This variable is used by ASan (and other sanitizers in the future)
on s390x-linux to override a check for CVE-2016-2143 in the running
kernel (see revision 267747 on compiler-rt). Since the check simply
checks if the kernel version is in a whitelist of known-good versions,
it may miss distribution kernels, or manually-patched kernels - hence
the need for this variable. To enable running the ASan testsuite on
such kernels, this variable should be passed from the environment
down to the testcases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19888
llvm-svn: 273825
This patch makes the bind placeholders in std::placeholders both (1) const and
(2) constexpr (See below).
This is technically a breaking change for any code using the placeholders
outside of std::bind and depending on them being non-const. However I don't
think this will break any real world code.
(1) Previously the placeholders were non-const extern globals in all
dialects. This patch changes these extern globals to be const in all dialects.
Since the cv-qualifiers don't participate in name mangling for globals this
is an ABI compatible change.
(2) Make the placeholders constexpr in C++11 and beyond. Although LWG 2488 only
applies to C++17 I don't see any reason not to backport this change.
llvm-svn: 273824
There is a "well-known" TSan false positive when using C++ weak_ptr/shared_ptr and code in destructors, e.g. described at <https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22324>. The "standard" solution is to build and use a TSan-instrumented version of libcxx, which is not trivial for end-users. This patch tries a different approach (on OS X): It adds an interceptor for the specific function in libc++.dylib, which implements the atomic operation that needs to be visible to TSan.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21609
llvm-svn: 273806
Summary:
This is a straightforward extension of what LoopUnswitch does to
branches to guards. That is, we unswitch
```
for (;;) {
...
guard(loop_invariant_cond);
...
}
```
into
```
if (loop_invariant_cond) {
for (;;) {
...
// There is no need to emit guard(true)
...
}
} else {
for (;;) {
...
guard(false);
// SimplifyCFG will clean this up by adding an
// unreachable after the guard(false)
...
}
}
```
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21725
llvm-svn: 273801
The last import is the penultimate entry, the last entry is nulled out.
Data beyond the null entry should not be considered to hold import
entries.
This fixes PR28302.
N.B. I am working on a reduced testcase, the one in PR28302 is too
large.
llvm-svn: 273790
If a sub-view has already been rendered, it's helpful to re-render the
expansion site before rendering the next expansion view. Make this fact
explicit in the rendering interface, instead of hiding it behind an
awkward Optional<LineRef> parameter.
llvm-svn: 273789
Don't cast GV expression to MCSymbolRefExpr. r272705 changed GV to binary
expressions by including offset even if the offset it 0
(we haven't hit this sooner since tested workloads don't include static offsets)
We don't really care about the type of expression, so set it directly.
Fixes: r272705
Consider section relative relocations. Since all const as data is in one boffer section relative is equivalent to abs32.
Fixes: r273166
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21633
llvm-svn: 273785
This is just a small step in the direction of making LLVMConfig.cmake a complete
replacement for llvm-config.
For those unfamiliar, llvm-config --build-mode prints out CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE. Thus
as one can imagine, LLVM_BUILD_TYPE is @CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE@.
llvm-svn: 273782
SimplifyCFG had logic to insert calls to llvm.trap for two very
particular IR patterns: stores and invokes of undef/null.
While InstCombine canonicalizes certain undefined behavior IR patterns
to stores of undef, phase ordering means that this cannot be relied upon
in general.
There are much better tools than llvm.trap: UBSan and ASan.
N.B. I could be argued into reverting this change if a clear argument as
to why it is important that we synthesize llvm.trap for stores, I'd be
hard pressed to see why it'd be useful for invokes...
llvm-svn: 273778
Rafael Espindola