doing anything
to the code in either of these tests I got curious.
I found that the pass doesn’t completely create the machine-level constructs
necessary to actually add a MachineFunction and MachineBasicBlock to the
module. This patch adds in those missing bits. After this, adding the
outliner before this pass won’t cause it to segfault.
You can recreate this behaviour by adding the MachineOutliner directly before
the pass and having it return false immediately.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46330
llvm-svn: 331307
This adds a some more tests, and adds some notes to tests which are using
a suboptimal lowering.
The constants with suboptimal lowerings seem to be relatively rare in
practice, but it might be a fun project to work on improvements.
llvm-svn: 331304
The logic for this combine is almost identical to the logic for a
(sext (sextload x)) combine.
This commit factors out the logic so it can be shared by both combines,
and corrects the SDLoc assigned in the zext version of the combine.
Prior to this patch, for the given test case, we would apply the
location associated with the udiv instruction to instructions which
perform the load.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
llvm-svn: 331303
Prior to this patch, for the given test case, we would apply the
location associated with the sdiv instruction to instructions which
perform the load.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46222
llvm-svn: 331302
In DAGCombiner, we try to simplify this pattern:
([s|z]ext (load ...))
Conceptually, a new extload which is created while splitting the load
should have the same debug location as the load.
Making this change affects the IROrder of the new load, causing some
test case churn.
In practice, the new location is never different from the location of
the [s|z]ext, at least not during check-llvm or a stage2 build.
Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46156
llvm-svn: 331301
Setting the right SDLoc on a newly-created zextload fixes a line table
bug which resulted in non-linear stepping behavior.
Several backend tests contained CHECK lines which relied on the IROrder
inherited from the wrong SDLoc. This patch breaks that dependence where
feasbile and regenerates test cases where not.
In some cases, changing a node's IROrder may alter register allocation
and spill behavior. This can affect performance. I have chosen not to
prevent this by applying a "known good" IROrder to SDLocs, as this may
hide a more general bug in the scheduler, or cause regressions on other
test inputs.
rdar://33755881, Part of: llvm.org/PR37262
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45995
llvm-svn: 331300
LLVM always puts function definition DIEs at the top level, but under
some circumstances GCC does not (at least in this case with member
functions of a function-local type).
To ensure that doesn't appear as though the local type's member function
is unduly inlined within the outer function - ensure the inline
discovery DIE parent walk stops at the first DW_TAG_subprogram.
llvm-svn: 331291
According to MSDN, Visual Studio 2015 included support for
std::is_final. Additionally, a bug in the Visual Studio compiler results
in the incorrect definition of __cplusplus. Due to the conditions in the
else case not holding either, we end up with no definition of
LLVM_IS_FINAL when building with MSVC. This has not yet been a problem
with LLVM/clang, however, the uses of LLVM_IS_FINAL is more prevalent in
swift, which uses the ADT library and causes issues when building lldb
with Visual Studio.
Workaround the issue by always assuming that the definition of
std::is_final is available with Visual Studio. Since we currently
require VS 2015+ for building LLVM, this condition should always hold
for the users in LLVM/clang (and for swift).
llvm-svn: 331282
Summary:
This fixes a build break with r331269.
test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/pr23997.ll
should be in:
test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/X86/pr23997.ll
llvm-svn: 331281
This is a follow-up to r331272.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331275
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
Summary:
This is a fix for PR23997.
The loop vectorizer is not preserving the inbounds property of GEPs that it creates.
This is inhibiting some optimizations. This patch preserves the inbounds property in
the case where a load/store is being fed by an inbounds GEP.
Reviewers: mkuper, javed.absar, hsaito
Reviewed By: hsaito
Subscribers: dcaballe, hsaito, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46191
llvm-svn: 331269
phi is on lhs of a comparison op.
For the following testcase,
L1:
%t0 = add i32 %m, 7
%t3 = icmp eq i32* %t2, null
br i1 %t3, label %L3, label %L2
L2:
%t4 = load i32, i32* %t2, align 4
br label %L3
L3:
%t5 = phi i32 [ %t0, %L1 ], [ %t4, %L2 ]
%t6 = icmp eq i32 %t0, %t5
br i1 %t6, label %L4, label %L5
We know if we go through the path L1 --> L3, %t6 should always be true. However
currently, if the rhs of the eq comparison is phi, JumpThreading fails to
evaluate %t6 to true. And we know that Instcombine cannot guarantee always
canonicalizing phi to the left hand side of the comparison operation according
to the operand priority comparison mechanism in instcombine. The patch handles
the case when rhs of the comparison op is a phi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46275
llvm-svn: 331266
instcombine should transform the relevant cases if the OverflowingBinaryOperator/PossiblyExactOperator can be proven to be safe.
Change-Id: I7aec62a31a894e465e00eb06aed80c3ea0c9dd45
llvm-svn: 331265
The previous version of this patch restricted the 'jal' instruction to MIPS and
microMIPSr3. microMIPS32r6 does not have this instruction and instead uses jal
as an alias for balc.
Original commit message:
> Reviewers: smaksimovic, atanasyan, abeserminji
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46114
>
llvm-svn: 331259
Without this change, GCC 7 raises the warning below:
control reaches end of non-void function
Reviewers: sbc100, andreadb
Reviewed By: andreadb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46304
llvm-svn: 331255
This patch fixes a bug introduced by revision 330778 (originally reviewed at:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44782), where function isFrameLoadOpcode returned
the wrong number of bytes read for opcodes VMOVSSrm and VMOVSDrm.
This corrects that mistake, and extends the regression test to catch cases where
the dead stores should be removed.
Patch by Jeremy Morse.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46256
llvm-svn: 331252
The warning was (introduced in r331220):
lib/MC/WasmObjectWriter.cpp:51:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
}
^
llvm-svn: 331251
unswitch and replace it with the amazingly simple update API code.
This addresses piles of FIXMEs around the update logic here and makes
everything substantially simpler.
llvm-svn: 331247
code review.
It turns out this *is* necessary, and I read the comment on the API
correctly the first time. ;]
The `applyUpdates` routine requires that updates are "balanced". This is
in order to cleanly handle cycles like inserting, removing, nad then
re-inserting the same edge. This precludes inserting the same edge
multiple times in a row as handling that would cause the insertion logic
to become *ordered* instead of *unordered* (which is what the API
provides).
It happens that in this specific case nothing (other than an assert and
contract violation) goes wrong because we're never inserting and
removing the same edge. The implementation *happens* to do the right
thing to eliminate redundant insertions in that case.
But the requirement is there and there is an assert to catch it.
Somehow, after the code review I never did another asserts-clang build
testing loop-unswich for a long time. As a consequence, I didn't notice
this despite a bunch of testing going on, but it shows up immediately
with an asserts build of clang itself.
llvm-svn: 331246
Previously for instructions like fxsave we would print "opaque ptr" as part of the memory operand. Now we print nothing.
We also no longer accept "opaque ptr" in the parser. We still accept any size to be specified for these instructions, but we may want to consider only parsing when no explicit size is specified. This what gas does.
llvm-svn: 331243
This appears to have some issues associated with the file directive output
causing multiple global symbols with the name "file" to be emitted into a
startup section. I'm investigating more specific causes and working with the
original author.
This reverts commit r330271.
Also Revert "[DEBUGINFO, NVPTX] Add the test for the debug info of the local"
This reverts commit r330592 and the follow up of 330779 as the testcase is dependent upon r330271.
llvm-svn: 331237
This test had values that differed in only in capitalization,
and that causes problems for the auto-generating check line
script. So I changed that in rL331226, but I accidentally
forgot to change a subsequent use of a param.
llvm-svn: 331228
See thread "Replacing LLVM_ON_WIN32 with just _WIN32" on llvm-dev and cfe-dev.
I replaced all uses of LLVM_ON_WIN32 with _WIN32 in r331127 (llvm),
r331069 (clang), r329697 (lldb), r329696 (lld), r329696 (clang-tools-extra).
If your out-of-tree program used LLVM_ON_WIN32, just use _WIN32 instead, which
is set at exactly the same time to exactly the same value.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46264
llvm-svn: 331224
This patch updates some code responsible the skip debug info to use
BasicBlock::instructionsWithoutDebug. I think this makes things slightly
simpler and more direct.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, hans, danielcdh
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46252
llvm-svn: 331221
Dead defs were being removed from the live set (in stepForward), but
registers clobbered by regmasks weren't (more specifically, they were
actually removed by removeRegsInMask, but then they were added back in).
llvm-svn: 331219
Teach AsmParser to check with Assembler for when evaluating constant
expressions. This improves the handing of preprocessor expressions
that must be resolved at parse time. This idiom can be found as
assembling-time assertion checks in source-level assemblers. Note that
this relies on the MCStreamer to keep sufficient tabs on Section /
Fragment information which the MCAsmStreamer does not. As a result the
textual output may fail where the equivalent object generation would
pass. This can most easily be resolved by folding the MCAsmStreamer
and MCObjectStreamer together which is planned for in a separate
patch.
Currently, this feature is only enabled for assembly input, keeping IR
compilation consistent between assembly and object generation.
Reviewers: echristo, rnk, probinson, espindola, peter.smith
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Subscribers: eraman, peter.smith, arichardson, jyknight, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45164
llvm-svn: 331218
This patch updates some code responsible the skip debug info to use
BasicBlock::instructionsWithoutDebug. I think this makes things slightly
simpler and more direct.
Reviewers: aprantl, vsk, chandlerc
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46253
llvm-svn: 331217
No need to waste space nor number MBBs differently if MF gets recreated.
Reviewers: qcolombet, stoklund, t.p.northover, bogner, javed.absar
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46078
llvm-svn: 331213
We need to split most of the scheduler classes by vector width to remove more of the InstRW overrides, this patch should make this easier/tidier by allowing us to pass the X86SchedWriteWidths wrapper to multi-width multiclasses and then split as required.
I've included fields for Scl (scalar float/double), MMX (MMX integer), XMM, YMM and ZMM widths. These fields mostly share the same classes but it should give us the flexibility that we may need in the future.
This patch has replaced a set of example SSE/AVX512 instruction cases but isn't exhaustive as it gets very noisy before we really need the functionality.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46266
llvm-svn: 331208
Summary:
As discussed in D45733, we want to do this in InstCombine.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/LGk
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: chandlerc, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45867
llvm-svn: 331205
This provides an optimized implementation of SADDO/SSUBO/UADDO/USUBO
as well as ADDCARRY/SUBCARRY on top of the new CC implementation.
In particular, multi-word arithmetic now uses UADDO/ADDCARRY instead
of the old ADDC/ADDE logic, which means we no longer need to use
"glue" links for those instructions. This also allows making full
use of the memory-based instructions like ALSI, which couldn't be
recognized due to limitations in the DAG matcher previously.
Also, the llvm.sadd.with.overflow et.al. intrinsincs now expand to
directly using the ADD instructions and checking for a CC 3 result.
llvm-svn: 331203
Currently, an instruction setting the condition code is linked to
the instruction using the condition code via a "glue" link in the
SelectionDAG. This has a number of drawbacks; in particular, it
means the same CC cannot be used by multiple users. It also makes
it more difficult to efficiently implement SADDO et. al.
This patch changes the back-end to represent CC dependencies as
normal values during SelectionDAG matching, along the lines of
how this is handled in the X86 back-end already.
In addition to the core mechanics of updating all relevant patterns,
this requires a number of additional changes:
- We now need to be able to spill/restore a CC value into a GPR
if necessary. This means providing a copyPhysReg implementation
for moves involving CC, and defining getCrossCopyRegClass.
- Since we still prefer to avoid such spills, we provide an override
for IsProfitableToFold to avoid creating a merged LOAD / ICMP if
this would result in multiple users of the CC.
- combineCCMask no longer requires a single CC user, and no longer
need to be careful about preventing invalid glue/chain cycles.
- emitSelect needs to be more careful in marking CC live-in to
the basic block it generates. Also, we can now optimize the
case of multiple subsequent selects with the same condition
just like X86 does.
llvm-svn: 331202
There are two separate fixes here:
* The lowering code for non-extending loads should report UnableToLegalize instead of emitting the same instruction.
* The target should not be requesting lowering of non-extending loads.
llvm-svn: 331201
This prevents infinite recursion in DWARFDie::findRecursively for
malformed DWARF where a DIE references itself.
This fixes PR36257.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43092
llvm-svn: 331200
This fixes PR37293.
We can have scheduling classes with no write latency entries, that still consume
processor resources. We don't want to treat those instructions as zero-latency
instructions; they still have to be issued to the underlying pipelines, so they
still consume resource cycles.
This is likely to be a regression which I have accidentally introduced at
revision 330807. Now, if an instruction has a non-empty set of write processor
resources, we conservatively treat it as a normal (i.e. non zero-latency)
instruction.
llvm-svn: 331193
In patterns where we need to specify a result VT, prefer
[(set (tr.vt tr.op:$V1), (operator ...))]
over
[(set tr.op:$V1, (tr.vt (operator ...)))]
This is NFC now, but simplifies some future changes.
llvm-svn: 331192
If we have LOCR instructions, select them directly from SelectionDAG
instead of first going through a pseudo instruction and then using
the custom inserter to emit the LOCR.
Provide Select pseudo-instructions for VR32/VR64 if we have vector
instructions, to avoid having to go through the first 16 FPRs
unnecessarily.
If we do not have LOCFHR, prefer using LOCR followed by a move
over a conditional branch.
llvm-svn: 331191
See r331124 for how I made a list of files missing the include.
I then ran this Python script:
for f in open('filelist.txt'):
f = f.strip()
fl = open(f).readlines()
found = False
for i in xrange(len(fl)):
p = '#include "llvm/'
if not fl[i].startswith(p):
continue
if fl[i][len(p):] > 'Config':
fl.insert(i, '#include "llvm/Config/llvm-config.h"\n')
found = True
break
if not found:
print 'not found', f
else:
open(f, 'w').write(''.join(fl))
and then looked through everything with `svn diff | diffstat -l | xargs -n 1000 gvim -p`
and tried to fix include ordering and whatnot.
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331184
Summary:
This patch will introduce copying of DBG_VALUE instructions
from an otherwise empty basic block to predecessor/successor
blocks in case the empty block is eliminated/bypassed. It
is currently only done in one identified situation in the
BranchFolding pass, before optimizing on empty block.
It can be seen as a light variant of the propagation done
by the LiveDebugValues pass, which unfortunately is executed
after the BranchFolding pass.
We only propagate (copy) DBG_VALUE instructions in a limited
number of situations:
a) If the empty BB is the only predecessor of a successor
we can copy the DBG_VALUE instruction to the beginning of
the successor (because the DBG_VALUE instruction is always
part of the flow between the blocks).
b) If the empty BB is the only successor of a predecessor
we can copy the DBG_VALUE instruction to the end of the
predecessor (because the DBG_VALUE instruction is always
part of the flow between the blocks). In this case we add
the DBG_VALUE just before the first terminator (assuming
that the terminators do not impact the DBG_VALUE).
A future solution, to handle more situations, could perhaps
be to run the LiveDebugValues pass before branch folding?
This fix is related to PR37234. It is expected to resolve
the problem seen, when applied together with the fix in
SelectionDAG from here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46129
Reviewers: #debug-info, aprantl, rnk
Reviewed By: #debug-info, aprantl
Subscribers: ormris, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46184
llvm-svn: 331183
Summary:
When building the selection DAG at ISel all PHI nodes are
selected and lowered to Machine Instruction PHI nodes before
we start to create any SDNodes. So there are no SDNodes for
values produced by the PHI nodes.
In the past when selecting a dbg.value intrinsic that uses
the value produced by a PHI node we have been handling such
dbg.value intrinsics as "dangling debug info". I.e. we have
not created a SDDbgValue node directly, because there is
no existing SDNode for the PHI result, instead we deferred
the creationg of a SDDbgValue until we found the first use
of the PHI result.
The old solution had a couple of flaws. The position of the
selected DBG_VALUE instruction would end up quite late in a
basic block, and for example not directly after the PHI node
as in the LLVM IR input. And in case there were no use at all
in the basic block the dbg.value could be dropped completely.
This patch introduces a new VREG kind of SDDbgValue nodes.
It is similar to a SDNODE kind of node, but it refers directly
to a virtual register and not a SDNode. When we do selection
for a dbg.value that is using the result of a PHI node we
can do a lookup of the virtual register directly (as it already
is determined for the PHI node) and create a SDDbgValue node
immediately instead of delaying the selection until we find a
use.
This should fix a problem with losing debug info at ISel
as seen in PR37234 (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37234).
It does not resolve PR37234 completely, because the debug info
is dropped later on in the BranchFolder (see D46184).
Reviewers: #debug-info, aprantl
Reviewed By: #debug-info, aprantl
Subscribers: rnk, gbedwell, aprantl, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46129
llvm-svn: 331182
This patch updates some code responsible the skip debug info to use
BasicBlock::instructionsWithoutDebug. I think this makes things
slightly simpler and more direct.
Reviewers: mkuper, rengolin, dcaballe, aprantl, vsk
Reviewed By: rengolin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46254
llvm-svn: 331174
The PMAXSD/PMINSD instregexs had been written as PMAX(C?)SD - looks like this was a search+replace error when matching float MAXSD/MINSD commutative instructions.
llvm-svn: 331167
Florian Hahn