When the user running LLDB with default settings sees the fixit
notification it means that the auto-applied fixit didn't work. This
patch shows the underlying error message instead of just the fixit to
make it easier to understand what the error in the expression was.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101333
Right now when running `expr --top-level -- void foo() {}`, LLDB just prints a cryptic
`error: Couldn't find $__lldb_expr() in the module` error. The reason for that is
that if we don't have a running process, we try to set our execution policy to always use the
IR interpreter (ExecutionPolicyNever) which works even without a process. However
that code didn't consider the special ExecutionPolicyTopLevel which we use for
top-level expressions. By changing the execution policy to ExecutionPolicyNever,
LLDB thinks we're actually trying to interpret a normal expression inside our
`$__lldb_expr` function and then fails when looking for it.
This just adds an exception for top-level expressions to that code and a bunch of tests.
Reviewed By: shafik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91723
This used to be a LLDB_LOGF call that used the printf %s syntax.
0ab109d43d changed it to LLDB_LOG but didn't
update this format string to use formatv's syntax so this just printed '%s'.
Display null pointer as `nullptr`, `nil` and `NULL` for C++,
Objective-C/Objective-C++ and C respectively. The original motivation
for this patch was to display a null std::string pointer as nullptr
instead of "", but the fix seemed generic enough to be done for all
summary providers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77153
Summary:
Usually when Clang emits an error Fix-It it does two things. It emits the diagnostic and then it fixes the
currently generated AST to reflect the applied Fix-It. While emitting the diagnostic is easy to implement,
fixing the currently generated AST is often tricky. That causes that some Fix-Its just keep the AST as-is or
abort the parsing process entirely. Once the parser stopped, any Fix-Its for the rest of the expression are
not detected and when the user manually applies the Fix-It, the next expression will just produce a new
Fix-It.
This is often occurring with quickly made Fix-Its that are just used to bridge temporary API changes
and that often are not worth implementing a proper API fixup in addition to the diagnostic. To still
give some kind of reasonable user-experience for users that have these Fix-Its and rely on them to
fix their expressions, this patch adds the ability to retry parsing with applied Fix-Its multiple time to
give the normal Fix-It experience where things Clang knows how to fix are not causing actual expression
error (at least when automatically applying Fix-Its is activated).
The way this is implemented is just by having another setting in the expression options that specify how
often we should try applying Fix-Its and then reparse the expression. The default setting is still 1 for everyone
so this should not affect the speed in which we fail to parse expressions.
Reviewers: jingham, JDevlieghere, friss, shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: shafik, abidh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77214
Currently when an expression fails to parse and we have a FixIt, we keep
the failed UserExpression around while trying to parse the expression with
applied fixits. This means that we have this rather confusing control flow:
1. Original expression created and parsing attempted.
2. Expression with applied FixIts is created and parsing attempted.
3. Original expression is destroyed and parser deconstructed.
4. Expression with applied FixIts is destroyed and parser deconstructed.
This patch just deletes the original expression so that step 2 and 3 are
swapped and the whole process looks more like just sequentially parsing two
expressions (which is what we actually do here).
Doesn't fix anything just makes the code less fragile.
StringRef will call strlen on the C string which is inefficient (as ConstString already
knows the string lenght and so does StringRef). This patch replaces all those calls
with GetStringRef() which doesn't recompute the length.
UserExpression::GetJITModule was used to support an option in
UserExpression::Evaluate that let you hold onto the JIT Module used during
the expression evaluation. This was only actually used in one spot --
REPL::IOHandlerInputComplete. That method didn't actually take use the
JIT module it got back, so this feature was not used in practice.
This means that we can delete the support in UserExpression::Evaluate
and delete the UserExpression::GetJITModule method entirely.
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
GetPersistentExpressionStateForLanguage() can return a nullptr if it
cannot construct a typesystem. This patch adds missing nullptr checks
at all uses.
Inspired by rdar://problem/58317195
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72413
Summary:
swift-lldb currently has to patch the ExpressionKind enum to add support for Swift expressions. If we implement LLVM's RTTI
with a static ID variable instead of a centralised enum we can drop that patch.
Reviewers: labath, davide
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #upstreaming_lldb_s_downstream_patches, #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70070
Summary:
After rL368069 I noticed that HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H is not defined in
Platform.h, or anywhere else in lldb. This change fixes that.
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65822
llvm-svn: 368125
This patch replaces explicit calls to log::Printf with the new LLDB_LOGF
macro. The macro is similar to LLDB_LOG but supports printf-style format
strings, instead of formatv-style format strings.
So instead of writing:
if (log)
log->Printf("%s\n", str);
You'd write:
LLDB_LOG(log, "%s\n", str);
This change was done mechanically with the command below. I replaced the
spurious if-checks with vim, since I know how to do multi-line
replacements with it.
find . -type f -name '*.cpp' -exec \
sed -i '' -E 's/log->Printf\(/LLDB_LOGF\(log, /g' "{}" +
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65128
llvm-svn: 366936
Summary:
NFC = [[ https://llvm.org/docs/Lexicon.html#nfc | Non functional change ]]
This commit is the result of modernizing the LLDB codebase by using
`nullptr` instread of `0` or `NULL`. See
https://clang.llvm.org/extra/clang-tidy/checks/modernize-use-nullptr.html
for more information.
This is the command I ran and I to fix and format the code base:
```
run-clang-tidy.py \
-header-filter='.*' \
-checks='-*,modernize-use-nullptr' \
-fix ~/dev/llvm-project/lldb/.* \
-format \
-style LLVM \
-p ~/llvm-builds/debug-ninja-gcc
```
NOTE: There were also changes to `llvm/utils/unittest` but I did not
include them because I felt that maybe this library shall be updated in
isolation somehow.
NOTE: I know this is a rather large commit but it is a nobrainer in most
parts.
Reviewers: martong, espindola, shafik, #lldb, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: arsenm, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, JDevlieghere, teemperor, rnkovacs, emaste, kubamracek, nemanjai, ki.stfu, javed.absar, arichardson, kbarton, jrtc27, MaskRay, atanasyan, dexonsmith, arphaman, jfb, jsji, jdoerfert, lldb-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #lldb, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61847
llvm-svn: 361484
lldbExpression was linking against lldbPluginExpressionParserClang, and
lldbPluginExpressionParserClang was linking against lldbExpression.
There's no reason lldbExpression should need anything from
lldbPluginExpressionParserClang, so let's remove that dependency.
llvm-svn: 360208
Summary:
This patch adds support of expression evaluation in a context of some object.
Consider the following example:
```
struct S {
int a = 11;
int b = 12;
};
int main() {
S s;
int a = 1;
int b = 2;
// We have stopped here
return 0;
}
```
This patch allows to do something like that:
```
lldb.frame.FindVariable("s").EvaluateExpression("a + b")
```
and the result will be `33` (not `3`) because fields `a` and `b` of `s` will be
used (not locals `a` and `b`).
This is achieved by replacing of `this` type and object for the expression. This
has some limitations: an expression can be evaluated only for values located in
the debuggee process memory (they must have an address of `eAddressTypeLoad`
type).
Reviewers: teemperor, clayborg, jingham, zturner, labath, davide, spyffe, serge-sans-paille
Reviewed By: jingham
Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits, leonid.mashinskiy
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55318
llvm-svn: 353149
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This reverts commit r344647.
This causes build failures with [-Werror, -Wswitch]. Some cases where the newly
introduced enum value is not handled in particular are in:
lldb/source/Expression/REPL.cpp:350
lldb/source/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.cpp:1529
(maybe there could be more)
As I don't understand lldb to make sure the likely trivial fixes are
correct and also as they might need additional tests, leaving to the
author to resolve.
llvm-svn: 344722
Before we returned an error that was not exposed in the SB API and no useful
error message. This change returns eExpressionProducedNoResult and an
appropriate error string.
<rdar://problem/44539514>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53309
llvm-svn: 344647
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559
llvm-svn: 296909
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
if it returns eExpressionCompleted. Don't try to get the error
from the ValueObjectSP if that's not true.
I just have a report of this from the field, I don't know how
to make it fail yet.
<rdar://problem/29113004>
llvm-svn: 286170
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
The result variables aren't useful, and if you have a breakpoint on a
common function you can generate a lot of these. So I changed the
code that checks the condition to set ResultVariableIsInternal in the
EvaluateExpressionOptions that we pass to the execution.
Unfortunately, the check for this variable was done in the wrong place
(the static UserExpression::Evaluate) which is not how breakpoint
conditions execute expressions (UserExpression::Execute). So I moved
the check to UserExpression::Execute (which Evaluate also calls) and made the
overridden method DoExecute.
llvm-svn: 266093
quietly apply fixits for those who really trust clang's fixits.
Also, moved the retry into ClangUserExpression::Evaluate, where I can make a whole new ClangUserExpression
to do the work. Reusing any of the parts of a UserExpression in situ isn't supported at present.
<rdar://problem/25351938>
llvm-svn: 264793
This feature is controlled by an expression command option, a target property and the
SBExpressionOptions setting. FixIt's are only applied to UserExpressions, not UtilityFunctions,
those you have to get right when you make them.
This is just a first stage. At present the fixits are applied silently. The next step
is to tell the user about the applied fixit.
<rdar://problem/25351938>
llvm-svn: 264379
a way for compilation to take a "thread to use for compilation". If it isn't set then the
compilation will use the currently selected thread. This should help keep function execution
to the one thread intended.
llvm-svn: 263972
We want to do a better job presenting errors that occur when evaluating
expressions. Key to this effort is getting away from a model where all
errors are spat out onto a stream where the client has to take or leave
all of them.
To this end, this patch adds a new class, DiagnosticManager, which
contains errors produced by the compiler or by LLDB as an expression
is created. The DiagnosticManager can dump itself to a log as well as
to a string. Clients will (in the future) be able to filter out the
errors they're interested in by ID or present subsets of these errors
to the user.
This patch is not intended to change the *users* of errors - only to
thread DiagnosticManagers to all the places where streams are used. I
also attempt to standardize our use of errors a bit, removing trailing
newlines and making clients omit 'error:', 'warning:' etc. and instead
pass the Severity flag.
The patch is testsuite-neutral, with modifications to one part of the
MI tests because it relied on "error: error:" being erroneously
printed. This patch fixes the MI variable handling and the testcase.
<rdar://problem/22864976>
llvm-svn: 263859
The Go interpreter doesn't JIT or use LLVM, so this also
moves all the JIT related code from UserExpression to a new class LLVMUserExpression.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13073
Fix merge
llvm-svn: 251820
A REPL takes over the command line and typically treats input as source code.
REPLs can also do code completion. The REPL class allows its subclasses to
implement the language-specific functionality without having to know about the
IOHandler-specific internals.
Also added a PluginManager-based way of getting to a REPL given a language and
a target.
Also brought in some utility code and expression options that are useful for
REPLs, such as line offsets for expressions, ANSI terminal coloring of errors,
and a few IOHandler convenience functions.
llvm-svn: 250753
When the target settings are consulted to decide the expression language
is decided in CommandObjectExpression, this doesn't help if you're running
SBFrame::EvaluateExpression(). Moving the logic into UserExpression fixes
this.
Based on patch from scallanan@apple.com
Reviewed by: dawn
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13267
llvm-svn: 249624
The concept here is that languages may have different ways of communicating
results. In particular, languages may have different names for their result
variables and in fact may have multiple types of result variables (e.g.,
error results). Materializer was tied to one specific model of result handling.
Instead, now UserExpressions can register their own handlers for the result
variables they inject. This allows language-specific code in Materializer to
be moved into the expression parser plug-in, and it simplifies Materializer.
These delegates are subclasses of PersistentVariableDelegate.
PersistentVariableDelegate can provide the name of the result variable, and is
notified when the result variable is populated. It can also be used to touch
persistent variables if need be, updating language-specific state. The
UserExpression owns the delegate and can decide on its result based on
consulting all of its (potentially multiple) delegates.
The user expression itself now makes the determination of what the final result
of the expression is, rather than relying on the Materializer, and I've added a
virtual function to UserExpression to allow this.
llvm-svn: 249233
Also added some target-level search functions so that persistent variables and
symbols can be searched for without hand-iterating across the map of
TypeSystems.
llvm-svn: 249027
the corresponding TypeSystem. This makes sense because what kind of data there
is -- and how it can be looked up -- depends on the language.
Functionality that is common to all type systems is factored out into
PersistentExpressionState.
llvm-svn: 248934
There are still a bunch of dependencies on the plug-in, but this helps to
identify them.
There are also a few more bits we need to move (and abstract, for example the
ClangPersistentVariables).
llvm-svn: 248612
Summary:
With the recent changes to separate clang from the core structures
of LLDB, many inclusions of clang headers can be removed.
Reviewers: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12954
llvm-svn: 248004
Before we had:
ClangFunction
ClangUtilityFunction
ClangUserExpression
and code all over in lldb that explicitly made Clang-based expressions. This patch adds an Expression
base class, and three pure virtual implementations for the Expression kinds:
FunctionCaller
UtilityFunction
UserExpression
You can request one of these expression types from the Target using the Get<ExpressionType>ForLanguage.
The Target will then consult all the registered TypeSystem plugins, and if the type system that matches
the language can make an expression of that kind, it will do so and return it.
Because all of the real expression types need to communicate with their ExpressionParser in a uniform way,
I also added a ExpressionTypeSystemHelper class that expressions generically can vend, and a ClangExpressionHelper
that encapsulates the operations that the ClangExpressionParser needs to perform on the ClangExpression types.
Then each of the Clang* expression kinds constructs the appropriate helper to do what it needs.
The patch also fixes a wart in the UtilityFunction that to use it you had to create a parallel FunctionCaller
to actually call the function made by the UtilityFunction. Now the UtilityFunction can be asked to vend a
FunctionCaller that will run its function. This cleaned up a lot of boiler plate code using UtilityFunctions.
Note, in this patch all the expression types explicitly depend on the LLVM JIT and IR, and all the common
JIT running code is in the FunctionCaller etc base classes. At some point we could also abstract that dependency
but I don't see us adding another back end in the near term, so I'll leave that exercise till it is actually necessary.
llvm-svn: 247720
Adrian Prantl