This reverts commit 0d48d265db.
This reapplies the following commit, with a fix for CAPI/ir.c:
[mlir] Start splitting the `tensor` dialect out of `std`.
This starts by moving `std.extract_element` to `tensor.extract` (this
mirrors the naming of `vector.extract`).
Curiously, `std.extract_element` supposedly works on vectors as well,
and this patch removes that functionality. I would tend to do that in
separate patch, but I couldn't find any downstream users relying on
this, and the fact that we have `vector.extract` made it seem safe
enough to lump in here.
This also sets up the `tensor` dialect as a dependency of the `std`
dialect, as some ops that currently live in `std` depend on
`tensor.extract` via their canonicalization patterns.
Part of RFC: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-tensor-dialect-from-std/2347/2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92991
This starts by moving `std.extract_element` to `tensor.extract` (this
mirrors the naming of `vector.extract`).
Curiously, `std.extract_element` supposedly works on vectors as well,
and this patch removes that functionality. I would tend to do that in
separate patch, but I couldn't find any downstream users relying on
this, and the fact that we have `vector.extract` made it seem safe
enough to lump in here.
This also sets up the `tensor` dialect as a dependency of the `std`
dialect, as some ops that currently live in `std` depend on
`tensor.extract` via their canonicalization patterns.
Part of RFC: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/rfc-split-the-tensor-dialect-from-std/2347/2
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92991
The LinalgDependenceGraph and alias analysis provide the necessary analysis for the Linalg fusion on buffers case.
However this is not enough for linalg on tensors which require proper memory effects to play nicely with DCE and other transformations.
This revision adds side effects to Linalg ops that were previously missing and has 2 consequences:
1. one example in the copy removal pass now fails since the linalg.generic op has side effects and the pass does not perform alias analysis / distinguish between reads and writes.
2. a few examples in fusion-tensor.mlir need to return the resulting tensor otherwise DCE automatically kicks in as part of greedy pattern application.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90762
Adds support for
- Dropping unit dimension loops for indexed_generic ops.
- Folding consecutive folding (or expanding) reshapes when the result
(or src) is a scalar.
- Fixes to indexed_generic -> generic fusion when zero-dim tensors are
involved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90118
The current fusion on tensors fuses reshape ops with generic ops by
linearizing the indexing maps of the fused tensor in the generic
op. This has some limitations
- It only works for static shapes
- The resulting indexing map has a linearization that would be
potentially prevent fusion later on (for ex. tile + fuse).
Instead, try to fuse the reshape consumer (producer) with generic op
producer (consumer) by expanding the dimensionality of the generic op
when the reshape is expanding (folding). This approach conflicts with
the linearization approach. The expansion method is used instead of
the linearization method.
Further refactoring that changes the fusion on tensors to be a
collection of patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89002
The tensor_reshape op was only fusible only if it is a collapsing case. Now we
propagate the op to all the operands so there is a further chance to fuse it
with generic op. The pre-conditions are:
1) The producer is not an indexed_generic op.
2) All the shapes of the operands are the same.
3) All the indexing maps are identity.
4) All the loops are parallel loops.
5) The producer has a single user.
It is possible to fuse the ops if the producer is an indexed_generic op. We
still can compute the original indices. E.g., if the reshape op collapses the d0
and d1, we can use DimOp to get the width of d1, and calculate the index
`d0 * width + d1`. Then replace all the uses with it. However, this pattern is
not implemented in the patch.
Reviewed By: mravishankar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86314
linalg.indexed_generic (consumer) with tensor arguments.
The implementation of fusing std.constant producer with a
linalg.indexed_generic consumer was already in place. It is exposed
with this change. Also cleaning up some of the patterns that implement
the fusion to not be templated, thereby avoiding lot of conditional
checks for calling the right instantiation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84566
This option avoids to accidentally reuse variable across -LABEL match,
it can be explicitly opted-in by prefixing the variable name with $
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81531
Having the input dumped on failure seems like a better
default: I debugged FileCheck tests for a while without knowing
about this option, which really helps to understand failures.
Remove `-dump-input-on-failure` and the environment variable
FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE which are now obsolete.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81422
Summary:
The fusion for tensor_reshape is embedding the information to indexing maps,
thus the exising pattenr also works for indexed_generic ops.
Depends On D80347
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80348
Summary:
Different from the fusion between generic ops, indices are involved. In this
context, we need to re-map the indices for producer since the fused op is built
on consumer's perspective. This patch supports all combination of the fusion
between indexed_generic ops and generic ops, which includes tests case:
1) generic op as producer and indexed_generic op as consumer.
2) indexed_generic op as producer and generic op as consumer.
3) indexed_generic op as producer and indexed_generic op as consumer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80347
The inversePermutation method returns a null map on failure. Update
uses of this method within Linalg to handle this. In LinalgToLoops the
null return value was used to emit scalar code. Modify that to return
failure, and emit scalar implementation when affine map is "empty",
i.e. 1 dims, 0 symbols and no result exprs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77964
The initial implementation of the fusion operation exposes a method to
fuse a consumer with its producer, when
- both the producer and consumer operate on tensors
- the producer has only a single result value
- the producer has only "parallel" iterator types
A new interface method hasTensorSemantics is added to verify that an
operation has all operands and results of type RankedTensorType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74172
Sean Silva