a Twine, e.g., for names).
- I am a little ambivalent about this; we don't want the string conversion of
utostr, but using overload '+' mixed with string and integer arguments is
sketchy. On the other hand, this particular usage is something of an idiom.
llvm-svn: 77579
- Some clients which used DOUT have moved to DEBUG. We are deprecating the
"magic" DOUT behavior which avoided calling printing functions when the
statement was disabled. In addition to being unnecessary magic, it had the
downside of leaving code in -Asserts builds, and of hiding potentially
unnecessary computations.
llvm-svn: 77019
"private" symbols which the assember shouldn't strip, but which the linker may
remove after evaluation. This is mostly useful for Objective-C metadata.
This is plumbing, so we don't have a use of it yet. More to come, etc.
llvm-svn: 76385
This adds location info for all llvm_unreachable calls (which is a macro now) in
!NDEBUG builds.
In NDEBUG builds location info and the message is off (it only prints
"UREACHABLE executed").
llvm-svn: 75640
Make llvm_unreachable take an optional string, thus moving the cerr<< out of
line.
LLVM_UNREACHABLE is now a simple wrapper that makes the message go away for
NDEBUG builds.
llvm-svn: 75379
>>
>
> It doesn't matter in terms of semantics: because AnalyzeGlobal
> returned false, we're guaranteed the address of the global is never
> taken. I wouldn't be surprised if we end up generating invalid IR in
> some cases, though, because of the semantics of replaceAllUsesWith.
> Do you have a testcase that breaks?
>
>
The problem is replaceAllUsesWith asserts for type mismatch here. Try attached .bc with llvm-ld.
assert(New->getType() == getType() &&
"replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!");
Since stack is always on address space zero, I don't think that type of GV in a different address space is ever going to match.
The other way is to allow replaceAllUsesWith to ignore address spaces while comparing types. (do we have a way to do that ?).
But then such an optimization may fail the entire idea of user wanting to place a variable into different memory space. The original idea of user might be to save on the stack space (data memory) and hence he asked the variable to be placed into different memory space (program memory). So the best bet here is to deny this optimization by checking
GV->getType()->getAddressSpace() == 0.
llvm-svn: 73605
is that, for functions whose bodies are entirely guarded by an if-statement, it
can be profitable to pull the test out of the callee and into the caller.
This code has had some cursory testing, but still has a number of known issues
on the LLVM test suite.
llvm-svn: 73338
the relationship with MergeFunctions.cpp's isEquivalentOperation,
and make a trivial code reordering so that the two functions are
easier to compare.
Fix the name of Instruction::isSameOperationAs in MergeFunction.cpp's
isEquivalentOperation's comment, and fix a nearby 80-column violation.
llvm-svn: 73241
Dan Gohman