They aren't designed to nest recursively, so this will prevent that.
Also add a --auto-continue flag, putting "continue" in the stop hook makes
the stop hooks fight one another in multi-threaded programs.
Also allow more than one -o options so you can make more complex stop hooks w/o
having to go into the editor.
<rdar://problem/48115661>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58394
llvm-svn: 354706
Split the recognition into NetBSD executables & shared libraries
and core(5) files.
Introduce new owner type: "NetBSD-CORE", as core(5) files are not tagged
in the same way as regular NetBSD executables.
Stop using incorrectly ABI_TAG and ABI_SIZE. Introduce IDENT_TAG,
IDENT_DECSZ, IDENT_NAMESZ and PROCINFO.
The new values detect correctly the NetBSD images.
The patch has been originally written by Kamil Rytarowski. I've added
tests and applied minor code changes per review. The work has been
sponsored by the NetBSD Foundation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42870
llvm-svn: 354466
Currently we'd always print the LLDB_REGISTER macro, even if the
LLDB_RECORD macro was already present. This patches changes that to make
it easier to incrementally update the macros.
Note that it's still possible for the RECORD and REGISTER macros to get
out of sync.
llvm-svn: 354400
Facebook creates minidump files that contain specific information about why things crash. Adding ways to dump these allows tools to be made that can auto download symbols based on the information that is contained in the minidump files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58398
llvm-svn: 354385
This reverts r354263, because it uncovered a problem in handling of the
minidumps with conflicting UUIDs. If a minidump contains two files with
the same UUID, we will not create to placeholder modules for them, but
instead reuse the first one for the second instance. This creates a
problem because these modules have their load address hardcoded in them
(and I've added an assert to verify that).
Technically this is not a problem with this patch, as the same issue
existed in the previous implementation, but it did not have the assert
which would diagnose that. Nonetheless, I am reverting this until I
figure out what's the best course of action in this situation.
llvm-svn: 354324
Importing cxx modules doesn't seem to work on Windows:
error: a.out :: Class 'tagARRAYDESC' has a member 'tdescElem' of type
'tagTYPEDESC' which does not have a complete definition.
error: a.out :: Class 'tagPARAMDESCEX' has a member 'varDefaultValue' of type
'tagVARIANT' which does not have a complete definition.
llvm-svn: 354300
The test had an implicit constructor for the Foo struct. Also, as the
instrumentation doesn't have to be reproducer specific, I moved the
tests into the lit/tools directory.
llvm-svn: 354294
In r353906 we hooked up clang and lldb's reproducer infrastructure to
capture files used by clang. This patch adds the necessary logic to have
clang reuse the files from lldb's reproducer during replay.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58309
llvm-svn: 354283
This re-commits r353677, which was reverted due to test failures on the
windows bot. The issue there was that ObjectFilePECOFF vended its base
address through the incorrect interface. SymbolFilePDB depended on that,
which lead to assertion failures when SymbolFilePDB was attempting to
use the placeholder object files as a base. This has been fixed in
r354258
It also fixes one small problem in the original patch. The issue was that the
Module class would attempt to overwrite the object file we created in
CreateModuleFromObjectFile if the file corresponding to the placeholder object
file happened to exist (but we have already disqualified it due to UUID
mismatch. The fix is simple -- we set the m_did_load_objfile flag to properly
record the fact that we have already created an object file for the module.
The original commit message was:
The reason this wasn't working was that ProcessMinidump was creating odd
object-file-less modules, and SymbolFileBreakpad required the module to
have an associated object file because it needed to get its base
address.
This fixes that by introducing a PlaceholderObjectFile to serve as a
dummy object file. The general idea for this is taken from D55142, but
I've reworked it a bit to avoid the need for the PlaceholderModule
class. Now that we have an object file, our modules are sufficiently
similar to regular modules that we can use the regular Module class
almost out of the box -- the only thing I needed to tweak was the
Module::CreateModuleFromObjectFile functon to set the module's FileSpec
in addition to it's architecture. This wasn't needed for ObjectFileJIT
(the other user of CreateModuleFromObjectFile), but it shouldn't hurt it
either, and the change seems like a straightforward extension of this
function.
Reviewers: clayborg, lemo, amccarth
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57751
llvm-svn: 354263
COFF files are modelled in lldb as having one big container section
spanning the entire module image, with the actual sections being
subsections of that. In this model, the base address is simply the
address of the first byte of that section.
This also removes the hack where ObjectFilePECOFF was using the
m_file_offset field to communicate this information. Using file offset
for this purpose is completely wrong, as that is supposed to indicate
where is this ObjectFile located in the file on disk. This field is only
meaningful for fat binaries, and should normally be 0.
Both PDB plugins have been updated to use GetBaseAddress instead of
GetFileOffset.
llvm-svn: 354258
ExecControl/StopHook/stop-hook-threads.test is flaky on Linux (it's
consistently failing on my machine, but doesn't fail on a co-worker's).
I'm seeing the following assertion failure:
```
CommandObject.cpp:145: bool lldb_private::CommandObject::CheckRequirements(lldb_private::CommandReturnObject&): Assertion `m_exe_ctx.GetTargetPtr() == NULL' failed.
```
Interestingly, this doesn't happen when typing the same commands in
interactive mode. The cause seems to be that, in synchronous execution
mode continue waits until the process stops again, and that includes
running any stop-hooks for that later stop, so we end with a stack trace
like this (lots of frames omitted for clarity):
```
abort()
CommandObject::CheckRequirements() <-- this is again the same instance of CommandObjectProcessContinue, fails assertion because the previous continue command hasn't finished.
Target::RunStopHooks()
CommandObjectProcessContinue::DoExecute()
Target::RunStopHooks()
```
In general, it seems like using process control commands inside
stop-hooks does not have very well defined semantics. You don't even
need multiple threads to make that assertion fail, you can build
```
int main() {
printf("1\n"); // break1
printf("2\n"); // break2
}
```
and then on lldb
```
target stop-hook add -o continue
break set -f stop-hook-simple.cpp -p "break1"
break set -f stop-hook-simple.cpp -p "break2"
run
```
In this case it's even worse because the presence of multiple threads
makes it prone to race conditions. In some tests I ran with a simpler
version of this test case, I was hitting either the previous assertion
failure or the following issue:
1. Two threads reach a breakpoint
2. First stop-hook does a process continue
3. Threads end
4. Second stop-hook runs, complains about process not existing.
This change disables the test on Linux. It's already marked as XFAIL on
Windows, so maybe we should just delete it until it's clear what should
be the expected behavior in these cases. Or maybe try to come up with a
way to write a similar multithreaded test without calling continue from
a stop hook, I don't know.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58257
llvm-svn: 354149
Summary:
As suggested by Pavel, we shouldn't let our tests parse the local .lldbinit to prevent random test failures
due to changed settings.
Fixes Minidump/Windows/Sigsegv/sigsegv.test (and probably others too).
Reviewers: labath, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, zturner
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58235
llvm-svn: 354038
Summary:
This is coming from the discussion in D55356 (the most interesting part
happened on the mailing list, so it isn't reflected on the review page).
In short the issue is that lldb assumes that all bytes of a module image
in memory will be backed by a "section". This isn't the case for PECOFF
files because the initial bytes of the module image will contain the
file header, which does not correspond to any normal section in the
file. In particular, this means it is not possible to implement
GetBaseAddress function for PECOFF files, because that's supposed point
to the first byte of that header.
If my (limited) understanding of how PECOFF files work is correct, then
the OS is expecded to load the entire module into one continuous chunk
of memory. The address of that chunk (+/- ASLR) is given by the "image
base" field in the COFF header, and it's size by "image size". All of
the COFF sections are then loaded into this range.
If that's true, then we can model this behavior in lldb by creating a
"container" section to represent the entire module image, and then place
other sections inside that. This would make be consistent with how MachO
and ELF files are modelled (except that those can have multiple
top-level containers as they can be loaded into multiple discontinuous
chunks of memory).
This change required a small number of fixups in the PDB plugins, which
assumed a certain order of sections within the object file (which
obivously changes now). I fix this by changing the lookup code to use
section IDs (which are unchanged) instead of indexes. This has the nice
benefit of removing spurious -1s in the plugins as the section IDs in
the pdbs match the 1-based section IDs in the COFF plugin.
Besides making the implementation of GetBaseAddress possible, this also
improves the lookup of addresses in the gaps between the object file
sections, which will now be correctly resolved as belonging to the
object file.
Reviewers: zturner, amccarth, stella.stamenova, clayborg, lemo
Reviewed By: clayborg, lemo
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56537
llvm-svn: 353916
This patch hooks up clang and lldb's reproducers functionality. It
ensures that when capturing a reproducer, headers and modules imported
through the expression parser are collected.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58076
llvm-svn: 353906
Summary:
This patch makes virtual bases to be added in the correct order to the bases
list. It is important because `VTableContext` (`MicrosoftVTableContext` in our
case) uses then the order of virtual bases in the list to restore the virtual
table indexes. These indexes are used then to resolve the layout of the virtual
bases.
We haven't enough information about offsets of virtual bases regarding to the
object (moreover, in a common case we can't rely on such information, see the
example here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53506#1272306 ), but there should be
enough information to restore the layout of the virtual bases from the indexes
in runtime. After D53506 this information is used whenever possible, so there
should be no problems with virtual bases' fields reading.
Reviewers: zturner, rnk, stella.stamenova
Subscribers: abidh, teemperor, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56904
llvm-svn: 353806
Summary:
`clang-cl` can't compile tests containing `char16_t` and `char32_t` types
without the MSVC compatibility option passed. This patch adds the option to the
`clang-cl` call in the `build.py` script by default.
Reviewers: zturner, labath, stella.stamenova, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57809
llvm-svn: 353709
Summary:
This adds support for auto-detection of path style to SymbolFileBreakpad
(similar to how r351328 did the same for DWARF). We guess each file
entry separately, as we have no idea which file came from which compile
units (and different compile units can have different path styles). The
breakpad generates should have already converted the paths to absolute
ones, so this guess should be reasonable accurate, but as always with
these kinds of things, it is hard to give guarantees about anything.
In an attempt to bring some unity to the path guessing logic, I move the
guessing logic from inside SymbolFileDWARF into the FileSpec class and
have both symbol files use it to implent their desired behavior.
Reviewers: clayborg, lemo, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: aprantl, markmentovai, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57895
llvm-svn: 353702
Fix the build helper to find lld-link via PATH lookup, rather than
making a fragile assumption that it will be present in the 'compiler
directory'. This fixes tests on Gentoo where clang and lld
are installed in different directories.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58001
llvm-svn: 353701
Skip running lldb-mi tests when Python support is disabled. This causes
lldb-mi to unconditionally fail, and therefore all the relevant tests
fail as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58000
llvm-svn: 353700
Summary:
The reason this wasn't working was that ProcessMinidump was creating odd
object-file-less modules, and SymbolFileBreakpad required the module to
have an associated object file because it needed to get its base
address.
This fixes that by introducing a PlaceholderObjectFile to serve as a
dummy object file. The general idea for this is taken from D55142, but
I've reworked it a bit to avoid the need for the PlaceholderModule
class. Now that we have an object file, our modules are sufficiently
similar to regular modules that we can use the regular Module class
almost out of the box -- the only thing I needed to tweak was the
Module::CreateModuleFromObjectFile functon to set the module's FileSpec
in addition to it's architecture. This wasn't needed for ObjectFileJIT
(the other user of CreateModuleFromObjectFile), but it shouldn't hurt it
either, and the change seems like a straightforward extension of this
function.
Reviewers: clayborg, lemo, amccarth
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57751
llvm-svn: 353677
The tests are failing on windows because the paths in the symbol file
are parsed using the host path style. I'm working on a patch to have
SymbolFileBreakpad auto-detect the correct path style (similar to dwarf
r351328).
I originally wanted to make this a part of the initial line-table patch,
but then I simply forgot.
llvm-svn: 353410
Summary:
This patch teaches SymbolFileBreakpad to parse the line information in
breakpad files and present it to lldb.
The trickiest question here was what kind of "compile units" to present
to lldb, as there really isn't enough information in breakpad files to
correctly reconstruct those.
A couple of options were considered
- have the entire file be one compile unit
- have one compile unit for each FILE record
- have one compile unit for each FUNC record
The main drawback of the first approach is that all of the files would
be considered "headers" by lldb, and so they wouldn't be searched if
target.inline-breakpoint-strategy=never. The single compile unit would
also be huge, and there isn't a good way to name it.
The second approach will create mostly correct compile units for cpp
files, but it will still be wrong for headers. However, the biggest
drawback here seemed to be the fact that this can cause a compile unit
to change mid-function (for example when a function from another file is
inlined or another file is #included into a function). While I don't
know of any specific thing that would break in this case, it does sound
like a thing that we should avoid.
In the end, we chose the third option, as it didn't seem to have any
major disadvantages, though it was not ideal either. One disadvantage
here is that this generates a large number of compile units, and there
is still a question on how to name it. We chose to simply name it after
the first line record in that function. This should be correct 99.99% of
the time, though it can produce somewhat strange results if the very
first line record comes from an #included file.
Reviewers: clayborg, zturner, lemo, markmentovai
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56595
llvm-svn: 353404
This patch introduces a new tool called 'lldb-instr'. It automates the
workflow of inserting LLDB_RECORD and LLDB_REGSITER macros for
instrumentation.
Because the tool won't be part of the build process, I didn't want to
over-complicate it. SB_RECORD macros are inserted in place, while
SB_REGISTER macros are printed to stdout, and have to be manually copied
into the Registry's constructor. Additionally, the utility makes no
attempt to properly format the inserted macros. Please use clang-format
to format the changes after running the tool.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56822
llvm-svn: 353271
stored relative to VFRAME
Summary:
This patch makes LLDB able to retrieve proper values for function arguments and
local variables stored in PDB relative to VFRAME register.
Patch contains retrieval of corresponding FPO table entries from PDB and a
generic translator from FPO programs to DWARF expressions to get correct VFRAME
value.
Patch also improves variables-locations.test and makes this test passable on
x86.
Patch By: leonid.mashinsky
Reviewers: zturner, asmith, stella.stamenova, aleksandr.urakov
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: arphaman, labath, mgorny, aprantl, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55122
llvm-svn: 352845
This patch adds the file provider which is responsible for capturing
files used by LLDB.
When capturing a reproducer, we use a file collector that is very
similar to the one used in clang. For every file that we touch, we add
an entry with a mapping from its virtual to its real path. When we
decide to generate a reproducer we copy over the files and their
permission into to reproducer folder.
When replaying a reproducer, we load the VFS mapping and instantiate a
RedirectingFileSystem. The latter will transparently use the files
available in the reproducer.
I've tested this on two macOS machines with an artificial example.
Still, it is very likely that I missed some places where we (still) use
native file system calls. I'm hoping to flesh those out while testing
with more advanced examples. However, I will fix those things in
separate patches.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54617
llvm-svn: 352538
Summary:
This patch adds the basic support of methods reconstruction by native PDB
plugin. It contains only most obvious changes (it processes LF_ONEMETHOD and
LF_METHOD records), some things still remain unsolved:
- mangled names retrieving;
- support of template methods.
Reviewers: zturner, labath, lemo, stella.stamenova
Reviewed by: zturner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56126
llvm-svn: 352464
This patch extends SymbolFileBreakpad::AddSymbols to include the symbols
from the FUNC records too. These symbols come from the debug info and
have a size associated with them, so they are given preference in case
there is a PUBLIC record for the same address.
To achieve this, I first pre-process the symbols into a temporary
DenseMap, and then insert the uniqued symbols into the module's symtab.
Reviewers: clayborg, lemo, zturner
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56590
llvm-svn: 351781
The new LLVM header is one line shorter than the old one, which lead to
some test failures. Ideally tests should rely on line numbers for
breakpoints or output, but that's a different discussion. Hopefully this
turns the bots green again.
llvm-svn: 351779
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Pavel Labath