which many Mips 64 ABIs use than for O64 which many
if not all other target ABIs use.
Most architectures have the following 64 bit relocation record format:
typedef struct
{
Elf64_Addr r_offset; /* Address of reference */
Elf64_Xword r_info; /* Symbol index and type of relocation */
} Elf64_Rel;
typedef struct
{
Elf64_Addr r_offset;
Elf64_Xword r_info;
Elf64_Sxword r_addend;
} Elf64_Rela;
Whereas N64 has the following format:
typedef struct
{
Elf64_Addr r_offset;/* Address of reference */
Elf64_Word r_sym; /* Symbol index */
Elf64_Byte r_ssym; /* Special symbol */
Elf64_Byte r_type3; /* Relocation type */
Elf64_Byte r_type2; /* Relocation type */
Elf64_Byte r_type; /* Relocation type */
} Elf64_Rel;
typedef struct
{
Elf64_Addr r_offset;/* Address of reference */
Elf64_Word r_sym; /* Symbol index */
Elf64_Byte r_ssym; /* Special symbol */
Elf64_Byte r_type3; /* Relocation type */
Elf64_Byte r_type2; /* Relocation type */
Elf64_Byte r_type; /* Relocation type */
Elf64_Sxword r_addend;
} Elf64_Rela;
The structure is the same size, but the r_info data element
is now 5 separate elements. Besides the content aspects,
endian byte reordering will be different for the area with
each element being endianized separately.
I treat this as generic and continue to pass r_type as
an integer masking and unmasking the byte sized N64
values for N64 mode. I've implemented this and it causes no
affect on other current targets.
This passes make check.
Jack
llvm-svn: 159299
Jack Carter